This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

An improved bound on the chromatic number of the Pancake graphs

Leen Droogendijk [email protected] Elena V. Konstantinova [email protected] Sobolev Institute of Mathematics, Ak. Koptyug av. 4, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia Novosibisk State University, Pirogova str. 2, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia
Abstract

In this paper an improved bound on the chromatic number of the Pancake graph Pn,n2P_{n},n\geqslant 2, is presented. The bound is obtained using a subadditivity property of the chromatic number of the Pancake graph. We also investigate an equitable coloring of PnP_{n}. An equitable (n1)(n-1)-coloring based on efficient dominating sets is given and optimal equitable 44-colorings are considered for small nn. It is conjectured that the chromatic number of PnP_{n} coincides with its equitable chromatic number for any n2n\geqslant 2.

keywords:
Pancake graph; chromatic number; equitable coloring
MSC:
[2010] 05C15, 05C25, 05C69
journal: arXiv

1 Introduction

The Pancake graph Pn,n2P_{n},\ n\geqslant 2, is defined as the Cayley graph over the symmetric group Symn\mathrm{Sym}_{n} with the generating set of all prefix–reversals ri, 2inr_{i},\ 2\leqslant i\leqslant n, inverting the order of any substring [1,i][1,i] of a permutation when multiplied on the right. It is a connected vertex–transitive (n1)(n-1)-regular graph without loops and multiple edges of order n!n!. It contains all cycles ClC_{l} of length ll, where 6ln!6\leqslant l\leqslant n! [14, 23].

A mapping c:V(Γ){1,2,,k}c:V(\Gamma)\rightarrow\{1,2,\ldots,k\} is called a proper kk–coloring of a graph Γ=(V,E)\Gamma=(V,E) if c(u)c(v)c(u)\neq c(v) whenever the vertices uu and vv are adjacent. The chromatic number χ(Γ)\chi(\Gamma) of a graph Γ\Gamma is the least number of colors needed to properly color vertices of Γ\Gamma. A subset of vertices assigned to the same color forms an independent set, i.e. a proper kk–coloring is the same as a partition of the vertex set into kk independent sets. The trivial lower and upper bounds on the chromatic number of the Pancake graphs are given as follows:

3χ(Pn)n1 for any n4.3\leqslant\chi(P_{n})\leqslant n-1{\mbox{ for any }}n\geqslant 4. (1)

Indeed, the graph PnP_{n} is (n1)(n-1)–regular, hence by Brooks’ theorem [4] we have the upper bound. Moreover, χ(P3)=2\chi(P_{3})=2 since P3C6P_{3}\cong C_{6}, and χ(P4)=3\chi(P_{4})=3 since there are 77–cycles in PnP_{n} for any n4n\geqslant 4 [19] which gives us the lower bound. The Brooks’ bound is improved by 11 for graphs with ω(Δ1)/2\omega\leqslant(\Delta-1)/2, where ω\omega and Δ\Delta are the size of the maximum clique and the maximum degree of the graph (see [5, 6]). Since ω(Pn)=2\omega(P_{n})=2, then χ(Pn)n2\chi(P_{n})\leqslant n-2 for any n6n\geqslant 6. Moreover, there is a proper 33–coloring of P5P_{5} [18]. Thus, we have:

χ(Pn)n2 for any n5.\chi(P_{n})\leqslant n-2{\mbox{ for any }}n\geqslant 5. (2)

Catlin’s bound for C4C_{4}–free graphs [7], that is χ23(Δ+3)\chi\leqslant\frac{2}{3}\left(\Delta+3\right), gives one more bound for any n8n\geqslant 8:

χ(Pn)23(n+2).\chi(P_{n})\leqslant\frac{2}{3}\left(n+2\right). (3)

Using structural properties of PnP_{n}, the following bounds were obtained in [18]:

for 5n8,χ(Pn){nk,if nk(mod 4) for k=1,3;n2,if n is even;{\mbox{\it}for}\ 5\leqslant n\leqslant 8,\ \chi(P_{n})\leqslant\left\{\begin{array}[]{ll}n-k,&\hbox{if $n\equiv k\,(${\rm mod} $4)$ for $k=1,3$;}\\ n-2,&\hbox{if $n$ is even;}\end{array}\right. (4)
for 9n16,χ(Pn){n(k+2),if nk(mod 4) for k=1,3;n4,if n is even;{\mbox{\it}for}\ 9\leqslant n\leqslant 16,\ \chi(P_{n})\leqslant\left\{\begin{array}[]{ll}n-(k+2),&\hbox{if $n\equiv k\,(${\rm mod} $4)$ for $k=1,3$;}\\ n-4,&\hbox{if $n$ is even;}\end{array}\right. (5)
forn17,χ(Pn){n(k+4),if nk(mod 4) for k=1,2,3;n8,if n0(mod 4).{\mbox{\it}for}\ n\geqslant 17,\ \chi(P_{n})\leqslant\left\{\begin{array}[]{ll}n-(k+4),&\hbox{if $n\equiv k\,(${\rm mod} $4)$ for $k=1,2,3$;}\\ n-8,&\hbox{if $n\equiv 0\,(${\rm mod} $4)$.}\end{array}\right. (6)

These bounds improve (2) for n7n\geqslant 7, however Catlin’s bound (3) is still better for all n>28n>28 and some smaller nn (for example, n=21,25,26,27n=21,25,26,27). Thus, they are far from good. Meanwhile, the asymptotic bound χ(Pn)O(n1log(n1))\chi(P_{n})\leqslant O\left(\frac{n-1}{log(n-1)}\right) holds for the Pancake graphs which follows from the results for C3,C4C_{3},C_{4}–free graphs [10, 15].

In this paper in Section 2 we present a new upper bound which improves Catlin’s bound (3). The new bound is obtained using a subadditivity property of the chromatic number of PnP_{n} and known chromatic numbers for n9n\leqslant 9. We have χ(P3)=2\chi(P_{3})=2 since P3C6P_{3}\cong C_{6}, and χ(P4)=3\chi(P_{4})=3 since there are 77–cycles in Pn,n4P_{n},\,n\geqslant 4. An example of a proper 33–coloring for P5P_{5} was given in [18]. An optimal 44-coloring for P6P_{6} was computed by Tomaž Pisanski, University of Primorska, Koper, Slovenia, and Jernej Azarija, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia, so χ(P6)=4\chi(P_{6})=4. Since Pn1P_{n-1} is an induced subgraph of PnP_{n}, then χ(P7)\chi(P_{7}) is at least 44, and from (4) we have χ(P7)=4\chi(P_{7})=4. Optimal 44-colorings for P8P_{8} and P9P_{9} were computed by A. H. Ghodrati, Sharif University, Tehran, Iran. By (5), 4χ(Pn)124\leqslant\chi(P_{n})\leqslant 12, where 10n1610\leqslant n\leqslant 16, however, proper 44-colorings in these cases are unknown. The known chromatic numbers are presented in the Table 1.

In Section 3 an equitable coloring is considered. A graph Γ\Gamma is said to be equitably kk-colorable if Γ\Gamma has a proper kk-coloring such that the sizes of any two color classes differ by at most one. The equitable chromatic number χ=(Γ)\chi_{=}(\Gamma) is the smallest integer kk such that Γ\Gamma is equitably kk-colorable. Equitable coloring was introduced by W. Meyer in 19731973 due to scheduling problems [21]. Moreover, it was conjectured that every connected graph with maximum degree Δ\Delta has an equitable coloring with Δ\Delta or fewer colors, with the exceptions of complete graphs and odd cycles. A strengthened version [8] of the conjecture states that each such graph has an equitable coloring with exactly Δ\Delta colors, with one additional exception, a complete bipartite graph in which both sides of the bipartition have the same odd number of vertices. A survey on equitable colorings can be found in [20].

In Section 3.1 an equitable (n1)(n-1)-coloring based on efficient dominating sets in the Pancake graphs Pn,n>2P_{n},n>2, is presented. Moreover, in Section 3.2 simple optimal equitable 44-colorings for P5,P6P_{5},P_{6} and P7P_{7} are described.

Let us note that any equitable coloring of PnP_{n} with at most nn colors has the property that the sizes of all color classes are equal since every integer at most nn divides n!n!. Thus, we have a strongly equitable coloring [12].

Since equitable coloring is a proper coloring with an additional condition, the inequality χ(Pn)χ=(Pn)\chi(P_{n})\leqslant\chi_{=}(P_{n}) holds for any n2n\geqslant 2. However, since all above optimal colorings are strongly equitable we have conjectured.

Conjecture 1

For any n2n\geqslant 2,

χ(Pn)=χ=(Pn).\chi(P_{n})=\chi_{=}(P_{n}).
nn 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
χ(Pn)\chi(P_{n}) 2 2 3 3 4 4 4 4
Table. 1: Chromatic numbers of the Pancake graphs Pn, 2n9P_{n},\ 2\leqslant n\leqslant 9.

2 Improved upper bound

Our main result is given by the following theorem.

Theorem 1

For any n9,n\geqslant 9, the following holds for the Pancake graph PnP_{n}:

χ(Pn)4n9+χ(Pn(mod9)).\chi(P_{n})\leqslant 4\left\lfloor\frac{n}{9}\right\rfloor+\chi\left(P_{n\pmod{9}}\right). (7)

To prove this result we need more notation. Let [n]={1,2,,n}[n]=\{1,2,\ldots,n\}. We consider a permutation π=[π1π2πn]\pi=[\pi_{1}\pi_{2}\ldots\pi_{n}] written as a string in one-line notation, where πi=π(i)\pi_{i}=\pi(i) for any i[n]i\in[n]. For K[n]K\subset[n], let Pn,KP_{n,K} be the induced subgraph of PnP_{n} whose vertex set consists of all permutations π\pi with π1K\pi_{1}\in K. By the symmetry of PnP_{n}, for any kk-element subset KK of [n][n], the induced subgraph Pn,KP_{n,K} is isomorphic to Pn,[k]P_{n,[k]}, which is abbreviated to Pn,kP_{n,k}.

We define a map fn,k:Pn,kPkf_{n,k}:P_{n,k}\to P_{k} by removing the elements that are not in [k][k]. For example, for n=5n=5 and k=3k=3, the vertex [14352][14352] of P5,3P_{5,3} is mapped to the vertex [132][132] of P3P_{3}. It is clear that this mapping is a graph homomorphism. Note that fn,kf_{n,k} is surjective, but not necessarily an isomorphism. In fact, Pn,kP_{n,k} is not even connected unless k=nk=n or n=2n=2.

Since an rr-coloring of a graph Γ\Gamma is equivalent to a graph homomorphism from Γ\Gamma to the complete graph KrK_{r}, this property implies that

χ(Pn,k)χ(Pk).\chi(P_{n,k})\leqslant\chi(P_{k}). (8)

Since Pn,kP_{n,k} always contains a subgraph isomorphic to PkP_{k} (e. g. the subgraph of all vertices that end with k+1,k+2,,nk+1,k+2,\ldots,n) it even follows that χ(Pn,k)=χ(Pk)\chi(P_{n,k})=\chi(P_{k}).

One more useful property says that all fibers fn+1,n:Pn+1,nPnf_{n+1,n}:P_{n+1,n}\to P_{n} are of size nn, which means that |fn+1,n1(v)|=n\left|f_{n+1,n}^{-1}(v)\right|=n for every vV(Pn)v\in V(P_{n}). Indeed, for any permutation of length nn one can insert n+1n+1 at nn different positions: the first position is forbidden since the vertices of Pn+1,nP_{n+1,n} start with an element from [n][n].

The following theorem immediately gives the general upper bound of (7) with taking into account χ(P9)=4\chi(P_{9})=4.

Theorem 2

The chromatic number of the Pancake graph is subadditive, i. e.

χ(Pn+m)χ(Pn)+χ(Pm)\chi(P_{n+m})\leqslant\chi(P_{n})+\chi(P_{m}) (9)

for all positive integers nn and mm.

Proof. Let the vertices of Pn+mP_{n+m} be partitioned into sets UU and WW such that UU contains permutations whose first element is in [n][n] and WW contains permutations whose first element is in {n+1,,n+m}\{n+1,\ldots,n+m\}. The subgraphs Pn+m,UP_{n+m,U} and Pn+m,WP_{n+m,W} are isomorphic to Pn+m,nP_{n+m,n} and Pn+m,mP_{n+m,m}, respectively. Hence, by (8) the graph Pn+m,UP_{n+m,U} is χ(Pn)\chi(P_{n})-colorable, and Pn+m,WP_{n+m,W} is χ(Pm)\chi(P_{m})-colorable. Using disjoint color sets on both subgraphs proves the desired inequality. \square

3 Equitable coloring and optimal colorings

It was shown in Introduction that there are optimal colorings of the Pancake graphs found by computer experiments. Such computations do not provide us any structural insight. In this section we consider colorings of the Pancake graphs Pn,n3P_{n},n\geqslant 3, using their structural properties. More precisely, we present equitable colorings of PnP_{n} in (n1)(n-1) colors.

An equitable coloring is not the same as a perfect coloring for which the multiset of colors of all neighbors of a vertex depends only on its own color [11]. This type of coloring gives a partition known as an equitable partition [13] which are used in algebraic combinatorics, graph theory and coding theory. In coding theory such kind of partitions are known as perfect codes [1, 16]. Some general information about equitable partitions can be found in [2].

The notion of perfect codes was generalized to the Pancake graphs in a natural way in [9]. An independent set DD of vertices in a graph Γ\Gamma is an efficient dominating set (or 11-perfect code) if each vertex not in DD is adjacent to exactly one vertex in DD. There are nn efficient dominating sets in PnP_{n} [9, 22] given by:

Di={[iπ2πn]},D_{i}=\{[i\,\pi_{2}\,\ldots\,\pi_{n}]\}, (10)

where πk[n]\{i},k[n]\{1},i[n]\pi_{k}\in[n]\backslash\{i\},\,k\in[n]\backslash\{1\},\,i\in[n]. It is obvious that |Di1Di2|=|D_{i_{1}}\bigcap D_{i_{2}}|=\emptyset, i1,i2[n],i1i2i_{1},i_{2}\in[n],\ i_{1}\neq i_{2}, which immediately gives a proper nn-coloring. Moreover, this coloring is perfect and equitable.

To present a proper (n1)(n-1)-coloring of the Pancake graphs based on efficient dominating sets we need to define such sets for induced subgraphs Pn1P_{n-1} of PnP_{n}.

Due to the hierarchical structure, for any n3n\geqslant 3 the graph PnP_{n} has nn copies of Pn1(i)P_{n-1}(i) with the vertex set Vi={[π1πn1i]}V_{i}=\{[\pi_{1}\ldots\pi_{n-1}i]\}, where πk[n]\{i},k[n1]\pi_{k}\in[n]\backslash\{i\},k\in[n-1], |Vi|=(n1)!|V_{i}|=(n-1)!. Any two copies Pn1(i),Pn1(j),ijP_{n-1}(i),P_{n-1}(j),i\neq j, are connected by (n2)!(n-2)! edges {[iπ2πn1j],[jπn1π2i]}\{[i\pi_{2}\ldots\pi_{n-1}j],\,[j\pi_{n-1}\ldots\pi_{2}i]\}, where [iπ2πn1j]rn=[jπn1π2i][i\pi_{2}\ldots\pi_{n-1}j]r_{n}=[j\pi_{n-1}\ldots\pi_{2}i]. Prefix–reversals rj,2jn1r_{j},2\leqslant j\leqslant n-1, define internal edges in all nn copies Pn1(i)P_{n-1}(i), and the prefix–reversal rnr_{n} defines external edges between copies.

Efficient dominating sets of Pn1(j),j[n]P_{n-1}(j),j\in[n], contain all permutations with the last element fixed to jj and the first element fixed [17], namely:

Dij={[iπ2πn1j]},D_{i}^{j}=\{[i\,\pi_{2}\,\ldots\,\pi_{n-1}\,j]\}, (11)

where i,j[n],iji,j\in[n],i\neq j, πk[n]\{i,j},k[n]\{1,n}\pi_{k}\in[n]\backslash\{i,\,j\},\,k\in[n]\backslash\{1,n\}. For any i[n]i\in[n], the sets (10) and (11) are given by the following obvious relationship:

Di=i=1,jinDij.D_{i}=\bigcup_{i=1,j\neq i}^{n}D_{i}^{j}. (12)

3.1 Equitable (n1)(n-1)-coloring

We now present an equitable (n1)(n-1)-coloring based on efficient dominating sets. Let

D={Dij:i,j[n],ij},|D|=n(n1),D=\{D_{i}^{j}:i,j\in[n],i\neq j\},\ \ |D|=n\,(n-1), (13)

and

Dj={Dij:i[n],ij},j[n],|Dj|=n1,D^{j}=\{D_{i}^{j}:i\in[n],i\neq j\},\ \ j\in[n],\ \ |D^{j}|=n-1, (14)

where

|Dij|=(n2)!.|D_{i}^{j}|=(n-2)!. (15)

Note that DD partitions the vertices of PnP_{n}, and DjD^{j} partitions the vertices of PnP_{n} that end with jj. We now define a graph QnQ_{n} whose vertices are the elements of DD, and X,YDX,Y\in D are adjacent in QnQ_{n} if and only if a vertex of XX is adjacent to a vertex of YY in PnP_{n}. From the properties of the Pancake graphs we immediately see that vertices DijD_{i}^{j} and DijD_{i^{\prime}}^{j^{\prime}} are adjacent in QnQ_{n} if and only if one of the following statements is true:

  1. (A1)

    j=jj=j^{\prime} and iii\neq i^{\prime}.

  2. (A2)

    i=ji=j^{\prime} and j=ij=i^{\prime}.

It is obvious that a proper coloring cc of QnQ_{n} trivially extends to a proper coloring of PnP_{n} in such a way that any vertex of PnP_{n} belongs to exactly one efficient dominating set XDX\in D and we give it the color c(X)c(X).

We now have reduced the problem to finding a proper (n1n-1)-coloring for QnQ_{n}. First let us show an idea of such colorings for the graphs Q4Q_{4} and Q6Q_{6}. The graphs are presented on Figures 1 and 2 such that the vertices corresponding to the set Dij,i,j[n],ijD_{i}^{j},\ i,j\in[n],i\neq j, are denoted by labels ijij. The vertices are arranged in a hamiltonian cycle such that all vertices with the same last element are grouped together and form 33- and 55-cliques, respectively. Within each clique the first element of labeling is cyclically incremented. Obviously, the elements of each clique must all have different colors, but the pictures suggest that we can ‘almost’ cyclically repeat a color pattern chosen on the first clique. The only collisions occur with the ‘long’ chords that connect antipodal vertices. We see that if we exchange the color of one end of each long chord with the color of the vertex counterclockwise next to it on the cycle, we obtain a proper coloring. It is clear that the proper colorings of Q4Q_{4} and Q6Q_{6} are equitable. Indeed, by (13)-(15) and from the construction Q4Q_{4} has 33 color classes of cardinality 44 each, and Q6Q_{6} has 55 color classes of cardinality 66 each. However, they are not perfect since the multisets of colors of all neighbors are different for different vertices having the same color. For example, in Q4Q_{4} the red vertex (14)(14) has two green and one blue neighbors, while the red vertex (32)(32) has two blue and one green neighbors. Similar, in Q6Q_{6} despite the red and the purple vertices have the same multiset of colors of their neighbors, the green, the blue and the dark blue vertices do not meet this condition to be perfect.

Note that this coloring is exactly the greedy coloring for the vertex sequence that starts with (1n)(1n) and then counterclockwise follows the cycle.


Refer to caption
Figure 1: The equitable 33-coloring of Q4Q_{4}
Refer to caption
Figure 2: The equitable 55-coloring of Q6Q_{6}

Now we formalize and prove this observation. First we define a map:

f:D[n1]f:D\to[n-1] (16)

such that

{f(Dij)=ij,if i>j;f(Dij)=n+ij,otherwise.\left\{\begin{array}[]{ll}f(D_{i}^{j})=i-j,&\hbox{if $i>j$};\\ f(D_{i}^{j})=n+i-j,&\hbox{otherwise}.\end{array}\right. (17)

Note that ff indeed has all its values in [n1][n-1], and that the restriction of ff to DjD_{j} is injective, i.e.

f(Dij)=f(Dij) if and only if i=i.f(D_{i}^{j})=f(D_{i^{\prime}}^{j})\mbox{ if and only if }i=i^{\prime}.

Next we let k=n2k=\frac{n}{2} and define a coloring

c:D[n1]c:D\to[n-1] (18)

by

c(Dij)=f(Dij)+ε,c(D_{i}^{j})=f(D_{i}^{j})+\varepsilon, (19)

where

ε={+1,if j>k and f(Dij)=k;1,if j>k and f(Dij)=k+1;0,otherwise.\varepsilon=\left\{\begin{array}[]{ll}+1,&\hbox{if $j>k$ and $f(D_{i}^{j})=k$;}\\ -1,&\hbox{if $j>k$ and $f(D_{i}^{j})=k+1$;}\\ 0,&\hbox{otherwise.}\end{array}\right. (20)

If nn is odd, the first two cases cannot occur, since f(Dij)f(D_{i}^{j}) is an integer, but kk is not. The restriction of cc to DjD^{j} is still injective, since it is either equal to ff for jkj\leqslant k or it is equal to ff with at most two adjacent function values exchanged.

In terms of the intuitive approach above, ff is the coloring that cyclically repeats along the cycle, and cc is the coloring that exchanges the colors near the ends of long chords.

Theorem 3

The coloring cc is proper and equitable for Pn,n>2P_{n},n>2.

Proof. Indeed, suppose that X=DijX=D_{i}^{j} and Y=DijY=D_{i^{\prime}}^{j^{\prime}} are adjacent. If j=jj=j^{\prime}, then iii\neq i^{\prime} by (A1). By the injectivity of cc for fixed jj, XX and YY must have different colors. By (A2) the only other possibility is that Y=DjiY=D_{j}^{i}. Without loss of generality we assume that j<ij<i.

First we handle the case that nn is odd. Then c(X)=c(Dij)=f(Dij)=ijc(X)=c(D_{i}^{j})=f(D_{i}^{j})=i-j, and c(Y)=c(Dji)=f(Dji)=n+jic(Y)=c(D_{j}^{i})=f(D_{j}^{i})=n+j-i. The equality c(X)=c(Y)c(X)=c(Y) implies n=2i2jn=2i-2j, so nn is even. There is a contradiction.

In the last part of the proof we assume that nn is even, so kk is an integer. We do a case analysis based on the position of kk.

If j<ikj<i\leqslant k then c(X)=ijc(X)=i-j, and c(Y)=n+jic(Y)=n+j-i. The equality c(X)=c(Y)c(X)=c(Y) implies 2i=n+2j=2k+2j2i=n+2j=2k+2j, so i=k+j>ki=k+j>k, and this gives a contradiction.

If jk<ij\leqslant k<i then c(X)=ijc(X)=i-j, and c(Y)=n+ji+εc(Y)=n+j-i+\varepsilon. The equality c(X)=c(Y)c(X)=c(Y) implies ij=n+ji+εi-j=n+j-i+\varepsilon, so 2k+2j=2iε2k+2j=2i-\varepsilon. Then ε\varepsilon must be even, hence ε=0\varepsilon=0, and i=k+ji=k+j or f(Y)=f(Dji)=n+ji=kf(Y)=f(D_{j}^{i})=n+j-i=k. Since i>ki>k we have ε=1\varepsilon=1 by (20) which gives a contradiction.

If k<j<ik<j<i then c(X)=ij+ε1c(X)=i-j+\varepsilon_{1} and c(Y)=n+ji+ε2c(Y)=n+j-i+\varepsilon_{2}. The equality c(X)=c(Y)c(X)=c(Y) implies ij+ε1=n+ji+ε2i-j+\varepsilon_{1}=n+j-i+\varepsilon_{2}, so 2i+ε1=2k+2j+ε22i+\varepsilon_{1}=2k+2j+\varepsilon_{2}, and hence ε1\varepsilon_{1} and ε2\varepsilon_{2} have the same parity. There are the following possibilities.

(i) If ε1=ε2\varepsilon_{1}=\varepsilon_{2} then ij=ki-j=k. Since k<j<in=2kk<j<i\leqslant n=2k we have k=ij<2kk=kk=i-j<2k-k=k which gives a contradiction.

(ii) If ε1=1\varepsilon_{1}=-1, ε2=1\varepsilon_{2}=1. As in case (i), we have k+1=ij<2kk=kk+1=i-j<2k-k=k which leads to a contradiction.

(iii) If ε1=1\varepsilon_{1}=1, ε2=1\varepsilon_{2}=-1 then ij=k1i-j=k-1. Again, since k<j<i2kk<j<i\leqslant 2k, this is only possible if j=k+1j=k+1 and i=n=2ki=n=2k. Then f(Dij)=k1f(D_{i}^{j})=k-1, so ε1=0\varepsilon_{1}=0 by (20), and we have a contradiction.

In all cases the assumption of color equality leads to a contradiction, which finishes the proof that cc is a proper coloring. Moreover, by (18) we have (n1)(n-1) color classes each of which has a cardinality |Dj||Dij|=n(n2)!|D^{j}|\cdot|D^{j}_{i}|=n(n-2)! (see (14), (15)) which finishes the proof of the statement. \square

3.2 Optimal colorings

It is obvious that above equitable (n1)(n-1)-coloring produces an optimal coloring for P3P_{3} and P4P_{4} (see Table 1). However, for n>4n>4 a proper coloring of QnQ_{n} can never produce an optimal coloring for PnP_{n}. Indeed, by (2) for n>4n>4 we have χ(Pn)<n1\chi(P_{n})<n-1 and χ(Qn)n1\chi(Q_{n})\geqslant n-1 since QnQ_{n} contains an (n1n-1)-clique.

Now we give a simple optimal 44-coloring of P5P_{5}, P6P_{6} or P7P_{7}. We define an even (odd) prefix–reversal ri, 2inr_{i},\ 2\leqslant i\leqslant n, if it corresponds to an even (odd) permutation. By [18, Lemma 4], if i0,1(mod4)i\equiv 0,1\pmod{4} then rir_{i} is an even prefix–reversal. Similar, rir_{i} is an odd prefix–reversal if i2,3(mod4)i\equiv 2,3\pmod{4}. By [18, Lemma 6], the Pancake graph Pn,n3P_{n},n\geqslant 3, has n!/n!/\ell independent even \ell–cycles where 62n6\leqslant\ell\leqslant 2n.

Let Γ\Gamma be one of P5P_{5}, P6P_{6}, P7P_{7}. Then the subgraph HH generated by the even prefix–reversals r4r_{4} and r5r_{5} is a spanning subgraph of Γ\Gamma consisting of disjoint 1010-cycles C10=(r5r4)5C_{10}=(r_{5}\ r_{4})^{5}. Since even prefix–reversals preserve parity, all vertices of HH that are on the same cycle have the same parity. Since all other edges of Γ\Gamma correspond to odd permutations, they have one endpoint on an ‘even’ 1010-cycle and the other endpoint on an ‘odd’ 1010-cycle. Thus, we can 22-color the even cycles and 22-color the odd cycles using two other colors. This results in an equitable 44-coloring of Γ\Gamma where each of the color classes has n!/4n!/4 vertices. Since χ(P6)=χ(P7)=4\chi(P_{6})=\chi(P_{7})=4 this coloring is optimal for P6P_{6} and P7P_{7}.

4 Discussion

There are trivial examples of graphs for which Conjecture 11 holds such as even cycles, bipartite graphs with equal parts. Any Cayley graph over the symmetric group generated by a set of transpositions gives a bipartite graph with two equal color classes. The statement holds for the Hamming graphs H(d,q)H(d,q) whose (equitable) chromatic number is qq. A regular graph with a Hoffman coloring always gives a strongly equitable coloring [3]. Hoffman’s lower bound is known as χ(Γ)1λ1/λv\chi(\Gamma)\geqslant 1-\lambda_{1}/\lambda_{v}, where λ1\lambda_{1} and λv\lambda_{v} are the largest and the smallest eigenvalues of Γ\Gamma. If equality holds, an optimal coloring of Γ\Gamma is called a Hoffman coloring.

Acknowledgements

The research work of the second author is supported by Mathematical Center in Akademgorodok, the agreement with Ministry of Science and High Education of the Russian Federation number 075-15-2019-1613. The authors thank Alexander Kostochka and Sergey Avgustinovich for useful discussions on equitable colorings.

References

  • [1] R. Ahlswede, H. Aydinian, L. Khachatrian, On Perfect Codes and Related Concepts, Designs, Codes and Cryptography, 22 (2001) 221-–237.
  • [2] R. A. Bailey, P. J. Cameron, A. L. Gavrilyuk, S. V. Goryainov, Equitable partitions of Latin-square graphs, Journal of Combinatorial Designs, 27 (2019) 142–160.
  • [3] A. Blokhuis, A. E. Brouwer, W. H. Haemers, On 33-chromatic distance-regular graphs, Designs, Codes and Cryptography, 44 (2007) 293–305.
  • [4] R. L. Brooks, On colouring the nodes of a network, Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc., 37 (1941) 194–197.
  • [5] O. V. Borodin, A. V. Kostochka, On an upper bound of a graph’s chromatic number depending on the graph’s degree and destiny, J. Combin. Theory. Ser. B., 23 (1977) 247–250.
  • [6] P. A. Catlin, A bound on the chromatic number of a graph, Discrete Math., 22 (1978) 81–84.
  • [7] P. A. Catlin, Another bound on the chromatic number of a graph, Discrete Math., 24 (1978) 1–6.
  • [8] B. L. Chen, K. W. Lih, P. L Wu, Equitable coloring and the maximum degree, European Journal of Combinatorics, 15 (1994) 443–447.
  • [9] I. J. Dejter, O. Serra, Efficient dominating sets in Cayley graphs, Discrete Applied Mathematics, 129 (2003) 319–328.
  • [10] A. Johansson, Asymptotic choice number for triangle free graphs, DIMACS Technical Report, (1996) 91–95.
  • [11] D. G. Fon-Der-Flaass, Perfect 22-colorings of a hypercube, Siberian Mathematical Journal, 48 (2007) 740-–745.
  • [12] H. Furmaňczyk, M. Kubale, V. V. Mkrtchyan, Equitable colorings of corona multiproducts of graphs, Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory, 37 (2017) 1079–1094.
  • [13] C. Godsil, Compact graphs and equitable partitions, Linear Algebra and its Applications, 255 (1997) 259-–266.
  • [14] A. Kanevsky, C. Feng, On the embedding of cycles in pancake graphs, Parallel Computing, 21 (1995) 923–936.
  • [15] J. H. Kim, On Brooks’ theorem for sparse graphs, Combinatorics, Probability and Computing, 4 (1995) 97-–132.
  • [16] S. Klavžar, U. Milutinović, C. Petr, 11-perfect codes in Sierpinski graphs, Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society, 66 (2002) 369–384.
  • [17] E. Konstantinova, On some structural properties of Star and Pancake graphs, LNCS, 7777 (2013) 472–487.
  • [18] E. V. Konstantinova, Chromatic properties of the Pancake graphs, Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory, 37 (2017) 777–787.
  • [19] E. V. Konstantinova, A. N. Medvedev, Cycles of length seven in the Pancake graph, Diskretnyi Analiz i Issledovanie Operatsii, 17 (2010) 46–55. (in Russian)
  • [20] K. W. Lih, Equitable Coloring of Graphs, In: P. Pardalos, D. Z. Du, R. Graham (Eds), Handbook of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, New York, NY, (2013) 1199–1248.
  • [21] W. Meyer, Equitable coloring, American Mathematical Monthly, 80 (1973) 920-–922.
  • [22] Ke Qiu, Optimal broadcasting algorithms for multiple messages on the star and pancake graphs using minimum dominating sets, Congress. Numerantium, 181 (2006) 33–39.
  • [23] J. J. Sheu, J. J. M. Tan, K. T. Chu, Cycle embedding in pancake interconnection networks, In.: Proc. 23rd Workshop on Combinatorial Mathematics and Computation Theory, Taiwan, (2006) 85–92.