An explicit formula for the -polynomial of the knot with Conway’s notation
Abstract
An explicit formula for the -polynomial of the knot having Conway’s notation is computed up to repeated factors. Our polynomial contains exactly the same irreducible factors as the -polynomial defined in [1].
keywords:
-polynomial, explicit formula, knot with Conway’s notation , Riley-Mednykh polynomial1 Introduction
In 1994, Cooper, Culler, Gillet, Long, and Shalen introduced the -polynomial, , of a compact 3-manifold with a single torus boundary [1]. A-polynomials are related to the following invariants: incompressible surfaces [1], the Culler-Shalen seminorm [2, 3], cusp shapes [4], the volumes [1, 5, 6] and Chern-Simons invariants [7, 8, 9, 10, 11] of the deformed orbifolds, Mahler measure [12], Alexander polynomials [1], conjecture [13, 14], etc. The conjecture has been proved for some knots. For example, our knot, the knot with Conway’s notation has been proved to satisfy the conjecture [15] except .
-polynomials are known only for a few due to the difficulty of computations. Among them some are not full ones. A-polynomials were obtained using triangulation in [16, 17, 18, 19, 20]. In [21], Culler presented -polynomials up to crossings and most crossings and many crossings, and all knots that can be triangulated with up to seven ideal tetrahedra. -polynomials are known for twist knots [22], pretzel knots [23, 24], [22, for between and ] [25, for between and and for ], recursively. Explicit formulas for the A-polynomials were computed for two-bridge torus knots [1, 22, 26], iterated torus knots [27], twist knots [8, 28, 29, 30], knots with Conway’s notation [31], and the twisted torus knots [30]. We recall here that is the mirror image of .
The main purpose of the paper is to find the explicit formula for the -polynomial of the knot having Conway’s notation up to repeated factors. Let us denote the -polynomial of the knot having Conway’s notation by . The following theorem gives the explicit formula for the -polynomial of .
Theorem 1.1
The -polynomial is given explicitly by
where | |||
and | |||
2 Proof of Theorem 1.1


A knot is a two bridge knot with Conway’s notation if has a regular two-dimensional projection of the form in Figure 1. Let us denote the exterior of by . The following proposition gives the fundamental group of [22, 32, 33].
Proposition 2.1
where .
Given a set of generators, , of the fundamental group for , we define a representation by
Then can be identified with the point . When varies we have an algebraic set whose defining equation is the following explicit Riley-Mednykh polynomial defined recursively by the following form:
(1) |
with initial conditions
and
It is known in [32] that is a representation of if and only if is a root of . We use different initial conditions for and , but the same for both series for simplicity.
Lemma 2.2
The Riley-Mednykh polynomial is described explicitly by
Proof 1
Write for the claimed formula and show that .
Case I: . When or , is undefined and can be considered as zero. Hence the finite sum can be regarded as an infinite sum. Direct computation shows that and . Now, we only need to show that satisfies the recursive relation. Note that can be written as .
In the last equality we use the binomial relation
three times.
Case II: . When or , is undefined and can be considered as zero. Hence the finite sum can be regarded as an infinite sum. Direct computation shows that and . As in Case I, one can easily show that satisfies the recursive relation. \qed
Let [1, 22], where is the word obtained by reversing (by reading words in from right to left). Let (the left upper entry of , [32, lemma 7.9]). Then is the longitude which is null-homologous in (you can read a twisted longitude from the Schubert normal form of the knot ), and we have
Lemma 2.3
[32, Theorem 7.10]
where | |||
Now substituting for into , for , gives
We observe that
and
The resulting expression is
Since is a non-polynomial factor of the -polynomial, we multiply it by its Galois conjugate to obtain the entire -polynomial [1, 22]. This is actually another method of defining the resultant of two polynomials [34, p.209-p.210]. We multiply by to clear the denominators and factor out some power of so that we have the -polynomial in Theorem 1.1. Formally, it can be done by multiplying by . Notice that and recall that
Now we want to show that the claimed formula does not have fractions. Direct computation shows that , , and (see, Appendix B) are polynomials in . From now on a polynomial means a polynomial in . Let us assume that for is a polynomial. From the equation (1), we have for . Hence and
(2) |
Now, we have
Proposition 2.4
(3) | |||
(4) | |||
(5) |
By direct computations,
(6) | ||||
(7) | ||||
(8) | ||||
(9) | ||||
(10) |
where , , , and are some polynomials (see Appendix A). Since , , and
are polynomials and since is a polynomial by Equation (8), the terms in Proposition 2.4-(3) and Proposition 2.4-(5) are polynomials and hence the term
in Proposition 2.4-(4) is a polynomial. Now we only need to show that is a polynomial. By Proposition 2.4, we have
(11) | |||
(12) | |||
(13) |
Since the terms in (11) and (13) are polynomials by the induction hypothesis and Equation (8), we only need to show the term in (12) is a polynomial. Now times the term in (12) becomes
(14) | |||
(15) |
by using Equation (2). The term in (14) is a polynomial because of Equations (9), (10), and the induction hypothesis. We will show that the term in (15) is a polynomial. By using Equation (2) again, times the term in (15) becomes
It is a polynomial by (4), (8), and the induction hypothesis. Therefore, for all , by induction, is a polynomial.
Now, we are going to show that for has and as terms so that it does not have any redundant or factors. Let us consider and as functions of , and and as a function of and . Let and . When is equal to zero, Proposition 2.4 simplifies to
Proposition 2.5
Since
(16) |
for all , by induction, has as a term. Let and . Since , we have the following equations from Equation (2):
Since , , by induction, we have and . Therefore for has as a term. Now, we are going to show that for has as a term and does not have a constant (nonzero) times as a term so that it does not have any redundant factors. By Proposition 2.5 and Equation (16), for has as a term. Since and (see Appendix C) is a polynomial up to , by Equations (2), (6) and (7), for is a polynomial up to . Hence, all the terms in (5) have at least 8th power of , and, by using Equations (6), (7) again, all the terms in (4) have at least 4th power of because we know that factoring out from a polynomial won’t affect factor of it and formulae in (4) and (5) are polynomials. Therefore if there were a constant (nonzero) times in for , it would be in the terms in (3). By using Equation (8), the terms in (3) can be rewritten as
(17) |
The terms in whose power of is less than or equal to are
The terms in whose power of is less than or equal to are
Now, one can easily prove that the terms in 17 do not include a constant (nonzero) times .
From now on, we will deal with the case for .
Substituting for into , for , gives
As in case , we multiply it by its Galois conjugate to obtain the entire -polynomial. We multiply by to clear the denominators and factor out some power of so that we have the -polynomial in Theorem 1.1. Similarly as in case , we can show that for does not have any redundant , or factors. It can be done by showing that it has and as terms and does not have a constant times as a term.
3 Appendix A
4 Appendix B
5 Appendix C
Acknowledgement
This work was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (No. NRF-2018R1A2B6005847). The second author was supported by 2018 Hongik University Research Fund.
References
References
-
[1]
D. Cooper, M. Culler, H. Gillet, D. D. Long, P. B. Shalen,
Plane curves associated to
character varieties of -manifolds, Invent. Math. 118 (1) (1994) 47–84.
doi:10.1007/BF01231526.
URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01231526 -
[2]
S. Boyer, X. Zhang, A
proof of the finite filling conjecture, J. Differential Geom. 59 (1) (2001)
87–176.
URL http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.jdg/1090349281 -
[3]
M. Culler, C. M. Gordon, J. Luecke, P. B. Shalen,
Dehn surgery on knots, Ann. of
Math. (2) 125 (2) (1987) 237–300.
doi:10.2307/1971311.
URL http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1971311 -
[4]
D. Cooper, D. D. Long,
Remarks on the
-polynomial of a knot, J. Knot Theory Ramifications 5 (5) (1996)
609–628.
doi:10.1142/S0218216596000357.
URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0218216596000357 -
[5]
J.-Y. Ham, J. Lee, The
volume of hyperbolic cone-manifolds of the knot with Conway’s notation
, J. Knot Theory Ramifications 25 (6) (2016) 1650030, 9.
doi:10.1142/S0218216516500309.
URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0218216516500309 -
[6]
J.-Y. Ham, A. Mednykh, V. Petrov,
Trigonometric identities
and volumes of the hyperbolic twist knot cone-manifolds, J. Knot Theory
Ramifications 23 (12) (2014) 1450064, 16.
doi:10.1142/S0218216514500643.
URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0218216514500643 - [7] S.-s. Chern, J. Simons, Some cohomology classes in principal fiber bundles and their application to Riemannian geometry, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 68 (1971) 791–794.
-
[8]
J.-Y. Ham, J. Lee, Explicit formulae
for Chern-Simons invariants of the twist-knot orbifolds and edge
polynomials of twist knots, Mat. Sb. 207 (9) (2016) 144–160.
doi:10.4213/sm8610.
URL http://dx.doi.org/10.4213/sm8610 -
[9]
J.-Y. Ham, J. Lee, Explicit
formulae for Chern-Simons invariants of the hyperbolic orbifolds of the
knot with Conway’s notation , Lett. Math. Phys. 107 (3) (2017)
427–437.
doi:10.1007/s11005-016-0904-0.
URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11005-016-0904-0 - [10] J.-Y. Ham, J. Lee, Explicit formulae for chern-simons invariants of the hyperbolic knot orbifolds, arXiv:1703.10984, preprint (2017).
- [11] H. M. Hilden, M. T. Lozano, J. M. Montesinos-Amilibia, On volumes and Chern-Simons invariants of geometric -manifolds, J. Math. Sci. Univ. Tokyo 3 (3) (1996) 723–744.
- [12] D. W. Boyd, Mahler’s measure and invariants of hyperbolic manifolds, in: Number theory for the millennium, I (Urbana, IL, 2000), A K Peters, Natick, MA, 2002, pp. 127–143.
-
[13]
C. Frohman, R. Gelca, W. Lofaro,
The A-polynomial from
the noncommutative viewpoint, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 354 (2) (2002)
735–747.
doi:10.1090/S0002-9947-01-02889-6.
URL https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-01-02889-6 -
[14]
S. Garoufalidis, Knots and
tropical curves, in: Interactions between hyperbolic geometry, quantum
topology and number theory, Vol. 541 of Contemp. Math., Amer. Math. Soc.,
Providence, RI, 2011, pp. 83–101.
doi:10.1090/conm/541/10680.
URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/conm/541/10680 -
[15]
T. T. Q. Le, A. T. Tran, On
the AJ conjecture for knots, Indiana Univ. Math. J. 64 (4) (2015)
1103–1151, with an appendix written jointly with Vu Q. Huynh.
doi:10.1512/iumj.2015.64.5602.
URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1512/iumj.2015.64.5602 - [16] A. A. Champanerkar, A-polynomial and Bloch invariants of hyperbolic 3-manifolds, ProQuest LLC, Ann Arbor, MI, 2003, thesis (Ph.D.)–Columbia University.
- [17] J. Howie, D. Mathews, J. Purcell, A-polynomials, ptolemy equations and dehn filling, arXiv:2002.10356, preprint (2021).
- [18] J. Howie, D. Mathews, J. Purcell, A-polynomials of fillings of the whitehead sister, arXiv:2106.13462, preprint (2021).
-
[19]
C. K. Zickert, Ptolemy
coordinates, Dehn invariant and the -polynomial, Math. Z. 283 (1-2)
(2016) 515–537.
doi:10.1007/s00209-015-1608-3.
URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s00209-015-1608-3 -
[20]
M. Goerner, C. K. Zickert,
Triangulation independent
Ptolemy varieties, Math. Z. 289 (1-2) (2018) 663–693.
doi:10.1007/s00209-017-1970-4.
URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s00209-017-1970-4 - [21] M. Culler, A-polynomials, http://homepages.math.uic.edu/culler/Apolynomials.
-
[22]
J. Hoste, P. D. Shanahan, A
formula for the A-polynomial of twist knots, J. Knot Theory Ramifications
13 (2) (2004) 193–209.
doi:10.1142/S0218216504003081.
URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0218216504003081 -
[23]
S. Garoufalidis, T. W. Mattman,
The -polynomial of
the pretzel knots, New York J. Math. 17 (2011) 269–279.
URL http://nyjm.albany.edu:8000/j/2011/17_269.html -
[24]
N. Tamura, Y. Yokota, A formula
for the -polynomials of -pretzel knots, Tokyo J. Math.
27 (1) (2004) 263–273.
doi:10.3836/tjm/1244208490.
URL http://dx.doi.org/10.3836/tjm/1244208490 - [25] K. Petersen, The -polynomial of a family of two-bridge knots, New York J. Math. 21 (2015) 847–881.
-
[26]
F. Nagasato, Computing the
A-polynomial using noncommutative methods, J. Knot Theory Ramifications
14 (6) (2005) 735–749.
doi:10.1142/S0218216505004068.
URL https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218216505004068 - [27] Y. Ni, X. Zhang, Detection of knots and a cabling formula for A-polynomials, arXiv:1411.0353, preprint (2014).
-
[28]
D. V. Mathews, Erratum: An
explicit formula for the A-polynomial of twist knots [mr3268980], J. Knot
Theory Ramifications 23 (11) (2014) 1492001, 1.
doi:10.1142/S0218216514920011.
URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0218216514920011 - [29] D. V. Mathews, An explicit formula for the A-polynomial of twist knots, J. Knot Theory Ramifications 23 (9).
- [30] E. Thompson, Twisting, ladder graphs and A-polynomials, arXiv:2107.11028, preprint (2021).
-
[31]
J.-Y. Ham, J. Lee, An
explicit formula for the -polynomial of the knot with Conway’s
notation , J. Knot Theory Ramifications 25 (10) (2016) 1650057,
9.
doi:10.1142/S0218216516500577.
URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0218216516500577 -
[32]
J.-Y. Ham, J. Lee, A. Mednykh, A. Rasskazov,
On the volume and
Chern-Simons invariant for 2-bridge knot orbifolds, J. Knot Theory
Ramifications 26 (12) (2017) 1750082, 22.
doi:10.1142/S0218216517500821.
URL https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218216517500821 - [33] R. Riley, Parabolic representations of knot groups. I, Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 24 (1972) 217–242.
- [34] S. Lang, Algebra, 2nd Edition, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Advanced Book Program, Reading, MA, 1984.