An elementary proof of the Voros connection formula for the Airy equation \dedicatoryDedicated to Professor Yoshitsugu Takei on his 60th birthday \AuthorHeadAoki, T., Suzuki, T. and Uchida, S. \supportThe first and the second author are supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant No. 18K03385. \VolumeNox \YearNo202x \PagesNo000–000 \communicationReceived April 20, 202x. Revised September 11, 202x.
An elementary proof of the Voros connection formula for WKB solutions to the Airy equation with a large parameter
Abstract
The Voros connection formula for WKB solutions to the Airy equation with a large parameter is proved by using cubic equations. Some parts of the results are generalized to the Pearcey system, which is a two-variable version of the Airy equation, is given.
:
33C05, 34E05, 34E15, 34E20keywords:
the Voros connection formula, Airy function, Pearcey integral, WKB solutions, resurgence1 Introduction
In [3], the Voros connection formula (cf. [12]) for the WKB solutions to Schrödinger-type ordinary differential equations is proved from the viewpoint of microlocal analysis [6]. The proof consists of two parts. In the first part, the Schrödinger-type ordinary differential equation with an analytic potential is formally transformed to the Airy equation with a large parameter near a simple turning point. The formal series appearing in the transformation can be justified by using microdifferential operators. In the second part, the Voros connection formula for the Airy equation is proved by computing the Borel transform of the WKB solutions directly in terms of the Gauss hypergeometric functions. The classical connection formulas for the hypergeometric functions yield the Voros formula for the Airy equation. Combining these two parts, we have the Voros formula for general equations. (See [7] also.)
In this article, we focus on the second part. We observe that the parameters in the hypergeometric functions used in the proof in [3, 7] are contained in the Schwarz list [11]. In other words, they are algebraic functions. Our aim is to prove the connection formula for the WKB solutions to the Airy equation by using analytic continuation of algebraic functions, not of the hypergeometric functions. This point of view gives some generalization. We find a similar structure in the Pearcey system (cf. [9]) with a large parameter. This system is a natural generalization of the Airy equation to the two-variable case. We see that the Borel transforms of the suitably normalized WKB solutions to the Pearcey system are also algebraic functions. Hence such WKB solutions are resurgent. We hope that this example provides a part of basics of the prospective theory for the exact WKB analysis of holonomic systems.
2 The Airy equation with a large parameter and its WKB solutions
The differential equation
(1) |
is called the Airy equation (cf. [10]). Airy used a solution to this equation expressed by an integral, known as the “Airy function” nowadays (see § 3), effectively in his theory of the rainbow (caustics) [1]. We introduce a positive large parameter by setting . Then we have a differential equation of the form
(2) |
We call this the Airy equation with the large parameter, or simply, the Airy equation. This equation plays a fundamental role in the exact WKB analysis. Let denote the logarithmic derivative of the unknown function , namely Then should satisfy the following Riccati-type equation:
(3) |
This equation has a formal solution defined by the recurrence relation
(4) |
We consider the exponential of the integral of :
which formally satisfies (2). We call this a WKB solution to (2). We easily see that
and if we fix the branch of the square root, say, as for , we have a formal solution . Another choice of the branch also gives a formal solution . If we set
then we have
satisfies (3) and
holds. Hence we may take as a primitive of and have the special WKB solutions of the form
(5) |
Here the integral is defined by one half of the term-by-term contour integral of starting from on the second sheet of the Riemann surface of , going around the origin counterclockwise and back to the on the first sheet:
We observe that has the weighted homogeneity
Hence satisfies
This relation and (2) imply that are formal solutions to the following system of partial differential equations in the variable :
(6) |
3 Integral representation
There are two standard solutions to (1), which are called the Airy functions [10]:
(7) | ||||
(8) |
Here the paths are taken as shown in Fig. 3.1. More precisely, the arguments of three half-line asymptotes of the paths are .
![[Uncaptioned image]](https://cdn.awesomepapers.org/papers/2713f31b-5ac9-4332-b119-e24235932eb9/x1.png)
Figure 3.1.
Hence the integrals
(9) |
are solutions to (2) satisfying . Here ’s are suitably deformed. We can see that have the same homogeneity as that of , namely,
This implies () satisfy (6).
Remark.
The Airy functions are expressed in terms of as
(10) |
We rewrite (9) by setting :
(11) |
Here is the image of by the mapping and
The branch of the root of the cubic equation
(12) |
is taken suitably (see §6). We note that (11) looks like the Laplace integral defining the Borel sum of WKB solutions (see (27)) and hence is expected to have some relation with the Borel transform of WKB solutions.
Lemma 3.1
The function defined as above satisfies the cubic equation
(13) |
Proof.
Proposition 3.2
The algebraic function defined by the cubic equation (13) satisfies the system of partial differential equations
(14) |
Proof.
We observe that the characteristic variety of the system (14) is the conormal bundle of the curve and hence the system is holonomic. The second equation of (14) implies that the unknown function can be written in the form
by using a function of one variable. It is easy to find a second-order ordinary differential equation for by using the first equation. This implies the rank of the holonomic system equals 2. Hence we have
Theorem 3.3
Let be three branches of the algebraic function defined by the cubic equation (13). Then any two of them form a basis of the analytic solution space of the holonomic system
(15) |
4 The Borel transform of WKB solutions
Let denote the Borel transform of . Explicitly, have the forms
Setting
and
we may rewrite them as
with some constants . Then can be written in the form
(16) | ||||
We introduce a new variable . Then we may rewrite as follows:
(17) | ||||
(18) |
Here we take the branches as if and if .
On the other hand, it follows from the definition of the Borel transform that satisfies the formal Borel transform of (6):
(19) |
or, equivalently,
(20) |
Proposition 4.1
The Borel transforms of the WKB solutions can be written as linear combinations of any two of ’s. Here are defined in Theorem 3.3. Especially, are algebraic functions.
Remark.
We set
in (13). Then we have the following cubic equation for :
(22) |
If , we have and we find three roots of (22) near with expansions
(23) |
We take the analytic continuation of to . If , we also have . For , we have a double root and a simple root . The expansion of the branches of which merge at are
(24) |
The graphs of for are shown in Figures 4.1–4.3. Since the coefficients of of (24) do not vanish, two roots and pass each other at and the coefficients of the leading terms of the expansions of at are .
![[Uncaptioned image]](https://cdn.awesomepapers.org/papers/2713f31b-5ac9-4332-b119-e24235932eb9/x2.png)
![[Uncaptioned image]](https://cdn.awesomepapers.org/papers/2713f31b-5ac9-4332-b119-e24235932eb9/x3.png)
![[Uncaptioned image]](https://cdn.awesomepapers.org/papers/2713f31b-5ac9-4332-b119-e24235932eb9/x4.png)
Fig. 4.1. Fig. 4.2. Fig. 4.3.
Replacing by in the expansions of ’s at and comparing the leading coefficients, we have
(25) |
We set
Then (23) yields the expansion of at :
Using Proposition 4.1 and comparing the leading terms of these expansions with (17), we have
(26) |
Similarly, (25) yields the expansion of at :
We compare the leading terms with (18). Then we obtain . Thus we have
Theorem 4.2
The Borel transforms of the WKB solutions to the Airy equation are expressed in terms of three branches ’s specified as above of the algebraic function defined by (13) as follows:
These relations can be also written in the form
Here designates the discontinuity of at .
Note that if , then are singularities of square root-type of and of in -variable.
5 The Voros connection formula for the Airy equation
The Stokes curve (cf. [7]) of (2) is defined by
It consists of three half-lines
Let and denote the sectors (two of the Stokes regions)
respectively. Let be half-lines
with the positive orientation in the -plane and we set
(27) |
Figures 5.1 and 5.2 show and for (), respectively. The wavy lines designate the branch cuts for in -plane. Theorem 4.2 implies that these functions are well-defined and each gives the Borel sum of in (), respectively.
![[Uncaptioned image]](https://cdn.awesomepapers.org/papers/2713f31b-5ac9-4332-b119-e24235932eb9/x5.png)
![[Uncaptioned image]](https://cdn.awesomepapers.org/papers/2713f31b-5ac9-4332-b119-e24235932eb9/x6.png)
![[Uncaptioned image]](https://cdn.awesomepapers.org/papers/2713f31b-5ac9-4332-b119-e24235932eb9/x7.png)
Fig. 5.2.1. Fig. 5.2.2.
Fig. 5.1. Stokes regions Fig. 5.2.3. Fig. 5.2.4.
![[Uncaptioned image]](https://cdn.awesomepapers.org/papers/2713f31b-5ac9-4332-b119-e24235932eb9/x8.png)
![[Uncaptioned image]](https://cdn.awesomepapers.org/papers/2713f31b-5ac9-4332-b119-e24235932eb9/x9.png)
We take the analytic continuation of to . If a point with moves up to across the positive real axis, the singular point of crosses (see Figures 5.2.3 and 5.2.1). Hence we have to take a path of integration shown in Figure 5.3 instead of for for the analytic continuation.
![[Uncaptioned image]](https://cdn.awesomepapers.org/papers/2713f31b-5ac9-4332-b119-e24235932eb9/x10.png)
![[Uncaptioned image]](https://cdn.awesomepapers.org/papers/2713f31b-5ac9-4332-b119-e24235932eb9/x11.png)
Fig. 5.3. Fig. 5.4.
Thus the analytic continuation of has an expression
for . If we take a path surrounding the branch cut (or ) clockwise (as shown in Figure 5.4), we have
as the path of integration for . Hence we have
(28) |
The first term equals . It follows from Theorem 4.2 that the second term can be written in terms of ’s:
Since is holomorphic on a neighborhood of in the -variable, it does not contribute to the value of the integration. Therefore we have
(29) |
The second term of the right-hand side equals
Hence Theorem 4.2 yields
namely,
On the other hand, the singularity does not meet when moves from to across the positive real axis. This implies . Hence we have obtained the Voros connection formula for the WKB solutions to the Airy equation without using any knowledge concerning the hypergoemetric functions:
6 Relation between WKB solutions and Airy functions
In this section, we relate the Airy functions and the WKB solutions. We employ the same notation as in the previous sections.
Theorem 6.1
The Airy functions and are expressed in terms of the Borel sums of WKB solutions to the Airy equation in as follows:
(30) |
Proof.
We choose the path of integration (9) more carefully. If , we take (resp. ) as the steepest descent path of the phase function of the integral (9) passing through the saddle point (resp. ). Here we take the branch as for . As a set, (resp. ) is included in
We go back to (11) and specify the branch of more precisely. Let us divide into two parts by cutting it at the saddle point . We denote by (resp. ) the lower (resp. upper) part. Let be the image of by the mapping . Then (resp. ) coincides with (resp. ). If (resp. ) is close to , the branch of the root of (12) should be taken as
Here we choose the branch as for . Hence the branch of should be taken as on (resp. on ). By the definition of , (11) for should be understood as
Using Theorem 4.2, we have
Thus the first equation of (10) shows
Next we divide into two parts at the saddle point . We denote by (resp. ) the right (resp. left) part. Let (resp. ) be the image of (resp. ) by the mapping . Then (resp. ) coincides with (resp. ). If (resp. ) is close to , the branch of the root of (12) should be taken as
Hence the branch of must be taken as on (resp. on ). Then we have
Hence the second equation in (10) yields
This completes the proof. ∎
Remark.
Using the Voros connection formula, we obtain
Conversely, are written in terms of and as follows:
Watson’s lemma and the expressions given above reproduce the classical asymptotic formulas for the Airy functions (cf. [10]):
Explicit forms of are written as follows:
7 Some generalization
We consider the following integral:
(31) |
Here are complex variables and the path of integration is taken suitably. This is a natural extension of (9) to two-variable case. It is called the Pearcey integral ([10]) with the large parameter . Most parts of the discussions developed in §§2–6 can be generalized to the system of partial differential equations that characterizes this integral. We review some results concerning this system without proof. Details will be given in [4].
We can easily see that satisfies the system of partial differential equations
(32) |
where we set , . WKB solutions to this system is constructed in [2, 5] and the connection problem of the solutions was discussed in [5]. We employ another system of partial differential equations. We set
(33) | ||||
(34) | ||||
(35) |
It is easy to see that is a solution to the system (cf. [9])
(36) |
In fact, we have
Setting
we can confirm the following relations:
(37) | ||||
(38) | ||||
(39) |
Hence if is fixed, (36) is equivalent to (32). We also note that
holds. Next we consider as an independent complex variable. Then the systems (32) and (36) are subholonomic. To find another independent differential equation for , we look at the weighted homogeneity of (31) in . We can see that
holds for and hence is a solution to
(40) |
where . We set
and consider the system of partial differential equations
To be more specific, let denote the Weyl algebra of the variable and the left ideal in generated by (). We can prove the following theorem (cf. [8]):
Theorem 7.1
Let denote the left -module defined by
Then is a holonomic system of rank .
Thus characterizes the 3-dimensional linear subspace spanned by (31) in the space of analytic functions. Note that there are four valleys of the integral (31) and hence six infinite paths of integration connecting distinct two valleys. Any three of them are independent, which give a basis of the solution space.
Next we construct WKB solutions to . We set and . Since we have (37) and (38), we can use (32) to find . That is, we see that and should satisfy
and
We seek formal solutions to these equations of the forms
Putting these expressions into the above equations, we see that and are obtained by the following recursion relations and initial conditions:
(41) | ||||
(42) | ||||
(43) | ||||
(44) | ||||
(45) |
This construction is the same as that given in [2, 5] and hence the 1-form of formal series
is closed. In these references, a formal solution of the form
is called a WKB solution to (32). Here is a suitably fixed point.
Now we consider the WKB solutions to of the form
In addition to (36) (or (32)), should satisfy (40) and hence the choice of the primitive of is constrained by this equation (up to genuine additive constants), namely,
(46) |
This choice is consistent with the construction of and . In fact, we can confirm the first equation of (46) by direct computation and the second by using the homogeneity of and . From now on, we take special WKB solutions of the form
(47) |
with the primitives given by (46). Let () denote the three roots of (41) and set . According to this choice, we have three WKB solutions () of the form (47).
Let be the Borel transform of () and the formal Borel transform of () . The explicit forms of ’s are given as follows:
Then holds for . We denote by the left ideal in generated by (). Here denotes the Weyl algebra of the variable . Then the following theorem can be proved in a similar manner to Theorem 7.1
Theorem 7.2
Let denote the left -module defined by
Then is a holonomic system of rank .
Thus characterizes the subspace of analytic functions spanned by ().
We go back to (31). We set and rewrite (31) as
Here is defined by
and the path of integration is suitably modified. The following lemma can be proved in a similar way to the proof of Lemma 3.1.
Lemma 7.3
The function defined as above satisfies the quadratic equation
and it is a solution to the holonomic system .
We note that the singular locus of coincides with the zero-point set of the leading coefficient of the above quadratic equation. For general , there are four roots of the quadratic equation, which satisfy . Looking at the singularity of , we find that any three of ’s are linearly independent. Thus we have the following theorem.
Theorem 7.4
The Borel transform of the WKB solution can be written as a linear combination of any three of ’s. In particular, ’s are algebraic and hence they are resurgent.
We can write down in terms of ’s. Explicit forms will be given in [4].
References
- [1] Airy, G. B., On the intensity of light in the neighbourhood of a caustic, Transactions of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 6, 3 (1838), 379–402.
- [2] Aoki, T., Toward the exact WKB analysis of holonomic systems, RIMS Kôkyûroku 1433 (2005), 1–8 (in Japanese).
- [3] Aoki, T., Kawai, T. and Takei,Y., The Bender-Wu analysis and the Voros theory, Special Functions, ICM-90 Satellite Conference Proceedings, Springer, 1991, 1–29.
- [4] Aoki, T., Suzuki, T. and Uchida, S., The Borel transform of the WKB solutions to the Pearcey system, in preparation.
- [5] Hirose, S., On the Stokes geometry for the Pearcey system and the (1,4) hypergeometric system, RIMS Kôkyûroku Bessatsu 40 (2013), 243–292.
- [6] Kashiwara, M., Kawai, T. and Kimura, T., Foundation of Algebraic Analysis, PMS-37, Princeton University Press, 1986.
- [7] Kawai, T. and Takei, Y., Algebraic Analysis of Singular Perturbation Theory, Translation of Mathematical Monographs, vol. 227, AMS, 2005.
- [8] Oaku, T., Computation of the characteristic variety and the singular locus of a system of differential equations with polynomial coefficients. Japan J. Indust. Appl. Math., 11 (1994), 485-497.
- [9] Okamoto, K. and Kimura, H., On particular solutions of the Garnier systems and the hypergeometric functions of several variables, Quart. J. Math., 37 (1986), 61–80.
- [10] Olver, F. W. J. et al., NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions, Cambridge University Press (2010).
- [11] Schwarz, H. A., Ueber diejenigen Fälle in welchen die Gaussische hypergeometrische Reihe eine algebraische Function ihres vierten Elementes darstellt, Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik, 75 (1873), 292–335.
- [12] Voros, A., The return of the quartic oscillator. The complex WKB method, Annales de l’I. H. P., section A, 39, no 3 (1983), p. 211-338.