This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

An analogue of Kida’s formula for elliptic curves with additive reduction

Anwesh Ray Chennai Mathematical Institute, H1, SIPCOT IT Park, Kelambakkam, Siruseri, Tamil Nadu 603103, India [email protected]  and  Pratiksha Shingavekar Chennai Mathematical Institute, H1, SIPCOT IT Park, Kelambakkam, Siruseri, Tamil Nadu 603103, India [email protected]
Abstract.

We study the Iwasawa theory of pp-primary Selmer groups of elliptic curves EE over a number field KK. Assume that EE has additive reduction at the primes of KK above pp. In this context, we prove that the Iwasawa invariants satisfy an analogue of the Riemann–Hurwitz formula. This generalizes a result of Hachimori and Matsuno. We apply our results to study rank stability questions for elliptic curves in prime cyclic extensions of \mathbb{Q}. These extensions are ordered by their absolute discriminant and we prove an asymptotic lower bound for the density of extensions in which the Iwasawa invariants as well as the rank of the elliptic curve is stable.

Key words and phrases:
rank stability, Iwasawa theory of elliptic curves, additive reduction, Kida’s formula
2020 Mathematics Subject Classification:
11R23, 11G05 (primary) 11G07 (secondary)
(Corresponding author) email: [email protected]

1. Introduction

1.1. Motivation and historical context

Let pp be a prime number and p\mathbb{Z}_{p} be the ring of pp-adic integers. Iwasawa [Iwa73] studied growth patterns of pp-primary parts of class numbers in certain infinite abelian Galois towers of number fields. Let FF be a number field. Setting μp¯\mu_{p^{\infty}}\subset\bar{\mathbb{Q}} to be the pp-primary roots of unity, we let F(μp)F(\mu_{p^{\infty}}) denote the Galois extension of FF that is generated by μp\mu_{p^{\infty}}. There is a unique p\mathbb{Z}_{p}-extension Fcyc/FF_{\operatorname{cyc}}/F which is contained in F(μp)F(\mu_{p^{\infty}}). This is called the cyclotomic p\mathbb{Z}_{p}-extension of FF and the Galois group Gal(Fcyc/F)\operatorname{Gal}(F_{\operatorname{cyc}}/F) is topologically isomorphic to p\mathbb{Z}_{p}. For a natural number nn, we define FnF_{n} to be the subfield of FcycF_{\operatorname{cyc}} such that Gal(Fn/F)/pn\operatorname{Gal}(F_{n}/F)\simeq\mathbb{Z}/p^{n}\mathbb{Z}. Thus, one has the tower of Galois extensions

F=F0F1F2FnFn+1Fcyc.F=F_{0}\subset F_{1}\subset F_{2}\subset\cdots\subset F_{n}\subset F_{n+1}\subset\cdots\subset F_{\operatorname{cyc}}.

Let ene_{n} be the exact power of pp that divides the class number of FnF_{n}. Iwasawa proved that there exist invariants μ=μp(F),λ=λp(F)0\mu=\mu_{p}(F),\lambda=\lambda_{p}(F)\in\mathbb{Z}_{\geq 0} and ν=νp(F)\nu=\nu_{p}(F)\in\mathbb{Z} such that

en=pnμ+nλ+ν,e_{n}=p^{n}\mu+n\lambda+\nu,

for all large enough values of nn. Moreover, Iwasawa conjectured that the μp(F)=0\mu_{p}(F)=0 for all number fields FF. The conjecture has been resolved for abelian extensions F/F/\mathbb{Q} by Ferrero and Washington [FW79].

Let KK be a number field and L/KL/K be a finite Galois extension such that Gal(L/K)\operatorname{Gal}(L/K) is a pp-group. Kida [Kid80] showed that there is an explicit relationship between the Iwasawa μ\mu- and λ\lambda-invariants for Kcyc/KK_{\operatorname{cyc}}/K and those for Lcyc/LL_{\operatorname{cyc}}/L. This can be viewed as an analogue of the Riemann-Hurwitz formula for Iwasawa invariants. Iwasawa [Iwa81, Theorem 6] later proved a generalization of this result using Galois cohomology. Let ww be a prime of LcycL_{\operatorname{cyc}} and vv be the prime of KcycK_{\operatorname{cyc}} such that w|vw|v. Set e(w)e(w) to denote the ramification index of ww over vv. Let U(Lcyc)U(L_{\operatorname{cyc}}) be the group of units of LcycL_{\operatorname{cyc}}.

Theorem A ([Iwa81, Theorem 6]).

Let pp be a prime, KK be a number field and L/KL/K be a finite Galois extension such that [L:K][L\mathrel{\mathop{\mathchar 58\relax}}K] is a power of pp. Assume that μp(K)=0\mu_{p}(K)=0. Then, μp(L)=0\mu_{p}(L)=0 and

λp(L)=[Lcyc:Kcyc]λp(K)+w(e(w)1)+(p1)(h2h1).\lambda_{p}(L)=[L_{\operatorname{cyc}}\mathrel{\mathop{\mathchar 58\relax}}K_{\operatorname{cyc}}]\lambda_{p}(K)+\sum_{w}\left(e(w)-1\right)+(p-1)(h_{2}-h_{1}).

The sum is over all primes ww of LcycL_{\operatorname{cyc}} (above vv in KcycK_{\operatorname{cyc}}) not dividing pp. The quantity hih_{i} is the rank of the abelian group Hi(Lcyc/Kcyc,U(Lcyc))H^{i}(L_{\operatorname{cyc}}/K_{\operatorname{cyc}},U(L_{\operatorname{cyc}})).

1.2. Main results

Mazur [Maz72] formulated the Iwasawa theory of elliptic curves with good ordinary reduction at the primes that lie above pp. Kato [Kat04] proved that for elliptic curves defined over \mathbb{Q}, the pp-primary Selmer groups considered by Mazur were cofinitely generated and cotorsion over the Iwasawa algebra. Hachimori and Matsuno [HM99] proved a generalization of Kida’s formula for Selmer groups of elliptic curves with good ordinary or multiplicative reduction at the primes that lie above pp. The Iwasawa theory of elliptic curves with additive reduction at primes above pp was initially studied by Delbourgo [Del98], who proved that the natural generalization of Kato’s result should hold, provided additional assumptions are satisfied (see Proposition 4.7). It is natural therefore to extend Kida’s formula to elliptic curves with additive reduction (at primes above pp). Set Λ\Lambda to denote the Iwasawa algebra. Let EE be an elliptic curve over a number field KK and L/KL/K be a finite Galois extension with Galois group G:=Gal(L/K)G\mathrel{\mathop{\mathchar 58\relax}}=\operatorname{Gal}(L/K). The Iwasawa μ\mu- and λ\lambda-invariants associated to the pp-primary Selmer group Selp(E/Kcyc)\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/K_{\operatorname{cyc}}) are denoted by μp(E/K)\mu_{p}(E/K) and λp(E/K)\lambda_{p}(E/K) respectively. Stated below is our main result.

Theorem B.

With respect to notation above, assume that GG is a pp-group. Moreover, assume that the following conditions are satisfied.

  1. (1)

    There exists a finite Galois extension K/KK^{\prime}/K with Galois group Δ:=Gal(K/K)\Delta\mathrel{\mathop{\mathchar 58\relax}}=\operatorname{Gal}(K^{\prime}/K) over which EE has good reduction at the primes above pp. Moreover, assume that p|Δ|p\nmid|\Delta|.

  2. (2)

    Let SaddS_{\operatorname{add}} be the set of primes vv of KK not dividing pp at which EE has additive reduction. Then all primes of SaddS_{\operatorname{add}} continue to have additive reduction in LcycL_{\operatorname{cyc}} (this condition is automatically satisfied when L/KL/K is unramified at all primes of SaddS_{\operatorname{add}} or if p5p\geq 5).

  3. (3)

    The Selmer group Selp(E/Kcyc)\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/K_{\operatorname{cyc}}) is cofinitely generated and cotorsion over Λ\Lambda with μp(E/K)=0\mu_{p}(E/K)=0.

Then, the following assertions hold

  1. (1)

    The Selmer group Selp(E/Lcyc)\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/L_{\operatorname{cyc}}) is cofinitely generated and cotorsion over Λ\Lambda with μp(E/L)=0\mu_{p}(E/L)=0.

  2. (2)

    We have that

    (1.1) λp(E/L)=[Lcyc:Kcyc]λp(E/K)+wP1(e(w)1)+2wP2(e(w)1).\lambda_{p}(E/L)=[L_{\operatorname{cyc}}\mathrel{\mathop{\mathchar 58\relax}}K_{\operatorname{cyc}}]\lambda_{p}(E/K)+\sum_{w\in P_{1}}\left(e(w)-1\right)+2\sum_{w\in P_{2}}\left(e(w)-1\right).

Here, P1P_{1} and P2P_{2} are the sets of primes of LcycL_{\operatorname{cyc}} defined as follows

P1:={wwpE has split multiplicative reduction at w},P2:={wwpE has good reduction at w and E(Lcyc,w) has a point of order p}.\begin{split}&P_{1}\mathrel{\mathop{\mathchar 58\relax}}=\{w\mid w\nmid p\text{, }E\text{ has split multiplicative reduction at }w\},\\ &P_{2}\mathrel{\mathop{\mathchar 58\relax}}=\{w\mid w\nmid p\text{, }E\text{ has good reduction at }w\text{ and }E(L_{\operatorname{cyc},w})\text{ has a point of order }p\}.\\ \end{split}

Note that the first of the above conditions imply that EE has potentially good reduction at the primes above pp. Leveraging Delbourgo’s results for K=K=\mathbb{Q}, we provide explicit conditions for the assumptions of Theorem B to hold, cf. Proposition 4.7 and Corollary 4.9. We also give an explicit example to illustrate these results, see the example following Assumption 5.1 on p. 20.

We then come to our main application, which is to prove density results for the stability of μ\mu and λ\lambda-invariants in /p\mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z}-extensions of \mathbb{Q}. Furthermore, one is also able to derive surprising results concerning rank stability in these extensions. There is considerable interest in rank stability questions for a fixed elliptic curve in prime cyclic extensions, see for instance [DFK04, DFK07, MR18, KR22, Ray23].

Our results are proven via analytic methods, specifically by an application of Delange’s Tauberian theorem (cf. Theorem 5.2). Let E/E_{/\mathbb{Q}} be an elliptic curve satisfying certain additional conditions (cf. Assumption 5.1). One of these conditions requires that the pp-primary Selmer group of EE over cyc\mathbb{Q}_{\operatorname{cyc}} is cotorsion over Λ\Lambda, and the Iwasawa μ\mu- and λ\lambda-invariants are 0. For instance, for p=3p=3, the elliptic curve E:y2+y=x33x5E\mathrel{\mathop{\mathchar 58\relax}}y^{2}+y=x^{3}-3x-5 is shown to satisfy these conditions. Then, we prove an asymptotic lower bound for the number of /p\mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z}-extensions L/L/\mathbb{Q} such that the μ\mu- and λ\lambda-invariants over for LcycL_{\operatorname{cyc}} remain 0.

Given a number field LL, set ΔL\Delta_{L} to denote its discriminant. Let X>0X>0, and 𝒮(X)\mathcal{S}(X) be the set of Galois extensions L/L/\mathbb{Q} with Gal(L/)/p\operatorname{Gal}(L/\mathbb{Q})\simeq\mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z} and such that |ΔL|X|\Delta_{L}|\leq X. Take 𝒮E(X)\mathcal{S}_{E}(X) to be subset of 𝒮(X)\mathcal{S}(X) consisting of the extensions for which the following conditions hold

  • Selp(E/L)\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/L) is cofinitely generated and cotorsion over Λ\Lambda,

  • μp(E/L)=0\mu_{p}(E/L)=0 and λp(E/L)=0\lambda_{p}(E/L)=0.

We note that for L𝒮E(X)L\in\mathcal{S}_{E}(X), it follows from Proposition 3.3 that rankE(L)=0\operatorname{rank}E(L)=0. Thus, the rank remains stable in such extensions L/L/\mathbb{Q}. We prove asymptotic formulae for NE(X):=#𝒮E(X)N_{E}(X)\mathrel{\mathop{\mathchar 58\relax}}=\#\mathcal{S}_{E}(X) respectively. Given two positive real valued functions f(X)f(X) and g(X)g(X), we write f(X)g(X)f(X)\gg g(X) to mean that there is a constant C>0C>0 such that Cf(X)>g(X)Cf(X)>g(X) for all sufficiently large XX.

Theorem C.

Let E/E_{/\mathbb{Q}} be an elliptic curve satisfying Assumption 5.1. With respect to notation above, assume that the Galois representation

ρE,p:Gal(¯/)GL2(𝔽p)\rho_{E,p}\mathrel{\mathop{\mathchar 58\relax}}\operatorname{Gal}(\bar{\mathbb{Q}}/\mathbb{Q})\rightarrow\operatorname{GL}_{2}(\mathbb{F}_{p})

on the pp-torsion in E(¯)E(\bar{\mathbb{Q}}) is surjective. Then, we have that

NE(X)X1(p1)(logX)β,N_{E}(X)\gg X^{\frac{1}{(p-1)}}(\log X)^{-\beta},

where β:=p2p+2p3p2p+1\beta\mathrel{\mathop{\mathchar 58\relax}}=\frac{p^{2}-p+2}{p^{3}-p^{2}-p+1}.

On the other hand, if we let M(X):=#𝒮(X)M(X)\mathrel{\mathop{\mathchar 58\relax}}=\#\mathcal{S}(X), then, there is a constant c>0c>0 such that M(X)cX1p1M(X)\sim cX^{\frac{1}{p-1}}. This is a special case of Malle’s conjecture [Mal02, Mal04], and this particular result is due to Mäki [M8̈5]. Later, the count was generalized to arbitrary number field bases by Wright [Wri89]. The power of logX\log X in Theorem C is negative, however, still is very close to 0 (especially for large values of pp). On comparing NE(X)N_{E}(X) with M(X)M(X), our result shows that there is a significantly large number of extensions in which the rank remains stable, compared to the total asymptotic. The difference simply lies in the power of logX\log X. We remark that for p=3p=3 and E:y2+y=x33x5E\mathrel{\mathop{\mathchar 58\relax}}y^{2}+y=x^{3}-3x-5, the conditions of Theorem C are satisfied.

1.3. Organization

Including the introduction, the article consists of five sections. In Section 2, we discuss preliminary notions and set up notation. We begin by discussing the algebraic structure of Selmer groups considered over cyclotomic p\mathbb{Z}_{p}-extensions. In this section, we also recall the results of Hachimori and Matsuno [HM99]. The Section 3 is devoted to the proof of Theorem B. Following this, we discuss the notion of the Euler characteristic of a Λ\Lambda-module in Section 4, and recall results of Delbourgo on elliptic curves over \mathbb{Q} with additive reduction at pp. These results are used in discussing precise conditions for the conditions of Theorem B are satisfied for K=K=\mathbb{Q}. Finally, in Section 5, Theorem C is proven.

2. Preliminaries

This section is preliminary in nature, and we set up notation that will be in place throughout the article. It serves to introduce basic notions in the Iwasawa theory of elliptic curves. For a more detailed exposition, the reader may refer to [Gre99, Gre01].

2.1. Selmer groups associated to elliptic curves

Let pp be an odd prime number and KK be a fixed number field. Denote by Σp\Sigma_{p}, the set of primes of KK that lie above pp. Let EE be an elliptic curve that is defined over KK. Denote by Σbad\Sigma_{\operatorname{bad}} the set of primes vv of KK at which EE has bad reduction. Let Σ\Sigma be a finite set of primes of KK that contains Σbad\Sigma_{\operatorname{bad}} and Σp\Sigma_{p}. Throughout, we choose an algebraic closure K¯/K\bar{K}/K as well as K¯v/Kv\bar{K}_{v}/K_{v} for any prime vv of KK. At each prime vv of KK, choose an embedding ιv:K¯K¯v\iota_{v}\mathrel{\mathop{\mathchar 58\relax}}\bar{K}\hookrightarrow\bar{K}_{v}. We take Gv\operatorname{G}_{v} to denote the absolute Galois group of KvK_{v}. Let KΣK_{\Sigma} be the maximal algebraic extension of KK in which all primes vΣv\notin\Sigma are unramified. Note that KΣK_{\Sigma} is a Galois extension of KK. We set GK,Σ:=Gal(KΣ/K)\operatorname{G}_{K,\Sigma}\mathrel{\mathop{\mathchar 58\relax}}=\operatorname{Gal}(K_{\Sigma}/K). For each prime vΣv\in\Sigma, we have a natural map

ιv:GvGK,Σ,\iota_{v}^{*}\mathrel{\mathop{\mathchar 58\relax}}\operatorname{G}_{v}\rightarrow\operatorname{G}_{K,\Sigma},

which is induced by ιv\iota_{v}.

For n1n\in\mathbb{Z}_{\geq 1}, take E[pn]E[p^{n}] to be the pnp^{n}-torsion subgroup of E(K¯)E(\bar{K}). Set E[p]E[p^{\infty}] to be the pp-primary part of E(K¯)E(\bar{K}). The action of Gal(K¯/K)\operatorname{Gal}(\bar{K}/K) descends to an action of GK,Σ\operatorname{G}_{K,\Sigma} on E[p]E[p^{\infty}] since Σ\Sigma contains the primes above pp and the primes at which EE has bad reduction. For i0i\geq 0 and any algebraic extension 𝒦/K\mathcal{K}/K that is contained in KΣK_{\Sigma}, we set

Hi(KΣ/𝒦,):=Hi(Gal(KΣ/𝒦),).H^{i}(K_{\Sigma}/\mathcal{K},\cdot)\mathrel{\mathop{\mathchar 58\relax}}=H^{i}(\operatorname{Gal}(K_{\Sigma}/\mathcal{K}),\cdot).

Let p\mathbb{Z}_{p} denote the ring of pp-adic integers. There is a unique extension Kcyc/KK_{\operatorname{cyc}}/K contained in K(μp)K(\mu_{p^{\infty}}) such that Gal(Kcyc/K)\operatorname{Gal}(K_{\operatorname{cyc}}/K) is topologically isomorphic to p\mathbb{Z}_{p}. This extension is called the cyclotomic p\mathbb{Z}_{p}-extension of KK. The only primes of KK that ramify in KcycK_{\operatorname{cyc}} are those that lie above pp, and hence KcycK_{\operatorname{cyc}} is contained in KΣK_{\Sigma}. We set Γ\Gamma to denote the Galois group Gal(Kcyc/K)\operatorname{Gal}(K_{\operatorname{cyc}}/K) and choose a topological generator γ\gamma of Γ\Gamma. Given any integer n0n\geq 0, let Kn/KK_{n}/K be the extension contained in KcycK_{\operatorname{cyc}} such that [Kn:K]=pn[K_{n}\mathrel{\mathop{\mathchar 58\relax}}K]=p^{n}. This extension is called the nn-th layer, and one has the following tower of extensions

K=K0K1K2KnKn+1Kcyc.K=K_{0}\subset K_{1}\subset K_{2}\subset\dots\subset K_{n}\subset K_{n+1}\subset\dots\subset K_{\operatorname{cyc}}.

Identify the Galois group Gal(Kcyc/Kn)\operatorname{Gal}(K_{\operatorname{cyc}}/K_{n}) with Γpn\Gamma^{p^{n}} and set Γn:=Γ/Γpn\Gamma_{n}\mathrel{\mathop{\mathchar 58\relax}}=\Gamma/\Gamma^{p^{n}}. In particular, one may identify Γn\Gamma_{n} with Gal(Kn/K)\operatorname{Gal}(K_{n}/K). In the course of this section, we shall introduce certain Selmer groups considered over KcycK_{\operatorname{cyc}}. These will be considered as modules over a certain completed group algebra called the Iwasawa algebra Λ\Lambda, which has nice properties. We take Λ\Lambda to denote the inverse limit

Λ:=limnp[Γn],\Lambda\mathrel{\mathop{\mathchar 58\relax}}=\varprojlim_{n}\mathbb{Z}_{p}[\Gamma_{n}],

with respect to natural quotient maps

πm,n:ΓmΓn\pi_{m,n}\mathrel{\mathop{\mathchar 58\relax}}\Gamma_{m}\rightarrow\Gamma_{n}

for mn0m\geq n\geq 0. Letting TT denote (γ1)(\gamma-1) we identify Λ\Lambda with the formal power series ring pT\mathbb{Z}_{p}\llbracket T\rrbracket.

Let 𝒦\mathcal{K} be an algebraic extension of KK which is contained in KΣK_{\Sigma}. We introduce the pp-primary Selmer group of EE over 𝒦\mathcal{K}. Let vv be a prime of 𝒦\mathcal{K}, and consider the Kummer exact sequence of Galois modules

(2.1) 0E[pn]E×pnE0.0\rightarrow E[p^{n}]\rightarrow E\xrightarrow{\times p^{n}}E\rightarrow 0.

Associated to (2.1), we have the exact sequence in cohomology

0E(𝒦v)/pnδv,nH1(𝒦v,E[pn])ϕv,nH1(𝒦v,E)[pn]0.0\rightarrow E(\mathcal{K}_{v})\otimes\mathbb{Z}/p^{n}\mathbb{Z}\xrightarrow{\delta_{v,n}}H^{1}(\mathcal{K}_{v},E[p^{n}])\xrightarrow{\phi_{v,n}}H^{1}(\mathcal{K}_{v},E)[p^{n}]\rightarrow 0.

Taking the direct limit as nn\rightarrow\infty, one obtains the following exact sequence

0E(𝒦v)p/pδvH1(𝒦v,E[p])ϕvH1(𝒦v,E)[p]0.0\rightarrow E(\mathcal{K}_{v})\otimes\mathbb{Q}_{p}/\mathbb{Z}_{p}\xrightarrow{\delta_{v}}H^{1}(\mathcal{K}_{v},E[p^{\infty}])\xrightarrow{\phi_{v}}H^{1}(\mathcal{K}_{v},E)[p^{\infty}]\rightarrow 0.
Definition 2.1.

With respect to the above notation, the pp-primary Selmer group of EE over 𝒦\mathcal{K} is defined as follows

Selp(E/𝒦):=ker(H1(KΣ/𝒦,E[p])ΦE,𝒦vH1(𝒦v,E)[p]),\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/\mathcal{K})\mathrel{\mathop{\mathchar 58\relax}}=\operatorname{ker}\left(H^{1}(K_{\Sigma}/\mathcal{K},E[p^{\infty}])\xrightarrow{\Phi_{E,\mathcal{K}}}\prod_{v}H^{1}(\mathcal{K}_{v},E)[p^{\infty}]\right),

where the map ΦE,𝒦\Phi_{E,\mathcal{K}} is the product of maps ϕv\phi_{v} as vv ranges over primes of 𝒦\mathcal{K} that lie above Σ\Sigma.

Of particular interest is the Selmer group Selp(E/Kcyc)\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/K_{\operatorname{cyc}}), which may in fact be identified with the direct limit limnSelp(E/Kn)\varinjlim_{n}\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/K_{n}). As is well known, Selp(E/Kcyc)\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/K_{\operatorname{cyc}}) has a canonical Λ\Lambda-module structure. Let Σcyc\Sigma_{\operatorname{cyc}} be the set of primes of KcycK_{\operatorname{cyc}} that lie above Σ\Sigma. Note that all primes of KK are finitely decomposed in KcycK_{\operatorname{cyc}}, hence Σcyc\Sigma_{\operatorname{cyc}} is finite. Thus, the Selmer group Selp(E/Kcyc)\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/K_{\operatorname{cyc}}) is the kernel of the natural restriction map

H1(KΣ/Kcyc,E[p])ΦE,KcycvΣcycH1(Kcyc,v,E)[p].H^{1}(K_{\Sigma}/K_{\operatorname{cyc}},E[p^{\infty}])\xrightarrow{\Phi_{E,K_{\operatorname{cyc}}}}\prod_{v\in\Sigma_{\operatorname{cyc}}}H^{1}(K_{\operatorname{cyc},v},E)[p^{\infty}].

2.2. Iwasawa invariants

In this subsection, we introduce the algebraic Iwasawa invariants associated to the pp-primary Selmer group Selp(E/Kcyc)\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/K_{\operatorname{cyc}}). A polynomial f(T)f(T) with coefficients in p\mathbb{Z}_{p} is said to be distinguished if it is monic and all non-leading coefficients are divisible by pp. Let MM and MM^{\prime} be finitely generated and torsion Λ\Lambda-modules. A Λ\Lambda-module homomorphism ϕ:MM\phi\mathrel{\mathop{\mathchar 58\relax}}M\rightarrow M^{\prime} is said to be a pseudo-isomorphism if the kernel and cokernel of ϕ\phi are finite. It follows from the structure theory of Λ\Lambda-modules (cf. [Was97, Chapter 13]) that if MM is a finitely generated and torsion Λ\Lambda-module, then it is pseudo-isomorphic to a module MM^{\prime} of the following form

(2.2) M=(i=1sΛ/(pmi))(j=1tΛ/(fj(T)nj)).M^{\prime}=\left(\bigoplus_{i=1}^{s}\Lambda/(p^{m_{i}})\right)\oplus\left(\bigoplus_{j=1}^{t}\Lambda/(f_{j}(T)^{n_{j}})\right).

In (2.2), s,ts,t are non-negative integers, mi,njm_{i},n_{j} are positive integers, and fj(T)f_{j}(T) are irreducible distinguished polynomials. It is understood in the above notation that if ss (resp. tt) is 0, then the direct sum is empty.

Definition 2.2.

The μ\mu-invariant is given by

μp(M):={imi if s>0;0 if s=0.\mu_{p}(M)\mathrel{\mathop{\mathchar 58\relax}}=\begin{cases}\sum_{i}m_{i}&\text{ if }s>0;\\ 0&\text{ if }s=0.\end{cases}

On the other hand, the λ\lambda-invariant is given by

λp(M):={jnjdeg(fj) if t>0;0 if t=0.\lambda_{p}(M)\mathrel{\mathop{\mathchar 58\relax}}=\begin{cases}\sum_{j}n_{j}\operatorname{deg}(f_{j})&\text{ if }t>0;\\ 0&\text{ if }t=0.\end{cases}
Lemma 2.3.

Let MM be finitely generated Λ\Lambda-module. Then, the following conditions are equivalent

  1. (1)

    MM is torsion with μp(M)=0\mu_{p}(M)=0,

  2. (2)

    MM is finitely generated as a p\mathbb{Z}_{p}-module.

Moreover, if these equivalent conditions are satisfied, then

λp(M)=rankp(M).\lambda_{p}(M)=\operatorname{rank}_{\mathbb{Z}_{p}}(M).
Proof.

Let us assume that MM is a finitely generated torsion Λ\Lambda-module with μ(M)=0\mu(M)=0. Then MM is pseudo-isomorphic to a Λ\Lambda-module MM^{\prime} given as follows

M=(j=1tΛ/(fj(T)nj)),M^{\prime}=\left(\bigoplus_{j=1}^{t}\Lambda/(f_{j}(T)^{n_{j}})\right),

with fj(T)f_{j}(T) distinguished polynomials. Then Λ/(fj(T)nj)\Lambda/(f_{j}(T)^{n_{j}}) is finitely generated as a p\mathbb{Z}_{p}-module with rank njdegfjn_{j}\operatorname{deg}f_{j}. Therefore, MM^{\prime} is a finitely generated p\mathbb{Z}_{p}-module and rankp(M)=Σjnjdegfj=λp(M)\operatorname{rank}_{\mathbb{Z}_{p}}(M^{\prime})=\Sigma_{j}n_{j}\operatorname{deg}f_{j}=\lambda_{p}(M^{\prime}). Since MM is pseudo-isomorphic to MM^{\prime} as Λ\Lambda-module, it follows that rankp(M)=rankp(M)\operatorname{rank}_{\mathbb{Z}_{p}}(M)=\operatorname{rank}_{\mathbb{Z}_{p}}(M^{\prime}) and λp(M)=λp(M)\lambda_{p}(M)=\lambda_{p}(M^{\prime}).

Conversely, assume that MM is a finitely generated p\mathbb{Z}_{p}-module. It is easy to see that MM must be a torsion Λ\Lambda-module. We show that μp(M)=0\mu_{p}(M)=0. Suppose by the way of contradiction that μp(M)0\mu_{p}(M)\neq 0. Then from the structure theorem MM is pseudo-isomorphic to a Λ\Lambda-module MM^{\prime}, which contains Λ/(pm)\Lambda/(p^{m}) for some m>0m>0. Note that Λ/(pm)\Lambda/(p^{m}) can be identified with /(pm)[T]\mathbb{Z}/(p^{m})[T] and therefore is infintely generated as a p\mathbb{Z}_{p}-module. This gives a contradiction and hence μp(M)=0\mu_{p}(M)=0. ∎

Let 𝔛(E/Kcyc)\mathfrak{X}(E/K_{\operatorname{cyc}}) denote the Pontryagin dual of Selp(E/Kcyc)\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/K_{\operatorname{cyc}}). Throughout the article, we make the following assumption.

Assumption 2.4.

The dual Selmer group 𝔛(E/Kcyc)\mathfrak{X}(E/K_{\operatorname{cyc}}) is finitely generated and torsion as a Λ\Lambda-module.

When EE has good ordinary reduction at all primes above pp, it is conjectured by Mazur that Assumption 2.4 holds. This conjecture was settled by Kato and Rubin in the case when EE is defined over \mathbb{Q} and K/K/\mathbb{Q} is an abelian extension. When EE has multiplicative reduction at the primes above pp, it is still conjectured that Assumption 2.4 holds [HM99, Introduction]. On the other hand, for K=K=\mathbb{Q} and EE an elliptic curve with bad additive reduction at pp, the conjecture was proven by Delbourgo [Del98] under additional hypotheses.

Definition 2.5.

When the above assumption holds, we shall denote by μp(E/K)\mu_{p}(E/K) (resp. λp(E/K)\lambda_{p}(E/K)) the μ\mu-invariant (resp. λ\lambda-invariant) of 𝔛(E/Kcyc)\mathfrak{X}(E/K_{\operatorname{cyc}}).

2.3. The results of Hachimori and Matsuno

In this subsection, we recall the results of Hachimori and Matsuno [HM99], who prove an analogue of Kida’s formula for elliptic curves E/KE_{/K} with semistable reduction at the primes of Σp\Sigma_{p}. Let L/KL/K be a Galois extension of number fields with Galois group G=Gal(L/K)G=\operatorname{Gal}(L/K). We assume that #G\#G is a power of pp. Let Σadd\Sigma_{\operatorname{add}} be the set of primes of KK at which EE has additive reduction. For a prime ww of LcycL_{\operatorname{cyc}}, denote by e(w)=eLcyc/Kcyc(w)e(w)=e_{L_{\operatorname{cyc}}/K_{\operatorname{cyc}}}(w) the ramification index of ww over KcycK_{\operatorname{cyc}}. We recall their main result in the case when EE has good ordinary reduction at the primes in Σp\Sigma_{p}.

Theorem 2.6 (Hachimori-Matsuno).

With respect to notation above, assume that the following conditions hold

  1. (1)

    EE has good ordinary reduction at all primes of KK that lie above pp.

  2. (2)

    All primes of Σadd\Sigma_{\operatorname{add}} continue to have additive reduction in LcycL_{\operatorname{cyc}} (this condition is automatically satisfied when L/KL/K is unramified at all primes of Σadd\Sigma_{\operatorname{add}} or if p5p\geq 5).

  3. (3)

    The Selmer group Selp(E/Kcyc)\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/K_{\operatorname{cyc}}) is cofinitely generated and cotorsion over Λ\Lambda with μp(E/K)=0\mu_{p}(E/K)=0.

Then, the following assertions hold

  1. (1)

    The Selmer group Selp(E/Lcyc)\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/L_{\operatorname{cyc}}) is cofinitely generated and cotorsion over Λ\Lambda with μp(E/L)=0\mu_{p}(E/L)=0.

  2. (2)

    We have that

    λp(E/L)=[Lcyc:Kcyc]λp(E/K)+wP1(e(w)1)+2wP2(e(w)1).\lambda_{p}(E/L)=[L_{\operatorname{cyc}}\mathrel{\mathop{\mathchar 58\relax}}K_{\operatorname{cyc}}]\lambda_{p}(E/K)+\sum_{w\in P_{1}}\left(e(w)-1\right)+2\sum_{w\in P_{2}}\left(e(w)-1\right).

Here, P1P_{1} and P2P_{2} are the sets of primes of LcycL_{\operatorname{cyc}} defined as follows

P1:={wwpE has split multiplicative reduction at w},P2:={wwpE has good reduction at w and E(Lcyc,w) has a point of order p}.\begin{split}&P_{1}\mathrel{\mathop{\mathchar 58\relax}}=\{w\mid w\nmid p\text{, }E\text{ has split multiplicative reduction at }w\},\\ &P_{2}\mathrel{\mathop{\mathchar 58\relax}}=\{w\mid w\nmid p\text{, }E\text{ has good reduction at }w\text{ and }E(L_{\operatorname{cyc},w})\text{ has a point of order }p\}.\\ \end{split}
Proof.

The above result is [HM99, Theorem 3.1]. ∎

Hachimori and Matsuno prove a similar result in the case when EE has split multiplicative reduction at all primes in Σp\Sigma_{p}, cf. [HM99, section 8].

3. Growth of Iwasawa Invariants

Throughout the section, let EE be an elliptic curve over KK and let L/KL/K be a finite Galois extension with Galois group G/pG\simeq\mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z}. We shall eventually reduce our proof for an arbitrary finite pp-group GG to this case. We make the Assumption 2.4 which states that the Selmer group Selp(E/Kcyc)\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/K_{\operatorname{cyc}}) is co-torsion as a Λ\Lambda-module. Next, we make the following assumption on the reduction type of EE at the primes above pp.

Assumption 3.1.

There exists a finite Galois extension K/KK^{\prime}/K such that EE has good reduction at all primes vpv\mid p of KK^{\prime}. Furthermore, setting Δ:=Gal(K/K)\Delta\mathrel{\mathop{\mathchar 58\relax}}=\operatorname{Gal}(K^{\prime}/K), assume that p#Δp\nmid\#\Delta.

The case we shall be mostly interested in is when EE has additive reduction at some of the primes in Σp\Sigma_{p}. We shall give an example when the Assumption 2.4 holds for K=K=\mathbb{Q}, EE has good ordinary reduction at the primes v|pv|p of KK^{\prime} and K(μp)K^{\prime}\subseteq\mathbb{Q}(\mu_{p}). This leverages results of Delbourgo [Del98] which we discuss in detail in the next section.

The following result of Imai [Ima75] will be of much significance in our local computations.

Lemma 3.2.

When Assumption 3.1 holds, we have that E(Kcyc)[p]E(K_{\operatorname{cyc}})[p^{\infty}] is finite.

Proof.

Since the Assumption 3.1 holds, EE has good reduction at the primes of KK^{\prime} that lie above pp. Thus, E(Kcyc)[p]E(K^{\prime}_{\operatorname{cyc}})[p^{\infty}] is finite by the main theorem of [Ima75]. It follows that E(Kcyc)[p]E(K_{\operatorname{cyc}})[p^{\infty}] is finite as well. ∎

Proposition 3.3.

Let EE be an elliptic curve over a number field KK such that the Assumptions 2.4 and 3.1 hold. Moreover, assume that μp(E/K)=0\mu_{p}(E/K)=0. Then, we have that rankE(K)λp(E/K)\operatorname{rank}E(K)\leq\lambda_{p}(E/K).

Proof.

Note that

(3.1) rankE(K)corankp(Selp(E/K)),\operatorname{rank}E(K)\leq\operatorname{corank}_{\mathbb{Z}_{p}}\left(\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/K)\right),

with equality if and only if (E/K)[p]\Sh(E/K)[p^{\infty}] is finite. On the other hand, it follows from Lemma 2.3 that Selp(E/Kcyc)\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/K_{\operatorname{cyc}}) is cofinitely generated as a p\mathbb{Z}_{p}-module, and

(3.2) λp(E/K)=corankp(Selp(E/Kcyc)).\lambda_{p}(E/K)=\operatorname{corank}_{\mathbb{Z}_{p}}\left(\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/K_{\operatorname{cyc}})\right).

Therefore, from (3.1) and (3.2), it suffices to show that

(3.3) corankp(Selp(E/K))corankp(Selp(E/Kcyc)).\operatorname{corank}_{\mathbb{Z}_{p}}\left(\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/K)\right)\leq\operatorname{corank}_{\mathbb{Z}_{p}}\left(\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/K_{\operatorname{cyc}})\right).

Note that there is a comparison map

ψ:Selp(E/K)Selp(E/Kcyc)\psi\mathrel{\mathop{\mathchar 58\relax}}\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/K)\rightarrow\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/K_{\operatorname{cyc}})

that is induced by the restriction map

res:H1(K,E[p])H1(Kcyc,E[p]).\operatorname{res}\mathrel{\mathop{\mathchar 58\relax}}H^{1}(K,E[p^{\infty}])\rightarrow H^{1}(K_{\operatorname{cyc}},E[p^{\infty}]).

From the inflation-restriction sequence, the kernel of res\operatorname{res} can be identified with H1(Γ,E(Kcyc)[p])H^{1}(\Gamma,E(K_{\operatorname{cyc}})[p^{\infty}]). It follows from Lemma 3.2 that E(Kcyc)[p]E(K_{\operatorname{cyc}})[p^{\infty}] is finite, and hence, the kernel of ψ\psi is finite. This proves that the relation (3.3) holds.
Thus the result has been proved. ∎

Proposition 3.4.

When Assumption 2.4 holds, then the restriction map

ΦE,Kcyc:H1(KΣ/Kcyc,E[p])vΣcycH1(Kcyc,v,E)[p]\Phi_{E,K_{\operatorname{cyc}}}\mathrel{\mathop{\mathchar 58\relax}}H^{1}(K_{\Sigma}/K_{\operatorname{cyc}},E[p^{\infty}])\to\prod_{v\in\Sigma_{\operatorname{cyc}}}H^{1}(K_{\operatorname{cyc},v},E)[p^{\infty}]

is surjective.

Proof.

The result follows from Lemma 3.2 and the proof of [KR22, Lemma 3.4] verbatim. ∎

Lemma 3.5.

Let vv be a prime of KcycK_{\operatorname{cyc}} lying above pp and ww be a prime of LcycL_{\operatorname{cyc}} lying above vv. Suppose that Assumption 3.1 holds, then

Hi(G,E(Lcyc,w))=0 for i=1,2.H^{i}(G,E(L_{\operatorname{cyc},w}))=0\text{ for }i=1,2.
Proof.

Recall from Assumption 3.1 that there exists a finite Galois extension K/KK^{\prime}/K such that EE has good reduction at all primes of KK^{\prime} dividing pp. Furthermore, setting Δ:=Gal(K/K)\Delta\mathrel{\mathop{\mathchar 58\relax}}=\operatorname{Gal}(K^{\prime}/K), we assume that p|Δ|p\nmid|\Delta|. Setting L:=LKL^{\prime}\mathrel{\mathop{\mathchar 58\relax}}=L\cdot K^{\prime}, we let ww^{\prime} be a prime of LcycL^{\prime}_{\operatorname{cyc}} that lies above ww. Take vv^{\prime} to be the prime of KcycK^{\prime}_{\operatorname{cyc}} that lies below ww^{\prime}, as depicted below

KcycK_{\operatorname{cyc}}LcycL_{\operatorname{cyc}}LcycL^{\prime}_{\operatorname{cyc}}KcycK^{\prime}_{\operatorname{cyc}}GGΔ\DeltaGGΔ\Deltav.v.wwww^{\prime}vv^{\prime}

Since Δ\Delta has order prime to pp and G/pG\simeq\mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z} by assumption, it follows that LcycKcyc=KcycL_{\operatorname{cyc}}\cap K^{\prime}_{\operatorname{cyc}}=K_{\operatorname{cyc}} and Gal(Kcyc/Kcyc)\operatorname{Gal}\left(K^{\prime}_{\operatorname{cyc}}/K_{\operatorname{cyc}}\right) is naturally isomorphic to Δ\Delta. Likewise, Gal(Lcyc/Kcyc)\operatorname{Gal}\left(L^{\prime}_{\operatorname{cyc}}/K^{\prime}_{\operatorname{cyc}}\right) can be identified with GG.

Let us first prove the result for i=1i=1, i.e., H1(G,E(Lcyc,w))=0H^{1}(G,E(L_{\operatorname{cyc},w}))=0. Since EE has good reduction at the primes of LcycL^{\prime}_{\operatorname{cyc}} that lie above pp, it follows from [HM99, p. 592, l.3, proof of Lemma 4.3] that

(3.4) H1(G,E(Lcyc,w))=0.H^{1}(G,E(L^{\prime}_{\operatorname{cyc},w^{\prime}}))=0.

We note that this makes use of a deep result of Coates and Greenberg [CG96, Theorem 3.1]. From the inflation-restriction sequence applied to Lcyc/Kcyc/KcycL^{\prime}_{\operatorname{cyc}}/K^{\prime}_{\operatorname{cyc}}/K_{\operatorname{cyc}}, we get

(3.5) 0H1(Δ,E(Kcyc,v))infH1(Lcyc/Kcyc,E(Lcyc,w))resH1(G,E(Lcyc,w))Δ.0\rightarrow H^{1}(\Delta,E(K^{\prime}_{\operatorname{cyc},v^{\prime}}))\xrightarrow{\operatorname{inf}}H^{1}(L^{\prime}_{\operatorname{cyc}}/K_{\operatorname{cyc}},E(L^{\prime}_{\operatorname{cyc},w^{\prime}}))\xrightarrow{\operatorname{res}}H^{1}(G,E(L^{\prime}_{\operatorname{cyc},w^{\prime}}))^{\Delta}.

Note that from (3.4) we have that H1(G,E(Lcyc,w))Δ=0H^{1}(G,E(L^{\prime}_{\operatorname{cyc},w^{\prime}}))^{\Delta}=0. On the other hand, it follows from restriction-corestriction that every element of H1(Δ,E(Kcyc,v))H^{1}(\Delta,E(K^{\prime}_{\operatorname{cyc},v^{\prime}})) has order dividing |Δ||\Delta|. In particular, H1(Δ,E(Kcyc,v))[p]=0H^{1}(\Delta,E(K^{\prime}_{\operatorname{cyc},v^{\prime}}))[p^{\infty}]=0 and thus, from (3.5) we find that

(3.6) H1(Lcyc/Kcyc,E(Lcyc,w))[p]=0.H^{1}(L^{\prime}_{\operatorname{cyc}}/K_{\operatorname{cyc}},E(L^{\prime}_{\operatorname{cyc},w^{\prime}}))[p^{\infty}]=0.

On the other hand, the inflation-restriction sequence applied to Lcyc/Lcyc/KcycL^{\prime}_{\operatorname{cyc}}/L_{\operatorname{cyc}}/K_{\operatorname{cyc}} gives us

0H1(G,E(Lcyc,w))infH1(Lcyc/Kcyc,E(Lcyc,w))resH1(Δ,E(Lcyc,w))G.0\rightarrow H^{1}(G,E(L_{\operatorname{cyc},w}))\xrightarrow{\operatorname{inf}}H^{1}(L^{\prime}_{\operatorname{cyc}}/K_{\operatorname{cyc}},E(L^{\prime}_{\operatorname{cyc},w^{\prime}}))\xrightarrow{\operatorname{res}}H^{1}(\Delta,E(L^{\prime}_{\operatorname{cyc},w^{\prime}}))^{G}.

From (3.6) and the injectivity of the inflation map, we obtain that

H1(G,E(Lcyc,w))[p]=0.H^{1}(G,E(L_{\operatorname{cyc},w}))[p^{\infty}]=0.

Since G/pG\simeq\mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z}, it follows (once again, from the restriction-corestriction sequence) that multiplication by pp is equal to 0 on H1(G,E(Lcyc,w))H^{1}(G,E(L_{\operatorname{cyc},w})). Hence, H1(G,E(Lcyc,w))H^{1}(G,E(L_{\operatorname{cyc},w})) is a pp-group, and we conclude that

H1(G,E(Lcyc,w))=0.H^{1}(G,E(L_{\operatorname{cyc},w}))=0.

Next, we prove that H2(G,E(Lcyc,w))=0H^{2}(G,E(L_{\operatorname{cyc},w}))=0 via a similar argument. It is stated on p.592, l.3 of the proof of [HM99, Lemma 4.3] that Hi(G,E(Lcyc,w))=0H^{i}\left(G,E(L^{\prime}_{\operatorname{cyc},w^{\prime}})\right)=0 for i=1,2i=1,2. Since GG is cyclic, it is thus true that Hi(G,E(Lcyc,w))=0H^{i}\left(G,E(L^{\prime}_{\operatorname{cyc},w^{\prime}})\right)=0 for all i>0i>0.

From [NSW08, Corollary 2.4.2], we deduce that

H2(Lcyc,w/Kcyc,v,E(Lcyc,w))H2(Δ,E(Kcyc,v)).H^{2}\left(L^{\prime}_{\operatorname{cyc},w^{\prime}}/K_{\operatorname{cyc},v},E(L^{\prime}_{\operatorname{cyc},w^{\prime}})\right)\simeq H^{2}(\Delta,E(K^{\prime}_{\operatorname{cyc},v^{\prime}})).

Since p|Δ|p\nmid|\Delta|, we have that

(3.7) H2(Lcyc,w/Kcyc,v,E(Lcyc,w))[p]=0.H^{2}\left(L^{\prime}_{\operatorname{cyc},w^{\prime}}/K_{\operatorname{cyc},v},E(L^{\prime}_{\operatorname{cyc},w^{\prime}})\right)[p^{\infty}]=0.

As was mentioned previously in our proof,

H1(Δ,E(Lcyc,w))[p]=0.H^{1}(\Delta,E(L^{\prime}_{\operatorname{cyc},w^{\prime}}))[p^{\infty}]=0.

From the inflation-restriction sequence

H1(Δ,E(Lcyc,w))GH2(G,E(Lcyc,w))H2(Lcyc/Kcyc,E(Lcyc,w)),H^{1}(\Delta,E(L^{\prime}_{\operatorname{cyc},w^{\prime}}))^{G}\rightarrow H^{2}(G,E(L_{\operatorname{cyc},w}))\rightarrow H^{2}(L^{\prime}_{\operatorname{cyc}}/K_{\operatorname{cyc}},E(L^{\prime}_{\operatorname{cyc},w^{\prime}})),

and (3.7) we deduce that H2(G,E(Lcyc,w))[p]=0H^{2}(G,E(L_{\operatorname{cyc},w}))[p^{\infty}]=0. Since H2(G,E(Lcyc,w))H^{2}(G,E(L_{\operatorname{cyc},w})) is a pp-group, we conclude that H2(G,E(Lcyc,w))=0H^{2}(G,E(L_{\operatorname{cyc},w}))=0 which completes the proof for i=2i=2. ∎

Let Σ(Kcyc)\Sigma(K_{\operatorname{cyc}}) (resp. Σ(Lcyc)\Sigma(L_{\operatorname{cyc}})) be the set of nonarchimedian primes of KcycK_{\operatorname{cyc}} (resp. LcycL_{\operatorname{cyc}}) that lie above Σ\Sigma.

Lemma 3.6.

There is a natural map

α:Selp(E/Kcyc)Selp(E/Lcyc)G\alpha\mathrel{\mathop{\mathchar 58\relax}}\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/K_{\operatorname{cyc}})\rightarrow\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/L_{\operatorname{cyc}})^{G}

whose kernel and cokernel are both finite.

Proof.

The proof follows from the argument of [HM99, Lemma 3.3] and uses the assertion of Lemma 3.5. ∎

Proposition 3.7.

Assume that 𝔛(E/Kcyc)\mathfrak{X}(E/K_{\operatorname{cyc}}) is a torsion Λ\Lambda-module with μp(E/K)=0\mu_{p}(E/K)=0. Then it follows that 𝔛(E/Lcyc)\mathfrak{X}(E/L_{\operatorname{cyc}}) is a torsion Λ\Lambda-module with μp(E/L)=0\mu_{p}(E/L)=0. Moreover, the λ\lambda-invariants are given as follows

(3.8) λp(E/K)=corankpSelp(E/Lcyc)G,λp(E/L)=corankpSelp(E/Lcyc).\begin{split}&\lambda_{p}(E/K)=\operatorname{corank}_{\mathbb{Z}_{p}}\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/L_{\operatorname{cyc}})^{G},\\ &\lambda_{p}(E/L)=\operatorname{corank}_{\mathbb{Z}_{p}}\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/L_{\operatorname{cyc}}).\end{split}
Proof.

The proof of this result is identical to that of [HM99, Corollary 3.4]. Nevertheless we provide some details for the benefit of exposition. Since 𝔛(E/Kcyc)\mathfrak{X}(E/K_{\operatorname{cyc}}) is assumed to be torsion as a Λ\Lambda-module whose μ\mu-invariant vanishes, it follows from the Lemma 2.3 that 𝔛(E/Kcyc)\mathfrak{X}(E/K_{\operatorname{cyc}}) is finitely generated as a p\mathbb{Z}_{p}-module. The Lemma 3.6 asserts that there is a map

α:Selp(E/Kcyc)Selp(E/Lcyc)G\alpha\mathrel{\mathop{\mathchar 58\relax}}\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/K_{\operatorname{cyc}})\rightarrow\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/L_{\operatorname{cyc}})^{G}

with finite kernel and cokernel. As a result, we deduce that 𝔛(E/Lcyc)G\mathfrak{X}(E/L_{\operatorname{cyc}})_{G} is a finitely generated p\mathbb{Z}_{p}-module. From Nakayama’s lemma applied to compact modules over local rings (cf. loc. cit. for a precise reference) it follows that 𝔛(E/Lcyc)\mathfrak{X}(E/L_{\operatorname{cyc}}) is finitely generated as a p[G]\mathbb{Z}_{p}[G]-module. Since GG is finite, we deduce that 𝔛(E/Lcyc)\mathfrak{X}(E/L_{\operatorname{cyc}}) is finitely generated as a p\mathbb{Z}_{p}-module. By Lemma 2.3 we conclude that 𝔛(E/Lcyc)\mathfrak{X}(E/L_{\operatorname{cyc}}) is torsion over Λ\Lambda and μp(E/L)=0\mu_{p}(E/L)=0.

Lemma 2.3 asserts that

λp(E/K)=corankpSelp(E/Kcyc),λp(E/L)=corankpSelp(E/Lcyc).\begin{split}&\lambda_{p}(E/K)=\operatorname{corank}_{\mathbb{Z}_{p}}\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/K_{\operatorname{cyc}}),\\ &\lambda_{p}(E/L)=\operatorname{corank}_{\mathbb{Z}_{p}}\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/L_{\operatorname{cyc}}).\end{split}

It follows from Lemma 3.6 that

corankpSelp(E/Kcyc)=corankpSelp(E/Lcyc)G.\operatorname{corank}_{\mathbb{Z}_{p}}\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/K_{\operatorname{cyc}})=\operatorname{corank}_{\mathbb{Z}_{p}}\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/L_{\operatorname{cyc}})^{G}.

Thus, we have proven the assertions regarding the λ\lambda-invariants (3.8). ∎

Let AA be a cofinitely generated p[G]\mathbb{Z}_{p}[G]-module. Recall that the Herbrand quotient is defined as follows:

hG(A):=#H2(G,A)#H1(G,A).h_{G}(A)\mathrel{\mathop{\mathchar 58\relax}}=\frac{\#H^{2}(G,A)}{\#H^{1}(G,A)}.
Proposition 3.8.

Assume that 𝔛(E/Kcyc)\mathfrak{X}(E/K_{\operatorname{cyc}}) is torsion as a Λ\Lambda-module with μp(E/K)=0\mu_{p}(E/K)=0, then

λp(E/L)=pλp(E/K)+(p1)hG(Selp(E/Lcyc)).\lambda_{p}(E/L)=p\lambda_{p}(E/K)+(p-1)h_{G}\left(\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/L_{\operatorname{cyc}})\right).
Proof.

The above result follows from the arguments on [HM99, p. 589, (3.3)]. ∎

In order to complete the proof of the result, we only need to compute the Herbrand quotient hG(Selp(E/Lcyc))h_{G}\left(\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/L_{\operatorname{cyc}})\right). Recall that it is assumed that Selp(E/Kcyc)\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/K_{\operatorname{cyc}}) is cotorsion as a Λ\Lambda-module and μp(E/K)=0\mu_{p}(E/K)=0. It follows therefore from Proposition 3.7 that the same is true for Selp(E/Lcyc)\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/L_{\operatorname{cyc}}). Thus from Proposition 3.4 that there is a short exact sequence

0Selp(E/Lcyc)H1(KΣ/Lcyc,E[p])wΣ(Lcyc)H1(Lcyc,w,E)[p]0.0\rightarrow\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/L_{\operatorname{cyc}})\rightarrow H^{1}(K_{\Sigma}/L_{\operatorname{cyc}},E[p^{\infty}])\rightarrow\prod_{w\in\Sigma(L_{\operatorname{cyc}})}H^{1}(L_{\operatorname{cyc},w},E)[p^{\infty}]\rightarrow 0.

Therefore, we find that

(3.9) hG(Selp(E/Lcyc))=hG(H1(KΣ/Lcyc,E[p]))vΣ(Kcyc)hG(w|vH1(Lcyc,w,E)[p]).h_{G}\left(\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/L_{\operatorname{cyc}})\right)=\frac{h_{G}\left(H^{1}(K_{\Sigma}/L_{\operatorname{cyc}},E[p^{\infty}])\right)}{\prod_{v\in\Sigma(K_{\operatorname{cyc}})}h_{G}\left(\prod_{w|v}H^{1}(L_{\operatorname{cyc},w},E)[p^{\infty}]\right)}.

We first compute the Herbrand quotient hG(H1(KΣ/Lcyc,E[p]))h_{G}\left(H^{1}(K_{\Sigma}/L_{\operatorname{cyc}},E[p^{\infty}])\right) following arguments in [HM99].

Lemma 3.9.

We have that

hG(H1(KΣ/Lcyc,E[p]))=hG(E(Lcyc)[p])=1.h_{G}\left(H^{1}(K_{\Sigma}/L_{\operatorname{cyc}},E[p^{\infty}])\right)=h_{G}\left(E(L_{\operatorname{cyc}})[p^{\infty}]\right)=1.
Proof.

The first equality

hG(H1(KΣ/Lcyc,E[p]))=hG(E(Lcyc)[p])h_{G}\left(H^{1}(K_{\Sigma}/L_{\operatorname{cyc}},E[p^{\infty}])\right)=h_{G}\left(E(L_{\operatorname{cyc}})[p^{\infty}]\right)

follows verbatim from [HM99, Lemma 4.1]. Since EE has good reduction at all primes of LL^{\prime} that lie above pp, it follows from a result of Imai [Ima75] that E(Lcyc)[p]E(L^{\prime}_{\operatorname{cyc}})[p^{\infty}] is finite. Consequently, we deduce that E(Lcyc)[p]E(L_{\operatorname{cyc}})[p^{\infty}] is finite and

hG(E(Lcyc)[p])=1.h_{G}\left(E(L_{\operatorname{cyc}})[p^{\infty}]\right)=1.

Next, we compute the local Herbrand quotients

hG,v:=hG(w|vH1(Lcyc,w,E)[p]).h_{G,v}\mathrel{\mathop{\mathchar 58\relax}}=h_{G}\left(\prod_{w|v}H^{1}(L_{\operatorname{cyc},w},E)[p^{\infty}]\right).

The computation for hG,vh_{G,v} for primes vpv\nmid p follows verbatim from those done in [HM99], cf. [HM99, Lemma 4.2, Proposition 5.1, Corollary 5.2]. It remains for us to compute hG,vh_{G,v} for primes v|pv|p.

Lemma 3.10.

For a prime v|pv|p, we have that hG,v=1h_{G,v}=1.

Proof.

The result follows directly from Lemma 3.5 which asserts that Hi(G,E(Lcyc,w))=0H^{i}(G,E(L_{\operatorname{cyc},w}))=0 for i=1,2i=1,2. ∎

Lemma 3.11.

Let KLMK\subset L\subset M be number fields such that L/KL/K and M/KM/K are Galois pp-extensions. If the assertion of Theorem B holds for M/LM/L and L/KL/K, then it holds for M/KM/K.

Proof.

The proof of the result follows verbatim from the case considered by Hachimori and Matsuno (cf. [HM99, Lemma 3.2]). ∎

We now give the proof of the main result.

Proof of Theorem B.

Let G:=Gal(Lcyc/Kcyc)G\mathrel{\mathop{\mathchar 58\relax}}=\operatorname{Gal}(L_{\operatorname{cyc}}/K_{\operatorname{cyc}}). It then follows from Lemma 3.11 that we may assume without loss of generality that G/pG\simeq\mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z}. Since it is assumed that 𝔛(E/Kcyc)\mathfrak{X}(E/K_{\operatorname{cyc}}) is torsion as a Λ\Lambda-module with μp(E/K)=0\mu_{p}(E/K)=0, it follows from Proposition 3.7 that the same assertion is true for 𝔛(E/Lcyc)\mathfrak{X}(E/L_{\operatorname{cyc}}). Then, recall that from Proposition 3.8 that

λp(E/L)=pλp(E/K)+(p1)hG(Selp(E/Lcyc)).\lambda_{p}(E/L)=p\lambda_{p}(E/K)+(p-1)h_{G}\left(\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/L_{\operatorname{cyc}})\right).

It remains to compute the Herbrand quotient hG(Selp(E/Lcyc))h_{G}\left(\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/L_{\operatorname{cyc}})\right). Recall that from (3.9) we have that

hG(Selp(E/Lcyc))=hG(H1(KΣ/Lcyc,E[p]))vΣ(Kcyc)hG,v,h_{G}\left(\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/L_{\operatorname{cyc}})\right)=\frac{h_{G}\left(H^{1}(K_{\Sigma}/L_{\operatorname{cyc}},E[p^{\infty}])\right)}{\prod_{v\in\Sigma(K_{\operatorname{cyc}})}h_{G,v}},

where

hG,v:=hG(w|vH1(Lcyc,w,E)[p]).h_{G,v}\mathrel{\mathop{\mathchar 58\relax}}=h_{G}\left(\prod_{w|v}H^{1}(L_{\operatorname{cyc},w},E)[p^{\infty}]\right).

Let v|pv|p be a prime of KcycK_{\operatorname{cyc}}, then from Lemma 3.5 we find that hG,v=1h_{G,v}=1. For vpv\nmid p, the computation of hG,vh_{G,v} follows from [HM99, Lemma 4.2, Proposition 5.1, Corollary 5.2]. Putting it all together, we obtain the formula relating λ\lambda-invariants

λp(E/L)=[L:K]λp(E/K)+wP1(e(w)1)+2wP2(e(w)1).\lambda_{p}(E/L)=[L\mathrel{\mathop{\mathchar 58\relax}}K]\lambda_{p}(E/K)+\sum_{w\in P_{1}}\left(e(w)-1\right)+2\sum_{w\in P_{2}}\left(e(w)-1\right).

We recall that P1P_{1} and P2P_{2} are the sets of primes of LcycL_{\operatorname{cyc}} defined as follows

P1:={wwpE has split multiplicative reduction at w},P2:={wwpE has good reduction at w and E(Lcyc,w) has a point of order p}.\begin{split}&P_{1}\mathrel{\mathop{\mathchar 58\relax}}=\{w\mid w\nmid p\text{, }E\text{ has split multiplicative reduction at }w\},\\ &P_{2}\mathrel{\mathop{\mathchar 58\relax}}=\{w\mid w\nmid p\text{, }E\text{ has good reduction at }w\text{ and }E(L_{\operatorname{cyc},w})\text{ has a point of order }p\}.\\ \end{split}

Let us discuss conditions under which

wPi(e(w)1)=0\sum_{w\in P_{i}}\left(e(w)-1\right)=0

for i=1,2i=1,2. We note here that the sums wPi(e(w)1)\sum_{w\in P_{i}}(e(w)-1) are supported only at primes wpw\nmid p of LcycL_{\operatorname{cyc}} that are ramified over KcycK_{\operatorname{cyc}}.

The following well known fact will prove to be very useful in our calculations.

Lemma 3.12.

Let GG be a finite abelian group of pp-power order and MM be a pp-primary GG-module. Suppose that MG=0M^{G}=0 or MG=0M_{G}=0, then M=0M=0.

Proof.

The stated result is [NSW08, Proposition 1.6.12]. ∎

Definition 3.13.

We introduce some further notation.

  • Let Q1Q_{1} be the set of primes vpv\nmid p of KK at which EE has bad reduction. Note that the set of primes Q1Q_{1} is finite.

  • Let Q2Q_{2} be the set of all primes vpv\nmid p of KK at which EE has good reduction and pp divides #E~(kv)\#\widetilde{E}(k_{v}). Here, kvk_{v} is the residue field of vv and E~\widetilde{E} is the reduction of EE at vv. This set of primes is possibly infinite.

  • Let Q3Q_{3} consist of the primes vpv\nmid p of KK that are in the complement of Q1Q2Q_{1}\cup Q_{2}.

Lemma 3.14.

Let ww be a prime of LcycL_{\operatorname{cyc}} and vv be the prime of KK such that w|vw|v. Assume that EE has good reduction at vv and that wP2w\in P_{2}. Then, we find that vQ2v\in Q_{2}.

Proof.

Suppose that wP2w\in P_{2}. Then, there is a large enough value of nn for which E(Ln,w)[p]0E(L_{n,w})[p]\neq 0. Since Lcyc/KL_{\operatorname{cyc}}/K is a pro-pp extension, from Lemma 3.12, it follows that

E(Ln,w)[p]0E(Kv)[p]0.E(L_{n,w})[p]\neq 0\Rightarrow E(K_{v})[p]\neq 0.

Let \ell be the prime number such that w|w|\ell. Then, the kernel of the reduction map

E(Kv)E~(kv)E(K_{v})\rightarrow\widetilde{E}(k_{v})

is a pro-\ell group. Since p\ell\neq p, it follows that there is an injection

E(Kv)[p]E~(kv)[p].E(K_{v})[p]\hookrightarrow\widetilde{E}(k_{v})[p].

This in turn implies that E~(kv)[p]0\widetilde{E}(k_{v})[p]\neq 0, and hence, vQ2v\in Q_{2}. ∎

Corollary 3.15.

Let E/KE_{/K} satisfy the conditions of Theorem B. Furthermore, assume that the only primes of KK that ramify in LL are in Q3Q_{3}. Then, we have that

λp(E/L)=[L:K]λp(E/K).\lambda_{p}(E/L)=[L\mathrel{\mathop{\mathchar 58\relax}}K]\lambda_{p}(E/K).
Proof.

Let wP1P2w\in P_{1}\cup P_{2} and vv be the prime of KK such that w|vw|v. Furthermore, assume that e(w)>1e(w)>1. From the formula (1.1), it suffices to show that no such ww exists. Since wpw\nmid p, it follows that vpv\nmid p. Assume first that vv is a prime of bad reduction for EE, i.e., vQ1v\in Q_{1}. Since L/KL/K is assumed to be unramified at all primes of Q1Q_{1} and Lcyc/LL_{\operatorname{cyc}}/L is unramified at all primes vpv\nmid p, it follows that vv is unramified in the extension Lcyc/KL_{\operatorname{cyc}}/K. This implies that e(w)=1e(w)=1 and hence this case cannot arise. Therefore, vv must be a prime of good reduction and so must be ww. Consequently, ww is not contained in P1P_{1}, and thus must be in P2P_{2}. Therefore by Lemma 3.14 we find that vQ2v\in Q_{2}. Thus, vQ3v\notin Q_{3} and must therefore be unramified in LL. Hence vv is unramified in LcycL_{\operatorname{cyc}}. However, e(w)>1e(w)>1 and gives a contradiction to this. Therefore, no such prime ww can exist and we obtain that

λp(E/L)=[L:K]λp(E/K),\lambda_{p}(E/L)=[L\mathrel{\mathop{\mathchar 58\relax}}K]\lambda_{p}(E/K),

since the local terms

wPi(e(w)1)=0\sum_{w\in P_{i}}(e(w)-1)=0

for i=1,2i=1,2. ∎

4. An Euler characteristic computation

Throughout this section MM will denote a cofinitely generated and cotorsion Λ\Lambda-module. Consider the module of invariants H0(Γ,M)=MΓH^{0}(\Gamma,M)=M^{\Gamma} and module of co-invariants H1(Γ,M)=MΓ=M/TMH^{1}(\Gamma,M)=M_{\Gamma}=M/TM. There is a natural map

ϕM:MΓMΓ,\phi_{M}\mathrel{\mathop{\mathchar 58\relax}}M^{\Gamma}\rightarrow M_{\Gamma},

that sends xMΓx\in M^{\Gamma} to xmodTMx\mod{TM} in MΓM_{\Gamma}. Since MM is cofinitely generated as a Λ\Lambda-module, MΓM^{\Gamma} and MΓM_{\Gamma} are cofinitely generated as p\mathbb{Z}_{p}-modules. Since Γp\Gamma\simeq\mathbb{Z}_{p} has cohomological dimension 11, we have that Hi(Γ,)=0H^{i}(\Gamma,\cdot)=0 for i2i\geq 2.

Lemma 4.1.

Letting MM be as above, we find that

corankpMΓ=corankpMΓ.\operatorname{corank}_{\mathbb{Z}_{p}}M^{\Gamma}=\operatorname{corank}_{\mathbb{Z}_{p}}M_{\Gamma}.
Proof.

It follows from [How02, Theorem 1.1] that

corankΛM=corankpMΓcorankpMΓ.\mathrm{corank}_{\Lambda}M=\operatorname{corank}_{\mathbb{Z}_{p}}M^{\Gamma}-\mathrm{corank}_{\mathbb{Z}_{p}}M_{\Gamma}.

Since MM is assumed to be cotorsion over Λ\Lambda, the result follows. ∎

In particular, the above Lemma implies that MΓM^{\Gamma} is finite if and only if MΓM_{\Gamma} is finite.

Definition 4.2.

Let MM be a cofinitely generated and cotorsion Λ\Lambda-module. Then, we say that the Euler characteristic of MM is well defined if MΓM^{\Gamma} (or equivalently) MΓM_{\Gamma} is finite. When this is the case, we define the Euler characteristic of MM as follows

χ(Γ,M):=i0(Hi(Γ,M))(1)i=(#MΓ#MΓ).\chi(\Gamma,M)\mathrel{\mathop{\mathchar 58\relax}}=\prod_{i\geq 0}\left(H^{i}(\Gamma,M)\right)^{(-1)^{i}}=\left(\frac{\#M^{\Gamma}}{\#M_{\Gamma}}\right).

Let NN denote the Pontryagin dual of MM. Thus, NN is finitely generated and torsion as a Λ\Lambda-module. Thus, NN is pseudo-isomorphic to NN^{\prime} where

(4.1) N=(i=1sΛ/(pmi))(j=1tΛ/(fj(T)nj)),N^{\prime}=\left(\bigoplus_{i=1}^{s}\Lambda/(p^{m_{i}})\right)\oplus\left(\bigoplus_{j=1}^{t}\Lambda/(f_{j}(T)^{n_{j}})\right),

cf. (2.2).

Definition 4.3.

Define the characteristic series as follows

fM(T):=ipmi×jfj(T)njf_{M}(T)\mathrel{\mathop{\mathchar 58\relax}}=\prod_{i}p^{m_{i}}\times\prod_{j}f_{j}(T)^{n_{j}}

and write

fM(T)=a0+a1T+a2T2++aλTλ.f_{M}(T)=a_{0}+a_{1}T+a_{2}T^{2}+\dots+a_{\lambda}T^{\lambda}.

Let aa and bb be pp-adic numbers, we write aba\sim b to mean that there exists up×u\in\mathbb{Z}_{p}^{\times} such that a=uba=ub.

Proposition 4.4.

Let MM be a cofinitely generated and cotorsion Λ\Lambda-module. Then, with respect to notation above, the following conditions are equivalent.

  1. (1)

    The Euler characteristic χ(Γ,M)\chi(\Gamma,M) is well defined in the sense of Definition 4.2.

  2. (2)

    a00a_{0}\neq 0.

Furthermore, if the above conditions are satisfied, then, χ(Γ,M)\chi(\Gamma,M) is an integer and

a0χ(Γ,M).a_{0}\sim\chi(\Gamma,M).
Proof.

Let NN denote the Pontryagin dual of MM. We can identify the Pontryagin dual of MΓM^{\Gamma} with N/TNN/TN. Note that N/TNN/TN is finite if and only if none of the distinguished polynomials fj(T)f_{j}(T) in (4.1) are divisible by TT. This in turn is equivalent to the condition that TfM(T)T\nmid f_{M}(T), i.e., a00a_{0}\neq 0. Thus, we find that the Euler characteristic is well defined if and only if a00a_{0}\neq 0. It is easy to see that if MM is pseudo-isomorphic to MM^{\prime}, then, χ(Γ,M)=χ(Γ,M)\chi(\Gamma,M)=\chi(\Gamma,M^{\prime}). Therefore, we may assume without loss of generality that

N=(i=1spT(pmi))(i=1spT(fj(T)nj)).N=\left(\bigoplus_{i=1}^{s}\frac{\mathbb{Z}_{p}\llbracket T\rrbracket}{(p^{m_{i}})}\right)\oplus\left(\bigoplus_{i=1}^{s}\frac{\mathbb{Z}_{p}\llbracket T\rrbracket}{(f_{j}(T)^{n_{j}})}\right).

Then, it is easy to see from the decomposition above that N[T]=0N[T]=0. Therefore, we have that MΓ=(N[T])=0M_{\Gamma}=\left(N[T]\right)^{\vee}=0. On the other hand,

MΓ=(N/TN)i/pmi×j/fj(0)nj.M^{\Gamma}=\left(N/TN\right)^{\vee}\simeq\prod_{i}\mathbb{Z}/p^{m_{i}}\times\prod_{j}\mathbb{Z}/f_{j}(0)^{n_{j}}.

Therefore, we find that

χ(Γ,M)f(0)=a0.\chi(\Gamma,M)\sim f(0)=a_{0}.

Lemma 4.5.

Let MM be a cofinitely generated and cotorsion Λ\Lambda-module for which the Euler characteristic is defined. Then the following assertions are equivalent

  1. (1)

    μp(M)=0\mu_{p}(M)=0 and λp(M)=0\lambda_{p}(M)=0,

  2. (2)

    a0a_{0} is not divisible by pp,

  3. (3)

    χ(Γ,M)=1\chi(\Gamma,M)=1.

Proof.

Let NN be the Pontryagin dual of MM. Then, by the structure theorem for finitely generated and torsion Λ\Lambda-modules, NN is pseudo-isomorphic to

N(i=1sΛ/(pmi))(j=1tΛ/(fj(T)nj)),N^{\prime}\simeq\left(\bigoplus_{i=1}^{s}\Lambda/(p^{m_{i}})\right)\oplus\left(\bigoplus_{j=1}^{t}\Lambda/(f_{j}(T)^{n_{j}})\right),

as in (2.2).

First we show that the conditions (1) and (2) are equivalent. Assume that μp(M)=0\mu_{p}(M)=0 and λp(M)=0\lambda_{p}(M)=0. Therefore, s=0s=0 and t=0t=0 in the above decomposition, and consequently, N=0N^{\prime}=0. Therefore fM(T)=1f_{M}(T)=1, and it thus follows that a0=1a_{0}=1. In particular, a0a_{0} is not divisible by pp. Conversely, suppose that pa0p\nmid a_{0}. By definition, fM(T)=pμp(M)gM(T)f_{M}(T)=p^{\mu_{p}(M)}g_{M}(T), where gM(T)g_{M}(T) is the distinguished polynomial jfj(T)nj\prod_{j}f_{j}(T)^{n_{j}}. In particular, we find that

a0=pμp(M)gM(0)a_{0}=p^{\mu_{p}(M)}g_{M}(0)

is not divisible by pp. This implies that μp(M)=0\mu_{p}(M)=0 and pgM(0)p\nmid g_{M}(0). However, gM(T)g_{M}(T) is distinguished and thus all its non-leading coefficients are divisible by pp. The only possibility therefore is if gM(T)=1g_{M}(T)=1. Recall that λp(M)\lambda_{p}(M) is the degree of gM(T)g_{M}(T), and we thus deduce that λp(M)=0\lambda_{p}(M)=0. This shows that (1) and (2) are equivalent.

Since the Euler characteristic is defined, it follows from Lemma 4.4 that χ(Γ,M)\chi(\Gamma,M) is an integer and moreover,

a0χ(Γ,M).a_{0}\sim\chi(\Gamma,M).

Thus we deduce that

pa0pχ(Γ,M).p\nmid a_{0}\Leftrightarrow p\nmid\chi(\Gamma,M).

Also note that by definition, χ(Γ,M)\chi(\Gamma,M) is a power of pp, and thus

pχ(Γ,M)χ(Γ,M)=1.p\nmid\chi(\Gamma,M)\Leftrightarrow\chi(\Gamma,M)=1.

This proves the equivalence of (2) and (3). The proof is thus complete. ∎

Throughout the rest of this section we set K:=K\mathrel{\mathop{\mathchar 58\relax}}=\mathbb{Q} and impose the following assumption.

Assumption 4.6.

Let EE be an elliptic curve over \mathbb{Q} and assume that EE has additive reduction at pp and that there is an extension L/L/\mathbb{Q} contained in (μp)\mathbb{Q}(\mu_{p}) such that EE has good ordinary reduction at π\pi, the prime of LL that lies above pp.

Note that Assumption 4.6 is a special case of the more general Assumption 3.1.

Proposition 4.7.

Let E/E_{/\mathbb{Q}} be an elliptic curve which satisfies Assumption 4.6. Moreover, assume that EE has analytic rank 0. Then, the following assertions hold.

  1. (1)

    The Selmer group Selp(E/cyc)\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/\mathbb{Q}_{\operatorname{cyc}}) is cotorsion over Λ\Lambda.

  2. (2)

    The Euler characteristic χ(Γ,Selp(E/cyc))\chi\left(\Gamma,\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/\mathbb{Q}_{\operatorname{cyc}})\right) is well defined.

Proof.

That the Selmer group Selp(E/cyc)\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/\mathbb{Q}_{\operatorname{cyc}}) is cotorsion over Λ\Lambda follows from [Del98, Theorem 3]. There is a natural map

α:Selp(E/)Selp(E/cyc)Γ\alpha\mathrel{\mathop{\mathchar 58\relax}}\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/\mathbb{Q})\rightarrow\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/\mathbb{Q}_{\operatorname{cyc}})^{\Gamma}

which has finite kernel and cokernel (cf. [Del98, p. 138 l.4 to p. 139 l. 11]). Since EE is assumed to have analytic rank 0, it follows that Selp(E/)\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/\mathbb{Q}) is finite. Since α\alpha has finite kernel and cokernel we deduce that Selp(E/cyc)Γ\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/\mathbb{Q}_{\operatorname{cyc}})^{\Gamma} is finite. Thus, the Euler characteristic of Selp(E/cyc)\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/\mathbb{Q}_{\operatorname{cyc}}) is defined. ∎

We introduce some further notation. Recall that E/LE_{/L} has good reduction at π\pi, let 𝔉\mathfrak{F} denote this reduction and

Π:E(Lπ)𝔉(𝔽p)\Pi\mathrel{\mathop{\mathchar 58\relax}}E(L_{\pi})\rightarrow\mathfrak{F}(\mathbb{F}_{p})

be the reduction map. The following Euler characteristic formula due to Delbourgo [Del98] will be used to construct elliptic curves E/E_{/\mathbb{Q}} for which μp(E/)\mu_{p}(E/\mathbb{Q}) and λp(E/)\lambda_{p}(E/\mathbb{Q}) will both be 0. Given a prime \ell, denote by c(E)c_{\ell}(E) the Tamagawa number of EE at \ell.

Theorem 4.8 (Euler characteristic formula).

Let E/E_{/\mathbb{Q}} be an elliptic curve satisfying the following conditions

  1. (1)

    Assumption 4.6 holds,

  2. (2)

    EE has analytic rank 0,

  3. (3)

    E()[p]=0E(\mathbb{Q})[p]=0.

Then, the Euler characteristic is given by

χ(Γ,Selp(E/cyc)#(E/)[p]×#𝔉(𝔽p)×#Π(E(p))×pc(E).\chi(\Gamma,\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/\mathbb{Q}_{\operatorname{cyc}})\sim\#\Sh(E/\mathbb{Q})[p^{\infty}]\times\#\mathfrak{F}(\mathbb{F}_{p})\times\#\Pi\left(E(\mathbb{Q}_{p})\right)\times\prod_{\ell\neq p}c_{\ell}(E).
Proof.

The above result is due to Delbourgo, cf. [Del98, p.148, l.-5 ]. ∎

The above formula gives us an explicit criterion for the vanishing of the μ\mu and λ\lambda-invariants of Selp(E/cyc)\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/\mathbb{Q}_{\operatorname{cyc}}).

Corollary 4.9.

Let EE be an elliptic curve over \mathbb{Q} satisfying the assumptions of Theorem 4.8. Then the following are equivalent.

  1. (1)

    λp(E/)=0\lambda_{p}(E/\mathbb{Q})=0 and μp(E/)=0\mu_{p}(E/\mathbb{Q})=0,

  2. (2)

    (E/)[p]\Sh(E/\mathbb{Q})[p^{\infty}] is trivial and #𝔉(𝔽p)\#\mathfrak{F}(\mathbb{F}_{p}), #Π(E(p))\#\Pi\left(E(\mathbb{Q}_{p})\right), c(E)c_{\ell}(E) for p\ell\neq p are not divisible by pp.

Proof.

By Theorem 4.8 above, the Euler characteristic χ(Γ,Selp(E/cyc))=1\chi(\Gamma,\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/\mathbb{Q}_{\operatorname{cyc}}))=1 if and only if (E/)[p]\Sh(E/\mathbb{Q})[p^{\infty}] is trivial and none of #𝔉(𝔽p)\#\mathfrak{F}(\mathbb{F}_{p}), #Π(E(p))\#\Pi\left(E(\mathbb{Q}_{p})\right), c(E)c_{\ell}(E) for p\ell\neq p are divisible by pp. Further, using Lemma 4.5 the Euler characteristic χ(Γ,Selp(E/cyc))=1\chi(\Gamma,\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/\mathbb{Q}_{\operatorname{cyc}}))=1 if and only if both λp(E/)=0\lambda_{p}(E/\mathbb{Q})=0 and μp(E/)=0\mu_{p}(E/\mathbb{Q})=0.
This shows that the conditions are equivalent, and completes the proof. ∎

An example

We give an example of an elliptic curve E/E/\mathbb{Q} for which the following conditions are satisfied.

  1. (1)

    EE has bad additive reduction at 33 and at the prime of (μ3)\mathbb{Q}(\mu_{3}) that lies above 33, it has good ordinary reduction.

  2. (2)

    The analytic rank of E/E/\mathbb{Q} is zero and consequently, Selp(E/)\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/\mathbb{Q}) is finite.

  3. (3)

    The Selmer group Selp(E/cyc)\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/\mathbb{Q}_{\operatorname{cyc}}) is cotorsion as a Λ\Lambda-module.

  4. (4)

    The invariants λp(E/)=0\lambda_{p}(E/\mathbb{Q})=0 and μp(E/)=0\mu_{p}(E/\mathbb{Q})=0.

Consider the curve E:y2+y=x33x5E\mathrel{\mathop{\mathchar 58\relax}}y^{2}+y=x^{3}-3x-5 over \mathbb{Q}. The conditions (1) and (2) above are checked on LMFDB. The condition (3) is satisfied due to part (1) of Proposition 4.7. Finally, the computations on [Del98, p. 149 l. -9 to p. 150 l. 5] show that the condition (2) in Corollary 4.9 are satisfied. This implies that the condition (4) above is satisfied by EE.

Let L/L/\mathbb{Q} be the /3\mathbb{Z}/3\mathbb{Z}-extension of \mathbb{Q} which is contained in (μ7)\mathbb{Q}(\mu_{7}). Then, the only prime that ramifies in LL is 77. This is a prime of good reduction for EE and it can be checked that #E~(𝔽7)=10\#\widetilde{E}(\mathbb{F}_{7})=10. Hence, E~(𝔽7)[3]=0\widetilde{E}(\mathbb{F}_{7})[3]=0 and we deduce that 7Q37\in Q_{3} (cf. Definition 3.13). Thus by Corollary 3.15, it follows that

λp(E/L)=3λp(E/)=0.\lambda_{p}(E/L)=3\lambda_{p}(E/\mathbb{Q})=0.

5. Density results

In this section we take K=K=\mathbb{Q} and L/L/\mathbb{Q} will always denote a Galois extension with Galois group Gal(L/)/p\operatorname{Gal}(L/\mathbb{Q})\simeq\mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z}. Set ΔL\Delta_{L} to be the discriminant of L/L/\mathbb{Q}. We fix an elliptic curve E/E_{/\mathbb{Q}}.

Assumption 5.1.

We assume throughout this section that the following assumptions are satisfied by EE.

  1. (1)

    There exists a finite Galois extension K/K^{\prime}/\mathbb{Q} with Galois group Δ:=Gal(K/)\Delta\mathrel{\mathop{\mathchar 58\relax}}=\operatorname{Gal}(K^{\prime}/\mathbb{Q}) over which EE has good reduction. Moreover, assume that p|Δ|p\nmid|\Delta|.

  2. (2)

    Let SaddS_{\operatorname{add}} be the set of primes vv of KK not dividing pp at which EE has additive reduction. Then all primes of SaddS_{\operatorname{add}} continue to have additive reduction in LcycL_{\operatorname{cyc}} (this condition is automatically satisfied when L/L/\mathbb{Q} is unramified at all primes of SaddS_{\operatorname{add}} or if p5p\geq 5).

  3. (3)

    The Selmer group Selp(E/cyc)\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/\mathbb{Q}_{\operatorname{cyc}}) is cofinitely generated and cotorsion over Λ\Lambda with

    μp(E/)=0 and λp(E/)=0.\mu_{p}(E/\mathbb{Q})=0\text{ and }\lambda_{p}(E/\mathbb{Q})=0.

The Corollary 4.9 gives us an explicit criterion for the above conditions to be satisfied. Recall that it was checked in the previous section that these conditions hold for the elliptic curve

E:y2+y=x33x5.E\mathrel{\mathop{\mathchar 58\relax}}y^{2}+y=x^{3}-3x-5.

Given a real number X>0X>0, 𝒮(X)\mathcal{S}(X) be the set of Galois extensions L/L/\mathbb{Q} with Gal(L/)/p\operatorname{Gal}(L/\mathbb{Q})\simeq\mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z} and such that |ΔL|X|\Delta_{L}|\leq X. It follows from the Hermite-Minkowski theorem that the set 𝒮(X)\mathcal{S}(X) is finite. Let 𝒮E(X)\mathcal{S}_{E}(X) be subset of 𝒮(X)\mathcal{S}(X) consisting of the extensions for which the following conditions hold

  • Selp(E/L)\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/L) is cofinitely generated and cotorsion over Λ\Lambda,

  • μp(E/L)=0\mu_{p}(E/L)=0 and λp(E/L)=0\lambda_{p}(E/L)=0.

We note that for L𝒮E(X)L\in\mathcal{S}_{E}(X), it follows from Proposition 3.3 that rankE(L)=0\operatorname{rank}E(L)=0. Thus, the rank remains stable in such extensions L/L/\mathbb{Q}. We prove asymptotic formulae for NE(X):=#𝒮E(X)N_{E}(X)\mathrel{\mathop{\mathchar 58\relax}}=\#\mathcal{S}_{E}(X) respectively. First, we recall the Tauberian theorem of Delange, which will be applied to obtain our result.

Theorem 5.2 (Delange’s Tauberian theorem).

Let f(s):=n=1annsf(s)\mathrel{\mathop{\mathchar 58\relax}}=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}a_{n}n^{-s} be a Dirichlet series with non-negative coefficients and a>0a>0 be a real number. Assume that f(s)f(s) converges for Re(s)>a\operatorname{Re}(s)>a and has a meromorphic continuation to a neighbourhood UU of Re(s)a\operatorname{Re}(s)\geq a. For X>0X>0, we set g(X):=nXang(X)\mathrel{\mathop{\mathchar 58\relax}}=\sum_{n\leq X}a_{n}. Assume that the only pole of f(s)f(s) is at s=as=a and the order of this pole is b>0b\in\mathbb{R}_{>0}, i.e.,

f(s)=1(sa)bh(s)f(s)=\frac{1}{(s-a)^{b}}h(s)

for some holomorphic function h(s)h(s) defined on UU. Then, there is a positive constant c>0c>0 such that XX\rightarrow\infty, we have that

g(X)cXa(logX)b1.g(X)\sim cX^{a}(\log X)^{b-1}.
Proof.

The result is a special case of [Ten15, Theorem 7.28]. ∎

Let L/L/\mathbb{Q} be a Galois extension with Gal(L/)/p\operatorname{Gal}(L/\mathbb{Q})\simeq\mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z} which is unramified at pp. Let 1,,k\ell_{1},\dots,\ell_{k} be primes that ramify in LL. It follows from class field theory that each of the primes i\ell_{i} is 1modp1\mod{p}. Let 1,,k\ell_{1},\dots,\ell_{k} be prime numbers that are 1modp1\mod{p}. Then, it is a straightforward exercise in class field theory that the number of /p\mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z}-extensions L/L/\mathbb{Q} that are ramified exactly at 1,,k\ell_{1},\dots,\ell_{k} is equal to (p1)k1(p-1)^{k-1}. Moreover, since the primes 1,,k\ell_{1},\dots,\ell_{k} are tamely ramified, it follows that L/L/\mathbb{Q} has discriminant ΔL=(i=1ki)p1\Delta_{L}=\left(\prod_{i=1}^{k}\ell_{i}\right)^{p-1}. We take 𝒬\mathcal{Q} to denote the set of primes Q3\ell\in Q_{3} (cf. Definition 3.13) such that 1modp\ell\equiv 1\mod{p}. Let α\alpha denote the natural density of 𝒬\mathcal{Q} and assume that α>0\alpha>0. Let

ρE,p:Gal(¯/)GL2(𝔽p)\rho_{E,p}\mathrel{\mathop{\mathchar 58\relax}}\operatorname{Gal}(\bar{\mathbb{Q}}/\mathbb{Q})\rightarrow\operatorname{GL}_{2}(\mathbb{F}_{p})

be the Galois representation on E[p]E[p].

Lemma 5.3.

Suppose that the representation ρE,p\rho_{E,p} is surjective, then

α=(p2p1p3p2p+1).\alpha=\left(\frac{p^{2}-p-1}{p^{3}-p^{2}-p+1}\right).
Proof.

Recall that a prime 𝒬\ell\in\mathcal{Q} if 1modp\ell\equiv 1\mod{p} and Q3\ell\in Q_{3}. The set Q3Q_{3} consists of primes p\ell\neq p such that EE has good reduction at \ell and E~(𝔽)[p]=0\widetilde{E}(\mathbb{F}_{\ell})[p]=0. Let a(E)a_{\ell}(E) denote the Frobenius trace of EE at \ell, note that

a(E)=+1#E~(𝔽).a_{\ell}(E)=\ell+1-\#\widetilde{E}(\mathbb{F}_{\ell}).

Since 1modp\ell\equiv 1\mod{p}, we find taht a(E)2#E~(𝔽)a_{\ell}(E)\equiv 2-\#\widetilde{E}(\mathbb{F}_{\ell}). Thus, we find that

E~(𝔽)[p]=0a(E)2modp.\widetilde{E}(\mathbb{F}_{\ell})[p]=0\Leftrightarrow a_{\ell}(E)\not\equiv 2\mod{p}.

Let σ\sigma_{\ell} denote the Frobenius at \ell. Since ρE,p\rho_{E,p} is unramified at \ell, there is a well defined matrix ρE,p(σ)GL2(𝔽)\rho_{E,p}(\sigma_{\ell})\in\operatorname{GL}_{2}(\mathbb{F}_{\ell}). Moreover, it follows from the Weil pairing that detρE,p=ω\operatorname{det}\rho_{E,p}=\omega, the mod-pp cyclotomic character. Therefore, we find that a prime p\ell\neq p of good reduction for EE is contained in 𝒬\mathcal{Q} if and only if

traceρE,p(σ)2, and detρE,p(σ)=1.\operatorname{trace}\rho_{E,p}(\sigma_{\ell})\neq 2,\text{ and }\operatorname{det}\rho_{E,p}(\sigma_{\ell})=1.

We take (E[p])\mathbb{Q}(E[p]) to denote the Galois extension of \mathbb{Q} which is fixed by the kernel of ρE,p\rho_{E,p}. We have a natural isomorphism

Gal((E[p])/)image(ρE,p)=GL2(𝔽p).\operatorname{Gal}\left(\mathbb{Q}(E[p])/\mathbb{Q}\right)\xrightarrow{\sim}\operatorname{image}(\rho_{E,p})=\operatorname{GL}_{2}(\mathbb{F}_{p}).

Thus one simply identifies Gal((E[p])/)\operatorname{Gal}\left(\mathbb{Q}(E[p])/\mathbb{Q}\right) with GL2(𝔽p)\operatorname{GL}_{2}(\mathbb{F}_{p}). With respect to this identification, 𝒬\ell\in\mathcal{Q} if and only if σ\sigma_{\ell} is a matrix with trace 2\neq 2 and determinant =1=1. It then follows from the Chebotarev density theorem that

α=#{ASL2(𝔽p)trace(A)2}#GL2(𝔽p).\alpha=\frac{\#\{A\in\operatorname{SL}_{2}(\mathbb{F}_{p})\mid\operatorname{trace}(A)\neq 2\}}{\#\operatorname{GL}_{2}(\mathbb{F}_{p})}.

We count the number of matrices of the form A=(abc2a)A=\left({\begin{array}[]{cc}a&b\\ c&2-a\\ \end{array}}\right) in SL2(𝔽p)\operatorname{SL}_{2}(\mathbb{F}_{p}). This equals the number of triples (a,b,c)𝔽p3(a,b,c)\in\mathbb{F}_{p}^{3} such that bc=a(2a)1=a2+2a1=(a1)2bc=a(2-a)-1=-a^{2}+2a-1=-(a-1)^{2}. It is easy to see that the number of such triples is equal to (p1)2+(2p1)(p-1)^{2}+(2p-1). Hence, we have

#{ASL2(𝔽p)trace(A)2}\displaystyle\#\{A\in\operatorname{SL}_{2}(\mathbb{F}_{p})\mid\operatorname{trace}(A)\neq 2\}
=\displaystyle= #SL2(𝔽p)(p1)2(2p1)\displaystyle\,\#\operatorname{SL}_{2}(\mathbb{F}_{p})-(p-1)^{2}-(2p-1)
=\displaystyle= p(p21)(p1)2(2p1)\displaystyle p(p^{2}-1)-(p-1)^{2}-(2p-1)
=\displaystyle= p3p2p.\displaystyle p^{3}-p^{2}-p.

Thus, we have shown that

α=(p3p2p(p2p)(p21))=(p2p1p3p2p+1).\alpha=\left(\frac{p^{3}-p^{2}-p}{(p^{2}-p)(p^{2}-1)}\right)=\left(\frac{p^{2}-p-1}{p^{3}-p^{2}-p+1}\right).

Remark 5.4.

Note that for our example from the previous section, ρE,3\rho_{E,3} is indeed surjective, as checked in LMFDB.

Given an integer of the form n=1kn=\ell_{1}\dots\ell_{k}, take an:=(p1)k1a_{n}\mathrel{\mathop{\mathchar 58\relax}}=(p-1)^{k-1} and set an:=0a_{n}\mathrel{\mathop{\mathchar 58\relax}}=0 otherwise. Then, we find from the discussion above that ana_{n} is the number of /p\mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z}-extensions L/L/\mathbb{Q} that are ramified at exactly the primes 1,,k\ell_{1},\dots,\ell_{k} and have discriminant np1n^{p-1}. Setting g(X):=nXang(X)\mathrel{\mathop{\mathchar 58\relax}}=\sum_{n\leq X}a_{n}, we find that

g(X)=#{LGal(L/)/p,|ΔL|X(p1), and L is ramified only at primes in 𝒬}.\begin{split}g(X)=\#\{L\mid&\operatorname{Gal}(L/\mathbb{Q})\simeq\mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z},|\Delta_{L}|\leq X^{(p-1)},\\ &\text{ and }L\text{ is ramified only at primes in }\mathcal{Q}\}.\end{split}
Proposition 5.5.

With respect to the notation above, let L/L/\mathbb{Q} be a /p\mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z} extension which is ramified only at a set of primes in 𝒬\mathcal{Q}. Then, the following conditions hold

  1. (1)

    Selp(E/L)\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/L) is cofinitely generated and cotorsion over Λ\Lambda,

  2. (2)

    μp(E/L)=0\mu_{p}(E/L)=0 and λp(E/L)=0\lambda_{p}(E/L)=0,

  3. (3)

    rankE(L)=0\operatorname{rank}E(L)=0.

Moreover, we find that

(5.1) g(X)NE(Xp1).g(X)\leq N_{E}(X^{p-1}).
Proof.

It follows from the assumptions on EE that the conditions of Theorem B are satisfied. Recall taht it is assumed that μp(E/)=0\mu_{p}(E/\mathbb{Q})=0 and λp(E/)=0\lambda_{p}(E/\mathbb{Q})=0. It follows from Theorem B that Selp(E/Lcyc)\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/L_{\operatorname{cyc}}) is cofinitely generated and cotorsion as a Λ\Lambda-module and μp(E/L)=0\mu_{p}(E/L)=0. Since 𝒬\mathcal{Q} is a subset of Q3Q_{3}, we deduce from Corollary 3.15 that λp(E/L)=0\lambda_{p}(E/L)=0 as well, and thus the conditions (1) and (2) above are both satisfied. Finally, since

rankE(L)λp(E/L)\operatorname{rank}E(L)\leq\lambda_{p}(E/L)

by Proposition 3.3, part (3) follows. That g(X)NE(Xp1)g(X)\leq N_{E}(X^{p-1}) simply follows as a consequence.
The result has thus been proven. ∎

We apply Delange’s Tauberian theorem (Theorem 5.2) to prove an asymptotic lower bound for g(X)g(X), and thus derive an asymptotic bound for NE(X)N_{E}(X).

Theorem 5.6.

With respect to notation above, we have that

NE(X)X1(p1)(logX)(p1)α1,N_{E}(X)\gg X^{\frac{1}{(p-1)}}(\log X)^{(p-1)\alpha-1},

where α\alpha is the density of 𝒬\mathcal{Q}.

Proof.

The proof of the result follows along the same lines as [Ser75, Theorem 2.4]. Nonetheless, we provide details for completeness. Set

f(s):=n=1anns=1(p1)T𝒬(p1)|T|(T)s=1(p1)𝒬(1+(p1)s).\begin{split}f(s)\mathrel{\mathop{\mathchar 58\relax}}=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}a_{n}n^{-s}&=\frac{1}{(p-1)}\sum_{T\subset\mathcal{Q}}(p-1)^{|T|}\left(\prod_{\ell\in T}\ell\right)^{-s}\\ &=\frac{1}{(p-1)}\prod_{\ell\in\mathcal{Q}}\left(1+(p-1)\ell^{-s}\right).\end{split}

It is easy to see that

logf(s)=(p1)𝒬s+k1(s),\log f(s)=(p-1)\sum_{\ell\in\mathcal{Q}}\ell^{-s}+k_{1}(s),

where k1(s)k_{1}(s) is holomorphic on Re(s)1\operatorname{Re}(s)\geq 1; and as a consequence,

logf(s)=(p1)αlog(1s1)+k2(s),\log f(s)=(p-1)\alpha\log\left(\frac{1}{s-1}\right)+k_{2}(s),

where k2(s)k_{2}(s) is holomorphic on Re(s)1\operatorname{Re}(s)\geq 1. Thus, we deduce that

f(s)=(s1)(p1)αh(s),f(s)=(s-1)^{-(p-1)\alpha}h(s),

where h(s)h(s) is a non-zero holomorphic function on Re(s)1\operatorname{Re}(s)\geq 1. It follows from the Theorem 5.2 that

g(X)cX(logX)(p1)α1,g(X)\sim cX(\log X)^{(p-1)\alpha-1},

where c>0c>0 is a constant that does not depend on XX. It then follows from (5.1) that

NE(X)X1(p1)(logX)(p1)α1.N_{E}(X)\gg X^{\frac{1}{(p-1)}}(\log X)^{(p-1)\alpha-1}.

This completes the proof of the result. ∎

We now give the proof of Theorem C.

Proof of Theorem C.

Since it is assumed that ρE,p\rho_{E,p} is surjective, it follows from Lemma 5.3 that

α=(p2p1p3p2p+1).\alpha=\left(\frac{p^{2}-p-1}{p^{3}-p^{2}-p+1}\right).

Noting that β=α(p1)1-\beta=\alpha(p-1)-1, the result is thus follows as a direct consequence of Theorem 5.6. ∎

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate:

Not applicable, no animals were studied or involved in the preparation of this manuscript.

Consent for publication:

The authors give their consent for the publication of the manuscript under review.

Availability of data and materials:

No data was generated or analyzed in obtaining the results in this article.

Competing interests:

There are no competing interests to report.

Funding:

There are no funding sources to report.

Authors’ contributions:

Both authors contributed equally in the preparation of this manuscript.

Acknowledgements:

There is no one that the authors wish to acknowledge.

References

  • [CG96] J. Coates and R. Greenberg. Kummer theory for abelian varieties over local fields. Invent. Math., 124(1-3):129–174, 1996.
  • [Del98] Daniel Delbourgo. Iwasawa theory for elliptic curves at unstable primes. Compositio Math., 113(2):123–153, 1998.
  • [DFK04] Chantal David, Jack Fearnley, and Hershy Kisilevsky. On the vanishing of twisted LL-functions of elliptic curves. Experiment. Math., 13(2):185–198, 2004.
  • [DFK07] Chantal David, Jack Fearnley, and Hershy Kisilevsky. Vanishing of LL-functions of elliptic curves over number fields. In Ranks of elliptic curves and random matrix theory, volume 341 of London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser., pages 247–259. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2007.
  • [FW79] Bruce Ferrero and Lawrence C. Washington. The Iwasawa invariant μp\mu_{p} vanishes for abelian number fields. Ann. of Math. (2), 109(2):377–395, 1979.
  • [Gre99] Ralph Greenberg. Iwasawa theory for elliptic curves. In Arithmetic theory of elliptic curves (Cetraro, 1997), volume 1716 of Lecture Notes in Math., pages 51–144. Springer, Berlin, 1999.
  • [Gre01] Ralph Greenberg. Introduction to Iwasawa theory for elliptic curves. In Arithmetic algebraic geometry (Park City, UT, 1999), volume 9 of IAS/Park City Math. Ser., pages 407–464. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2001.
  • [HM99] Yoshitaka Hachimori and Kazuo Matsuno. An analogue of Kida’s formula for the Selmer groups of elliptic curves. J. Algebraic Geom., 8(3):581–601, 1999.
  • [How02] Susan Howson. Euler characteristics as invariants of Iwasawa modules. Proc. London Math. Soc. (3), 85(3):634–658, 2002.
  • [Ima75] Hideo Imai. A remark on the rational points of abelian varieties with values in cyclotomic p\mathbb{Z}_{p}-extensions. Proc. Japan Acad., 51:12–16, 1975.
  • [Iwa73] Kenkichi Iwasawa. On 𝐙l{\bf Z}_{l}-extensions of algebraic number fields. Ann. of Math. (2), 98:246–326, 1973.
  • [Iwa81] Kenkichi Iwasawa. Riemann-Hurwitz formula and pp-adic Galois representations for number fields. Tohoku Math. J., Second Series, 33(2):263–288, 1981.
  • [Kat04] Kazuya Kato. pp-adic Hodge theory and values of zeta functions of modular forms. Number 295, pages ix, 117–290. 2004. Cohomologies pp-adiques et applications arithmétiques. III.
  • [Kid80] Yûji Kida. \ell-extensions of CM-fields and cyclotomic invariants. J. Number Theory, 12:519–528, 1980.
  • [KR22] Debanjana Kundu and Anwesh Ray. Iwasawa invariants for elliptic curves over p\mathbb{Z}_{p}-extensions and Kida’s formula. Forum Math., 34(4):945–967, 2022.
  • [M8̈5] Sirpa Mäki. On the density of abelian number fields. Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Ser. A I Math. Dissertationes, (54):104, 1985.
  • [Mal02] Gunter Malle. On the distribution of Galois groups. Journal of Number Theory, 92(2):315–329, 2002.
  • [Mal04] Gunter Malle. On the distribution of Galois groups, II. Experimental Mathematics, 13(2):129–135, 2004.
  • [Maz72] Barry Mazur. Rational points of abelian varieties with values in towers of number fields. Invent. Math., 18(3-4):183–266, 1972.
  • [MR18] Barry Mazur and Karl Rubin. Diophantine stability. Amer. J. Math., 140(3):571–616, 2018. With an appendix by Michael Larsen.
  • [NSW08] Jürgen Neukirch, Alexander Schmidt, and Kay Wingberg. Cohomology of number fields, volume 323 of Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences]. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, second edition, 2008.
  • [Ray23] Anwesh Ray. Arithmetic statistics and diophantine stability for elliptic curves. Ramanujan J., 62(1):215–239, 2023.
  • [Ser75] Jean-Pierre Serre. Divisibilité de certaines fonctions arithmétiques. In Séminaire Delange-Pisot-Poitou (16e année: 1974/75), Théorie des nombres, Fasc. 1, pages Exp. No. 20, 28. Secrétariat Math., Paris, 1975.
  • [Ten15] Gérald Tenenbaum. Introduction to analytic and probabilistic number theory, volume 163. American Mathematical Soc., 2015.
  • [Was97] Lawrence C. Washington. Introduction to cyclotomic fields, volume 83 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, New York, second edition, 1997.
  • [Wri89] David J. Wright. Distribution of discriminants of abelian extensions. Proc. London Math. Soc. (3), 58(1):17–50, 1989.