This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

All-silicon quantum light source by embedding an atomic emissive center in a nanophotonic cavity

Walid Redjem Equal contribution Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA    Yertay Zhiyenbayev Equal contribution Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA    Wayesh Qarony Equal contribution Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA    Vsevolod Ivanov Accelerator Technology and Applied Physics Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA    Christos Papapanos Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA    Wei Liu Accelerator Technology and Applied Physics Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA    Kaushalya Jhuria Accelerator Technology and Applied Physics Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA    Zakaria Al Balushi Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, USA Materials Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA    Scott Dhuey Molecular Foundry, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA    Adam Schwartzberg Molecular Foundry, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA    Liang Tan Molecular Foundry, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA    Thomas Schenkel Accelerator Technology and Applied Physics Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA    Boubacar Kanté Corresponding author: [email protected] Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA Materials Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
Abstract

Silicon is the most scalable optoelectronic material, and it has revolutionized our lives in many ways. The prospect of quantum optics in silicon is an exciting avenue because it has the potential to address the scaling and integration challenges, the most pressing questions facing quantum science and technology. We report the first all-silicon quantum light source based on a single atomic emissive center embedded in a silicon-based nanophotonic cavity. We observe a more than 30-fold enhancement of luminescence, a near unity atom-cavity coupling efficiency, and an 8-fold acceleration of the emission from the quantum center. Our work opens avenues for large-scale integrated all-silicon cavity quantum electrodynamics and quantum photon interfaces with applications in quantum communication, sensing, imaging, and computing.

preprint: APS/123-QED

Quantum science and technologies promise to revolutionize our societies [1, 2]. In the search for the ideal quantum information processing platform, “scaling” is perhaps the most challenging question due to the fundamental but contradictory requirements for quantum systems to simultaneously be isolated and controllable from the environment in large arrays of interacting qubits [3, 4]. Among many quantum information platforms ranging from superconducting qubits to trapped ions, quantum photons play a fundamental role because they are necessary for future quantum networks to enable communication between distant quantum nodes [5, 6, 7, 8, 9]. Quantum photons have been generated from an extensive range of platforms, including quantum dots, color-centers in diamonds such as NV, SiV, and SnV, or defects in two-dimensional materials such as hBN [10, 11, 12, 13, 14]. The scaling challenge is currently being addressed using hybrid material platforms and metamaterials in which quantum light sources are optimized and integrated into more complex scalable systems, following the example of heterogeneous integration in the classical domain [15, 16, 17, 18]. However, the challenge for integrating quantum devices is more significant than for classical systems because each interface allows losses and decoherence that need to be minimized. It is thus fundamental to minimize the number of interfaces by deeply integrating intrinsically scalable platforms.

Silicon is currently the most scalable optoelectronic material. Despite the lack of efficient classical light sources based on silicon, emissive centers have been observed in silicon since the end of the 1980s [19]. It is only during the last two years that single centers in silicon have been isolated [20, 21, 22, 23]. Since then, emissive centers in silicon have been coupled to waveguides, and more recently, an ensemble of centers has been integrated into ring resonators [24, 25, 26, 27]. However, deterministic single photon sources based on silicon emissive centers have remained elusive due to the lack of controlled manufacturing approaches and the complexity of materials interfaces after device fabrication. We report the first all-silicon quantum light source based on an atomic emissive center in a silicon nanophotonic cavity. The manufacturing of the centers in silicon-on-insulator substrates, with controlled densities and dipole orientations, enables their overlap with designed nanophotonic cavities. We demonstrate the successful alignment of a quantum defect and nanophotonic cavity dipole moments and tune the nanophotonic cavity to overlap its resonance with the zero-phonon line of the silicon-based quantum defect. We achieve a more than 30-fold enhancement of the luminescence intensity and an 8-fold acceleration of the single photon emission rate. Our results open the door to large-scale integrated all-silicon quantum optics devices and systems for applications in quantum communication, sensing, imaging, and computing.

The proposed all-silicon atom-cavity system, presented in Fig. 1A, consists of a single defect in silicon embedded in a photonic crystal (PhC) defect cavity. The PhC cavity consists of three missing holes in a suspended triangular lattice of holes [28]. The atomic defect, the G-center in silicon, is made of two substitutional carbon atoms (black spheres) bound to the same silicon self-interstitial (blue sphere). The manufacturing process starts with the implantation of carbon (13C) with an energy of 36 keV in a commercial 230 nm thick silicon-on-insulator (SOI) wafer. The implantation is followed by electron beam lithography, dry etching, thermal annealing, and wet etching (see Supplementary Materials). Secondary ion mass spectroscopy (SIMS) measurements indicate that the implanted carbon and the atomic centers created during the annealing process are located in the middle of the silicon layer (see Supplementary Materials).

The dipole moment of the center is computed by density functional theory [29]. It is in the plane as indicated by the red arrow in the inset of Fig.1A. The G-center is one of a broad diversity of recently observed emissive centers in silicon and its electronic structure, presented in Fig. 1B, comprises a ground singlet state, a dark excited triplet state, and an excited singlet state [30]. The computed electromagnetic mode of the cavity for the transverse electric polarization is superimposed on the sketch of the PhC, evidencing the high confinement of the electromagnetic field in the region of missing holes in the triangular lattice. This polarization matches the orientation of the atomic defect dipole moment. The deterministic positioning of atomic-scale defects in photonic cavities has been challenging for most platforms and has not yet been achieved for silicon-emissive centers. It requires not only overlap of the quantum defect with highly confined optical modes but also the alignment of the dipole moments of the atom and the cavity. To overcome this challenge in our platform, we first investigated the scalable manufacturing of single emissive centers with controllable densities and inhomogeneous broadening. We identified an annealing time window below which only ensembles of centers are created and beyond which all single centers are destroyed (see Supplementary Materials). We also find that shorter annealing time within that window minimizes the inhomogeneous broadening of the zero-phonon line (ZPL) of the quantum emitters, a critical requirement for overlapping the ZPL with a designed nanophotonic resonance to enhance light-matter interaction (see Supplementary Materials). The controlled density and inhomogeneous broadening of quantum centers increase the probability of overlap with an array of finite-size photonic crystal cavities. We subsequently investigated the polarization response of created emissive centers, and a statistical analysis presented in the supplementary materials indicates a preferential orientation of the emitters in silicon. We then fabricate PhC cavities so that the dipole moments of the cavities and centers align. Fig. 1C presents a scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of a fabricated silicon-based atom-cavity system. The inset presents the cavity with a mode volume of 0.66(λcav/n)30.66(\lambda_{\text{cav}}/n)^{3}. The successful embedding of a single center in a cavity involved a controlled sequence of CMOS-compatible fabrication steps.

Fig. 2A presents the photoluminescence (PL) raster scan of a device with bright emission from a color center within the boundaries of the cavity. The dashed white line indicates the boundary of the finite PhC, and the suspended PhC is surrounded by the silicon-on-insulator (SOI) wafer. The photoluminescence of the photonic device, presented in Fig. 2B, exhibits a sharp peak at  1275 nm and a blue-shifted broader peak at  1272 nm, corresponding to the ZPL of the color-center and the cavity resonance, respectively. The cavity is further characterized in reflectivity using resonant scattering measurements in Fig. 2C. The cavity is illuminated with a linearly polarized white light source (white arrow) at 45 degrees with respect to the cavity axis that is along the X-direction. The signal polarized perpendicular to the excitation is collected (red arrow) to probe the cavity mode, and resonance is observed at  1272 nm, in perfect agreement with the PL measurement. The reflectivity is fitted with a Fano resonance line shape giving an intrinsic quality factor (QQ) of 3209. The experimental value is comparable to the theoretical QQ of 6000 and the discrepancy is attributed to fabrication imperfections. Fig. 2D presents the polarization diagram of the cavity mode detuned from the ZPL in orange and the polarization diagram of a quantum emitter alone in black. The polarizations agree well with a dipolar model (solid lines) and have been successfully aligned.

In Fig. 3A, the spectrum of the quantum emitter over a broad range of energy shows the zero-phonon line (ZPL) of the silicon emissive center and its phonon sideband. Fig. 3B presents the spectrum of the quantum emitter using a high-resolution grating. The ZPL is located at 972.43 meV and has a linewidth of 8.3 GHz. To demonstrate that the bright emission from the middle of the cavity corresponds to a single emissive center, we performed quantum coherence measurements of the emitter in the cavity. Autocorrelation measurements, shown in Fig. 3C, are performed using a Hanbury-Brown and Twiss interferometer with superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors (see Supplementary Materials). The second-order correlation measurements of the emission from the cavity under continuous excitation exhibit an antibunching, confirming the successful spatial overlap of a single silicon emissive center with the nanophotonic cavity with an antibunching at a zero delay g(2)(0)=0.30±0.07g^{(2)}(0)=0.30\pm 0.07. Autocorrelation measurements under pulsed excitation at a repetition rate of 10 MHz are presented in Fig. 3D and they demonstrate on-demand single-photon generation from the all-silicon platform.

The enhancement of the single center in the cavity requires spatial and spectral overlap. Spatial overlap was achieved in Fig. 2 and Fig. 3. To achieve spectral overlap, the nanophotonic cavity is tuned using cycles of argon gas injection. The injected gas condensates at the surface of the PhC and modifies the effective index of cavity mode tuning the resonance wavelength of the cavity that is shifted from  1269 nm to  1275 nm. In Fig. 4A, as the cavity resonance is shifted towards the ZPL of the quantum center, the photoluminescence is enhanced to reach a maximum at  1275 nm, where the spectral overlap is achieved. In Fig. 4B, the ZPL intensity as a function of the cavity detuning shows an enhancement larger than 30 achieved on resonance. For cavity detuning varying from δ\delta = 2.40 nm to δ\delta = 0.00 nm, the excited lifetime shortens from 53.6 ns to 6.7 ns. An 8-fold reduction in the lifetime is experimentally observed when the overlap is achieved compared to the off-resonance case. Light-matter interaction in cavities is usually quantified using the Purcell factor (FpF_{p}) that measures the decay rate enhancement of the atom from free space to the cavity (γcav=Fpγ0\gamma_{\text{cav}}=F_{p}\gamma_{0}). It can be estimated by Fp=(τbulk/τonτbulk/τoff)/ηF_{p}=(\tau_{\text{bulk}}/\tau_{\text{on}}-\tau_{\text{bulk}}/\tau_{\text{off}})/\eta where τbulk\tau_{\text{bulk}} is the lifetime of a quantum emitter outside the PhC (dark yellow dots in Fig. 4C), and τoff\tau_{\text{off}} is the lifetime for a detuning of 2.4 nm. The lifetime measured off-resonance is slightly longer than the one in the bulk because of the reduced density of state in the PhC gap [31]. The percentage of photons emitted at the ZPL wavelength of the emitter (Debye-Waller) is η=15%\eta=15\%, which was measured by comparing the count rate with and without the ZPL bandpass filter. The experimental Purcell factor of the defect cavity is Fp29.0F_{p}\sim 29.0. The coupling efficiency of the center to the cavity mode (β\beta factor) can be estimated by 1/τon/[1/τon+1/τoff]1/\tau_{on}/[1/\tau_{on}+1/\tau_{off}], yielding a value of β89%\beta\sim 89\%.

We thus reported the first all-silicon quantum light source based on an atomic emissive center in a silicon-based nanophotonic cavity. The quantum light source in silicon is one of a broad diversity of recently discovered centers that we successfully embedded in a silicon-on-insulator photonic crystal cavity. The quantum center is manufactured in silicon using a sequence of CMOS compatible steps that control the density, inhomogeneous broadening, and orientation of the dipolar moment of the emitters, enabling their efficient overlap with designed nanophotonic cavities. The performance of the quantum light source can be further improved by developing cavities with higher quality factors as well as more deterministic positioning methods to further improve the emitter-cavity spatial overlap. Our results will enable all-silicon quantum optics interfaces with silicon-emissive centers for scalable and integrated quantum optoelectronics.

References

  • Nielsen et al. [2002] M. A. Nielsen, I. Chuang, and L. K. Grover, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information, Am. J. Phys. 70 (2002).
  • MacFarlane et al. [2003] A. G. J. MacFarlane, J. P. Dowling, and G. J. Milburn, Quantum technology: the second quantum revolution, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 361, 1655 (2003).
  • de Leon et al. [2021] N. P. de Leon, K. M. Itoh, D. Kim, K. K. Mehta, T. E. Northup, H. Paik, B. S. Palmer, N. Samarth, S. Sangtawesin, and D. W. Steuerman, Materials challenges and opportunities for quantum computing hardware, Science 372, eabb2823 (2021).
  • Arute et al. [2019] F. Arute, K. Arya, R. Babbush, D. Bacon, J. C. Bardin, R. Barends, R. Biswas, S. Boixo, F. G. S. L. Brandao, D. A. Buell, B. Burkett, Y. Chen, Z. Chen, B. Chiaro, R. Collins, W. Courtney, A. Dunsworth, E. Farhi, B. Foxen, A. Fowler, C. Gidney, M. Giustina, R. Graff, K. Guerin, S. Habegger, M. P. Harrigan, M. J. Hartmann, A. Ho, M. Hoffmann, T. Huang, T. S. Humble, S. V. Isakov, E. Jeffrey, Z. Jiang, D. Kafri, K. Kechedzhi, J. Kelly, P. V. Klimov, S. Knysh, A. Korotkov, F. Kostritsa, D. Landhuis, M. Lindmark, E. Lucero, D. Lyakh, S. Mandrà, J. R. McClean, M. McEwen, A. Megrant, X. Mi, K. Michielsen, M. Mohseni, J. Mutus, O. Naaman, M. Neeley, C. Neill, M. Y. Niu, E. Ostby, A. Petukhov, J. C. Platt, C. Quintana, E. G. Rieffel, P. Roushan, N. C. Rubin, D. Sank, K. J. Satzinger, V. Smelyanskiy, K. J. Sung, M. D. Trevithick, A. Vainsencher, B. Villalonga, T. White, Z. J. Yao, P. Yeh, A. Zalcman, H. Neven, and J. M. Martinis, Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor, Nature 574, 505 (2019).
  • Bouwmeester et al. [1997] D. Bouwmeester, J.-W. Pan, K. Mattle, M. Eibl, H. Weinfurter, and A. Zeilinger, Experimental quantum teleportation, Nature 390, 575 (1997).
  • Clarke and Wilhelm [2008] J. Clarke and F. K. Wilhelm, Superconducting quantum bits, Nature 453, 1031 (2008).
  • Devoret and Schoelkopf [2013] M. H. Devoret and R. J. Schoelkopf, Superconducting Circuits for Quantum Information: An Outlook, Science 339, 1169 (2013).
  • Monroe and Kim [2013] C. Monroe and J. Kim, Scaling the Ion Trap Quantum Processor, Science 339, 1164 (2013).
  • Kimble [2008] H. J. Kimble, The quantum internet, Nature 453, 1023 (2008).
  • Santori et al. [2002] C. Santori, D. Fattal, J. Vučković, G. S. Solomon, and Y. Yamamoto, Indistinguishable photons from a single-photon device, Nature 419, 594 (2002).
  • Gruber et al. [1997] A. Gruber, A. Dräbenstedt, C. Tietz, L. Fleury, J. Wrachtrup, and C. v. Borczyskowski, Scanning Confocal Optical Microscopy and Magnetic Resonance on Single Defect Centers, Science 276, 2012 (1997).
  • Lee et al. [2014] J. C. Lee, D. O. Bracher, S. Cui, K. Ohno, C. A. McLellan, X. Zhang, P. Andrich, B. Alemán, K. J. Russell, A. P. Magyar, I. Aharonovich, A. Bleszynski Jayich, D. Awschalom, and E. L. Hu, Deterministic coupling of delta-doped nitrogen vacancy centers to a nanobeam photonic crystal cavity, Applied Physics Letters 105, 261101 (2014).
  • Hayee et al. [2020] F. Hayee, L. Yu, J. L. Zhang, C. J. Ciccarino, M. Nguyen, A. F. Marshall, I. Aharonovich, J. Vučković, P. Narang, T. F. Heinz, and J. A. Dionne, Revealing multiple classes of stable quantum emitters in hexagonal boron nitride with correlated optical and electron microscopy, Nature Materials 19, 534 (2020).
  • Xu et al. [2021] X. Xu, Z. O. Martin, D. Sychev, A. S. Lagutchev, Y. P. Chen, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, V. M. Shalaev, and A. Boltasseva, Creating Quantum Emitters in Hexagonal Boron Nitride Deterministically on Chip-Compatible Substrates, Nano Letters 21, 8182 (2021).
  • Elshaari et al. [2020] A. W. Elshaari, W. Pernice, K. Srinivasan, O. Benson, and V. Zwiller, Hybrid integrated quantum photonic circuits, Nature Photonics 14, 285 (2020).
  • Wan et al. [2020] N. H. Wan, T.-J. Lu, K. C. Chen, M. P. Walsh, M. E. Trusheim, L. De Santis, E. A. Bersin, I. B. Harris, S. L. Mouradian, I. R. Christen, E. S. Bielejec, and D. Englund, Large-scale integration of artificial atoms in hybrid photonic circuits, Nature 583, 226 (2020).
  • Carter et al. [2013] S. G. Carter, T. M. Sweeney, M. Kim, C. S. Kim, D. Solenov, S. E. Economou, T. L. Reinecke, L. Yang, A. S. Bracker, and D. Gammon, Quantum control of a spin qubit coupled to a photonic crystal cavity, Nature Photonics 7, 329 (2013).
  • Santiago-Cruz et al. [2022] T. Santiago-Cruz, S. D. Gennaro, O. Mitrofanov, S. Addamane, J. Reno, I. Brener, and M. V. Chekhova, Resonant metasurfaces for generating complex quantum states, Science 377, 991 (2022).
  • Davies [1989] G. Davies, The optical properties of luminescence centres in silicon, Physics Reports 176, 83 (1989).
  • Redjem et al. [2020] W. Redjem, A. Durand, T. Herzig, A. Benali, S. Pezzagna, J. Meijer, A. Y. Kuznetsov, H. S. Nguyen, S. Cueff, J.-M. Gérard, I. Robert-Philip, B. Gil, D. Caliste, P. Pochet, M. Abbarchi, V. Jacques, A. Dréau, and G. Cassabois, Single artificial atoms in silicon emitting at telecom wavelengths, Nature Electronics 3, 738 (2020).
  • Hollenbach et al. [2020] M. Hollenbach, Y. Berencén, U. Kentsch, M. Helm, and G. V. Astakhov, Engineering telecom single-photon emitters in silicon for scalable quantum photonics, Optics Express 28, 26111 (2020).
  • Durand et al. [2021] A. Durand, Y. Baron, W. Redjem, T. Herzig, A. Benali, S. Pezzagna, J. Meijer, A. Kuznetsov, J.-M. Gérard, I. Robert-Philip, M. Abbarchi, V. Jacques, G. Cassabois, and A. Dréau, Broad Diversity of Near-Infrared Single-Photon Emitters in Silicon, Physical Review Letters 126, 083602 (2021).
  • Higginbottom et al. [2022] D. B. Higginbottom, A. T. K. Kurkjian, C. Chartrand, M. Kazemi, N. A. Brunelle, E. R. MacQuarrie, J. R. Klein, N. R. Lee-Hone, J. Stacho, M. Ruether, C. Bowness, L. Bergeron, A. DeAbreu, S. R. Harrigan, J. Kanaganayagam, D. W. Marsden, T. S. Richards, L. A. Stott, S. Roorda, K. J. Morse, M. L. W. Thewalt, and S. Simmons, Optical observation of single spins in silicon, Nature 607, 266 (2022).
  • Prabhu et al. [2022] M. Prabhu, C. Errando-Herranz, L. De Santis, I. Christen, C. Chen, and D. R. Englund, Individually Addressable Artificial Atoms in Silicon Photonics (2022), arXiv:2202.02342.
  • DeAbreu et al. [2022] A. DeAbreu, C. Bowness, A. Alizadeh, C. Chartrand, N. A. Brunelle, E. R. MacQuarrie, N. R. Lee-Hone, M. Ruether, M. Kazemi, A. T. K. Kurkjian, S. Roorda, N. V. Abrosimov, H.-J. Pohl, M. L. W. Thewalt, D. B. Higginbottom, and S. Simmons, Waveguide-integrated silicon T centres (2022), arXiv:2209.14260.
  • Komza et al. [2022] L. Komza, P. Samutpraphoot, M. Odeh, Y.-L. Tang, M. Mathew, J. Chang, H. Song, M.-K. Kim, Y. Xiong, G. Hautier, and A. Sipahigil, Indistinguishable photons from an artificial atom in silicon photonics (2022), arXiv:2211.09305.
  • Lefaucher et al. [2022] B. Lefaucher, J.-B. Jager, V. Calvo, A. Durand, Y. Baron, F. Cache, V. Jacques, I. Robert-Philip, G. Cassabois, T. Herzig, J. Meijer, S. Pezzagna, M. Khoury, M. Abbarchi, A. Dréau, and J.-M. Gérard, Cavity-enhanced zero-phonon emission from an ensemble of G centers in a silicon-on-insulator microring (2022), arXiv:2210.05485.
  • Sakoda [2005] K. Sakoda, Optical Properties of Photonic Crystals, edited by W. T. Rhodes, T. Asakura, K.-H. Brenner, T. W. Hänsch, T. Kamiya, F. Krausz, B. Monemar, H. Venghaus, H. Weber, and H. Weinfurter, Springer Series in Optical Sciences, Vol. 80 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2005).
  • Ivanov et al. [2022] V. Ivanov, J. Simoni, Y. Lee, W. Liu, K. Jhuria, W. Redjem, Y. Zhiyenbayev, C. Papapanos, W. Qarony, B. Kanté, A. Persaud, T. Schenkel, and L. Z. Tan, Effect of localization on photoluminescence and zero-field splitting of silicon color centers, Physical Review B 106, 134107 (2022).
  • Udvarhelyi et al. [2021] P. Udvarhelyi, B. Somogyi, G. Thiering, and A. Gali, Identification of a Telecom Wavelength Single Photon Emitter in Silicon, Physical Review Letters 127, 196402 (2021).
  • Yablonovitch [1987] E. Yablonovitch, Inhibited Spontaneous Emission in Solid-State Physics and Electronics, Physical Review Letters 58, 2059 (1987).
Refer to caption
Figure 1: A single atomic emissive center embedded in a silicon-photonic cavity. (A) Silicon quantum interface with an “atomic defect” located within the “photonic defect” cavity of three missing holes in a triangular photonic crystal (PhC). The atomic defect is the G-center in silicon made of two substitutional carbon atoms (black spheres) bound to the same silicon self-interstitial (blue sphere). The red arrow indicates the direction of the dipole moment of the G-center. The G-center is one of a broad diversity of recently observed emissive centers in silicon, the most scalable optoelectronic material. The computed electromagnetic mode of the cavity is superimposed on the sketch of the PhC, evidencing the high confinement of the electromagnetic field in the region of missing holes in the triangular lattice. The cavity is fabricated so that its dipole moment and the dipole moment of the defect are colinear (see Supplementary Materials). The electric field strength peaks at the center of the cavity and exponentially decays in the bulk of the PhC. (B) Energy level diagram of the G-center in silicon comprising a ground singlet state, a dark excited triplet state, and an excited singlet state. The cavity can be tuned to be in resonance with the radiative transition between the excited and ground singlet states to enhance light-matter interaction. (C) Scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of a fabricated silicon-based atom-cavity system suspended in the air. The successful embedding of a single G-center in a photonic cavity involved a controlled sequence of fabrication steps using a commercial 230 nm thick silicon-on-insulator (SOI) wafer that is carbon implanted, followed by electron beam lithography, dry etching, thermal annealing, and wet etching (see Supplementary Materials). The fabrication steps, compatible with standard CMOS processes, are optimized to increase the probability of single color centers in cavities (see Supplementary Materials).
Refer to caption
Figure 2: Experimental characterization of the silicon-based quantum emitter and cavity. (A) Photoluminescence (PL) raster scan of a device with a single emitter in the cavity. The boundary of the finite photonic crystal (PhC) is indicated by the dashed white line and the suspended PhC is surrounded by the silicon-on-insulator (SOI) wafer. The photoluminescence signal shows bright emission from a color center within the boundaries of the cavity. (B) The photoluminescence of the photonic device exhibits a sharp peak at  1275 nm and a blue-shifted broader peak at  1272 nm, corresponding to the zero-phonon line of the color-center and the cavity resonance, respectively. (C) Reflectivity of the photonic crystal cavity obtained by resonant scattering measurements. The cavity is illuminated with a linearly polarized white light source (white arrow) at 45 degrees with respect to the cavity axis that is along the X-direction. The polarized signal perpendicular to the excitation is collected (red arrow) to probe the cavity mode. (D) The polarization diagram of the cavity mode detuned from the ZPL is shown in orange. The polarization diagram of a quantum emitter alone is shown in black. The polarizations agree well with a dipolar model (solid lines) and are well aligned (see Supplementary Materials).
Refer to caption
Figure 3: Quantum coherence measurements of the emitter in the cavity. (A) Spectrum of the quantum emitter over a broad range of energy showing the zero-phonon line (ZPL) of the silicon emissive center and its phonon sideband. (B) Spectrum of the quantum emitter using a high-resolution grating. The ZPL is located at 972.43 meV and has a linewidth of 8.3 GHz. (C) Second-order autocorrelation measurements of the emission from the cavity under continuous excitation. The antibunching at zero delay confirms the successful spatial overlap of a single silicon emissive center with the nanophotonic cavity with an antibunching at zero delay g(2)(0)=0.30±0.07g^{(2)}(0)=0.30\pm 0.07. (D) Second-order autocorrelation measurements under pulsed excitation at a repetition rate of 10 MHz demonstrating on-demand single-photon generation from the all-silicon platform. Autocorrelation measurements are performed using a Hanbury-Brown and Twiss interferometer with superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors (see Supplementary Materials).
Refer to caption
Figure 4: Spectral tuning of the nanocavity and enhanced atom-cavity interaction. (A) Cavity tuning as a function of the argon gas injection cycle. The enhancement of the single center in the cavity requires spatial and spectral overlap. Spatial overlap was achieved in Fig. 2 and Fig. 3 and spectral overlap is achieved here by tuning the nanophotonic cavity. Gas injection modifies the effective index of cavity mode and tunes the resonance wavelength of the cavity that is shifted from \sim1269 nm to \sim1275 nm. As the cavity resonance is shifted towards the ZPL of the quantum center, the photoluminescence is enhanced to reach a maximum at \sim1275 nm, where the spectral overlap is achieved. (B) Zero-phonon line intensity as a function of the cavity detuning. An enhancement larger than 30 is achieved on resonance. (C) Excited lifetime for cavity detuning of δ\delta = 2.40 nm, δ\delta = 0.23 nm, and δ\delta = 0.00 nm. The lifetime of emitted photons shortens from 53.6 ns to 6.7 ns when the detuning between the cavity and emitter is decreased. An 8-fold reduction in the lifetime is experimentally observed when the overlap is achieved compared to the off-resonance case. These results constitute the first all-silicon quantum light source using a silicon emissive center in a cavity, and the center can be further accelerated by designing cavities with higher quality factors as well as more deterministic positioning methods to further improve the emitter-cavity spatial overlap. The results will enable all-silicon quantum optics interfaces with silicon-emissive centers for scalable quantum optics.