Ab-initio no-core shell model study of 10-14B isotopes with realistic NN interactions
Abstract
We report a comprehensive study of 10-14B isotopes within the ab-initio no-core shell model (NCSM) using realistic nucleon-nucleon (NN) interactions. In particular, we have applied the inside non-local outside Yukawa (INOY) interaction to study energy spectra, electromagnetic properties and point-proton radii of the boron isotopes. The NCSM results with the charge-dependent Bonn 2000 (CDB2K), the chiral next-to-next-to-next-to-leading order (N3LO) and optimized next-to-next-to-leading order (N2LOopt) interactions are also reported. We have reached basis sizes up to = 10 for 10B, = 8 for 11,12,13B and = 6 for 14B with m-scheme dimensions up to 1.7 billion. We also compare the NCSM calculations with the phenomenological YSOX interaction using the shell model to test the predictive power of the ab-initio nuclear theory. Overall, our NCSM results are consistent with the available experimental data. The experimental ground state spin of 10B has been reproduced using the INOY NN interaction. Typically, the 3N interaction is required to correctly reproduce the aforementioned state.
pacs:
21.60.Cs, 21.30.Fe, 21.10.Dr, 27.20.+nI Introduction
In nuclear physics, our focus is to describe the nuclear structure including the exotic behaviour of atomic nuclei throughout the nuclear chart. Conventional shell model SM ; p ; sd ; fp ; O.Sorlin ; T.Otsuka , where interactions are assumed to exist only among the valence nucleons in a particular model space is unable to determine the drip line dripline1 ; dripline2 , cluster cluster and halo halo structures. The study of interactions derived from first principles has been a challenging area of research over the past decades. These fundamental interactions are determined from either meson-exchange theory or Quantum chromodynamics (QCD) QCD . QCD is non-perturbative in low-energy regime which makes analytic solutions difficult. This difficulty is overcome by chiral effective field theory (EFT) RMP ; EFT1 ; EFT2 ; EFT3 . Chiral perturbation theory (PT) PT within EFT provides a connection between QCD and the hadronic system.
Progress has been made in the development of different many-body modern ab-initio approaches ab-initio ; HHMS2015 ; SHKH2019 , one of them being the NCSM Phys.Rev.C502841(1994) ; Phys.Rev.C542986(1996) ; Phys.Rev.C573119(1998) ; PRL84 ; 1999 ; PRC62 ; 2000 ; 2009 ; MVS2009 ; nocore_review ; stetcu1 ; stetcu2 . Ab-initio methods are more fundamental compared to the nuclear shell model. The aim of this paper is to explain the nuclear structure of boron isotopes with realistic NN interactions as the only input. The well-bound stable 10B have posed a challenge to the microscopic nuclear theory in particular concerning the reproduction of its ground-state spin av8'nocore . The boron isotopes have been investigated in the past using the shell model monopole ; TOSM . Shell model Hamiltonian constructed from a monopole-based universal interaction (VMU) in full model space including excitations has been used for a systematic study of boron isotopes monopole . This phenomenological effective interaction is obtained by fitting experimental data, thus, it at least partly includes three-body effects. So it is able to reproduce spin of the ground state (g.s.) of 10B. This VMU based Hamiltonian, however, fails to describe the drip line nucleus 19B. Tensor-optimized shell model (TOSM) TOSM has been applied to study 10B using effective bare nucleon-nucleon (NN) interaction Argonne V8 (AV8) av8' . The g.s. obtained with AV8 interaction is , which, in experiment, is the first excited state of 10B. AV8 interaction, which is a modification of tensor and spin-orbit forces of AV8 interaction, gives correct g.s. spin and low-lying spectra, indicating that the tensor forces affect the level ordering. TOSM with Minnesota (MN) effective interaction MN without tensor force also gives correct g.s. spin but a smaller g.s. radius compared to the experimental result, which affects the nuclear saturation property, thus providing the small level density.
In Refs. Nmax8 ; 10B_PRL ; Nmax10 , the structure of 10B was studied within the NCSM, using accurate charge dependent NN potentials up to the order of PT in basis spaces () of up to . Using the NN interactions alone led to an incorrect g.s. of 10B. By including the chiral three-nucleon interaction (3N), the g.s. was correctly reproduced as 10B_PRL ; Nmax10 . The ab-initio NCSM study of 10B with the chiral N2LO (next-to-next-to-leading order) NN interaction EKM2015 including three-body forces has been done in Ref. N2LO , where it was shown that the g.s. energy and spin depends on the chiral order. To correctly reproduce the as an experimental g.s., 3N force with the N2LO NN interaction is needed. In Ref. N2LOopt , N2LOopt interaction was employed in the NCSM calculation for 10B up to = 10 (10) to calculate ground and low-lying excited states. This study reported as a g.s. instead of . Realistic shell model calculations including contributions of a chiral three-body force [N3LO NN + N2LO 3N potential] for 10B is reported in Ref. MBPT . These results are consistent with the NCSM results with the same interaction. The NCSM with CDB2K potential ( = 8) and AV8’ ( = 6) predict as g.s. of 10B CDB2Knocore ; av8'nocore . Green’s function Monte Carlo (GFMC) approach with AV8’ and AV18 has also been employed to investigate the g.s. of 10B GFMC and similarly predicts the as the ground state with these NN forces.
In Ref. PLB , the Daejeon16 and JISP16 (J-matrix inverse scattering potential) NN interactions were applied to -shell nuclei. For 10B, excitation energies of state with respect to state of 0.5(1) MeV and 0.9(2.4) MeV were reported with Daejeon16 and JISP16 NN interactions, respectively. This means both these NN interactions reproduce correct g.s. without adding 3N forces but the ordering could not be confirmed on the account of uncertainty in the energy result obtained from JISP16 interaction.
In recent years, several experimental techniques have been used to measure nuclear charge radius for neutron-rich nuclei towards the drip line nature_Ca . These then serve as a test of the predictive power of ab-initio calculation. Charge radii inform us about the breakdown of the conventional shell gaps and the evolution of new shell gaps. One of the reasons behind the disappearance of the shell gap is the presence of the halo structure. Tanihata et al. RMSradii have measured interaction cross-sections () for 8,12-15B using radioactive nuclear beams at the Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory. In this experiment, the interaction nuclear radii and the effective root-mean-square (rms) radii of nucleon distribution have been deduced from . Point-proton radii of 12-17B are also measured from the charge-changing cross-section () at GSI, Darmstadt N=14 . Further, the proton radii were extracted from a finite-range Glauber model analysis of the . The measurement shows the existence of a thick neutron surface in 17B chargechanging . A recent experiment on nitrogen chain establishes the neutron skin and signature of the shell gap by measuring proton-radii of 17-22N isotopes.
In the present work, we perform systematic NCSM calculations for 10-14B isotopes using INOY INOY , N3LO Machleidt , CDB2K CDBonn and N2LOopt N2LOopt NN interactions. For the first time, we report NCSM structure results with the INOY interaction for these isotopes. We have reached basis sizes up to = 10 for 10B, = 8 for 11,12,13B and = 6 for 14B with m-scheme dimensions up to 1.7 billion. Apart from energy spectra, we have also calculated electromagnetic properties and point-proton radii. In addition, we compare shell model results of energy levels and nuclear observables obtained with the YSOX interaction monopole with present ab-initio results.
The paper is organized as follows: In section II, we describe the NCSM formalism. In section III, we briefly review the NN interactions used in our calculations. We present the NCSM results of the energy spectra and compare them to those obtained with the shell model YSOX interaction in section IV. In section V, electromagnetic properties of 10-14B are reported. In section VI, we discuss point-proton radii of 10-14B. Finally, we summarize the paper in section VII.
II No-core shell model formalism
In NCSM 2009 ; nocore_review , all nucleons are treated as active, which means there is no assumption of an inert core, unlike in standard shell model. The nucleus is described as a system of non-relativistic nucleons which interact by realistic NN or NN + 3N interactions.
In the present work, we have considered only realistic NN interactions between the nucleons. The Hamiltonian for the nucleon system is then given by
(1) |
where Trel is the relative kinetic energy, is the mass of nucleon and V is the realistic NN interaction that contains both nuclear and electromagnetic (Coulomb) parts.
In the NCSM, translational invariance as well as angular momentum and parity of the nuclear system are conserved. The many-body wave function is cast into an expansion over a complete set of antisymmetric -nucleon harmonic oscillator (HO) basis states containing up to - HO excitations above the lowest possible configuration.
We use a truncated HO basis while the realistic NN interactions act in the full space. Unless the potential is soft like, e.g., the N2LOopt, we need to derive an effective interaction to facilitate the convergence. Two renormalization methods based on similarity transformations have been applied in the NCSM, the Okubo-Lee-Suzuki (OLS) scheme Prog.Theor.Phys.12 ; Prog.Theor.Phys. ; Prog.Theor.Phys.68 ; Prog.Theor.Phys.92 and more recently the Similarity Renormalization Group (SRG) Bogner2007 . The latter has the advantage in being more systematic and in the fact that renormalized potentials are phaseshift equivalent. The three-body induced terms, however, cannot be neglected. Those, in turn, are difficult to converge for potentials that generate strong short-range correlations, such as the CDB2K Jurgenson2011 . The OLS method is applied directly in the HO basis and results in an - and -dependent effective interaction, i.e, the calculation is not variational. The three-body induced terms are less important. It has been observed that the method works particularly well for the INOY interaction Forssen2005 ; Caurier2006 ; Forssen2009 ; Forssen2013 . Consequently, in this work we apply the OLS method for the INOY, CDB2K and, for a consitent comparison also for the N3LO NN interaction. For the latter, the SRG method is, however, more appropriate Jurgenson2011 ; Jurgenson2013 . The softer N2LOopt NN interaction is not renormalized.
To facilitate the derivation of the OLS effective interaction, we add centre-of-mass (c.m.) HO Hamiltonian to equation (1) which makes the Hamiltonian dependent on the HO frequency.
where
The intrinsic properties of the system are not affected by the addition of HO c.m. Hamiltonian due to translational invariance of the Hamiltonian (1).
Thus, we obtain a modified Hamiltonian:
(2) |
We divide the A nucleon large HO basis space into two parts: one is the finite active space () which contains all states up to , and, the other is the excluded space (). NCSM calculations are performed in the truncated space. The two-body OLS effective is derived by applying the Hamiltonian (2) to two nucleons and performing the unitary transformation in the HO basis 2009 ; nocore_review . Eventually, the second term in the brackets in (2) is replaced by the effective interaction.
Finally, we subtract the c.m. Hamiltonian and include the Lawson projection term Lawson to shift the spurious c.m. excitations.
(3) |
An extension of the NCSM that provides a unified description of both bound and unbound states is the no-core shell model with continuum (NCSMC) approach NCSMC . It has been successfully applied, e.g., to explain the parity inversion phenomenon in 11Be 11Be . It has not been applied to boron isotopes yet although NCSMC calculations for 10,11B are now in progress.
III Realistic NN and shell model interactions
In the present work, apart from the INOY interaction INOY ; nonlocal ; Doleschall , we also report results with the CDB2K offshell ; Phys.Rep. ; Adv.Nucl.Phys. ; CDBonn , N3LO QCD ; Machleidt and N2LOopt optimizedn2lo ; N2LOopt interactions.
The Inside Non-Local Outside Yukawa (INOY) interaction INOY ; nonlocal ; Doleschall has a local character (Yukawa tail) at long distances ( fm) and a non-local one at short distances ( fm), where the non-local part is due to the internal structure of the nucleon. As it is constructed in coordinate space, the range of locality and non-locality is explicitly controllable. This interaction has the form:
where, the cut-off function is defined as:
and and are the non-local part and the Yukawa tail (the same as in AV18 potential av18 ), respectively. The parameters and have the values 1.0 fm-1 and 2.0 fm, respectively. Because of the non-local character in the INOY interaction, three-body force effects are in part absorbed by nonlocal terms, e.g., it produces correct binding energy of the three-nucleon system (3H and 3He) without adding three-body forces explicitly.
The Charge-Dependent Bonn 2000 potential (CDB2K) is a meson exchange based potential offshell ; Phys.Rep. ; Adv.Nucl.Phys. ; CDBonn . It includes all the mesons with masses below the nucleon mass, i.e. , , and as an exchange particle between nucleons. The has a vanishing coupling constant and as such, can be ignored. This potential also includes two scalar-isoscalar (or ) bosons. Charge dependence of nuclear forces, which is investigated by the Bonn full model based on charge independence breaking (difference between proton-proton/neutron-neutron and proton-neutron interaction; pion mass splitting) and charge symmetry breaking (difference between proton-proton and neutron-neutron interaction; nucleon mass splitting) in all partial waves with , is also reproduced. The potential is represented in terms of the one-boson-exchange (OBE) covariant Feynman amplitudes. The off-shell behavior of the potential, which plays an important role in nuclear structure calculations, is affected by imposing locality on the Feynman amplitudes. So, non-local Feynman amplitudes are used in the CDB2K potential. This momentum-space dependent potential fits proton-proton data with per datum of 1.01 and the neutron-proton data with /datum 1.02 below 350 MeV, where is the square of theoretical error over the experimental error.
Chiral perturbation theory is a perturbative expansion in , where 1 GeV. Entem and Machleidt constructed the NN potential QCD ; Machleidt at fourth order (next-to-next-to-next-to-leading order; N3LO) of PT in the momentum-space. In PT, two class of contributions determine the NN amplitude: Contact terms and pion-exchane diagrams. The N3LO interaction contains 24 contact terms, whose parameters contribute to the fit of partial waves of NN scattering with angular momentum . Charge dependence is also included up to next-to-leading order of the isospin-violation scheme. The N3LO has two charge-dependent contacts. Thus, the total number of contact terms is 26. The N3LO has one pion-exchange (OPE) as well as two pion-exchange (TPE) contributions. Contributions of three pion exchange in the N3LO, however, are negligible. OPE and TPE depend on the axial-vector coupling constant (1.29), the pion decay constant (92.4 MeV) and eight low-energy constants (LEC). Three of them (, and ) are varied in the fitting process and other are fixed. All constants are determined from the NN data. With a total of 29 parameters, the N3LO yields /datum 1 up to 290 MeV for the fit of neutron-proton data. The accuracy in the reproduction of NN data for this order is comparable to the high-precision phenomenological AV18 potential av18 .
The N2LOopt N2LOopt ; optimizedn2lo is a softer interaction and as such, the OLS or SRG renormalization is not needed. This interaction was derived from EFT at the N2LO order. For the optimization of the LECs, Practical Optimization Using No Derivatives algorithm (POUNDERs) was used. In particular, the optimisation is performed for the pion-nucleon (N) couplings (, , ) and 11 partial wave contact parameters and . The N2LOopt interaction reproduces reasonably well experimental binding energies and radii of = 3, 4 nuclei.
For comparison, we have also performed shell model calculations with the phenomenological YSOX interaction monopole developed by the Tokyo group. In the YSOX interaction, 4He is assumed as a core and interactions take place in the valence space. Single-particle energies are = 1.05 MeV, = 5.30 MeV, = 8.01 MeV, = 2.11 MeV and = 10.11 MeV. There are 516 two-body matrix elements (TBMEs) in this interaction.
NCSM calculations presented in this paper have been performed with the pAntoine code pAntoine1 ; pAntoine11 ; pAntoine2 . We have used KSHELL code KSHELL2019 for the shell model calculation with the YSOX interaction monopole . Recently, we have reported NCSM results for N, O and F isotopes in Refs. arch1 ; arch2 performed in an analogous way.
IV Results and Discussions
The dimensions corresponding to different for boron isotopes are shown in Table 1. We can see that they increase rapidly with and the mass number. In the present work, we were able to perform NCSM calculations up to = 10 for 10B, = 8 for 11,12,13B and = 6 for 14B. First, we investigate the dependence on the HO frequency () for various bases, typically up to the next to the largest accesible for computational reasons. The optimal HO frequency used to calculate the entire energy spectrum is found from the g.s. energy minimum in the largest space. Fig. 1 shows variation of g.s. energy of 10B for different basis spaces as a function of HO frequencies for the four interactions that we employ. Overall, we observe a decrease of the g.s. energy dependece on the frequency at higher as expected. Let us re-iterate that the N2LOopt calculations are variational while those with the OLS renormalized interactions are not.












10B 11B 12B 13B 14B 0 84 62 28 5 48 2 4 6 8 10
We note that minima of the g.s. energy are at the same frequency for both = 6 and 8 for the INOY interaction. Thus, we expect to obtain the minimum at the same frequency also for = 10. Optimal frequency values for the INOY, CDB2K, N3LO and N2LOopt interactions are at = 20 MeV, 14 MeV, 12 MeV and 22 MeV, respectively. Only for those values we performed the = 10 calculations. We have determined the optimal frequencies for other boron isotopes as shown in Fig. 2 corresponding to INOY and N2LOopt interactions. Similarly, we have obtained optimal frequencies for CDB2K and N3LO interactions.
The NCSM results of low-lying states for boron isotopes corresponding to the INOY interaction in the basis spaces 0 to highest , and for the other interactions in the highest are shown in Figs. 3-4. From the figures, we can see how the energy states approach the experimental values. Along with the NCSM results, we have also reported shell model results corresponding to YSOX interaction. All results are compared with experimental data. We have calculated only natural parity states for each nucleus.
IV.1 Energy spectra for 10,12,14B
Experimentally, the g.s. of 10B is 3+ and the first excited state 1+ lies 0.718 MeV above the g.s. For the INOY interaction, we obtain the correct g.s. 3+ as seen in the energy spectrum shown in the top panel of Fig. 3. The difference between 3+ and 1+ states decreases as increases and for = 10, the difference is 1.250 MeV. Previously, the NCSM results using CDB2K interaction have been reported for = 8 CDB2Knocore . In the present paper, we have extended the basis size from = 8 to 10 to further improve convergence. Overall, the present results are consistent with those of Ref. CDB2Knocore . The CDB2K interaction is unable to reproduce the correct g.s. 3+. For comparison, we have also studied NCSM results with N3LO and N2LOopt interactions for = 10. These interactions predict 1+ as the g.s. contrary to the experimental result, albeit the difference between 3+ and 1+ states is very small (0.035 MeV) for the N2LOopt interaction. We note that the calculated 3 corresponding to CDB2K and N3LO interactions is respectively, 1.069 MeV and 1.594 MeV above the 1 state. We can also see that the INOY interaction predicts the correct ordering of 3+-1+-0+-1+-2+ states contrary to the phenomenological YSOX interaction.





As seen in the second panel of Fig. 3, the INOY interaction fails to predict correct g.s. for 12B, while CDB2K, N3LO and N2LOopt interactions are able to predict the g.s. correctly. At the same time, it is clear that the difference between and states decreases with increasing for INOY interaction. So, we expect that for larger , the g.s. would be also for the INOY interaction. Using CDB2K and N3LO interactions, the NCSM results are too compressed compared to experimental results. In particular, the state is too low. The N2LOopt interaction gives the correct order of the energy levels up to 3 with lower energy values than the experimentally obtained energies.
For 14B, we have reached only = 6 space, due to huge dimension of Hamiltonian matrix involved in the calculation. All interactions provide the correct g.s. as . Experimentally, and states are tentative, which are confirmed with the CDB2K and N3LO interactions. These states are also confirmed with YSOX interaction. For the INOY interaction, the order of states , and , is reversed in comparison to the (tentative) experimental data. The energy difference between and states is larger for all ab-initio interactions compared to that obtained in experiment.
10B | EXPT | INOY | CDB2K | N3LO | N2LOopt | YSOX |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q() | 0.0845(2) | 0.061 | 0.071 | 0.077 | 0.067 | 0.073 |
() | 1.8004636(8) | 1.836 | 1.852 | 1.856 | 1.838 | 1.806 |
Eg.s.() | -64.751 | -63.433 | -54.979 | -53.225 | -54.181 | -65.144 |
) | 1.777(9) | 0.911 | 2.091 | 2.686 | 1.482 | 0.757 |
) | 0.00047(27) | 0.0007 | 0.002 | 0.003 | 0.0001 | 0.004 |
11B | EXPT | INOY | CDB2K | N3LO | N2LOopt | YSOX |
Q() | 0.04059(10) | 0.027 | 0.030 | 0.031 | 0.029 | 0.043 |
() | 2.688378(1) | 2.371 | 2.537 | 2.622 | 2.366 | 2.501 |
Eg.s.() | -76.205 | -74.926 | -66.034 | -62.915 | -59.993 | -76.686 |
) | 1.83(44) | 0.814 | 1.258 | 1.478 | 1.032 | 3.118 |
) | 0.519(18) | 0.708 | 0.976 | 1.051 | 0.766 | 0.835 |
12B | EXPT | INOY | CDB2K | N3LO | N2LOopt | YSOX |
Q() | 0.0132(3) | 0.009 | 0.009 | 0.010 | 0.010 | 0.014 |
() | 1.003(1) | 0.561 | 0.134 | 0.022 | 0.282 | 0.737 |
Eg.s.() | -79.575 | -78.304 | -69.350 | -68.062 | -61.226 | -79.264 |
) | NA | 0.047 | 0.078 | 0.086 | 0.066 | 0.026 |
) | 0.251(36) | 0.125 | 0.197 | 0.339 | 0.170 | 0.204 |
13B | EXPT | INOY | CDB2K | N3LO | N2LOopt | YSOX |
Q() | 0.0365(8) | 0.025 | 0.029 | 0.031 | 0.028 | 0.042 |
() | 3.1778(5) | 2.844 | 2.815 | 2.830 | 2.781 | 2.959 |
Eg.s.() | -84.454 | -85.205 | -75.856 | -74.716 | -65.624 | -84.185 |
) | NA | 1.800 | 2.281 | 2.721 | 1.990 | 0.787 |
) | NA | 0.984 | 1.035 | 1.065 | 0.982 | 0.729 |
14B | EXPT | INOY | CDB2K | N3LO | N2LOopt | YSOX |
Q() | 0.0297(8) | 0.016 | 0.025 | 0.025 | 0.004 | 0.026 |
() | 1.185(5) | 0.778 | 0.926 | 0.914 | 0.550 | 0.614 |
Eg.s.() | -85.422 | -82.002 | -76.929 | -77.549 | -51.413 | -84.454 |
) | NA | 2.579 | 2.457 | 2.436 | 2.755 | 2.656 |
IV.2 Energy spectra for 11,13B
For 11B, we employed HO frequencies of 20 MeV, 16 MeV and 24 MeV for the INOY, CDB2K and N2LOopt interaction, respectively. For N3LO interaction, optimal frequency is taken to be 15 MeV from Ref. 10B_PRL . The state is the experimental g.s. of 11B. Our NCSM calculations reproduce the correct g.s. with all four interactions. We get correct excited states up to 7 MeV with all interactions except the N3LO. The experimental g.s. energy of the state is -76.205 MeV. With the INOY interaction, we obtain the energy of -74.9 MeV for this state, fairly close to the experimental value. For N3LO interaction, and states are almost degenerate, while the INOY gives a splitting close to experimental. This splitting depends on the strength of the spin-orbit interaction, which is apparently the largest for the INOY interaction. We note that the energy gap between the states and obtained using the INOY interaction is very large compared to the experimental value. This could be because the optimal HO frequency is chosen with respect to the g.s. which is then used to predict the whole energy spectrum. It is possible that a faster convergence of the excited states could be achieved with a different optimal frequency.






Our NCSM calculations have been performed up to = 8 for 13B, for which we obtain correct g.s. with all interactions. The energy difference between theoretical and experimental excited states is rather large, which makes it difficult to use the present calculations for assigning experimentally unknown spin and parity to the excited states.
V Electromagnetic properties
Table 2 contains quadrupole moments (), magnetic moments (), g.s. energies (Eg.s.), reduced electric quadrupole transition probabilities () and reduced magnetic dipole transition probabilities (). Only one-body electromagnetic operators were considered. The experimental binding energy of 10B is -64.751 MeV. The INOY interaction underbinds the 10B nucleus by 1.32 MeV while YSOX interaction overbinds this by 0.39 MeV. The other used realistic interactions underestimate the experimental binding energy more significantly. The g.s. and moments of 10,11B are in a reasonable agreement with experiment for all interactions. On the other hand, the calculated value for 10B varies substantially. Similarly, we find interaction dependence and stronger disagreements with experiment for the 12,13,14B g.s. moments. We predict several and values for 12-14B which are not yet measured experimentally.


In Fig. 5, we show and transition strengths corresponding to different and for 10B with the INOY, CDB2K and N3LO interactions. curves become flat, which means they become independent of and . So, the convergence of the result is obtained at smaller and lower . As discussed, e.g., in Refs. stetcu1 ; stetcu2 , it is a big task to compute the transition operator, as it depends on the long-range correlations in the nucleus i.e. the tails of nuclear wave functions. From Fig. 5, we can see that value varies even for large value of the parameter. The best value is then taken where these curves become flat, although clearly we have not reached convergence within the model spaces used in this work.
The quadrupole and magnetic moments of the studied isotopes are summarized in Fig. 6. Overall, the experimental trends are well reproduced for both observables although the NCSM calculations systematically under predict the experimental quadrupole moments.

In Fig. 7, the dependence of the calculated g.s. energies on the mass number of boron isotopes is plotted with INOY, CDB2K, N3LO, N2LOopt, YSOX interactions and compared with experimental energies. NCSM results obtained at the largest accessible space with the optimal frequency are shown. From Fig. 7, we can conclude that INOY interaction provides better description for g.s. energy than other used ab initio interactions.
For the N2LOopt interaction, we have extrapolated the g.s. energy using an exponential fitting function with the value of g.s. energy at . In particular, we have used last three points in the extrapolation procedure. For 14B, no meaningful extrapolation was possible.







VI Point-proton radii
In Table 3, we have presented point-proton radii (rp) using NCSM with INOY, CDB2K and N3LO interactions at their optimal frequencies along with experimentally observed radii chargechanging . The INOY interaction considerably underestimates the radii. For 10,11B, the CDB2K and N3LO interactions produce better results, with the former slightly underestimating and the latter slightly overestimating the radii. For 12-14B, the radii are underestimated for all interactions.
EXPT | INOY | CDB2K | N3LO | |
---|---|---|---|---|
10B | 2.32(5) | 2.03 | 2.27 | 2.38 |
11B | 2.21(2) | 1.97 | 2.15 | 2.24 |
12B | 2.31(7) | 1.96 | 2.13 | 2.23 |
13B | 2.48(3) | 1.98 | 2.10 | 2.20 |
14B | 2.50(2) | 1.99 | 2.18 | 2.20 |
In Fig. 8, we present the variation of 10B with frequency and for INOY, CDB2K and N3LO interaction. With the enlargement of basis size , the dependence of on frequencies decreases. The curves of corresponding to different intersect each-other approximately at the same point. We take this crossing point as an estimate of the converged radius PLB ; Phys.Rev.C90034305(2014) . In particular, we consider the intersection point of the curves at the highest successive as an estimate of the converged radius. In this way, we obtain 10B point-proton radii for INOY, CDB2K and N3LO interactions 2.14, 2.30 and 2.36 fm, respectively.
Similarly, we have shown variation of with frequency and for other isotopes corresponding to INOY interaction in Fig. 9. Obtained values for 11B,12B,13B and 14B are 2.00, 1.99, 1.95 and 1.99 fm, respectively. However, even with this determination of the radii, the experimental trend is not reproduced.
We can conclude that the CDB2K and N3LO interactions give radii which are much closer to experimental value than the radii obtained with the INOY interaction. To some extent this is not surprising given the fact that those interactions underbind the studied isotopes. We have obtained different optimal frequencies for the energy spectra and the point-proton radii. Similar findings were reported for 12C using Daejeon16 and JISP16 interactions in Ref. PLB .
VII Conclusions
In this work, we have applied ab-initio no-core shell model to obtain spectroscopic properties of boron isotopes using INOY, CDB2K, N3LO and N2LOopt nucleon-nucleon interactions. We have calculated low-lying spectra and other observables with all four interactions and, in addition, compared the NCSM results with shell model using YSOX valence-space effective interaction. We were able to correctly reproduce the g.s. spin of 10B only with the INOY NN interaction. Overall, the INOY interaction reproduced quite reasonably g.s. energies of all the studied isotopes, 10-14B.
Considering electromagnetic properties, we have obtained fast convergence for values, whereas, converging observables is a computational challenge. The INOY interaction again appears to do better than the other interactions in the reproduction of the observables for all isotopes.
Concerning proton radii, we find that optimal frequency obtained from the minima of the g.s. energy curves and that obtained from the intersection of radii curves could be different. In this case, the CDB2K and N3LO interactions give radii which are much closer to experimental value than the radii obtained with the INOY interaction.
The present study confirms that non-locality in the NN interaction can account for some of the many-nucleon force effects. The non-local NN interaction like INOY can provide a quite reasonable description of ground-state energies, excitation spectra and selected electromagnetic properties, e.g., magnetic moments and transitions. However, the description of nuclear radii and consequently of the density remains unsatisfactory. Recent studies show that the inclusion of the 3N interaction, in particular 3N interaction with non-local regulators, is essential for a correct simultaneous description of nuclear binding and nuclear size Nmax10 ; N2LOsat ; NN3Nlnl .
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We would like to thank Christian Forssén for making available the pAntoine code. We thank Toshio Suzuki for the YSOX interaction. P.C. acknowledges financial support from MHRD (Government of India) for her PhD thesis work. P.C.S. acknowledges a research grant from SERB (India), CRG/2019/000556. P.N. acknowledges support from the NSERC Grant No. SAPIN-2016-00033. TRIUMF receives federal funding via a contribution agreement with the National Research Council of Canada.
References
- (1) B. A. Brown, “The nuclear shell model towards the drip lines”, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 47, 517 (2001).
- (2) S. Cohen and D. Kurath, “Effective interactions for the shell”, Nucl. Phys. 73, 1 (1965).
- (3) B. A. Brown and W. A. Richter, “New “USD” Hamiltonians for the shell”, Phys. Rev. C 74, 034315 (2006).
- (4) M. Honma, T. Otsuka, B. A. Brown and T. Mizusaki, “Shell-model description of neutron-rich -shell nuclei with a new effective interaction GXPF1”, Eur. Phys. J. A 25, 499 (2005).
- (5) O. Sorlin and M.-G. Porquet, “ Nuclear magic numbers: New features far from stability”, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 61, 602 (2008).
- (6) T. Otsuka, A. Gade, O. Sorlin, T. Suzuki and Y. Utsuno, “Evolution of shell structure in exotic nuclei”, Rev. Mod. Phys. 92, 015002 (2020).
- (7) M. Thoennessen, “Current status and future potential of nuclide discoveries”, Rep. Prog. Phys. 76, 056301 (2013).
- (8) D. S. Ahn, N. Fukuda, H. Geissel, N. Inabe, N. Iwasa, T. Kubo, K. Kusaka, D. J. Morrissey, D. Murai, T. Nakamura et al., “Location of the neutron dripline at fluorine and neon”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 212501 (2019).
- (9) M. Freer, H. Fujita, Z. Buthelezi, J. Carter, R. W. Fearick, S. V. Förtsch, R. Neveling, S. M. Perez, P. Papka, F. D. Smit et al., “Cluster structure of 12C and 11Be”, Nucl. Phys. A 834, 621 (2010).
- (10) I. Tanihata, “Neutron halo nuclei”, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 22, 157 (1996).
- (11) R. Machleidt and D. R. Entem, “Chiral effective field theory and nuclear forces”, Phys. Rep. 503, 1 (2011).
- (12) E. Epelbaum, H.-W. Hammer and U.-G. Meißner, “Modern theory of nuclear forces”, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 1773 (2009).
- (13) S. Weinberg, “Phenomenological lagrangians”, Physica A 96, 327 (1979).
- (14) S. Weinberg, “Nuclear forces from chiral lagrangians”, Phys. Lett. B 251, 288 (1990).
- (15) S. Weinberg, “Effective chiral lagrangians for nucleon-pion interactions and nuclear forces”, Nucl. Phys. B 363, 3 (1991).
- (16) S. Scherer, “Introduction to chiral perturbation theory”, Adv. Nucl. Phys. 27, 277 (2003).
- (17) W. Leidemann and G. Orlandini, “Modern ab initio approaches and applications in few-nucleon physics with A 4”, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 68, 158 (2013).
- (18) K. Hebeler, J.D. Holt, J. Menéndez, and A. Schwenk, “Nuclear Forces and Their Impact on Neutron-Rich Nuclei and Neutron-Rich Matter,” Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science 65 457-484, (2015).
-
(19)
S. Ragnar Stroberg, Heiko Hergert, Scott K. Bogner, and Jason D. Holt
“Nonempirical Interactions for the Nuclear Shell Model: An Update,”
Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science
69, 307-362, (2019). - (20) D. C. Zheng, J. P. Vary and B. R. Barrett, “Large-space shell-model calculations for light nuclei”, Phys. Rev. C 50, 2841 (1994).
- (21) P. Navrátil and B. R. Barrett, “No-core shell-model calculations with starting-energy-independent multivalued effective interactions”, Phys. Rev. C 54, 2986 (1996).
- (22) P. Navrátil and B. R. Barrett, “Large-basis shell-model calculations for -shell nuclei”, Phys. Rev. C 57, 3119 (1998).
- (23) P. Navrátil and B. R. Barrett, “Four-nucleon shell-model calculations in a Faddeev-like approach”, Phys. Rev. C 59, 1906 (1999).
- (24) P. Navrátil, J. P. Vary and B. R. Barrett, “Properties of 12C in the ab initio nuclear shell model”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5728 (2000).
- (25) P. Navrátil, G. P. Kamuntavičius and B. R. Barrett, “Few-nucleon systems in a translationally invariant harmonic oscillator basis”, Phys. Rev. C 61, 044001 (2000).
- (26) P. Navrátil, J. P. Vary and B. R. Barrett, “Large-basis ab initio no-core shell model and its application to 12C”, Phys. Rev. C 62, 054311 (2000).
- (27) P. Navrátil, S. Quaglioni, I. Stetcu and B. R. Barrett, “Recent developments in no-core shell-model calculations”, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 36, 083101 (2009).
- (28) P. Maris, J. P. Vary, and A. M. Shirokov, “ Ab initio no-core full configuration calculations of light nuclei,” Phys. Rev. C 79, 014308 (2019).
- (29) B. R. Barrett, P. Navrátil and J. P. Vary, “Ab initio no core shell model”, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 69, 131 (2013).
- (30) I. Stetcu, B. R. Barrett, P. Navrátil, and J. P. Vary, “Long- and short-range correlations in the ab initio no-core shell model”, Phys. Rev. C 73, 037307 (2006).
- (31) I. Stetcu, B. R. Barrett, P. Navrátil, and J. P. Vary, “Effective operators within the ab initio no-core shell model”, Phys. Rev. C 71, 044325 (2005).
- (32) P. Navrátil and W. E. Ormand, “Ab initio shell model calculations with three-body effective interactions for - shell nuclei”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 152502 (2002).
- (33) C. Yuan, T. Suzuki, T. Otsuka, F. Xu and N. Tsunoda, “Shell-model study of boron, carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen isotopes with a monopole-based universal interaction”, Phys. Rev. C 85, 064324 (2012).
- (34) T. Myo, A. Umeya, H. Toki and K. Ikeda, “Structures in 9,10Be and 10B studied with the tensor-optimized shell model”, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2015, 063D03 (2015).
- (35) B. S. Pudliner, V. R. Pandharipande, J. Carlson, S. C. Pieper and R. B. Wiringa, “Quantum Monte Carlo calculations of nuclei with ”, Phys. Rev. C 56, 1720 (1997).
- (36) D. R. Thompson, M. Lemere and Y.C. Yang, “Systematic investigation of scattering problems with the resonating-group method”, Nucl. Phys. A 286, 53 (1977).
- (37) P. Navrátil, V. G. Gueorguiev, J. P. Vary, W. E. Ormand and A. Nogga, “Structure of nuclei with two- plus three-nucleon interactions from chiral effective field theory”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 042501 (2007).
- (38) P. Navrátil and E. Caurier, “Nuclear structure with accurate chiral perturbation theory nucleon-nucleon potential: Application to 6Li and 10B”, Phys. Rev. C 69, 014311 (2004).
- (39) T. Hüther, K. Vobig, K. Hebeler, R. Machleidt and R. Roth, “Family of chiral two-plus three-nucleon interactions for accurate nuclear structure studies”, arXiv:1911.04955v1 [nucl-th] 12 Nov 2019.
- (40) E. Epelbaum, H. Krebs and U. G. Meißner, “Precision Nucleon-Nucleon Potential at Fifth Order in the Chiral Expansion,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 122301 (2015).
- (41) P. Maris, “Ab initio calculations of -shell nuclei up to N2LO in chiral effective field theory”, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1291, 012005 (2019).
- (42) A. Ekström, G. Baardsen, C. Forssén, G. Hagen, M. Hjorth-Jensen, G. R. Jansen, R. Machleidt, W. Nazarewicz, T. Papenbrock, J. Sarich et al., “Optimized chiral nucleon-nucleon interaction at next-to-next-to-leading order”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 192502 (2013).
- (43) T. Fukui, L. De Angelis, Y. Z. Ma, L. Coraggio, A. Gargano, N. Itaco and F. R. Xu, “Realistic shell-model calculations for -shell nuclei including contributions of a chiral three-body force”, Phys. Rev. C 98, 044305 (2018).
- (44) E. Caurier, P. Navrátil, W. E. Ormand and J. P. Vary, “Ab initio shell model for nuclei”, Phys. Rev. C 66, 024314 (2002).
- (45) S. C. Pieper, K. Varga and R. B. Wiringa, “Quantum Monte Carlo calculations of nuclei”, Phys. Rev. C 66, 044310 (2002).
- (46) A. M. Shirokov, I. J. Shin, Y. Kim, M. Sosonkina, P. Maris and J. P. Vary, “N3LO NN interaction adjusted to light nuclei in ab exitu approach”, Phys. Lett. B 761, 87 (2016).
- (47) R. F. Garcia Ruiz, M. L. Bissell, K. Blaum, A. Ekström, N. Frömmgen, G. Hagen, M. Hammen, K. Hebeler, J. D. Holt, G. R. Jansen et al., “Unexpectedly large charge radii of neutron-rich calcium isotopes”, Nature Physics 12, 594 (2016).
- (48) I. Tanihata, T. Kobayashi, O. Yamakawa, S. Shimoura, K. Ekuni, K. Sugimoto, N. Takahashi, T. Shimoda and H. Sato, “Measurement of interaction cross sections using isotope beams of Be and B and isospin dependence of the nuclear radii”, Phys. Lett. B 206, 592 (1988).
- (49) S. Bagchi, R. Kanungo, W. Horiuchi , G. Hagen, T. D. Morris, S. R. Stroberg, T. Suzuki, F. Ameil, J. Atkinson, Y. Ayyad et al., “Neutron skin and signature of the shell gap found from measured proton radii of 17-22N”, Phys. Lett. B 790, 251 (2019).
- (50) A. Estradé, R. Kanungo, W. Horiuchi, F. Ameil, J. Atkinson, Y. Ayyad, D. Cortina-Gil, I. Dillmann, A. Evdokimov, F. Farinon et al., “Proton radii of 12-17B define a thick neutron surface in 17B”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 132501 (2014).
- (51) P. Doleschall and I. Borbély, “Properties of the nonlocal interactions required for the correct triton binding energy”, Phys. Rev. C 62, 054004 (2000).
- (52) D. R. Entem and R. Machleidt, “Accurate charge-dependent nucleon-nucleon potential at fourth order of chiral perturbation theory”, Phys. Rev. C 68, 041001(R) (2003).
- (53) R. Machleidt, “High-precision, charge-dependent Bonn nucleon-nucleon potential”, Phys. Rev. C 63, 024001 (2001).
- (54) S. Ôkubo, “Diagonalization of Hamiltonian and Tamm-Dancoff equation”, Prog. Theor. Phys. 12, 603 (1954).
- (55) K. Suzuki and S. Y. Lee, “Convergent theory for effective interaction in nuclei”, Prog. Theor. Phys. 64, 2091 (1980).
- (56) K. Suzuki, “Construction of Hermitian effective interaction in nuclei: General relation between Hermitian and non-Hermitian forms”, Prog. Theor. Phys. 68, 246 (1982).
- (57) K. Suzuki and R. Okamoto, “Effective interaction theory and unitary-model-operator approach to nuclear saturation problem”, Prog. Theor. Phys. 92, 1045 (1994).
- (58) S. K. Bogner, R. J. Furnstahl, R. J. Perry, “Similarity renormalization group for nucleon-nucleon interactions,” Phys. Rev. C 75, 061001 (2007).
- (59) E. D. Jurgenson, P. Navrátil, R. J. Furnstahl, “Evolving nuclear many-body forces with the similarity renormalization group,” Phys. Rev. C 83, 034301 (2011).
- (60) C. Forssén, P. Navrátil, W. E. Ormand, E. Caurier, “Large basis ab initio shell model investigation of 9Be and 11Be,” Phys. Rev.C 71, 044312 (2005).
- (61) E. Caurier and P. Navrátil, “Proton radii of 4,6,8He isotopes from high-precision nucleon-nucleon interactions,” Phys. Rev.C 73, 021302(R) (2006).
- (62) C. Forssén, E. Caurier, P. Navrátil, “Charge radii and electromagnetic moments of Li and Be isotopes from the ab initio no-core shell model,” Phys. Rev. C 79, 021303(R) (2009).
- (63) C. Forssén, R. Roth, P. Navrátil, “Systematics of states in C isotopes from the no-core shell model,” J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 40, 055105 (2013).
- (64) E. D. Jurgenson, P. Maris, R. J. Furnstahl, P. Navrátil, W. E. Ormand, J. P. Vary, “Structure of -shell nuclei using three-nucleon interactions evolved with the similarity renormalization group,” Phys. Rev. C 87, 054312 (2013).
- (65) D. H. Gloeckner and R. D. Lawson, “Spurious center-of-mass motion”, Phys. Lett. B 53, 313 (1974).
- (66) S. Baroni, P. Navrátil and S. Quaglioni, “Ab initio description of the exotic unbound 7He nucleus”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 022505 (2013).
- (67) A. Calci, P. Navrátil, R. Roth, J. Dohet-Eraly, S. Quaglioni and G. Hupin, “Can ab initio theory explain the phenomenon of parity inversion in 11Be?”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 242501 (2016).
- (68) P. Doleschall, I. Borbély, Z. Papp and W. Plessas, “Nonlocality in the nucleon-nucleon interaction and three-nucleon bound states”, Phys. Rev. C 67, 064005 (2003).
- (69) P. Doleschall, “Influence of the short range nonlocal nucleon-nucleon interaction on the elastic scattering: Below ”, Phys. Rev. C 69, 054001 (2004).
- (70) R. Machleidt, F. Sammarruca and Y. Song, “Nonlocal nature of the nuclear force and its impact on nuclear structure”, Phys. Rev. C 53, R1483 (1996.)
- (71) R. Machleidt, K. Holinde and Ch. Elster, “The Bonn meson-exchange model for the nucleon—nucleon interaction”, Phys. Rep. 149, 1 (1987).
- (72) R. Machleidt, “The meson theory of nuclear forces and nuclear structure”, Adv. Nucl. Phys. 19, 189 (1989).
- (73) D. Logoteta, “Optimized chiral N2LO interactions in nuclear matter”, Eur. Phys. J. A 54, 111 (2018).
- (74) R. B. Wiringa, V. G. J. Stoks and R. Schiavilla, “Accurate nucleon-nucleon potential with charge-independence breaking”, Phys. Rev. C 51, 38 (1995).
- (75) E. Caurier and F. Nowacki, “Present status of shell model techniques”, Acta Phys. Pol. B 30, 705 (1999).
- (76) E. Caurier, G. Martínez-Pinedo, F. Nowacki, A. Poves, and A. P. Zuker, “The shell model as a unified view of nuclear structure”, Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 427 (2005).
- (77) C. Forssén, B. D. Carlsson, H. T. Johansson, D. Sääf, A. Bansal, G. Hagen and T. Papenbrock, “Large-scale exact diagonalizations reveal low-momentum scales of nuclei”, Phys. Rev. C 97, 034328 (2018).
- (78) N. Shimizu, T. Mizusaki, Y. Utsuno and Y. Tsunoda, “Thick-restart block Lanczos method for large-scale shell-model calculations”, Comput. Phys. Comm. 244, 372 (2019).
- (79) A. Saxena and P. C. Srivastava, “Ab initio no-core shell model study of neutron-rich nitrogen isotopes”, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2019, 073D02 (2019).
- (80) A. Saxena and P. C. Srivastava, “Ab initio no-core shell model study of 18-23O and 18-24F isotopes”, J Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 47, 055113 (2020).
- (81) Data extracted using the NNDC World Wide Web site from the ENSDF, https://www.nndc.bnl.gov/ensdf/.
- (82) IAEA, https://www-nds.iaea.org/nuclearmoments/.
- (83) M. A. Caprio, P. Maris and J. P. Vary, “Halo nuclei 6He and 8He with the Coulomb-Sturmian basis”, Phys. Rev. C 90, 034305 (2014).
- (84) A. Ekström, G. R. Jansen, K. A. Wendt, G. Hagen, T. Papenbrock, B. D. Carlsson, C. Forssén, M. Hjorth-Jensen, P. Navrátil, and W. Nazarewicz, “Accurate nuclear radii and binding energies from a chiral interaction”, Phys. Rev. C 91, 051301(R) (2015).
- (85) V. Somà, P. Navrátil, F. Raimondi, C. Barbieri, and T. Duguet, “Novel chiral Hamiltonian and observables in light and medium-mass nuclei”, Phys. Rev. C 101, 014318 (2020).