This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

A short proof of the existence of a minor-universal countable planar graph

George Kontogeorgiou

An element of a class of graphs is minor-universal for the class if every other element of the class is its minor. In [2], Diestel and KΓΌhn constructed a minor-universal countable planar graph. Their construction is rather involved. The purpose of this note is to present a significantly simpler construction and proof, based on a suggestion of Georgakopoulos ([3], p.7) to modify the construction of [4]. The idea is as follows:

  1. i.

    𝒒0\mathcal{G}_{0} is a copy of C3C_{3} embedded in π•Š2\mathbb{S}^{2};

  2. ii.

    for n>0n>0, 𝒒n\mathcal{G}_{n} is the plane graph obtained from 𝒒nβˆ’1\mathcal{G}_{n-1} in the following way: in each face FF of 𝒒nβˆ’1\mathcal{G}_{n-1} we place a vertex vFv_{F}, we connect vFv_{F} to each vertex uβˆˆβˆ‚Fu\in\partial F with an edge, and we subdivide each edge {vF,u}\{v_{F},u\} exactly nn times;

  3. iii.

    we define 𝒒:=⋃n=0βˆžπ’’n\mathcal{G}:=\bigcup_{n=0}^{\infty}\mathcal{G}_{n}.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: 𝒒2\mathcal{G}_{2} is formed by gluing two copies of this graph at the outer triangle.

In this note I prove:

Theorem 1.

The graph 𝒒\mathcal{G} is minor-universal for countable planar graphs.

By its construction, 𝒒\mathcal{G} is countable and planar. It remains to show that it has every other countable planar graph as a minor. This follows directly from the following two lemmata:

Lemma 1.

Every countable planar graph is a minor of a countable, sub-cubic, 2-connected planar graph.

Proof.

Let Gβˆˆπ’žG\in\mathcal{C}. It is simple to construct a countable planar graph G′≻GG^{\prime}\succ G in π’ž\mathcal{C} that is 2-connected and has finite maximum degree by blowing up each vertex to a locally finite tree and taking the fattening, for details see ([3], Chapter 4). We blow up each vertex of Gβ€²G^{\prime} to a finite trivalent tree to get the promised graph Gβ€²β€²G^{\prime\prime}. ∎

Lemma 2.

Every countable, sub-cubic, 2-connected planar graph is a minor of 𝒒\mathcal{G}.

The rest of this note is devoted to proving Lemma 2.

Proof of Lemma 2

An ear decomposition of a countable graph GG is a sequence (Gn)nβˆˆβ„•(G_{n})_{n\in\mathbb{N}} of subgraphs of GG such that:

  1. i.

    G0G_{0} is a cycle;

  2. ii.

    for n>0n>0, either Gn=Gnβˆ’1G_{n}=G_{n-1} or GnG_{n} is a simple graph obtained from Gnβˆ’1G_{n-1} by connecting two distinct vertices of Gnβˆ’1G_{n-1} with a new path (called an ear in this context);

  3. iii.

    G=⋃n=0∞GnG=\bigcup_{n=0}^{\infty}G_{n}.

We first prove two claims that are used in our proof.

Claim 1.

Every 2-connected countable graph GG with at least three vertices admits an ear decomposition.

Proof.

We order the edges of GG. By the infinite version of Menger’s Theorem ([1]), there exists a cycle CC that contains e0e_{0}. Set G0:=CG_{0}:=C. Given Gnβˆ’1G_{n-1}, we determine GnG_{n} as follows. If Gnβˆ’1=GG_{n-1}=G, then set Gn:=GG_{n}:=G. Otherwise, let ee be the edge outside of Gnβˆ’1G_{n-1} with the smallest index. It is a well-known exercise that there exists a cycle CeC_{e} in GG that contains both ee and e0e_{0}. Let PeP_{e} be the subpath of CeC_{e} that meets Gnβˆ’1G_{n-1} only at its endpoints and contains ee. Set Gn:=Gnβˆ’1βˆͺPeG_{n}:=G_{n-1}\cup P_{e}. To see that G=⋃n=0∞GnG=\bigcup_{n=0}^{\infty}G_{n}, note that en∈Gne_{n}\in G_{n}.

∎

Remark 1.

If GG is a plane graph, then the nt​hn^{th} ear of its ear decomposition lies in a face of Gnβˆ’1G_{n-1}.

An nn-diameter of 𝒒\mathcal{G} is a maximal path contained in 𝒒n+1βˆ–π’’n\mathcal{G}_{n+1}\setminus\mathcal{G}_{n}. An nn-slice of 𝒒\mathcal{G} is a subgraph that is bounded by (but does not contain the edges of) the boundary of a face of 𝒒n\mathcal{G}_{n} and perhaps one of the diameters of that face, and does not contain 𝒒0\mathcal{G}_{0}. An nn-piece is a subgraph of 𝒒\mathcal{G} of the form FΒ―βˆ©π’’\overline{F}\cap\mathcal{G} or (FΒ―βˆ©π’’)βˆ–π’’n(\overline{F}\cap\mathcal{G})\setminus\mathcal{G}_{n} for some face FF of 𝒒n\mathcal{G}_{n}. Recall that, given a separator SS of a graph GG and a connected component KβŠ†Gβˆ–SK\subseteq G\setminus S, the torso of KK is the induced subgraph of GG on the vertices V​(K)βˆͺSV(K)\cup S.

Refer to caption
Figure 2: A purple 22-diameter bounding a grey area that contains a 22-slice.
Claim 2.

Every nn-slice is (n+3)(n+3)-connected.

Proof.

Let JJ be an nn-slice and SS be a separator of JJ. We say that a connected component is NN-coarse for Nβ‰₯nN\geq n if its torso in JJ is the union of a finite set of NN-pieces. Since SS is finite, it is entirely contained in some 𝒒N\mathcal{G}_{N} for Nβ‰₯nN\geq n, so it splits JJ into NN-coarse components. Therefore SS must have order at least N+3β‰₯n+3N+3\geq n+3, since N+3N+3 is half the length of an NN-diameter rounded up, which is the shortest boundary that an NN-coarse component can have with its complement in JJ. ∎

Recall that an inflated copy (briefly denoted as I​GIG) of a graph G=(V,E)G=(V,E) is a graph HH together with a map Ο•:Gβ†’H\phi:G\rightarrow H such that for every v∈Vv\in V and e∈Ee\in E with ends {x,y}\{x,y\}, the following are true:

  1. i.

    ϕ​(v)\phi(v) is a connected subgraph of HH;

  2. ii.

    ϕ​(e)\phi(e) is an open path between ϕ​(x)\phi(x) and ϕ​(y)\phi(y);

  3. iii.

    the images of the elements of GG are pairwise disjoint;

  4. iv.

    ϕ​(G)=H\phi(G)=H.

A graph GG is a minor of a graph Gβ€²G^{\prime} if and only if Gβ€²G^{\prime} contains an I​GIG as a subgraph. We are now ready to prove Lemma 2:

Proof.

Let GG be a plane graph as in the statement of Lemma 2. We will construct a subgraph HH of 𝒒\mathcal{G} that is an I​GIG. In particular, we will define HH as the union of a sequence HnH_{n} of I​GnIG_{n}, where (Gn)nβˆˆβ„•(G_{n})_{n\in\mathbb{N}} is an ear decomposition of GG (Claim 1), such that for every nβˆˆβ„•n\in\mathbb{N}, v∈V​(G)v\in V(G), and e∈E​(G)e\in E(G), we have for the corresponding maps that Ο•n​(v)βŠ†Ο•n+1​(v)\phi_{n}(v)\subseteq\phi_{n+1}(v) and Ο•n​(e)=Ο•n+1​(e)\phi_{n}(e)=\phi_{n+1}(e). This will allow us to define Ο•:Gβ†’H\phi:G\rightarrow H by setting Ο•:=⋃n=0βˆžΟ•n\phi:=\bigcup_{n=0}^{\infty}\phi_{n}; the reader is invited to check that this yields an IG. To satisfy these constraints, we also require a consistent way to correspond abstract faces of GnG_{n} to slices of 𝒒\mathcal{G}. To keep notation simple, we overload our maps Ο•n\phi_{n} to also perform this function.

The following definition is key in our analysis: given a face FF of GnG_{n}, we denote by VFV_{F} the set of vertices of βˆ‚F\partial F that are ends of ears contained in FF. Note that, since GG is sub-cubic, each vertex can be the end of at most one ear.

We construct inductively the sequence Ο•n\phi_{n} with the additional useful requirements that for each v∈V​(Gn)v\in V(G_{n}), Ο•n​(v)\phi_{n}(v) is a path, and that for each face FF of GnG_{n}, the slice Ο•n​(F)\phi_{n}(F) is |VF||V_{F}|-connected and intersects HnH_{n} only at one end vertex of each of the paths {Ο•n​(v)|vβˆˆβˆ‚F}\{\phi_{n}(v)|v\in\partial F\} and in the correct cyclic order.

For the base case, suppose that G0G_{0} has length l0β‰₯3l_{0}\geq 3. We consider two disjoint face cycles C0C_{0} and C0β€²C^{\prime}_{0} of the graph 𝒒l0\mathcal{G}_{l_{0}}, contained in the same (l0βˆ’2l_{0}-2)-piece, noting that each has length 2​l0+3>l02l_{0}+3>l_{0}. By Menger’s Theorem and Claim 2, we may also consider l0l_{0} disjoint paths inside the piece joining C0C_{0} and C0β€²C^{\prime}_{0}. We define Ο•0\phi_{0} by mapping the vertices of G0G_{0} to these paths in the correct cyclic order, each edge of G0G_{0} to an appropriate (open) subpath of C0C_{0}, and the two faces F0F_{0} and F0β€²F^{\prime}_{0} of G0G_{0} to the two l0l_{0}-slices J0J_{0} and J0β€²J^{\prime}_{0} bounded by C0C_{0} and C0β€²C^{\prime}_{0}, respectively. Both J0J_{0} and J0β€²J^{\prime}_{0} are (l0+3)(l_{0}+3)-connected, and l0+3>l0=|VF0|+|VF0β€²|l_{0}+3>l_{0}=|V_{F_{0}}|+|V_{F^{\prime}_{0}}|, so F0F_{0} is mapped to a |VF0||V_{F_{0}}|-connected slice and F0β€²F^{\prime}_{0} is mapped to a |VF0β€²||V_{F^{\prime}_{0}}|-connected slice.

For the inductive step, suppose that we have defined Ο•nβˆ’1\phi_{n-1} so that each vertex vv is mapped to a path Ο•nβˆ’1​(v)\phi_{n-1}(v) and each face FF is mapped to a |VF||V_{F}|-connected slice Ο•nβˆ’1​(F)\phi_{n-1}(F) that intersects Hnβˆ’1H_{n-1} only at one end vertex of each of the paths {Ο•nβˆ’1​(v)|vβˆˆβˆ‚F}\{\phi_{n-1}(v)|v\in\partial F\} and in the correct cyclic order.

Let FF, of boundary length say ll, be the unique (Remark 1) face of Gnβˆ’1G_{n-1} such that the nt​hn^{th} ear Gnβˆ–Gnβˆ’1G_{n}\setminus G_{n-1}, of length say LL, lies within FF, splitting it to two faces Fβ€²F^{\prime} and Fβ€²β€²F^{\prime\prime}. Let ff be a face of 𝒒N\mathcal{G}_{N} for some N>nN>n such that ff is bounded by the slice Ο•nβˆ’1​(F)\phi_{n-1}(F), has diameter length at least LL, and all its slices have connectivity at least 2​L+l2L+l (e.g. take N=2​L+lβˆ’3N=2L+l-3) (Claim 2).

Refer to caption
Figure 3: A step in the construction of Ο•\phi.

By the inductive hypothesis, Ο•nβˆ’1​(F)\phi_{n-1}(F) is |VF||V_{F}|-connected. By Menger’s Theorem, there exist disjoint paths (Pv)v∈VF(P_{v})_{v\in V_{F}} in Ο•nβˆ’1​(F)\phi_{n-1}(F) such that PvP_{v} begins at the vertex Ο•nβˆ’1​(v)βˆ©Ο•nβˆ’1​(F)\phi_{n-1}(v)\cap\phi_{n-1}(F) and ends at some p​(v)βˆˆβˆ‚fp(v)\in\partial f. In particular, since 𝒒\mathcal{G} is a plane graph, pp preserves the cyclic order of Ο•nβˆ’1​(VF)\phi_{n-1}(V_{F}). We also denote by DD the diameter of ff with ends p​(x)p(x) and p​(y)p(y), where xx and yy are the ends of the ear Gnβˆ–Gnβˆ’1G_{n}\setminus G_{n-1}.

For v∈VFv\in V_{F} we set Ο•n​(v)=Ο•nβˆ’1​(v)βˆͺPv\phi_{n}(v)=\phi_{n-1}(v)\cup P_{v}. The vertices of the ear Gnβˆ–Gnβˆ’1G_{n}\setminus G_{n-1} we map arbitrarily (but in the correct order) to single vertices of DD. Each edge of the ear is mapped to the subpath of DD between the images of its ends. The faces Fβ€²F^{\prime} and FF are mapped to the corresponding slices induced on ff by DD. Every other vertex, edge, or face of GnG_{n} has the same image under Ο•n\phi_{n} as under Ο•nβˆ’1\phi_{n-1}.

Firstly, it follows from the construction that Ο•n:Gnβ†’Hn\phi_{n}:G_{n}\rightarrow H_{n} is an I​GnIG_{n}.

Moreover, for v∈VFv\in V_{F}, by the inductive hypothesis, Ο•nβˆ’1​(v)\phi_{n-1}(v) is a path. Also, PvP_{v} is a path and, again by the inductive hypothesis, Ο•nβˆ’1​(v)∩Pv\phi_{n-1}(v)\cap P_{v} is a single vertex. Therefore, Ο•n​(v)\phi_{n}(v) is a path. Trivially, the same holds for vertices in V​(Gn)βˆ–VFV(G_{n})\setminus V_{F}.

Additionally, both Fβ€²F^{\prime} and Fβ€²β€²F^{\prime\prime} are mapped to slices of connectivity 2​L+l2L+l. Since |VFβ€²|+|VFβ€²β€²|≀|βˆ‚Fβ€²|+|βˆ‚Fβ€²β€²|=2​L+l|V_{F^{\prime}}|+|V_{F^{\prime\prime}}|\leq|\partial F^{\prime}|+|\partial F^{\prime\prime}|=2L+l, both of these slices are adequately connected. We have also ensured that they intersect the appropriate vertex images under Ο•n\phi_{n} only at one end vertex each and in the correct cyclic order. These same properties hold, by the inductive hypothesis, for every other face image of GnG_{n}. This concludes the induction, and the proof of Lemma 2.

∎

Remark 2.

The above construction is quite manageable, and perhaps can be modified to tackle the problem of minor-universal elements for 2-complexes embeddable in π•Š3\mathbb{S}^{3}, mentioned in ([3], p.12).

References

  • [1] Halin, R. (1974). A note on Menger’s theorem for infinite locally finite graphs. Abhandlungen aus dem Mathematischen Seminar der UniversitΓ€t Hamburg. 40:111-114.
  • [2] Diestel, R. and KΓΌhn, D. (1999). A universal planar graph under the minor relation. Journal of Graph Theory. 32:191-206.
  • [3] Georgakopoulos, A. (2022). On graph classes with minor-universal elements. Preprint.
  • [4] Georgakopoulos, A. (2006). Infinite highly connected planar graphs of large girth. Abhandlungen aus dem Mathematischen Seminar der UniversitΓ€t Hamburg. 76(1):235-245.