A semi-small decomposition of the Chow ring of a matroid
Abstract.
We give a semi-small orthogonal decomposition of the Chow ring of a matroid . The decomposition is used to give simple proofs of Poincaré duality, the hard Lefschetz theorem, and the Hodge–Riemann relations for the Chow ring, recovering the main result of [AHK]. We also show that a similar semi-small orthogonal decomposition holds for the augmented Chow ring of .
1. Introduction
A matroid on a finite set is a nonempty collection of subsets of , called flats of , that satisfies the following properties:
-
(1)
The intersection of any two flats is a flat.
-
(2)
For any flat , any element in is contained in exactly one flat that is minimal among the flats strictly containing .
Throughout, we suppose in addition that is a loopless matroid:
-
(3)
The empty subset of is a flat.
We write for the lattice of all flats of . Every maximal flag of proper flats of has the same cardinality , called the rank of . A matroid can be equivalently defined in terms of its independent sets or the rank function. For background in matroid theory, we refer to [Oxley] and [Welsh].
The first aim of the present paper is to decompose the Chow ring of as a module over the Chow ring of the deletion (Theorem 1.1). The decomposition resembles the decomposition of the cohomology ring of a projective variety induced by a semi-small map. In Section 4, we use the decomposition to give simple proofs of Poincaré duality, the hard Lefschetz theorem, and the Hodge–Riemann relations for the Chow ring, recovering the main result of [AHK].
The second aim of the present paper is to introduce the augmented Chow ring of , which contains the graded Möbius algebra of as a subalgebra. We give an analogous semi-small decomposition of the augmented Chow ring of as a module over the augmented Chow ring of the deletion (Theorem 1.2), and use this to prove Poincaré duality, the hard Lefschetz theorem, and the Hodge–Riemann relations for the augmented Chow ring. These results will play a major role in the forthcoming paper [BHMPW], where we will prove the Top-Heavy conjecture along with the nonnegativity of the coefficients of the Kazhdan–Lusztig polynomial of a matroid.
1.1.
Let be the ring of polynomials with variables labeled by the nonempty proper flats of :
The Chow ring of , introduced by Feichtner and Yuzvinsky in [FY], is the quotient algebra111A slightly different presentation for the Chow ring of was used in [FY] in a more general context. The present description was used in [AHK], where the Chow ring of was denoted . For a comparison of the two presentations, see [BES].
where is the ideal generated by the linear forms
and is the ideal generated by the quadratic monomials
When is nonempty, the Chow ring of admits a degree map
where is any complete flag of nonempty proper flats of (Definition 2.12). For any integer , the degree map defines the Poincaré pairing
If is realizable over a field,222 We say that is realizable over a field if there exists a linear subspace such that is independent if and only if the projection from to is surjective. Almost all matroids are not realizable over any field [Nelson]. then the Chow ring of is isomorphic to the Chow ring of a smooth projective variety over the field (Remark 2.13).
Let be an element of , and let be the deletion of from . By definition, is the matroid on whose flats are the sets of the form for a flat of . The Chow rings of and are related by the graded algebra homomorphism
where a variable in the target is set to zero if its label is not a flat of . Let be the image of the homomorphism , and let be the collection
The element is said to be a coloop of if the ranks of and are not equal.
Theorem 1.1.
If is not a coloop of , there is a direct sum decomposition of into indecomposable graded -modules
() |
All pairs of distinct summands are orthogonal for the Poincaré pairing of . If is a coloop of , there is a direct sum decomposition of into indecomposable graded -modules333When , we treat the symbol as zero in the right-hand side of ().
() |
All pairs of distinct summands except for the first two are orthogonal for the Poincaré pairing of .
We write for the rank function of . For any proper flat of , we set444The symbols and appear inconsistently in the literature, sometimes this way and sometimes interchanged. The localization is frequently called the restriction. On the other hand, the contraction is also sometimes called the restriction, especially in the context of hyperplane arrangements, so we avoid the word restriction to minimize ambiguity.
The lattice of flats of can be identified with the lattice of flats of that are contained in , and the lattice of flats of can be identified with the lattice of flats of that contain . The -module summands in the decompositions () and () admit isomorphisms
where indicates a degree shift (Propositions 3.4 and 3.5). In addition, if is a coloop of ,
Numerically, the semi-smallness of the decomposition () is reflected in the identity
When is the Boolean matroid on , the graded dimension of is given by the Eulerian numbers , and the decomposition () specializes to the known quadratic recurrence relation
where is the -th Eulerian polynomial [Petersen, Theorem 1.5].
1.2.
We also give similar decompositions for the augmented Chow ring of , which we now introduce. Let be the ring of polynomials in two sets of variables
The augmented Chow ring of is the quotient algebra
where is the ideal generated by the linear forms
and is the ideal generated by the quadratic monomials
for every pair of incomparable proper flats and of , and | |||
for every element of and every proper flat of not containing . |
The augmented Chow ring of admits a degree map
where is any complete flag of proper flats of (Definition 2.12). For any integer , the degree map defines the Poincaré pairing
If is realizable over a field, then the augmented Chow ring of is isomorphic to the Chow ring of a smooth projective variety over the field (Remark 2.13). The augmented Chow ring contains the graded Möbius algebra (Proposition 2.15), and it is related to the Chow ring of by the isomorphism
The -module structure of will be studied in detail in the forthcoming paper [BHMPW].
As before, we write for the matroid obtained from by deleting the element . The augmented Chow rings of and are related by the graded algebra homomorphism
where a variable in the target is set to zero if its label is not a flat of . Let be the image of the homomorphism , and let be the collection
Theorem 1.2.
If is not a coloop of , there is a direct sum decomposition of into indecomposable graded -modules
() |
All pairs of distinct summands are orthogonal for the Poincaré pairing of . If is a coloop of , there is a direct sum decomposition of into indecomposable graded -modules
() |
All pairs of distinct summands except for the first two are orthogonal for the Poincaré pairing of .
1.3.
Let be the Boolean matroid on . By definition, every subset of is a flat of . The Chow rings of and are related by the surjective graded algebra homomorphism
where a variable in the target is set to zero if its label is not a flat of . Similarly, we have a surjective graded algebra homomorphism
where a variable in the target is set to zero if its label is not a flat of . As in [AHK, Section 4], we may identify the Chow ring with the ring of piecewise polynomial functions modulo linear functions on the normal fan of the standard permutohedron in . Similarly, the augmented Chow ring can be identified with the ring of piecewise polynomial functions modulo linear functions of the normal fan of the stellahedron in (Definition 2.4). A convex piecewise linear function on a complete fan is said to be strictly convex if there is a bijection between the cones in the fan and the faces of the graph of the function.
In Section 4, we use Theorems 1.1 and 1.2 to give simple proofs of Poincaré duality, the hard Lefschetz theorem, and the Hodge–Riemann relations for and .
Theorem 1.3.
Let be a strictly convex piecewise linear function on , viewed as an element of .
-
(1)
(Poincaré duality theorem) For every nonnegative integer , the bilinear pairing
is non-degenerate.
-
(2)
(Hard Lefschetz theorem) For every nonnegative integer , the multiplication map
is an isomorphism.
-
(3)
(Hodge–Riemann relations) For every nonnegative integer , the bilinear form
is positive definite on the kernel of multiplication by .
Let be a strictly convex piecewise linear function on , viewed as an element of .
-
(4)
(Poincaré duality theorem) For every nonnegative integer , the bilinear pairing
is non-degenerate.
-
(5)
(Hard Lefschetz theorem) For every nonnegative integer , the multiplication map
is an isomorphism.
-
(6)
(Hodge–Riemann relations) For every nonnegative integer , the bilinear form
is positive definite on the kernel of multiplication by .
Theorem 1.3 holds non-vacuously, as there are strictly convex piecewise linear functions on and (Proposition 2.6). The first part of Theorem 1.3 on recovers the main result of [AHK].555Independent proofs of Poincaré duality for were given in [BES] and [BDF]. The authors of [BES] also prove the degree Hodge–Riemann relations for . The second part of Theorem 1.3 on is new.
1.4.
In Section 5, we use Theorems 1.1 and 1.2 to obtain decompositions of and related to those appearing in [AHK, Theorem 6.18]. Let be the subalgebra of generated by the element
where the sum is over all nonempty proper flats of containing a given element in , and let be the subalgebra of generated by the element
where the sum is over all proper flats of . We define graded subspaces and by
A degree computation shows that the elements and are nonzero (Proposition 2.26).
Theorem 1.4.
Let be the set of all nonempty proper flats of , and let be the set of all proper flats of with rank at least two.
-
(1)
We have a decomposition of -modules
() All pairs of distinct summands are orthogonal for the Poincaré pairing of .
-
(2)
We have a decomposition of -modules
() All pairs of distinct summands are orthogonal for the Poincaré pairing of .
Here is the injective -module homomorphism (Propositions 2.21 and 2.22)
and is the injective -module homomorphism (Propositions 2.18 and 2.19)
When is the Boolean matroid on , the decomposition () specializes to a linear recurrence relation for the Eulerian polynomials
When applied repeatedly, Theorem 1.4 produces bases of and that are permuted by the automorphism group of .666Different bases of are given in [FY, Corollary 1] and [BES, Corollary 3.3.3].
Acknowledgments. We thank Christopher Eur and Matthew Stevens for useful discussions.
2. The Chow ring and the augmented Chow ring of a matroid
In this section, we collect the various properties of the algebras and that we will need in order to prove Theorems 1.1–1.4. In Section 2.1, we review the definition and basic properties of the Bergman fan and introduce the closely related augmented Bergman fan of a matroid. Section 2.2 is devoted to understanding the stars of the various rays in these two fans, while Section 2.3 is where we compute the space of balanced top-dimensional weights on each fan. Feichtner and Yuzvinsky showed that the Chow ring of a matroid coincides with the Chow ring of the toric variety associated with its Bergman fan [FY, Theorem 3], and we establish the analogous result for the augmented Chow ring in Section 2.4. Section 2.5 is where we show that the augmented Chow ring contains the graded Möbius algebra. In Section 2.6, we use the results of Section 2.2 to construct various homomorphisms that relate the Chow and augmented Chow rings of different matroids.
Remark 2.1.
It is worth noting why we need to interpret and as Chow rings of toric varieties. First, the study of balanced weights on the Bergman fan and augmented Bergman fan allow us to show that and are nonzero, which is not easy to prove directly from the definitions. The definition of the pullback and pushforward maps in Section 2.6 is made cleaner by thinking about fans, though it would also be possible to define these maps by taking Propositions 2.17, 2.18, 2.20, 2.21, 2.23, and 2.24 as definitions. Finally, and most importantly, the fan perspective will be essential for understanding the ample classes that appear in Theorem 1.3.
2.1. Fans
Let be a finite set, and let be a loopless matroid of rank on the ground set . We write for the rank function of , and write for the closure operator of , which for a set returns the smallest flat containing . The independence complex of is the simplicial complex of independent sets of . A set is independent if and only if the rank of is . The vertices of are the elements of the ground set , and a collection of vertices is a face of when the corresponding set of elements is an independent set of . The Bergman complex of is the order complex of the poset of nonempty proper flats of . The vertices of are the nonempty proper flats of , and a collection of vertices is a face of when the corresponding set of flats is a flag. The independence complex of is pure of dimension , and the Bergman complex of is pure of dimension . For a detailed study of the simplicial complexes and , we refer to [Bjorner]. We introduce the augmented Bergman complex of as a simplicial complex that interpolates between the independence complex and the Bergman complex of .
Definition 2.2.
Let be an independent set of , and let be a flag of proper flats of . When is contained in every flat in , we say that is compatible with and write . The augmented Bergman complex of is the simplicial complex of all compatible pairs , where is an independent set of and is a flag of proper flats of .
A vertex of the augmented Bergman complex is either a singleton subset of or a proper flat of . More precisely, the vertices of are the compatible pairs either of the form or of the form , where is an element of and is a proper flat of . The augmented Bergman complex contains both the independence complex and the Bergman complex as subcomplexes. In fact, contains the order complex of the poset of proper flats of , which is the cone over the Bergman complex with the cone point corresponding to the empty flat. It is straightforward to check that is pure of dimension .
Proposition 2.3.
The Bergman complex and the augmented Bergman complex of are both connected in codimension .
Proof.
The statement about the Bergman complex is a direct consequence of its shellability [Bjorner]. We prove the statement about the augmented Bergman complex using the statement about the Bergman complex.
The claim is that, given any two facets of , one may travel from one facet to the other by passing through faces of codimension at most . Since the Bergman complex of is connected in codimension , the subcomplex of consisting of faces of the form is connected in codimension . Thus it suffices to show that any facet of can be connected to a facet of the form through codimension faces.
Let be a facet of . If is nonempty, choose any element of , and consider the flag of flats obtained by adjoining the closure of to . The independent set is compatible with the flag , and the facet is adjacent to the facet . Repeating the procedure, we can connect the given facet to a facet of the desired form through codimension faces. ∎
Let be the vector space spanned by the standard basis vectors corresponding to the elements . For an arbitrary subset , we set
For an element , we write for the ray generated by the vector in . For a subset , we write for the ray generated by the vector in , and write for the ray generated by the vector in . Using these rays, we construct fan models of the Bergman complex and the augmented Bergman complex as follows.
Definition 2.4.
The Bergman fan of is a simplicial fan in the quotient space with rays for nonempty proper flats of . The cones of are of the form
where is a flag of nonempty proper flats of .
The augmented Bergman fan of is a simplicial fan in with rays for elements in and for proper flats of . The cones of the augmented Bergman fan are of the form
where is a flag of proper flats of and is an independent set of compatible with . We write for the cone when is the empty flag of flats of .
Remark 2.5.
If is nonempty, then the Bergman fan is the star of the ray in the augmented Bergman fan . If is empty, then and both consist of a single -dimensional cone.
Let be another loopless matroid on . The matroid is said to be a quotient of if every flat of is a flat of . The condition implies that every independent set of is an independent set of [Kung, Proposition 8.1.6]. Therefore, when is a quotient of , the augmented Bergman fan of is a subfan of the augmented Bergman fan of , and the Bergman fan of is a subfan of the Bergman fan of . In particular, we have inclusions of fans and , where is the Boolean matroid on defined by the condition that is an independent set of .
Proposition 2.6.
The Bergman fan and the augmented Bergman fan of are each normal fans of convex polytopes. In particular, there are strictly convex piecewise linear functions on and .
The above proposition can be used to show that the augmented Bergman fan and the Bergman fan of are, in fact, fans.
Proof.
The statement for the Bergman fan is well-known: The Bergman fan of is the normal fan of the standard permutohedron in . See, for example, [AHK, Section 2]. The statement for the augmented Bergman fan follows from the fact that it is an iterated stellar subdivision of the normal fan of the simplex
More precisely, is isomorphic to the fan in [AHK, Definition 2.3], where is the order filter of all subsets of containing the new element , via the linear isomorphism
It is shown in [AHK, Proposition 2.4] that is an iterated stellar subdivision of the normal fan of the simplex.777In fact, the augmented Bergman fan is the normal fan of the stellahedron in , the graph associahedron of the star graph with endpoints. We refer to [CD] and [Devadoss] for detailed discussions of graph associahedra and their realizations. ∎
A direct inspection shows that is a unimodular fan; that is, the set of primitive ray generators in any cone in is a subset of a basis of the free abelian group . It follows that is also a unimodular fan; that is, the set of primitive ray generators in any cone in is a subset of a basis of the free abelian group .
2.2. Stars
For any element of , we write for the closure of in , and write for the injective linear map
For any proper flat of , we write for the linear isomorphism
For any nonempty proper flat of , we write for the linear isomorphism
Let be the localization of at , and let be the contraction of by .
Proposition 2.7.
The following are descriptions of the stars of the rays in and using the three linear maps above.
-
(1)
For any element , the linear map identifies the augmented Bergman fan of with the star of the ray in the augmented Bergman fan of :
-
(2)
For any proper flat of , the linear map identifies the product of the Bergman fan of and the augmented Bergman fan of with the star of the ray in the augmented Bergman fan of :
-
(3)
For any nonempty proper flat of , the linear map identifies the product of the Bergman fan of and the Bergman fan of with the star of the ray in the Bergman fan of :
Repeated applications of the first statement show that, for any independent set of , the star of the cone in can be identified with the augmented Bergman fan of , where is the closure of in .
Proof.
The first statement follows from the following facts: A flat of contains if and only if it contains , and an independent set of containing does not contain any other element in . The second and third statements follow directly from the definitions. ∎
2.3. Weights
For any simplicial fan , we write for the set of -dimensional cones in . If is a codimension face of a cone , we write
A -dimensional balanced weight on is a -valued function on that satisfies the balancing condition: For every -dimensional cone in ,
is contained in the subspace spanned by , |
where the sum is over all -dimensional cones containing . We write for the group of -dimensional balanced weights on .
Proposition 2.8.
The Bergman fan and the augmented Bergman fan of have the following unique balancing property.
-
(1)
A -dimensional weight on is balanced if and only if it is constant.
-
(2)
A -dimensional weight on is balanced if and only if it is constant.
Proof.
The first statement is [AHK, Proposition 5.2]. We prove the second statement.
Let be a codimension cone of , and let be the smallest flat in . We analyze the primitive generators of the rays in the star of the cone in . Let be the closure of in . There are two cases.
When the closure of is not , the primitive ray generators in question are and , for elements in not in the closure of . The primitive ray generators satisfy the relation
which is zero modulo the span of . As the ’s are independent modulo the span of , any relation between the primitive generators must be a multiple of the displayed one.
When the closure of is , the fact that has codimension implies that there is a unique integer with such that does not include a flat of rank . Let be the unique flat in of rank , and let be the unique flat in of rank . The primitive ray generators in question are for the flats in , where is the set of flats of covering and covered by . By the flat partition property of matroids [Oxley, Section 1.4], the primitive ray generators satisfy the relation
which is zero modulo the span of . Since any proper subset of the primitive generators for in is independent modulo the span of , any relation between the primitive generators must be a multiple of the displayed one.
The local analysis above shows that any constant -dimensional weight on is balanced. Since is connected in codimension by Proposition 2.3, it also shows that any -dimensional balanced weight on must be constant. ∎
2.4. Chow rings
Any unimodular fan in defines a graded commutative algebra , which is the Chow ring of the associated smooth toric variety over with rational coefficients. Equivalently, is the ring of continuous piecewise polynomial functions on with rational coefficients modulo the ideal generated by globally linear functions [Brion, Section 3.1]. We write for the Chow group of codimension cycles in , so that
The group of -dimensional balanced weights on is related to by the isomorphism
where is the class of the torus orbit closure in corresponding to a -dimensional cone in . See [AHK, Section 5] for a detailed discussion. For general facts on toric varieties and Chow rings, and for any undefined terms, we refer to [CLS] and [Fulton].
In Proposition 2.10 below, we show that the Chow ring of coincides with and that the augmented Chow ring of coincides with .
Lemma 2.9.
The following identities hold in the augmented Chow ring .
-
(1)
For any element of , we have .
-
(2)
For any two bases and of a flat of , we have .
-
(3)
For any dependent set of , we have .
Proof.
The first identity is a straightforward consequence of the relations in and :
For the second identity, we may assume that and , by the basis exchange property of matroids. Since a flat of contains if and only if it contains , we have
This immediately implies that we also have
which tells us that
For the third identity, we may suppose that is a circuit, that is, a minimal dependent set. Since is a loopless matroid, we may choose distinct elements and from . Note that the independent sets and have the same closure because is a circuit. Therefore, by the second identity, we have
Combining the above with the first identity, we get
By the second identity in Lemma 2.9, we may define
for any flat of and any basis of . The element will play the role of the fundamental class for the augmented Chow ring of .
Proposition 2.10.
We have isomorphisms
Proof.
The first isomorphism is proved in [FY, Theorem 3]; see also [AHK, Section 5.3].
Let be the ideal of generated by the monomials for every dependent set of . The ring of continuous piecewise polynomial functions on is isomorphic to the Stanley–Reisner ring of , which is equal to
The ring is obtained from this ring by killing the linear forms that generate the ideal . In other words, we have a surjective homomorphism
The fact that this is an isomorphism follows from the third part of Lemma 2.9. ∎
Remark 2.11.
By Proposition 2.10, the graded dimension of the Chow ring of the rank Boolean matroid is given by the -vector of the permutohedron in . In other words, we have
See [Petersen, Section 9.1] for more on permutohedra and Eulerian numbers.
If is nonempty, we have the balanced weight
which can be used to define a degree map on the Chow ring of . Similarly, for any ,
can be used to define a degree map on the augmented Chow ring of .
Definition 2.12.
Consider the following degree maps for the Chow ring and the augmented Chow ring of .
-
(1)
If is nonempty, the degree map for is the linear map
where is any monomial corresponding to a maximal cone of .
-
(2)
For any , the degree map for is the linear map
where is any monomial corresponding to a maximal cone of .
By Proposition 2.8, the degree maps are well-defined and are isomorphisms. It follows that, for any two maximal cones and of the Bergman fan of ,
Similarly, for any two maximal cones and of the augmented Bergman fan of ,
where is the closure of in and is the closure of in . Proposition 2.10 shows that
Remark 2.13.
Let be a field, and let be a -dimensional linear subspace of . We suppose that the subspace is not contained in for any proper subset of . Let be the Boolean matroid on , and let be the loopless matroid on defined by
Let be the projective space of lines in , and let be its open torus. For any proper flat of , we write for the projective subspace
The wonderful variety is obtained from by first blowing up for every corank flat , then blowing up the strict transforms of for every corank flat , and so on. Equivalently,
When is nonempty, the inclusion induces an isomorphism between their Chow rings,888In general, the inclusion does not induce an isomorphism between their singular cohomology rings. and hence the Chow ring of is isomorphic to [FY, Corollary 2].
Let be the projective completion of , and let be its open torus. The projective completion contains a copy of as the hyperplane at infinity, and it therefore contains a copy of for every nonempty proper flat . The augmented wonderful variety is obtained from by first blowing up for every corank flat , then blowing up the strict transforms of for every corank flat , and so on. Equivalently,
The inclusion induces an isomorphism between their Chow rings, and hence the Chow ring of is isomorphic to .999This can be proved using the interpretation of in the last sentence of Remark 4.1.
2.5. The graded Möbius algebra
For any nonnegative integer , we define a vector space
where the direct sum is over the set of rank flats of .
Definition 2.14.
The graded Möbius algebra of is the graded vector space
The multiplication in is defined by the rule
where stands for the join operation in the lattice of flats of .
Our double use of the symbol is justified by the following proposition.
Proposition 2.15.
The graded linear map
is an injective homomorphism of graded algebras.
Proof.
We first show that the linear map is injective. It is enough to check that the subset
is linearly independent for every nonnegative integer . Suppose that
For any given rank flat , we choose a saturated flag of proper flats whose smallest member is and observe that
Since the degree of is , this implies that must be zero.
We next check that the linear map is an algebra homomorphism using Lemma 2.9. Let be a basis of a flat , and let be a basis of a flat . If the rank of is the sum of the ranks of and , then and are disjoint and their union is a basis of . Therefore, in the augmented Chow ring of ,
If the rank of is less than the sum of the ranks of and , then either and intersect or the union of and is dependent in . Therefore, in the augmented Chow ring of ,
Remark 2.16.
Consider the torus , the toric variety , and the augmented wonderful variety in Remark 2.13. The identity of uniquely extends to a toric map
Let be the restriction of to the augmented wonderful variety . If we identify the Chow ring of with as in Remark 2.13, the image of the pullback is the graded Möbius algebra .
2.6. Pullback and pushforward maps
Let be a unimodular fan, and let be a -dimensional cone in . The torus orbit closure in the smooth toric variety corresponding to can be identified with the toric variety of the fan . Its class in the Chow ring of is the monomial , which is the product of the divisor classes corresponding to the rays in . The inclusion of the torus orbit closure in defines the pullback and the pushforward between the Chow rings, whose composition is multiplication by the monomial :
The pullback is a surjective graded algebra homomorphism, while the pushforward is a degree homomorphism of -modules.
We give an explicit description of the pullback and the pushforward when is the augmented Bergman fan and is the ray of a proper flat of . Recall from Proposition 2.7 that the star of admits the decomposition
Thus we may identify the Chow ring of the star of with . We denote the pullback to the tensor product by and the pushforward from the tensor product by :
To describe the pullback and the pushforward, we introduce Chow classes , , and . They are defined as the sums
where the sum is over all proper flats of ;
where the sum is over all nonempty proper flats of containing a given element in ; and
where the sum is over all nonempty proper flats of not containing a given element in . The linear relations defining show that and do not depend on the choice of .
The following two propositions are straightforward.
Proposition 2.17.
The pullback is the unique graded algebra homomorphism
that satisfies the following properties:
-
If is a proper flat of incomparable to , then .
-
If is a proper flat of properly contained in , then .
-
If is a proper flat of properly containing , then .
-
If is an element of , then .
-
If is an element of , then .
The above five properties imply the following additional properties of :
-
The equality holds.
-
The equality holds.
Proposition 2.18.
The pushforward is the unique -module homomorphism101010We make into a -module homomorphism via the pullback .
that satisfies, for any collection of proper flats of strictly containing and any collection of proper flats of strictly contained in ,
The composition is multiplication by the element , and the composition is multiplication by the element .
Proposition 2.18 shows that the pushforward commutes with the degree maps:
Proposition 2.19.
If and satisfy the Poincaré duality part of Theorem 1.3, then is injective.
In other words, assuming Poincaré duality for the Chow rings, the graded -module is isomorphic to the principal ideal of in .111111For a graded vector space , we write for the graded vector space whose degree piece is equal to . In particular,
Proof.
We will use the symbol to denote the degree function . For contradiction, suppose that for . By the two Poincaré duality statements in Theorem 1.3, there is an element such that . By surjectivity of the pullback , there is an element such that . Since is a -module homomorphism that commutes with the degree maps, we have
which is a contradiction. ∎
We next give an explicit description of the pullback and the pushforward when is the Bergman fan and is the ray of a nonempty proper flat of . Recall from Proposition 2.7 that the star of admits the decomposition
Thus we may identify the Chow ring of the star of with . We denote the pullback to the tensor product by and the pushforward from the tensor product by :
The following analogues of Propositions 2.17 and 2.18 are straightforward.
Proposition 2.20.
The pullback is the unique graded algebra homomorphism
that satisfies the following properties:
-
If is a nonempty proper flat of incomparable to , then .
-
If is a nonempty proper flat of properly contained in , then .
-
If is a nonempty proper flat of properly containing , then .
The above three properties imply the following additional properties of :
-
The equality holds.
-
The equality holds.
-
The equality holds.
Proposition 2.21.
The pushforward is the unique -module homomorphism
that satisfies, for any collection of proper flats of strictly containing and any collection of nonempty proper flats of strictly contained in ,
The composition is multiplication by the element , and the composition is multiplication by the element .
Proposition 2.21 shows that the pushforward commutes with the degree maps:
Proposition 2.22.
If and satisfy the Poincaré duality part of Theorem 1.3, then is injective.
In other words, assuming Poincaré duality for the Chow rings, the graded -module is isomorphic to the principal ideal of in .
Proof.
The proof is essentially identical to that of Proposition 2.19. ∎
Last, we give an explicit description of the pullback and the pushforward when is the augmented Bergman fan and is the cone of a independent set of . By Proposition 2.7, we have
where is the closure of in . Thus we may identify the Chow ring of the star of with . We denote the corresponding pullback by and the pushforward by :
Note that the pullback and the pushforward only depend on and not on .
Proposition 2.23.
The pullback is the unique graded algebra homomorphism
that satisfies the following properties:
-
If is a proper flat of that contains , then .
-
If is a proper flat of that does not contain , then .
The above two properties imply the following additional properties of :
-
If is an element of , then .
-
If is an element of , then .
-
The equality holds.
Proposition 2.24.
The pushforward is the unique -module homomorphism
that satisfies, for any collection of proper flats of containing ,
The composition is multiplication by the element , and the composition is zero.
Proposition 2.24 shows that the pushforward commutes with the degree maps:
Proposition 2.25.
If satisfies the Poincaré duality part of Theorem 1.3, then is injective.
In other words, assuming Poincaré duality for the Chow rings, the graded -module is isomorphic to the principal ideal of in .
Proof.
The proof is essentially identical to that of Proposition 2.19. ∎
The basic properties of the pullback and the pushforward maps can be used to describe the fundamental classes of and in terms of and .
Proposition 2.26.
The degree of is , and the degree of is .
Proof.
We prove the first statement by induction on . Note that, for any nonempty proper flat of rank , we have
since . Therefore, for any proper flat of rank and any element in , we have
Now, using the induction hypothesis applied to the matroid of rank , we get
where is any maximal flag of nonempty proper flats of that starts from .
For the second statement, note that, for any proper flat of rank ,
Using the first statement, we get the conclusion from the identity
More generally, the degree of is the -th coefficient of the reduced characteristic polynomial of [AHK, Proposition 9.5].
Remark 2.27.
In the setting of Remark 2.13, the element , viewed as an element of the Chow ring of the augmented wonderful variety , is the class of the pullback of the hyperplane .
3. Proofs of the semi-small decompositions and the Poincaré duality theorems
In this section, we prove Theorems 1.1 and 1.2 together with the two Poincaré duality statements in Theorem 1.3. For an element of , we write and for the coordinate projections
Note that and . In addition, and for .
Proposition 3.1.
Let be a loopless matroid on , and let be an element of .
-
(1)
The projection maps any cone of onto a cone of .
-
(2)
The projection maps any cone of onto a cone of .
Recall that a linear map defines a morphism of fans if it maps any cone of into a cone of [CLS, Chapter 3]. Thus the above proposition is stronger than the statement that and induce morphisms of fans.
Proof.
The projection maps onto , where is the flag of flats of obtained by removing from the members of . Similarly, maps onto . ∎
By Proposition 3.1, the projection defines a map from the toric variety of to the toric variety of , and hence the pullback homomorphism . Explicitly, the pullback is the graded algebra homomorphism
where a variable in the target is set to zero if its label is not a flat of . Similarly, defines a map from the toric variety of to the toric variety of , and hence an algebra homomorphism
where a variable in the target is set to zero if its label is not a flat of .
Remark 3.2.
We use the notations introduced in Remark 2.13. Let be the image of under the -th projection . We have the commutative diagrams of wonderful varieties and their Chow rings
The map is birational if and only if is not a coloop of . By Proposition 3.1, the fibers of are at most one-dimensional, and hence the fibers of are at most one-dimensional. It follows that is semi-small in the sense of Goresky–MacPherson when is not a coloop of .
Similarly, we have the diagrams of augmented wonderful varieties and their Chow rings
The map is birational if and only if is not a coloop of . By Proposition 3.1, the fibers of are at most one-dimensional, and hence is semi-small when is not a coloop of .
Numerically, the semi-smallness of is reflected in the identity
Similarly, the semi-smallness of is reflected in the identity121212The displayed identities follow from Proposition 3.5 and the Poincaré duality parts of Theorem 1.3.
For a detailed discussion of semi-small maps in the context of Hodge theory and the decomposition theorem, see [dCM2] and [dCM1].
The element is said to be a coloop of if the ranks of and are not equal. We show that the pullbacks and are compatible with the degree maps of and .
Lemma 3.3.
Suppose that is nonempty.
-
(1)
If is not a coloop of , then commutes with the degree maps:
-
(2)
If is not a coloop of , then commutes with the degree maps:
-
(3)
If is a coloop of , we have
where the middle maps are multiplications by the elements and .
-
(4)
If is a coloop of , we have
where the middle maps are multiplications by the elements and .
Proof.
If is not a coloop of , we may choose a basis of that is also a basis of . We have
Since for all , the first identity follows. Similarly, by Proposition 2.26,
Since when is not a coloop, the second identity follows.
Suppose now that is a coloop of . In this case, , and hence
Using the compatibility of the pushforward with the degree maps, we have
Since when is a coloop of , the above implies
The identities for can be obtained in a similar way. ∎
Proposition 3.4.
Proof.
The proof is essentially identical to that of Proposition 2.19. ∎
For a flat in , we write for the pullback map between the augmented Chow rings obtained from the deletion of from the localization :
Similarly, for a flat in , we write for the pullback map between the Chow rings obtained from the deletion of from the localization :
Note that is a coloop of in these cases.
Proposition 3.5.
It follows, assuming Poincaré duality for the Chow rings,131313We need Poincaré duality for , , , , and . that
Therefore, again assuming Poincaré duality for the Chow rings, we have
Proof.
We prove the first statement. The proof of the second statement is essentially identical. The third statement is a straightforward consequence of the fact that and are the identity maps when is a coloop.
Let be a flat in . It is enough to show that
since the result will then follow by applying . The projection maps the ray to the ray , and hence defines morphisms of fans
where and are the isomorphisms in Proposition 2.7. The main point is that the matroid is a quotient of . In other words, we have the inclusion of Bergman fans
Therefore, the morphism admits the factorization
where the second map induces a surjective pullback map between the Chow rings. By the equality , we have the commutative diagram of pullback maps between the Chow rings
The conclusion follows from the surjectivity of the pullback maps and . ∎
Remark 3.6.
Since is a coloop in when or , Proposition 3.5 implies that
Proposition 3.7.
It follows, assuming Poincaré duality for the Chow rings,141414We need Poincaré duality for , , , , and . that the restriction of the Poincaré pairing of to the subspace is non-degenerate, and the restriction of the Poincaré pairing of to the subspace is non-degenerate.
Proof.
We prove the first identity. The second identity can be proved in the same way.
Since the pushforward is a -module homomorphism, the left-hand side is
The pushforward commutes with the degree maps, so the above is equal to
Using that the composition is multiplication by , we get
Since is a coloop of , the expression simplifies to
Now the third part of Lemma 3.3 shows that the above quantity is the right-hand side of the formula in statement (1). ∎
Lemma 3.8.
If flats , are in and is a proper subset of , then
Similarly, if , are in and is a proper subset of , then
Proof.
Since is not comparable to , we have
The second part follows from the same argument. ∎
Proof of Theorem 1.1, Theorem 1.2, and parts (1) and (4) of Theorem 1.3.
All the summands in the proposed decompositions are cyclic, and therefore indecomposable in the category of graded modules.151515By [CF, Corollary 2] or [GG, Theorem 3.2], the indecomposability of the summands in the category of graded modules implies the indecomposability of the summands in the category of modules. We prove the decompositions by induction on the cardinality of the ground set . If is empty, then Theorem 1.1, Theorem 1.2, and part (1) of Theorem 1.3 are vacuous, while part (4) of Theorem 1.3 is trivial. Furthermore, all of these results are trivial when is a singleton. Thus, we may assume that is an element of , that is nonempty, and that all the results hold for loopless matroids whose ground set is a proper subset of .
First we assume that is not a coloop. Let us show that the terms in the right-hand side of the decomposition () are orthogonal. Multiplying and lands in , and this ideal vanishes in degree by Remark 3.6, so they are orthogonal. On the other hand, the product of and vanishes if are not comparable, while if or , the product is contained in or respectively, by Lemma 3.8. So these terms are also orthogonal.
It follows from the induction hypothesis and Lemma 3.3 that the restriction of the Poincaré pairing of to is non-degenerate. By Proposition 3.5, Proposition 3.7, and the induction hypothesis, the restriction of the Poincaré pairing of to any other summand is also non-degenerate. Therefore, we can conclude that the sum on the right-hand side of () is a direct sum with a non-degenerate Poincaré pairing.
To complete the proof of the decomposition () and the Poincaré duality theorem for , we must show that the direct sum
is equal to all of . This is obvious in degree . To see that it holds in degree , it is enough to check that is contained in the direct sum for any proper flat of . If is a not flat of , then If is a flat of , then either or . In the first case, is an element of the summand indexed by . In the second case,
Since our direct sum is a sum of -modules and it includes the degree and parts of , it will suffice to show that is generated in degrees and as a graded -module. In other words, we need to show that
We first prove the equality when . Since we have proved that the decomposition () holds in degree , we know that
Using Lemma 3.8, we may reduce the problem to showing that
We can rewrite the relation in the augmented Chow ring of as
thus reducing the problem to showing that
The collection is downward closed, meaning that if , then ; therefore,
Lemma 3.8 tells us that , thus so is .
We next prove the equality when . In this case, we use the result for along with the fact that the algebra is generated in degree to conclude that
This completes the proof of the decomposition () and the Poincaré duality theorem for when there is an element that is not a coloop of .
The proof when is a coloop is almost the same; we explain the places where something different must be said. The orthogonality of and for follows because and are incomparable. To show that the right-hand side of () spans , one extra statement we need to check is that
Since is a coloop, is the set of all flats properly contained in , and we have
where the last equality follows because and are not comparable. Thus
By the induction hypothesis, we know satisfies the Poincaré duality theorem. By the coloop case of Lemma 3.3, the Poincaré pairing on restricts to a perfect pairing between and . Since is a subring of and is zero in degree , the restriction of the Poincaré pairing on to is zero. Therefore, the subspaces and intersect trivially, and the restriction of the Poincaré pairing on to is non-degenerate. This completes the proof of the theorems about when is a coloop.
We observe that the surjectivity of the pullback gives the equality
The proof of the theorems about then follows by an argument identical to the one used for . ∎
4. Proofs of the hard Lefschetz theorems and the Hodge–Riemann relations
In this section, we prove Theorem 1.3. Parts (1) and (4) have already been proved in the previous section. We will first prove parts (2) and (3) by induction on the cardinality of . The proof of parts (5) and (6) is nearly identical to the proof of parts (2) and (3), with the added nuance that we use parts (2) and (3) for the matroid in the proof of parts (5) and (6) for the matroid .
For any fan , we will say that satisfies the hard Lefschetz theorem or the Hodge–Riemann relations with respect to some piecewise linear function on if the ring satisfies the hard Lefschetz theorem or the Hodge–Riemann relations with respect to the corresponding element of .
Proof of Theorem 1.3, parts (2) and (3).
The statements are trivial when the cardinality of is or , so we will assume throughout the proof that the cardinality of is at least .
Let be the Boolean matroid on . By the induction hypothesis, we know that for every nonempty proper flat of , the fans and satisfy the hard Lefschetz theorem and the Hodge–Riemann relations with respect to any strictly convex piecewise linear functions on and , respectively. By [AHK, Proposition 7.7], this implies that for every nonempty proper flat of , the product satisfies the hard Lefschetz theorem and the Hodge–Riemann relations with respect to any strictly convex piecewise linear function on . In other words, satisfies the local Hodge–Riemann relations [AHK, Definition 7.14]:
The star of any ray in satisfies the Hodge–Riemann relations. |
This in turn implies that satisfies the hard Lefschetz theorem with respect to any strictly convex piecewise linear function on [AHK, Proposition 7.15]. It remains to prove only that satisfies the Hodge–Riemann relations with respect to any strictly convex piecewise linear function on .
Let be a piecewise linear function on , and let be the Hodge–Riemann form
By [AHK, Proposition 7.6], the fan satisfies the Hodge–Riemann relations with respect to if and only if, for all , the Hodge–Riemann form is non-degenerate and has the signature
Since satisfies the hard Lefschetz theorem with respect to any strictly convex piecewise linear function on and signature is a locally constant function on the space of nonsingular forms, the following statements are equivalent:
-
(i)
The fan satisfies the Hodge–Riemann relations with respect to any strictly convex piecewise linear function on .
-
(ii)
The fan satisfies the Hodge–Riemann relations with respect to some strictly convex piecewise linear function on .
Furthermore, since satisfying the Hodge–Riemann relations with respect to a given piecewise linear function is an open condition on the function, statement (ii) is equivalent to the following:
-
(iii)
The fan satisfies the Hodge–Riemann relations with respect to some convex piecewise linear function on .
We show that statement (iii) holds using the semi-small decomposition in Theorem 1.1.
If is the Boolean matroid , then can be identified with the cohomology ring of the smooth complex projective toric variety . Therefore, in this case, Theorem 1.3 is a special case of the usual hard Lefschetz theorem and the Hodge–Riemann relations for smooth complex projective varieties.161616It is not difficult to directly prove the hard Lefschetz theorem and the Hodge–Riemann relations for using the coloop case of Theorem 1.1. Alternatively, we may apply McMullen’s hard Lefschetz theorem and Hodge–Riemann relations for polytope algebras [McMullen] to the standard permutohedron in .
If is not the Boolean matroid , choose an element that is not a coloop in , and consider the morphism of fans
By induction, we know that satisfies the Hodge–Riemann relations with respect to any strictly convex piecewise linear function on . We will show that satisfies the Hodge–Riemann relations with respect to the pullback , which is a piecewise linear function on that is convex but not necessarily strictly convex.
By Theorem 1.1, we have the orthogonal decomposition of into -modules
By orthogonality, it is enough to show that each summand of satisfies the Hodge–Riemann relations with respect to :
-
(iv)
For every nonnegative integer , the bilinear form
is positive definite on the kernel of multiplication by .
-
(v)
For every nonnegative integer , the bilinear form
is positive definite on the kernel of multiplication by .
By Proposition 3.4, the homomorphism restricts to an isomorphism of -modules
Thus, statement (iv) follows from Lemma 3.3 and the induction hypothesis applied to . By Propositions 2.22, 3.4, and 3.5, the homomorphisms and give a -module isomorphism
Note that the pullback of a strictly convex piecewise linear function on to the star
is the class of a strictly convex piecewise linear function. Therefore, statement (v) follows from Proposition 3.7 and the induction applied to and . ∎
Proof of Theorem 1.3, parts (5) and (6).
This proof is nearly identical to the proof of parts (2) and (3). In that argument, we used the fact that rays of are indexed by nonempty proper flats of and the star of the ray is isomorphic to , which we can show satisfies the hard Lefschetz theorem and the Hodge–Riemann relations using the induction hypothesis. When dealing instead with the augmented Bergman fan , we have rays indexed by elements of and rays indexed by proper flats of , with
Thus the stars of and for nonempty can be shown to satisfy the hard Lefschetz theorem and the Hodge–Riemann relations using the induction hypothesis. However, the star of is isomorphic to , so we need to use parts (2) and (3) of Theorem 1.3 for itself. ∎
Remark 4.1.
It is possible to deduce Poincaré duality, the hard Lefschetz theorem, and the Hodge–Riemann relations for using [AHK, Theorem 6.19 and Theorem 8.8], where the three properties are proved for generalized Bergman fans in [AHK, Definition 3.2]. We sketch the argument here, leaving details to the interested readers. Consider the direct sum of and the rank matroid on the singleton and the order filter of all proper flats of that contain . The symbols and are defined in the same way for the Boolean matroid on . It is straightforward to check that the linear isomorphism
identifies the complete fan with the complete fan , and the augmented Bergman fan with a subfan of . The third identity in Lemma 2.9 shows that the inclusion of the augmented Bergman fan into the generalized Bergman fan induces an isomorphism between their Chow rings.
5. Proof of Theorem 1.4
In this section, we prove the decomposition () by induction on the cardinality of . The decomposition () can be proved using the same argument. The results are trivial when has at most one element. Thus, we may assume that is an element of , that is nonempty, and that all the results hold for loopless matroids whose ground set is a proper subset of .
We first prove that the summands appearing in the right-hand side of () are orthogonal to each other.
Lemma 5.1.
Let and be distinct nonempty proper flats of .
-
(1)
The spaces and are orthogonal in .
-
(2)
The spaces and are orthogonal in .
Proof.
The fifth bullet point in Proposition 2.20, together with the fact that is a -module homomorphism via , implies that every summand in the right-hand side of () is an -submodule. Thus the first orthogonality follows from the vanishing of in degree .
For the second orthogonality, we may suppose that is a proper subset of . Since is a -module homomorphism commuting with the degree maps, it is enough to show that
and are orthogonal in . |
For this, we use the commutative diagram of pullback and pushforward maps
which further reduces to the assertion that
and are orthogonal in . |
Since , the above follows from the first orthogonality for . ∎
We next show that the restriction of the Poincaré pairing of to each summand appearing in the right-hand side of () is non-degenerate.
Lemma 5.2.
Let be a nonempty proper flat of , and let .
-
(1)
The restriction of the Poincaré pairing of to is non-degenerate.
-
(2)
The restriction of the Poincaré pairing of to is non-degenerate.
Proof.
The first statement follows from Proposition 2.26. We prove the second statement.
Since the Poincaré pairing of is non-degenerate, it is enough to show that the restriction of the Poincaré pairing satisfies
The proof of the identity is nearly identical to that of Proposition 3.7. The left-hand side is
because is a -module homomorphism commuting with the degree maps. Since the composition is multiplication by , the above becomes
The vanishing of in degree further simplifies the above to the desired expression
To complete the proof, we only need to show that the graded vector spaces on both sides of () have the same dimension, which is the next proposition.
Proposition 5.3.
As graded vector spaces, there exists an isomorphism
() |
where the sum is over the set of proper flats of with rank at least two.
Proof.
We prove the proposition using induction on the cardinality of . Suppose the proposition holds for any matroid whose ground set is a proper subset of . Suppose that there exists an element that is not a coloop. Then the decomposition () implies
since the maps , , and are injective via the Poincaré duality part of Theorem 1.3. By applying the induction hypothesis to the matroids and , we see that the left-hand side of () is isomorphic to the graded vector space
Since is not a coloop, we may replace by .
Now, we further decompose the right-hand side of () to match the displayed expression. For this, we split the index set into three groups:
-
(1)
,
-
(2)
, and
-
(3)
.
Suppose belongs to the first group. In this case, we have as graded vector spaces. Therefore, we have
Suppose belongs to the second group. In this case, , and the matroids and have the same rank. Therefore, we have
Suppose now that every element of is a coloop of ; that is, is a Boolean matroid. We fix an element . The decomposition () and the Poincaré duality part of Theorem 1.3 imply
The assumption that is a coloop implies that . The induction hypothesis applies to the matroids and , and hence the left-hand side of () is isomorphic to
Remark 5.4.
The decomposition of graded vector spaces appearing in [AHK, Theorem 6.18] specializes to decompositions of and of , where the latter goes through Remark 4.1. At the level of Poincaré polynomials, these decompositions coincide with those of Theorem 1.4. However, the subspaces appearing in the decompositions are not the same. In particular, the decompositions in [AHK, Theorem 6.18] are not orthogonal, and they are not compatible with the -module structure on or the -module structure on .