A note on hamiltonian cycles in -tough -free graphs
b Department of Mathematics, Illinois State University, Normal, IL 61790, USA
E-mails: [email protected], [email protected])
Abstract
Let be a real number and be a graph. We say is -tough if for every cutset of , the ratio of to the number of components of is at least . The Toughness Conjecture of Chvátal, stating that there exists a constant such that every -tough graph with at least three vertices is hamiltonian, is still open in general. For any given integer , a graph is free if does not contain the disjoint union of and isolated vertices as an induced subgraph. In this note, we show that every 4-tough and -connected -free graph with at least three vertices is hamiltonian. This result in some sense is an “extension” of the classical Chvátal-Erdős Theorem that every -connected -free graph on at least three vertices is hamiltonian.
Keywords: toughness; hamiltonian cycle; -free graph
1 Introduction
We consider only simple graphs. Let be a graph. We denote by and the vertex set and edge set of , respectively. For a vertex and a subgraph of , denotes the set of neighbors of that are contained in , and . Let . Then and . Denote by the subgraph of induced by , and let . We skip the subscript if no confusion may arise.
For a given graph , we say that is -free if does not contain as an induced subgraph. For another graph , is the disjoint union of and . For positive integers and , we denote by the graph consisting of disjoint copies of the path . For two integers and , let .
Throughout this paper, if not specified, we will assume to be a nonnegative real number. The number of components of is denoted by . The graph is said to be -tough if for each with . The toughness is the largest real number for which is -tough, or is if is complete. This concept, a measure of graph connectivity and “resilience” under removal of vertices, was introduced by Chvátal [5] in 1973. It is easy to see that if has a hamiltonian cycle then is 1-tough. Conversely, Chvátal [5] conjectured that there exists a constant such that every -tough graph is hamiltonian (Chvátal’s toughness conjecture). Bauer, Broersma and Veldman [1] have constructed -tough graphs that are not hamiltonian for all , so must be at least . It is not difficult to see that a non-complete -tough graph is -connected.
There are many papers on Chvátal’s toughness conjecture, and it has been verified when restricted to a number of graph classes [2], including planar graphs, claw-free graphs, co-comparability graphs, and chordal graphs. The conjecture was also confirmed for graphs forbidden small linear forests. The results include the following: 1-tough for -free graphs, where [10]; 25-tough, 3-tough, and now 2-tough for -free graphs [4, 12, 11]; 3-tough for -free graphs [9]; 7-tough for -free graphs [8]; and 15-tough for -free graphs [13]. In this paper, for any integer , we investigate Chvátal’s toughness conjecture for -free graphs. For , it is an easy exercise to show that every 1-tough -free graph on vertices has minimum degree at least and so is hamiltonian by Dirac’s Theorem [7]. By [10], 1-tough is enough to guarantee a hamiltonian cycle for -free graphs on at least three vertices. By [9], 3-tough is enough to guarantee a hamiltonian cycle for -free graphs on at least three vertices. Thus we consider only the case when , and obtain the result below.
Theorem 1.
Let be an integer and be a -tough and -connected -free graph. Then is hamiltonian.
As a non-complete -tough graph is -connected, as a corollary of Theorem 1, we get the following result.
Corollary 2.
For any integer , every -tough -free graph on at least three vertices is hamiltonian.
Theorem 1 can also be seen as a result along the Chavátal-Erdős type theorems [6]. The Chavátal-Erdős Theorem can be rephrased as below: for any integer , every -connected -free graph on at least three vertices is hamiltonian. It is necessary for a hamiltonian graph to be 1-tough and the condition that “-connected and -free” in the Chavátal-Erdős Theorem implies that the graph is 1-tough. However, any constant connectivity condition cannot guarantee the existence of a hamiltonian cycle in -free graphs. For example, for integer , the complete bipartite graph is -connected, -free for any , but is not hamiltonian. This explains the involvement of the toughness condition in Theorem 1 other than the connectivity condition. However, we do think that the condition 4-tough is not sharp and we propose the following conjecture.
Conjecture 3.
Let be an integer and be a -tough and -connected -free graph. Then is hamiltonian.
2 Proof of Theorem 1
We start with certain notation and preliminary results. Let be an oriented cycle, and we assume that the orientation is clockwise throughout the rest of this paper. For , denote the immediate successor of on by and the immediate predecessor of on by . For , denotes the segment of starting at , following in the orientation, and ending at . Likewise, is the opposite segment of with endpoints as and .
A path connecting two vertices and is called a -path, and we write or in order to specify the two endvertices of . Let and be two paths. If is an edge, we write as the concatenation of and through the edge .
Lemma 4 ([3]).
Let be a positive real number and be a -tough graph on at lest three vertices with . Then is hamiltonian.
Proof of Theorem 1.
Suppose for a contradiction that is not hamiltonian. Then is not complete and by Lemma 4. Since is -connected, . Thus we have . Let be a longest cycle of . As is not hamiltonian, . Let be a component of and suppose . We let be all the neighbors of vertices of on , and we assume that they appear in the order along . Note that as is -connected.
Claim 1.
Any two vertices in are not consecutive on , and is an independent set in .
Proof.
The first part is clear as otherwise we can extend . For the second part, suppose to the contrary that for some . Without loss of generality, assume that . Let such that , and let be an -path of . Then is a cycle longer than , a contradiction. ∎
Claim 2.
Each component of is trivial, i.e., a one-vertex graph.
Proof.
We still let represent any component of . Suppose to the contrary that has an edge . Then and together form an induced , which contains as an induced subgraph, a contradiction. ∎
Claim 3.
.
Proof.
Suppose to the contrary that . Then has exactly components by Claim 2. Thus is a cutset of and . This contradicts that is -tough. ∎
Our goal in the rest of the proof is to find an independent set of size more than in and so to reach a contradiction to the toughness of . By Claim 2, let . Assume, without loss of generality, that . Then by Claim 3. Let , and define
if is even; | ||||
if is odd. |
Claim 4.
. As a consequence, is an independent set in .
Proof.
Let . Since is an independent set in by Claim 1, the consequence part of the claim follows easily from the first part and the -freeness of . So we only show that . Considering the edge and the independent set , we conclude that by the -freeness of . Next, we show . Suppose not, then . Otherwise let for some . Then and form an induced copy of . We consider three cases regarding the size of the set below.
Case 1: .
Let for some distinct . Assume, without loss of generality, that . Then is a cycle longer than , a contradiction.
Case 2: .
Let for some . If , then has another neighbor with since . So is a cycle longer than , a contradiction. If , then has another neighbor with since . So is a cycle longer than , a contradiction. If , then we define two indices as follows:
Clearly, and . If then is a cycle longer than ; if , then is a cycle longer than . Thus we assume .
If is a neighbor of , then is a cycle longer than , a contradiction. So . This implies that . We claim that . Otherwise, suppose for some . Then is a cycle longer than . Hence or has at least vertices belonging to as .
If has at least vertices in , then and the vertices in induce a subgraph in , a contradiction. If has at least vertices in , then and the vertices in induce a subgraph in , a contradiction.
Case 3: .
We define and the same way as in Case 2. Since , . If , then is a cycle longer than , a contradiction. So . If , then is a cycle longer than , a contradiction. So is not a neighbor of and thus . By the same argument as in Case 2, we have . So dose not have any neighbor in , which is a subset of . By the definition of and the assumption that , we know that does not have any neighbor in . Since , or has at least vertices belonging to . If has vertices belonging to , then those vertices and the edge induce a copy of . If has vertices belonging to , then those vertices and the edge induce a copy of .
Cases 1 to 3 imply . Since is an independent set in , and , the -freeness of implies that . With playing the role of and playing the role of , the same arguments in Cases 1 to 3 show that . Repeating the same arguments for all other elements of , we get . ∎
References
- [1] D. Bauer, H. J. Broersma, and H. J. Veldman. Not every 2-tough graph is Hamiltonian. In Proceedings of the 5th Twente Workshop on Graphs and Combinatorial Optimization (Enschede, 1997), volume 99, pages 317–321, 2000.
- [2] D. Bauer, H.J. Broersma, and E. Schmeichel. Toughness in graphs – a survey. Graphs and Combinatorics, 22(1):1–35, 2006.
- [3] Douglas Bauer, H. J. Broersma, J. van den Heuvel, and H. J. Veldman. Long cycles in graphs with prescribed toughness and minimum degree. Discrete Math., 141(1-3):1–10, 1995.
- [4] H. Broersma, V. Patel, and A. Pyatkin. On toughness and Hamiltonicity of -free graphs. J. Graph Theory, 75(3):244–255, 2014.
- [5] V. Chvátal. Tough graphs and Hamiltonian circuits. Discrete Math., 5:215–228, 1973.
- [6] V. Chvátal and P. Erdős. A note on Hamiltonian circuits. Discrete Math., 2:111–113, 1972.
- [7] G. A. Dirac. Some theorems on abstract graphs. Proc. London Math. Soc. (3), 2:69–81, 1952.
- [8] Y. Gao and S. Shan. Hamiltonian cycles in 7-tough -free graphs. arXiv:2107.08476, 2021.
- [9] A. Hatfield and E. Grimm. Hamiltonicity of 3-tough -free graphs. arXiv:2106.07083, 2021.
- [10] B. Li, H. J. Broersma, and S. Zhang. Forbidden subgraphs for Hamiltonicity of 1-tough graphs. Discuss. Math. Graph Theory, 36(4):915–929, 2016.
- [11] K. Ota and M. Sanka. Hamiltonian cycles in 2-tough -free graphs. arXiv:2103.06760, 2021.
- [12] S. Shan. Hamiltonian cycles in 3-tough -free graphs. J. Graph Theory, 94(3):349–363, 2020.
- [13] S. Shan. Hamiltonian cycles in tough -free graphs. Electron. J. Combin., 28(1):Paper No. 1.36, 16, 2021.