This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

A note on girth-diameter cages

Gabriela Araujo-Pardo Gabriela Araujo-Pardo, Instituto de Matemáticas-Campus Juriquilla, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México. [email protected] Marston Conder Marston Conder, Department of Mathematics, University of Auckland, New Zealand [email protected] Natalia García-Colín Natalia García-Colín, Département d’Informatique, Université Libre de Bruxelles and Department of Statistical Learning, ScaDS.AI Leipzig [email protected] György Kiss György Kiss, Department of Geometry and HUN-REN-ELTE Geometric and Algebraic Combinatorics, Research Group, Eötvös Loránd University, Hungary, and Faculty of Mathematics, Natural Sciences and Information Technologies, University of Primorska, Slovenia [email protected]  and  Dimitri Leemans Dimitri Leemans, Département de Mathématique, Université libre de Bruxelles, and Department of Statistical Learning, ScaDS.AI Leipzig [email protected]
Abstract.

In this paper we introduce a problem closely related to the Cage Problem and the Degree Diameter Problem. For integers k2k\geq 2, g3g\geq 3 and d1d\geq 1, we define a (k;g,d)(k;\,g,d)-graph to be a kk-regular graph with girth gg and diameter dd. We denote by n0(k;g,d)n_{0}(k;\,g,d) the smallest possible order of such a graph, and, if such a graph exists, we call it a (k;g,d)(k;g,d)-cage. In particular, we focus on (k; 5,4)(k;\,5,4)-graphs. We show that n0(k; 5,4)k2+k+2n_{0}(k;\,5,4)\geq k^{2}+k+2 for all kk, and report on the determination of all (k; 5,4)(k;\,5,4)-cages for k=3,4k=3,4 and 55 and examples with k=6k=6, and describe some examples of (k; 5,4)(k;\,5,4)-graphs which prove that n0(k; 5,4)2k2n_{0}(k;\,5,4)\leq 2k^{2} for infinitely many values of kk.

Key words and phrases:
Cages, girth, degree-diameter problem
2000 Mathematics Subject Classification:
05C35,05E30, 05B30

1. Introduction

The order of a graph is the number of its vertices, its diameter is the maximum distance between a pair of its vertices, and its girth is the length of its smallest circuit. A graph is kk-regular if each of its vertices has exactly kk neighbours.

The well-known Cage Problem involves finding the kk-regular graphs of girth gg with smallest possible order n(k,g)n(k,g), for a given pair (k,g)(k,g) of integers with k2k\geq 2 and g3g\geq 3. A regular graph with these properties is called a (k,g)(k,g)-cage, or simply a cage. Cages were introduced by Tutte [13] in 1947, and the Cage Problem has been widely studied from the time when Erdös and Sachs [8] proved their existence in 1963. A complete survey about this topic and its relevance can be found in [9].

The equally well known Degree-Diameter Problem involves finding the kk-regular graphs of diameter dd with largest possible order, for a given pair (k,d)(k,d) of integers with k2k\geq 2 and d1d\geq 1. In this case what is known as the ‘Moore bound’ states that the largest order is at most 1+k+k(k1)++k(k1)d11+k+k(k-1)+\cdots+k(k-1)^{d-1}. It is easy to see that graphs attaining this upper bound are cages with odd girth g=2d+1g=2d+1. Conversely, if gg is odd then this is also a lower bound for the order of a kk-regular graph with girth gg, when d=(g1)/2d=(g-1)/2. For a complete review of the Degree-Diameter problem, we refer the reader to [12].

Motivated by the above background, in this paper we describe a variation of the Cage Problem by considering a lower bound for the order of regular graphs with given girth and given diameter, which we call girth-diameter cages (or simply gdgd-cages).

Specifically, for given integers k,gk,g and dd with k2k\geq 2, g3g\geq 3 and d1d\geq 1, we define a (k;g,d)(k;g,d)-graph to be a kk-regular graph with girth gg and diameter dd, and we denote by n0(k;g,d)n_{0}(k;\,g,d) the smallest possible order of such a graph (if one exists). A necessary condition for existence is g2d\lfloor\frac{g}{2}\rfloor\leq d (since g2d+1g\leq 2d+1), but our main interest in such graphs is in cases where g2dg\lfloor\frac{g}{2}\rfloor\leq d\leq g.

In this note, we study the first pair of parameters that we considered interesting, namely those with girth g=5g=5 and diameter d=4d=4, that is, we study (k; 5,4)(k;\,5,4)-graphs.

For any (k; 5,4)(k;\,5,4)-graph GG of order nn, let rr and cc be two vertices at distance 44 from each other. Then the neighbourhoods N(r)N(r) and N(c)N(c) of rr and cc must each consist of kk vertices, with N(c)N(r)=N(c)\cap N(r)=\emptyset, and the remaining n2k2n-2k-2 vertices of GG form a set MM that includes all neighbours of vertices in N(r)N(r) apart from rr and all neighbours of vertices in N(c)N(c) apart from cc. Hence |M|k(k1)|M|\geq k(k-1), and it follows that |V(G)|2+2k+k(k1)=k2+k+2|V(G)|\geq 2+2k+k(k-1)=k^{2}+k+2. We may call this number k2+k+2k^{2}+k+2 the Moore bound for n0(k; 5,4)n_{0}(k;\,5,4), and denote it by M(k; 5,4)M(k;\,5,4).

Note that it is easy to obtain a generic bound for any given integers k,gk,g and dd with k2k\geq 2, g5g\geq 5 and d4d\geq 4.

2. (k; 5,4)(k;\,5,4)-cages for k=3,4,5k=3,4,5 and 66.

For degree k=3,k=3, we found an example of a (3; 5,4)(3;\,5,4)-graph attaining the Moore bound n=M(3; 5,4)=32+3+2=14n=M(3;\,5,4)=3^{2}+3+2=14, and by an easy computational search we found that up to isomorphism there is just one other. These two (3; 5,4)(3;\,5,4)-cages are depicted in Figure 1, with the 1919 black edges in common. One of them contains also the two red edges (and its automorphism group has order 1212), while the other one contains the two green edges (and its automorphism group has order 44). They can be found in House of Graphs [11] with identification numbers 1000 and 50487.

Refer to caption


Figure 1. The two graphs with degree 3, diameter 4 and girth 5

Similarly for degree k=4,k=4, we found that there are exactly four non-isomorphic graphs attaining the Moore bound M(4; 5,4)=42+4+2=22M(4;\,5,4)=4^{2}+4+2=22, with automorphism groups of orders 11, 22, 44 and 88. These graphs are available in House of Graphs with identification numbers 50459, 49991, 49992 and 49993 respectively.

For degree k=5,k=5, we found using a more advanced computational search that there are exactly seven non-isomorphic graphs that attain the Moore bound M(5; 5,4)=52+5+2=32M(5;\,5,4)=5^{2}+5+2=32, with automorphism groups of orders 44, 44, 1010, 1010, 4848, 6464 and 19201920. Two of the latter seven (5; 5,4)(5;\,5,4)-cages appeared already (in a different context) in [5], namely those with automorphism groups of orders 4848 and 19201920.

A similar computational search has so far also produced two non-isomorphic 66-valent graphs that attain the Moore bound M(6; 5,4)=62+6+2=44M(6;\,5,4)=6^{2}+6+2=44, with automorphism groups of orders 4040 and 240240.

3. (k; 5,4)(k;\,5,4)-graphs from the Levi graphs of biaffine planes.

Some small (k; 5,4)(k;\,5,4)-graphs graphs can be obtained using an amalgamation method on the Levi graphs (incidence graphs) of biaffine planes, as we explain below.

Definition 1.

Let Πq\Pi_{q} be a finite projective plane of order qq. A biaffine plane is obtained from Πq\Pi_{q} by choosing a point-line pair (P,)(P,\ell), deleting PP, deleting \ell, all the lines incident with PP and all the points belonging to \ell. If the point-line pair is incident in Πq\Pi_{q}, then we say that the biaffine plane is of type 11, and otherwise we say it is of type 22.

The Levi graph of Πq\Pi_{q} is a (q+1,6)(q+1,6)-cage and its diameter is 3.3. The Levi graphs of biaffine planes are (q; 6,4)(q;\,6,4)-graphs of orders 2q22q^{2} and 2(q21),2(q^{2}-1), respectively. Two vertices are at distance 44 if and only if both of them correspond either to points on a deleted line or to lines in the same parallel class.

The first time that this type of construction was used to find graphs of girth 55 (as far as the authors are aware), is in a paper [7] by Brown, who proved that if q5q\geq 5 is a prime power, then n(q+2,5)2q2.n(q+2,5)\leq 2q^{2}.

More sophisticated but similar construction methods have been presented by Funk [10], Abreu et al [1], and Abajo and her co-authors in a series of papers [2, 3, 4]. In order to construct these graphs, the authors of these papers applied the so-called ‘amalgamation’ technique. By inserting some new edges between vertices in the incidence graph of the biaffine plane that correspond either to two points of a deleted line or to two lines of a parallel class, they obtained regular graphs with degree q+aq+a for certain values of a2a\geq 2, and with diameter 44 when the diameter of the amalgamated subgraph is at least 44. For example, this happens with a qq-cycle in the incidence graph of a biaffine plane of order qq, for q7q\geq 7.

The exact orders of these (k; 5,4)(k;\,5,4)-graphs are a little smaller than 2k22k^{2}, but generally larger than M(k; 5,4)=k2+k+2M(k;\,5,4)=k^{2}+k+2.

As mentioned before, Araujo-Pardo and Leemans [5] used a biaffine plane of type 11 to construct a (q+1,5,4)(q+1,5,4)-graph of order 2q22q^{2} for q=4q=4, and this particular graph attains the lower bound M(5; 5,4)=32M(5;\,5,4)=32. Then recently Araujo-Pardo, Kiss and Porupsánszki [6] generalised the latter graph for any 22-power q=2r,q=2^{r}, and presented a simple geometric construction for (q+2; 5,4)(q+2;\,5,4)-graphs whose order is 2q222q^{2}-2, using a biaffine plane of type 22.

4. The ‘middle’ graph

For construction of the various examples we found for degree k=5k=5 and 66, we strongly utilised properties of the subgraph HH induced by the ‘middle’ vertex set M=V(G)({r}{c}N(r)N(c))M=V(G)\setminus(\{r\}\cup\{c\}\cup N(r)\cup N(c)) described earlier, when GG is a graph attaining the Moore bound M(k; 5,4)M(k;\,5,4). In particular:

  1. (a)

    HH has order k(k1)k(k-1);

  2. (b)

    HH is regular with degree k2k-2;

  3. (c)

    HH has girth at least 55, so contains no circuits of length 33 or 44;

  4. (d)

    HH has diameter at least 33; and

  5. (e)

    the vertex-set of HH can be labelled with ordered pairs (i,j)(i,j) with ijki\neq j\in\mathbb{Z}_{k}, such that if (i,j)(i,j) is adjacent to (i,j)(i^{\prime},j^{\prime}) then iii\neq i^{\prime} and jjj\neq j^{\prime}, and two vertices (i,j)(i,j) and (i,j)(i^{\prime},j^{\prime}) with i=ii=i^{\prime} or j=jj=j^{\prime} must lie at distance at least 3 from each other.

The first three properties above are obvious. To verify the last two, let us introduce some extra notation. Denote the kk vertices in N(r)N(r) as r1,rkr_{1},\ldots r_{k}, and those in N(c)N(c) as c1,ckc_{1},\ldots c_{k}, and for 1ik1\leq i\leq k define Ri=N(ri){r}R_{i}=N(r_{i})\setminus\{r\} and Ci=N(ci){c}.C_{i}=N(c_{i})\setminus\{c\}.

Because HH contains no 33-cycles, we find that RiRj=R_{i}\cap R_{j}=\emptyset and CiCj=C_{i}\cap C_{j}=\emptyset whenever iji\neq j, and because HH contains no 44-cycles, also |CiRi|1|C_{i}\cap R_{i}|\leq 1 for all i,ji,j. Hence we can think of each RiR_{i} as a row and each CjC_{j} as a column of the k×kk\times k integer grid corresponding to k×Zk\mathbb{Z}_{k}\times Z_{k} with its diagonal {(j,j):jk}\{(j,j):j\in\mathbb{Z}_{k}\} removed, and relabel the vertices of HH as the pairs (i,j)(i,j) with i,jki,j\in\mathbb{Z}_{k} such that iji\neq j.

Next, there must be at least one pair of vertices in HH at distance at least 33 from each other, for otherwise a path of length 22 between vertices (i,j)(i,j) and (i,j)(i^{\prime},j) in HH would form a 44-cycle in GG when taken together with the edges from cjc_{j} to (i,j)(i,j) and (i,j)(i^{\prime},j). This line of argument also implies that two vertices that share the first or the second coordinate must lie at distance at least 33 from each other.

The examples we found (and described earlier in Section 2) have the following properties:

  1. \bullet

    When k=3k=3 the subgraph HH of order 66 consists of three non-incident edges;

  2. \bullet

    When k=4k=4 the subgraph HH is a 22-regular graph of order 1212, and indeed in all four examples, it is a single cycle, with girth 1212 and diameter 66;

  3. \bullet

    When k=5k=5 the subgraph HH is a 33-regular graph of order 2020, with diameter 44 and girth 55 in two cases, diameter 55 and girth 55 in three cases, and diameter 44 and girth 66 in the other two cases.

We now present the following:

Proposition. A graph HH with the properties (a) to (e) listed above can be extended to a (k; 5,4)(k;\,5,4)-cage.

Proof.

Suppose that HH is a graph satisfying the conditions (a) to (e). Then the set of vertices and edges of a new graph GG can be constructed by adding the 2+2k2+2k vertices r,r1,rk,c,c1,,ckr,r_{1},\ldots r_{k},c,c_{1},\ldots,c_{k} and the edges {r,ri}\{r,r_{i}\}, {ri,(i,j)}\{r_{i},(i,j)\}, {c,cj}\{c,c_{j}\}, {cj,(i,j)}\{c_{j},(i,j)\} for i,jki,j\in\mathbb{Z}_{k}, and we immediately find that GG is a kk-regular graph with k(k+1)+2k(k+1)+2 vertices. All that remains is to check that the diameter of GG is 44 and its girth is 55.

First it is clear that every rir_{i} and every cjc_{j} lies at distance at most 33 from each of rr and cc, and every vertex (i,j)(i,j) lies at distance 22 from each of rr and cc, and hence at distance at most 33 from every rir_{i^{\prime}} and every cjc_{j^{\prime}}, and at distance at most 44 from every other middle vertex (i,j)(i^{\prime},j^{\prime}). It now follows easily that every two vertices lie at distance at most 44 from each other, so the diameter is 44.

Finally, suppose that some circuit of length 33 or 44 occurs in GG. Then since the girth of HH is at least 55, at least one of the vertices of that circuit lies in HH and at least one lies in GHG-H. The latter vertex cannot be rr or cc, so that circuit must contain some rir_{i} or some cjc_{j}, but neither of rr and cc. Hence the circuit contains two vertices (i,j)(i,j) and (i,j)(i^{\prime},j^{\prime}) with i=ii=i^{\prime} or j=jj=j^{\prime}, but then by property (e) those two vertices lie at distance at least 33 from each other in HH, so the circuit must contain another vertex of GHG-H either adjacent to both (i,j)(i,j) and (i,j)(i,j^{\prime}), or adjacent to both (i,j)(i,j) and (i,j)(i^{\prime},j), which is impossible. Hence the girth of GG is 55. ∎

5. Future work

Using the above Proposition, the search for (k; 5,4)(k;\,5,4)-cages may be reduced to the search for suitable ‘middle’ graphs satisfying the conditions (a) to (e) given in the previous section. Some of us are continuing to search for possible constructions of such graphs that would work for other values of the degree k6k\geq 6.

Finally, we remark that the middle graph HH is a (k2,g)(k-2,g)-graph where g5g\geq 5 and the graph is of order

k(k1)=(k2)2+3(k2)+2=M(k2; 5,4)+2(k2),k(k-1)=(k-2)^{2}+3(k-2)+2=M(k-2;\,5,4)+2(k-2),

and that for k14k\geq 14 the order of the record holder (k2,5)(k-2,5)-graphs is greater than this number (see [9] and Table 1 in [3]). Hence it would seem to be quite a challenge to find (k; 5,4)(k;\,5,4)-cages of order k2+k+2k^{2}+k+2 for large kk.

6. Acknowledgements

This research was initiated at the BIRS workshop 23w5125 ‘Extremal Graphs arising from Designs and Configurations’. The authors are very grateful to the organisers and to BIRS. Gabriela Araujo-Pardo acknowledges support by PAPIIT-México under grant IN101821. Marston Conder acknowledges support from New Zealand’s Marsden Fund (project UOA2030). Dimitri Leemans acknowledges support from an Action de Recherche Concertée grant from the Communauté Française – Wallonie Bruxelles and the Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique de Belgique. György Kiss acknowledges support from the Hungarian National Research, Development and Innovation Office OTKA grant no. SNN 132625.

References

  • [1] M. Abreu, G. Araujo-Pardo, C. Balbuena and D. Labbate. Families of Small Regular Graphs of Girth 55. Discrete Math. 312 (2012), 2832–2842.
  • [2] E. Abajo G. Araujo, C. Balbuena and M. Bendala. New small regular graphs of girth 55. Discrete Math. 340 (2017), 1878–1888.
  • [3] E. Abajo, C. Balbuena, M. Bendala and X. Marcote. Improving bounds on the order of regular graphs of girth 55. Discrete Math. 342 (2019), 2900–2910.
  • [4] E. Abajo and M. Bendala. Regular graphs of girth 55 from elliptic semi planes of type C. Discrete Math. 344 (2021), Paper No. 112343.
  • [5] G. Araujo-Pardo and D. Leemans, Edge-girth-regular graphs arising from biaffine planes and Suzuki groups, Discrete Math. 345 (2022), no. 10, Paper No. 112991, 10 pp.
  • [6] G. Araujo-Pardo, Gy. Kiss and I. Porupsánszki. On extremal (almost) edge-girth-regular graphs. Preprint, 2023.
  • [7] W. G. Brown, On the non-existence of a type of regular graphs of girth 5, Canad. J. Math. 19 (1967), 644–648.
  • [8] P. Erdös and H. Sachs, Reguläre Graphen gegebener Taillenweite mit minimaler Knotenzahl, Wiss. Z. Uni. Halle (Math. Nat.) 12 (1963), 251–257.
  • [9] G. Exoo and R. Jajcay, Dynamic Cage Survey, Electron. J. Combin., Dynamic Survey #DS16: Jul 26, 2013.
  • [10] M. Funk, Girth 5 graphs from elliptic semiplanes, Note Mat. 29 (Suppl 1) (2009), 91–114.
  • [11] K. Coolsaet, S. D’hondt and J. Goedgebeur, House of Graphs 2.0: A database of interesting graphs and more, Discrete Applied Mathematics, 325 (2023), 97–107. Available at https://houseofgraphs.org
  • [12] M. Miller and J. Sirán, Moore Graphs and Beyond: A survey of the Degree/Diameter Problem (2000), Electron. J. Combin., Dynamic Survey #DS14: May 16, 2013.
  • [13] W.T. Tutte, A family of cubical graphs, Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 43 (1947), 459–474.