A non-commutative F&M Riesz Theorem
Abstract
We extend results on analytic complex measures on the complex unit circle to a non-commutative multivariate setting. Identifying continuous linear functionals on a certain self-adjoint subspace of the Cuntz–Toeplitz algebra, the free disk operator system, with non-commutative (NC) analogues of complex measures, we refine a previously developed Lebesgue decomposition for positive NC measures to establish an NC version of the Frigyes and Marcel Riesz Theorem for ‘analytic’ measures, i.e. complex measures with vanishing positive moments. The proof relies on novel results on the order properties of positive NC measures that we develop and extend from classical measure theory.
1 Introduction
The Riesz–Markov theorem identifies any finite and regular Borel measure on the complex unit circle with a bounded linear functional on the Banach space of continuous functions. By the Weierstrass approximation theorem, the Banach space of continuous functions on the circle is the supremum norm–closure of the linear span of the disk algebra and its conjugate algebra. The disk algebra is often defined as the unital Banach algebra of analytic functions in the complex unit disk with continuous boundary values. This is completely isometrically isomorphic to the unital norm–closed operator algebra generated by the shift operator, , of multiplication by the independent variable on . Here, denotes the Hardy space, the Hilbert space of analytic functions in the complex unit disk that have square–summable Taylor series coefficients at , equipped with the inner product of these coefficients.
An immediate non-commutative (NC) multivariate generalization of is then , the NC Hardy space or full Fock space, which consists of square–summable power series in several formal NC variables . Elements of are power series,
with square–summable coefficients . The free monoid, , is the set of all words, , , in the letters . This is a monoid with product given by concatenation of words and the unit is the empty word containing no letters. Given any , the free monomial is and , viewed as a constant NC function. As in the classical setting, left multiplication by any of the independent NC variables defines an isometry on , and we call these isometries the left free shifts. These play the role of the shift in this NC Hardy space theory.
The NC analogues of the disk algebra, the continuous functions (equivalently, the disk operator system, the supremum norm–closed linear span of the disk algebra and its conjugates) and positive measures are then the free disk algebra, , the free disk system,
and NC measures, i.e. bounded linear functionals on the free disk system. We denote the Banach space of all NC measures by and the cone of positive NC measures by . In [15, 14], the first two named authors constructed the Lebesgue decomposition of any positive NC measure with respect to a canonical NC Lebesgue measure and showed that the sets of absolutely continuous and singular NC measures are positive and hereditary cones, in syzygy with classical measure theory.
The isometric left free shifts on have pairwise orthogonal ranges and it follows that the linear map is an isometry from several copies of into itself. Such an isometry is called a row isometry. By the classical Wold decomposition theorem, any isometry on Hilbert space decomposes as the direct sum of a pure isometry, i.e. an isometry unitarily equivalent to copies of the shift on , and a unitary operator. There is an exact analogue of the Wold decomposition theorem for row isometries, established by G. Popescu; any row isometry decomposes as the direct sum of a pure row isometry, unitarily equivalent to several copies of the left free shift and a surjective or Cuntz row isometry, the multivariate analogue of a unitary operator [21]. The -algebra and its quotient, , by the compact operators are the celebrated Cuntz–Toeplitz and Cuntz algebras [4], respectively. These are universal -algebras for row isometries and are important objects in -algebra theory. Any representation, , of determines and is uniquely determined by the row isometry .
The Lebesgue–von Neumann–Wold decomposition of a single isometry on Hilbert space further splits the unitary direct summand into the direct sum of a unitary with absolutely continuous spectral measure (with respect to Lebesgue measure) and a singular unitary. In [18], M. Kennedy extended the Lebesgue–von Neumann–Wold decomposition for single isometries to row isometries. A new feature in this decomposition is that the Cuntz direct summand of any row isometry generally splits as the direct sum of three different types which we will call absolutely continuous (AC) Cuntz, von Neumann type (called singular in [18]) and dilation–type.
A Gelfand–Naimark–Segal (GNS) construction applied to the free disk algebra and any positive NC measure produces a Hilbert space and a row isometry acting on . Any cyclic row isometry (or representation of ) can be obtained as the GNS row isometry of a positive NC measure, as recorded in Lemma 2.2. The role of normalized Lebesgue measure on the circle is played by the so-called vacuum state of the Fock space, where is identified with the vacuum vector . We call NC Lebesgue measure. Observe that if we identify normalized Lebesgue measure, , with a positive linear functional on the norm-closure of the linear span of the disk algebra and its conjugate algebra, via the Riesz–Markov Theorem, then . Thus, our definition of NC Lebesgue measure recovers normalized Lebesgue measure when . In [15, 14], the first two named authors constructed the Lebesgue decomposition of any positive NC measure, , , where are absolutely continuous and singular, respectively, with respect to NC Lebesgue measure in the sense of [14, Corollary 8.12, Corollary 8.13]. In particular, it is shown that the sets of absolutely continuous and singular NC measures are positive cones that are hereditary in the sense that if and is absolutely continuous or singular, then implies that is also absolutely continuous or singular, respectively, in parallel with classical measure theory. In our NC Lebesgue decomposition, is absolutely continuous if and only if its GNS row isometry is the direct sum of pure and AC Cuntz row isometries, while is singular if and only if is the direct sum of von Neumann–type and dilation–type row isometries [14, Corollary 8.12, Corollary 8.13].
In this paper we further refine the NC Lebesgue decomposition of [14] by proving that the sets of dilation–type and von Neumann type NC measures (NC measures whose GNS row isometries are dilation or von Neumann type) are both positive hereditary cones in Theorem 3.18. This yields, in Corollary 3.19, a refined Kennedy–Lebesgue–von Neumann decomposition of any positive NC measure. We then apply this decomposition to obtain analogues of classical results due to Frigyes and Marcel Riesz characterizing analytic (complex) NC measures, which are those bounded linear functionals on the free disk system which annihilate . In particular, in Theorem 5.2, we show that a complex NC measure is analytic if and only if its absolutely continuous, singular, dilation and von Neumann parts are each also analytic. We apply this to establish an analogue of the classical F&M Riesz theorem in Theorem 5.5. The classical theorem states that analytic measures are absolutely continuous [25], [11, Chapter 4]. We remark that the NC F&M Riesz theorem obtained here is related, but not equivalent to, one previously developed in [3, Theorem A] using different techniques. Both Theorem 5.5 of the present paper and Theorem A of [3] conclude that an analytic NC measure need not be absolutely continuous, however the results of this paper and those of [3] describe the obstruction in different ways. We discuss the relationship between these two results in Remark 5.10.
2 Background and Notation
Throughout, given in a Hilbert space , we denote the inner product of and by , with being conjugate linear in the first argument and linear in the second. We borrow notation from [15, 14]. The Fock space or NC Hardy space is
equipped with the inner product of the power series coefficients . Elements of the NC Hardy space can be viewed as free non-commutative functions in the NC unit row–ball, , of all finite–dimensional strict row contractions:
The left free shift is the row isometry on the full Fock space whose component operators act by left multiplication by the independent variables, . The free or NC disk algebra is , the free disk system is . This is a self-adjoint unital norm-closed subspace of operators, i.e. an operator system. A (complex) NC measure is a bounded linear functional on the free disk system. The set of all complex NC measures is denoted by , and the positive NC measures by . We remark that any is uniquely determined by the moments .
Given , we write for the operator of left multiplication by on , where
is the NC function determined by . The partial Cesàro sums of the series for converge in the strong operator topology to , as shown in [7, Lemma 1.1]. More generally, given a row isometry , we write for the unique representation of satisfying for all .
The free disk system has the semi-Dirichlet property [9]:
The semi-Dirichlet property enables one to apply a Gelfand–Naimark–Segal (GNS)-type construction to , where is any positive NC measure. One obtains a GNS–Hilbert space as the norm closure of the free disk algebra (modulo vectors of zero length) with respect to the pre-inner product
Elements of this Hilbert space are equivalence classes , , where is the left ideal of all those such that . This construction provides a representation , where
This is a unital completely isometric isomorphism, so that the image of the left free shifts,
defines a row isometry, which we call the GNS row isometry of , acting on the GNS space . The original positive NC measure then has the spacial representation
If and , then the map
extends by continuity to a contraction with dense range. In this case, setting , we have
and can be viewed as the ‘NC Radon–Nikodym derivative’ of with respect to .
Remark 2.1.
The NC Radon–Nikodym derivative, is or Toeplitz in the sense that
Here, recall that a bounded linear operator on the Hardy space is called Toeplitz if is the compression of the bounded multiplication operator for some . A theorem of Brown and Halmos identifies the Toeplitz operators as the set of all bounded linear operators, , obeying the simple algebraic condition
where is the shift [2, Theorem 6].
We refer to as the co-embedding determined by the inequality , since its adjoint is injective. Given satisfying , it follows that
We remark that that is unitarily equivalent to an embedding of NC reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces; see [15, Lemma 3][14].
We now record the fact that any cyclic row isometry is unitarily equivalent to the GNS row isometry of a positive NC measure. The proof is straightforward and thus omitted.
Lemma 2.2.
Let be a cyclic row isometry on a Hilbert space with a cyclic vector . Define a positive NC measure by setting . The map defined by , , extends to a surjective isometry that intertwines and .
Let denote the left free analytic Toeplitz algebra or the Free Hardy Algebra. From a result of Davidson–Pitts [7, Corollary 2.12], it follows that , the closure of in the weak operator topology (WOT). That is, is a free semigroup algebra, the unital WOT–closed operator algebra generated by a row isometry [5]. The algebra can also be identified with the left multiplier algebra of , viewed as a non-commutative reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS) [26, 16, 1]. We remark that this left multiplier algebra is equal to the unital Banach algebra of all free NC functions in the NC unit row-ball that are uniformly bounded in supremum norm [26, 23]. The NC or free Toeplitz system is
We also use the right free shift , the row isometry of right multiplications by the independent NC variables on the Fock space. The right free analtyic Toeplitz algebra is .
2.1 Stucture of GNS row isometries
By [18], any row isometry on a Hilbert space can be decomposed as the direct sum of four types of row isometries:
Here is pure type if it is unitarily equivalent to an ampliation of . The remaining three types are Cuntz, i.e. surjective row isometries. A Cuntz row isometry is the multi-variable analogue of a unitary in our context and we sometimes call a Cuntz row isometry a Cuntz unitary. We also call any pure type row isometry a pure row isometry. The summand is absolutely continuous Cuntz (or AC Cuntz or ACC), meaning that is a Cuntz row isometry and the free semigroup algebra it generates is completely isometrically isomorphic and weak homeomorphic to . The summand is von Neumann type, meaning the free semigroup algebra it generates is self-adjoint and hence a von Neumann algebra. The leftover piece is of dilation type. A row isometry is of dilation type if it has no direct summand of the previous three types. Any dilation type row isometry has a block upper triangular decomposition
so that has a restriction to an invariant subspace that is unitarily equivalent to a pure row isometry and is the minimal row isometric dilation of its compression to the orthogonal complement of this invariant space. Since is of Cuntz type, is necessarily a non-isometric row co-isometry [21]. A row isometry containing only pure type and ACC summands is said to be absolutely continuous (or AC), and a row isometry containing only dilation–type and von Neumann–type summands is said to be singular.
We form the set of labels
For a given row isometry , if we write “ is type ”, then we mean “ is pure type ” when , “ is Cuntz–type” when , “ is absolutely continuous” when , “ is singular” when , “ is absolutely continuous Cuntz” when , “ is dilation–type” when , and “ is von Neumann–type” when . We include the trivial type, . If is of type this simply means that can be any row isometry.
Definition 2.3.
Let . A positive NC measure is said to be type if its GNS row isometry is type .
Let and consider a row isometry . There is an orthogonal projection that commutes with such that restricted to the range of is the type summand of . In the case of a GNS row isometry , we write . Given a positive NC measure , we denote by the positive NC measure satisfying
One may readily verify that is a co-isometry satisfying
Note that satisfies
Because is reducing for , it follows that for all words . From this, we see that is unitarily equivalent to the restriction of to . Therefore, the GNS row isometry of is type , and thus is type .
There is an additional projection associated with any row isometry , and that is the free semigroup algebra structure projection of . With denoting the free semigroup algebra of , we denote by largest projection in so that is self-adjoint [8, Structure Theorem 2.6]. It has the following properties. First, has the decomposition
where denotes the von Neumann algebra generated by . When ,
is completely isometrically isomorphic and weak homeomorphic to . Here and elsewhere, whenever is an orthogonal projection.
This is related to the subspace of all weak continuous vectors for a row isometry . A vector is weak continuous if the linear functional , defined by , is weak continuous [10]. A bounded operator is an intertwiner for if
The following theorem combines results of Davidson–Li–Pitts and Kennedy to characterize the set of all weak continuous vectors of in terms of bounded intertwiners.
Theorem 2.4 (Davidson–Li–Pitts, Kennedy).
Let be a row isometry on .
-
1.
If then the linear functional ,
is weak continuous.
-
2.
is a closed invariant subspace, and
-
3.
If is the structure projection of , then
Proof.
Items 1 and 2 are directly from [10, Theorem 2.7]. For item 3, we note the following. The second dual of is a free semi-group algebra, and thus there exists a structure projection for . Let denote the weak continuous representation of determined by . By [10, Proposition 5.2], , where denotes the projection onto the closed subspace . In comments following [10, Proposition 5.2], it is shown that if and only if is “regular”, meaning that the and coincide. By [10, Theorem 3.4] and [18, Corollary 4.17], we see that is always regular. ∎
3 Convex and order structure of NC measures
If are positive NC measures, it is natural to ask whether the contractive co-embedding intertwines the various structure projections of and . That is, do we generally have that , where ? By [14, Corollary 8.11] the sets of absolutely continuous (AC) and singular positive NC measures are positive hereditary cones. It is therefore also natural to ask whether the sets of von Neumann type and dilation type NC measures are also positive hereditary cones, as we prove in Theorem 3.18 at the end of this section.
Definition 3.1.
Let . We say that is a hereditary type if and being type together imply that is type . A positive sub-cone, , of a postive cone, , is hereditary, if , and imply that . We say that determines a hereditary cone if the set of type– positive NC measures form a hereditary cone.
Lemma 3.2.
Let with . If is positive semi-definite, then
Proof.
By [12, Lemma 4.6] the cone of ‘positive finite sums of squares’ of free polynomials, i.e. elements of the form
is norm-dense in the cone of positive elements of the free disk system, . Hence, to prove the claim, it suffices to show that
for any . This is easily verified:
∎
Proposition 3.3.
Let .
-
(a)
If are such that and is of type , then is also of type . In particular, if this formula holds for all such that , then is a hereditary type.
-
(b)
If whenever are such that , then determines a hereditary cone.
-
(c)
Suppose that are types and are such that and similarly for . If and , then .
-
(d)
Suppose that , , is a type and . If is of type then .
Proof.
(a) Suppose and is type . Then and thus , and therefore
for each . Thus, is type .
(b) The hereditary property follows from (a). To see that determines a cone, suppose are type . Clearly, . Then
and . Thus,
Therefore, is type .
(c) Define by setting for . Then it follows from comments following Definition 2.3 that is a surjective isometry. The surjective isometry is defined similarly. We note that, with respect to this direct sum decomposition,
Thus,
Let be defined by , with similarly defined. Then
and
Therefore, .
(d) Since is type , we have and so . Let be positive semi-definite. By Lemma 3.2, we have
and so
That is, . ∎
Lemma 3.4.
Suppose that and that for all of type for which . Further assume that for all of type . Then the following assertions hold:
-
(i)
If , of type , are such that and and are type and , respectively, then and .
-
(ii)
For any of type , one has .
Proof.
(i) Plainly and . It follows from Proposition 3.3(d) that and since
For any positive semi-definite , set
Note that are non-negative real numbers. As
it follows that . As every element of is a linear combination of positive semi-definite elements, assertion (i) is proved.
Remark 3.5.
Let be such that for all . It follows from Proposition 3.3 that the following assertions are equivalent.
-
(i)
whenever are of type and .
-
(ii)
and whenever are of type and .
Indeed, that (ii) implies (i) it precisely Proposition 3.3(c). In the other direction, we first note that and . Assume (i). Since and are type and , respectively, it then follows from Proposition 3.3(d) that and . In particular, (i) and (ii) hold in the case where , in which case our starting assumption is that .
Proposition 3.6.
Suppose that and . Let be the contractive co-embedding. Then and . That is and are hereditary types and determine positive hereditary cones.
Proof.
Corollary 3.7.
With as above, if , where , then .
In the next lemma, recall that if is the structure projection of , that is the projection onto by Theorem 2.4.
Lemma 3.8.
Suppose with . Let and be the structure projections of and , respectively. Then, .
Proof.
Set . Let be a WC vector of . By Theorem 2.4 there is an intertwiner and a vector such that . As intertwines and , it follows that is a WC vector of . Thus, . ∎
Lemma 3.9.
Suppose with . Let be the reducing projection onto the support of its Cuntz direct summand. Then, . In particular, if is Cuntz type, then is Cuntz type, and is a hereditary type.
Proof.
It follows from Popescu’s Wold decomposition theorem, [21, Theorem 1.3], that the range of is the set of all so that for any non-negative integer, , there exist such that
Set . Then,
for any non-negative integer . It follows that , from which the remaining claim follows on application of Proposition 3.3(a). ∎
Lemma 3.10.
Let be a row isometry on a Hilbert space and set
Then is reducing and the restriction of to is the von Neumann–type summand of .
Proof.
By a result of M. Kennedy, a row isometry, , is of von Neumann type if and only if it has no wandering vectors [17]. Specifically, any pure or AC Cuntz row isometry has wandering vectors. Since a dilation–type row isometry has a pure type restriction to the non-trivial invariant subspace of its weak continuous vectors, it also has wandering vectors. It is clear that any wandering vector for belongs to . By construction so that restricted to has no wandering vectors and is hence of von Neumann type. That is, . Let , let , and let be an intertwiner. Then, for any words , we have
Since , we have and thus . Therefore, . ∎
Remark 3.11.
If is of dilation type on , then is invariant but cannot contain any reducing subspace. Thus, for dilation–type row isometries.
Remark 3.12.
The following fact is well–known and can be found in [14, Lemma 8.9]:
Lemma 3.13.
Let and be row isometries on Hilbert spaces respectively and suppose that is a Cuntz unitary. If is a bounded linear map satisfying
then
and is in the commutant of the von Neumann algebra of , and similarly is in the commutant of the von Neumann algebra of .
Lemma 3.14.
Suppose satisfy . If is of von Neumann type, then so is . That is, is a hereditary type.
Proof.
The set of all positive singular NC measures is a positive hereditary cone so that is necessarily singular. That is, , is the sum of a positive dilation–type and a von Neumann–type NC measure. Suppose that is a weak continuous vector. By Theorem 2.4, there is a bounded intertwiner and a vector so that . Since , the co-embedding is contractive and for any word . By Lemma 3.13, we also have that , so that is an intertwiner:
Setting , we see that is in the range of a bounded interwtiner. Thus, , since is of von Neumann type. Because is injective, we have . It follows that , and thus . We conclude that is of von Neumann type. ∎
Lemma 3.15.
Suppose satisfy . Then, .
The above lemma and Proposition 3.3(a) imply that is also a hereditary type.
Proof.
Set , and . We know that , that and that for every word . Hence we assume, without loss in generality, that both and are singular. The GNS row isometry of any singular NC measure is Cuntz, so we assume in particular that are Cuntz. Note that is invariant and that is the smallest reducing subspace of which contains by Lemma 3.10. Let , and denote by and the GNS representations of induced by and , respectively. Since , it belongs to , where and thus by Lemma 3.10, there is a sequence of operators and a such that
Since is Cuntz, we can again apply Lemma 3.13 to find that
Because , it follows from Lemma 3.8 that . Thus, , where by Lemma 3.10 again. ∎
Lemma 3.16.
Let . If , then the positive NC measure determined by , , is of von Neumann type.
Proof.
Let denote the cyclic subspace of generated by . Note that there is a surjective isometry such that for each . Because is von Neumann type, for any given word , there exists a net in such that is the weak limit of . As for any , it follows that is the weak limit of . This shows that the weak closure of is self-adjoint, and thus is of von Neumann type. ∎
Lemma 3.17.
Let . If and is of von Neumann type, then . That is, is a hereditary type.
Proof.
Theorem 3.18.
Suppose satisfy . Let denote the contractive co-embedding. Then, , and and the sets of positive NC measures of dilation and von Neumann type are positive hereditary cones.
Proof.
Assume first that and are singular. Set . Plainly, , where, as before, . By Lemma 3.16, we see that is of von Neumann type, and thus by Lemma 3.17 we see that . Then, for any ,
whence
Let be the projection onto the range of . Applying the Douglas factorization lemma then yields . In particular, , and it follows that
(3.1) |
As and are assumed singular, we have (and similarly for ). Then,
by Lemma 3.15 | ||||
As , the theorem is proved in the case where and are singular.
In the general case, where and are not necessarily singular, we note that implies , thus . As seen in the proof of Proposition 3.3, there are unitary intertwiners and such that
Since and , it follows that and a similar formula holds for . Thus,
That is, . As , we have
It now follows from Proposition 3.3(b) that the dilation–type and von Neumann–type positive NC measures form hereditary cones. ∎
The following result refines our NC Lebesgue decomposition, [14, Section 8], by further decomposing any positive and singular NC measure into positive dilation–type and von Neumann–type NC measures:
Corollary 3.19 (NC Kennedy–Lebesgue–von Neumann decomposition).
Any positive NC measure has a unique NC Kennedy–Lebesgue–von Neumann decomposition,
where are positive NC measures of absolutely continuous–type, dilation–type and von Neumann–type, respectively. The absolutely continuous, dilation–type and von Neumann–type positive NC measures each form a positive hereditary cone. If are, respectively, absolutely continuous, dilation–type and von Neumann–type positive NC measures, and , then
Moreover, if , then for any
Proof.
It is already known from [14] that the absolutely continuous positive NC measures form a hereditary cone and the fact that the dilation– and von Neumann–type positive NC measures form hereditary cones was proven in Theorem 3.18. The additivity of follows from Theorem 3.18 and Lemma 3.4(ii). That follows from Proposition 3.6, leaving . From this and Lemma 3.4(i), we have , the second equality following from Lemma 3.10. It now follows that . ∎
Example 3.20.
In contrast to the types just discussed, the set of Cuntz–type positive NC measures is not a cone. For a univariate example, consider normalized Lebesgue measure on the upper and lower half-circles and , which sum to normalized Lebesgue measure. Both of these measures have the property that their ‘GNS representations’ are unitary. One can use this to construct a (perhaps somewhat trivial) multi-variable example by setting
for each word . To see that is Cuntz, it suffices to note that is unitarily equivalent to , where is the unitary operator of multiplication by on .
Example 3.21.
On the other hand the set of pure positive NC measures is not hereditary. The example [10, Example 2.11], based on [7, Example 3.2], provides a row isometry, , on a separable Hilbert space so that is Cuntz (surjective) and there is a bounded intertwiner, ,
so that has dense range and is cyclic. Set . Now choose any real number and note that . This is a strictly positive left Toeplitz operator which is bounded below, and hence it is factorizable by [24, Theorem 1.5]. That is, there exists an such that such that is cyclic for . Define the positive NC measures and . Then clearly , where is the AC Cuntz row isometry considered above and . Since is -cyclic
Clearly extends to an onto isometry intertwining the GNS row isometry of and so that is of pure type and where is AC Cuntz.
4 Complex NC measures
Our goal for the remainder of the paper is to apply the preceding results to study analytic (and complex) NC measures. As for positive NC measures we define:
Definition 4.1.
An NC measure is absolutely continuous (AC) if it has a weak continuous extension to the free Toeplitz system, .
Let be given by , . We call NC Lebesgue measure, and note that it is absolutely continuous. It plays the role of normalized Lebesgue measure in this NC measure theory [15, 14].
In [7, Theorem 2.10], Davidson–Pitts show that any bounded linear functional on that extends weak continuously to is a vector functional, for . The next lemma shows that their proof extends to our setting.
Lemma 4.2.
Any absolutely continuous NC measure , for , is a vector functional. That is, if is absolutely continuous, then there exist such that
Proof.
By general considerations, can be extended (with generally increase in norm) to a weak continuous linear functional, , acting on . Indeed, since is weak closed, it can be identified with the annihilator where is a norm-closed subspace of the trace-class operators on , the pre-dual of [20, Corollary 2.4.11]. Thus, for any and any , we have . If is the quotient map, then can be identified with the inclusion map of into [20, Proposition 2.4.13]. That is, the pre-dual of is isomorphic to and linear functionals on which extend weak continuously to can be identified with this quotient space. It follows that we can identify with the equivalence class for some . Hence, for any and ,
Since
there exists, for any , an so that
Set . Then given by
is a weak continuous extension of to with norm . The trace-class operator has a singular-value decomposition
Choose any sequence of words so that for . For example, one can choose the words for . Then,
both converge to elements in . In what follows, when and for all . For any , we have
The lemma now follows from the fact that is norm dense in , ∎
Given , define by
We also set
Corollary 4.3.
Any absolutely continuous NC measure can be decomposed as where each is AC. In particular, is AC.
Proof.
Applying Lemma 4.2 to , we obtain vectors such that for . Set , where,
Then we observe that, for any positive semi-definite ,
and similarly,
Therefore, we can set , , etc. ∎
4.1 General Wittstock decomposition
Any can be written as a linear combination of four positive NC measures,
where
This also works for operator-valued NC measures, i.e. operator-valued completely bounded maps on the free disk system, by the Wittstock decomposition theorem [27] [19, Theorem 8.5].
Definition 4.4.
If is such that , then we call a Wittstock decomposition of . The set of all Wittstock decompositions of is denoted by . Given a Wittstock decomposition , the total variation of with respect to is
Remark 4.5.
The total variation depends on the choice of Wittstock decomposition of and this is not uniquely determined by . Indeed, if is any Wittstock decomposition of , then so is where , and , , for any . This is a rather trivial example of non-uniqueness and in this case . However, even if are two different Wittstock decompositions of so that , this need not imply that for each . That is, one could have, for example, that without having and for some .
Proposition 4.6.
Let . Then, is absolutely continuous if and only if there exists a such that is absolutely continuous.
Proof.
If is absolutely continuous, then we can apply Corollary 4.3. Conversely, suppose that is such that is absolutely continuous. Recall that the absolutely continuous NC measures form a hereditary cone. As , it follows that is absolutely continuous for each . Thus, is then absolutely continuous. ∎
Definition 4.7.
Let . A complex NC measure is type , if there exists a Wittstock decomposition such that is type .
Remark 4.8.
Since for each , where is a Wittstock decomposition of , and the sets of AC, singular, dilation–type and von Neumann–type NC measures are positive hereditary cones, it follows that if is one of these four types, then so is each . It follows that cannot, for example, be both absolutely continuous and von Neumann type without also being .
Lemma 4.9.
Let and suppose for all . If is type and , then
Proof.
Since is type , there exist , where each is type . Thus, for each . By separating the real and imaginary parts of , we find that
and thus
Using Corollary 3.19, we have
Likewise, we find that . ∎
By the preceeding lemma, the condition is symmetric in and it occurs when , i.e. whenever for every .
Any with Wittstock decomposition has a corresponding Lebesgue decomposition:
where
and similarly for . Similarly, More generally, for , we set
4.2 GNS formula
Let and let be a Wittstock decomposition of . Since , there exists a corresponding contractive co-embedding for . Then, given ,
It then follows that
(4.1) |
where
is a Toeplitz operator, i.e.
5 Analytic NC measures
Definition 5.1.
An analytic NC measure, , is any complex NC measure that annihilates .
The following is an analogue of [11, Corollary 2, Chapter 4].
Theorem 5.2.
If is a complex NC measure that annihilates , then each of , , and annihilate .
Proof.
Let . As in Section 4.2, if , then
where
and each is the contractive co-embedding arising from . By Proposition 3.6, Theorem 3.18 and Corollary 3.7, it further follows that if , then
where . In particular, since , we can find a sequence of NC polynomials in such that . Then, for any ,
This proves that also annihilates for any . ∎
In the next lemma, we say that is of Cuntz–type if it has a Wittstock decomposition whose corresponding total variation is Cuntz–type. It follows from Lemma 3.9 that each is of Cuntz–type.
Lemma 5.3.
If is a complex NC measure of Cuntz–type that annihilates , then it also annihilates .
Proof.
Remark 5.4.
At this point, the proof of the classical F&M Riesz theorem, as presented in [11, Chapter 4], is straightforward. Given any complex measure obeying the above assumptions we have that
for any , . We then consider the complex measure . This is again a complex singular measure which annihilates . By the above lemma also annihilates . In particular it annihilates , so that by construction
Proceeding inductively, we conclude that all moments of vanish so that . In the NC setting, this argument breaks down for singular NC measures of dilation–type; see Section 6.
The main result of this section is an analogue of the F&M Riesz theorem:
Theorem 5.5.
(NC F&M Riesz Theorem) Every analytic NC measure has vanishing von Neumann part.
When , the von Neumann part of an isometry is the singular part of its unitary direct summand. Hence any analytic measure on the circle is absolutely continuous and we recover the classical F&M Riesz theorem with a new proof. Note, however, that as soon as , an analytic NC measure, , will be AC if and only if it has no dilation part. That is, an analytic linear functional on need not extend weak continuously to ; see Proposition 6.1.
Note that is a contractive linear map on . As , it follows by continuity that is a contractive linear endomorphism of .
Definition 5.6.
Let and . Define by
Lemma 5.7.
Let and . Define by setting for . If is absolutely continuous, then so is . If is von Neumann type, then so is .
Proof.
Plainly, is a continuous linear map on . It is readily verified that , and thus is indeed defined. It is an elementary exercise to produce an isometry satisfying
We see immediately that is a closed invariant subspace of and that is unitarily equivalent to .
Suppose that is absolutely continuous. Then every element of is a weak continuous vector. In particular, is weak continuous. For any , we note that , and thus
Therefore, is absolutely continuous.
Now suppose instead that is of von Neumann type. Let and denote the weak closures of and , respectively. Clearly, is invariant. As is of von Neumann type, it follows that is a von Neumann algebra, and thus is reducing. In particular, is a von Neumann algebra. As is unitarily equivalent to , we see that is of von Neumann type. That is, is of von Neumann type. ∎
Remark 5.8.
If is of dilation–type, it is generally not true that is of dilation–type and hence the classical proof as described in Remark 5.4 breaks down. The next section, Section 6 provides an example of a dilation–type NC measure, , so that is weak continuous and such that is analytic but not weak continuous, see Proposition 6.1.
Proposition 5.9.
Let and . If is absolutely continuous, then is absolutely continuous. If is of von Neumann type, then is of von Neumann type.
Proof.
Let , and let be of type . First assume that is positive. For each , set
Then,
for all and so . Because is type , it follows from Lemma 5.7 that each is type , and thus is type .
Now consider the general case of . Since is type , there exists a such that each is of type . It follows that is type for each . Let be a Wittstock decomposition of where each is type . Then
As each is of type , it follows that has a Wittstock decomposition such that is of type , and therefore is of type . ∎
Proof.
(of Theorem 5.5) By Corollary 5.2 and Lemma 5.3, if annihilates , then annihilates . By Proposition 5.9, for any , we see that is of von Neumann type. Since, by definition, and annihilates , we have that is a von Neumann type NC measure which annihilates . By Lemma 5.3 again, annihilates so that
Proceeding inductively we obtain that
for any and we conclude that . ∎
Remark 5.10.
An NC F&M Riesz theorem was previously obtained in [3, Theorem A], by R. Clouâtre and the second two named authours of the present paper, using different techniques. Both Theorem 5.5 and [3, Theorem A] disallow the presence of von Neumann type summands in their corresponding models of analytic linear functionals on , though what this means in these two cases is different. Both papers find that analytic linear functionals on need not have weak continuous extensions to the weak closure, , of , as we detail in the next section. We also remark that the results of [3] and the current paper describe the obstruction to weak continuous extension in different ways.
To compare the two sets of results, fix and suppose , as this is the definition of analyticity used in [3]. There, the free disk system is viewed as embedded, completely isometrically, inside the Cuntz algebra, , via the quotient map whose kernel is the compact operators. Let be an extension of to . In [3, Theorem A], it is proved that there exists a representation , a cyclic vector and a vector such that
, and the restriction of to the norm closure of is unitarily equivalent to . The triple is referred to as a “Riesz representation” of the functional . The particular form of the representation implies that has no von Neumann–type summand, as is noted in [3]. We note that
The representation and the vector are such that , where and denote their weak continuous extensions to the second dual of and is the ‘radial’ part of the polar decomposition a normal linear functional. In the present paper, we find that there exists a Wittstock decomposition of and a -Toeplitz operator , such that
with having no von Neumann–type summand. One will recall that we assume in Theorem 5.5 that annihilates , not . However, this is equivalent to the analyticity assumptions of [3, Theorem A], since a vector functional applied to a representation of annihilates if and only if it annihilates ; see Lemma 5.3.
As another point of contrast, our total variation is not uniquely determined by . From the polar decomposition , we may readily produce a Wittstock decomposition of , but it is not generally of the type that have proven useful in this paper, nor of course is equal to . We also remark that, unless the GNS row isometry of is Cuntz, need not have a unique positive Kreĭn–Arveson extension to (see the proposition below).
For yet another point of contrast, it follows from [3, Corollary 5.2] that can be analytic and admit a weak continuous extension to , with having a dilation–type summand. In the representation of this paper, admits a weak continuous extension to precisely when is absolutely continuous (for some ). Despite these differences, we can collect some necessary and sufficient conditions for the absolute continuity of an analytic . By combining Proposition 4.6, Lemma 4.2 and [3, Theorem B], we see that the following conditions are equivalent, where we suppose is analytic, .
-
(i)
extends weak continuously to .
-
(ii)
There exists a such that is absolutely continuous.
-
(iii)
There exist such that , .
-
(iv)
The weak continuous extension of to the second dual of annihilates , where is the free semi-group structure projection of the second dual of .
It should be noted that the equivalences (i)(ii)(iii) do not require analyticity of . For (iv), we remark that extends weak continuously if and only if does, and so the different conditions for analyticity from these two papers do not present any difficulties here.
Proposition 5.11.
If is Cuntz type, then has a unique positive Kreĭn–Arveson extension to the Cuntz–Toeplitz algebra, .
Proof.
Let be any Kreĭn–Arveson (positive) extension of . Apply the GNS construction to to obtain a GNS Hilbert space and a representation satisfying
By construction, is cyclic for the GNS row isometry . Observe that there is an isometry with -invariant range. Indeed, for any ,
Thus, there is an isometry determined by , . Plainly, for each .
Next, observe that is reducing and is unitarily equivalent to . Indeed, is Cuntz, and so any given element is the norm-limit of vectors , where , as shown in [13, Theorem 6.4]. Hence, for any and ,
That is, for each , whence for each .
Finally, note that . Since is dense in and is dense in , it follows that , showing that is in fact a surjective isometry. Therefore, for any ,
6 A Dilation-type example
Recall that there is, in essence, a bijection between positive, finite and regular Borel measures on the circle and the set of Herglotz functions in the disk, i.e. analytic functions in the complex unit disk with positive semi-definite real part. This correspondence extends to positive NC measures and non-commutative (left) Herglotz functions in , ; see [12, 13]. A fractional linear transformation, the so-called Cayley transform, then implements a bijection between the left NC Schur class of contractive NC functions in and and the left NC Herglotz class. If is the (essentially) unique NC measure corresponding to the contractive NC function , we write , and is called the NC Clark measure of ; see [15, Section 3] for details.
By [15, Corollary 7.25], if is inner, i.e. an isometric left multiplier, then its NC Clark measure is singular, so that its GNS representation is a Cuntz row isometry which can be decomposed as the direct sum of a dilation–type row isometry and a von Neumann type row isometry [14].
Classically, any sum of Dirac point masses is singular with respect to Lebesgue measure on the circle. Motivated by this, consider the positive linear functional defined by
and . Here, is used to indicate that does not contain the ‘letter’ . One may think of as a ‘Dirac point mass’ at the point , where is the first level of the NC unit ball . Setting , we note that for all words . Since is a row contraction, it follows from results of Popescu that the map extends to a positive linear functional on [22, Theorem 2.1].
Before continuing, we remark that the example of this section is related to [3, Example 2], which is itself related to atomic representations of [7]. This example is also a special case of [6, Example 5.1]. However, we here choose to start from the linear functional, , rather than the functional’s representation as a vector functional on a representation, to emphasize the NC function theory associated with the NC measure.
Claim 1.
is a wandering vector for and has vanishing von Neumann part.
Proof.
Note that any wandering vector for is always a weak continuous vector. Indeed, if is wandering for , then
is a constant multiple of NC Lebesgue measure, and hence is absolutely continuous.
To see that is wandering for , note that
However is also cyclic for since , which is cyclic for . This means that the smallest reducing subspace that contains the weak continuous vector is all of , so that by Lemma 3.10. ∎
In what follows, if , , is any word, then we set . This letter reversal map is an involution on the free monoid.
Claim 2.
The NC measure is the NC Clark measure of , ; a left-inner NC function. Thus, is purely of dilation–type.
Proof.
Given , let . The (left) Herglotz function, of is
It follows that the Cayley transform,
of is , which is inner. By [15, Corollary 7.25], is the direct sum of a dilation–type and a von Neumann–type row isometry and the previous claim shows that the von Neumann part vanishes. ∎
Claim 3.
For any word such that , the vector is weak continuous. In particular, the closed span of is contained in .
The proof below uses the concept of the NC Herglotz space of NC Cauchy transforms with respect to a positive NC measure, see [15, Section 3.8, Lemma 5.2]. The NC Herglotz space, of any positive NC measure, , is a non-commutative reproducing kernel Hilbert space (NC-RKHS) of NC functions in the NC unit row–ball [13, 12, 15, 14]. The details of this construction will not be relevant or needed for our purposes here. It will suffice to remark that if is a positive NC measure, then there is an onto and isometric linear map, , the free Cauchy transform.
Proof.
Given any so that , the vector is a WC vector if and only if
is an absolutely continuous (weak continuous) NC measure. The free Cauchy transform of , is then,
The Taylor coefficients of vanish if are not comparable. Thus, if and only if or if . Since is fixed, there are only finitely many words such that . On the other hand if , then
since . This proves that has at most finitely many non-zero Taylor coefficients and so and is a weak continuous vector for . Indeed, since , is a weak analytic vector for in the sense of [14, Definition 8.2] and is hence a weak continuous vector by [14, Corollary 8.3].
Since this vector is cyclic and must be invariant, we see that . Therefore, is weak continuous and is a weak continuous vector for . ∎
Proposition 6.1.
The positive NC measure defined by is equal to NC Lebesgue measure, , and hence is weak continuous. The NC measure , i.e. , annihilates the NC disk algebra , but is not weak continuous.
Proof.
The vector is a unit wandering vector for the dilation–type positive NC measure . Hence, . Consider the sequence . This converges weak to , and yet,
which of course cannot converge to . ∎
References
- [1] J.A. Ball, G. Marx, and V. Vinnikov. Noncommutative reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces. J. Funct. Anal., 271:1844–1920, 2016.
- [2] H. Arlen Brown and P. B. Halmos. Algebraic properties of toeplitz operators. rem, 100:173, 1963.
- [3] Raphaël Clouâtre, Robert TW Martin, and Edward J Timko. Analytic functionals for the non-commutative disc algebra. Accepted by J. Funct. Anal. arXiv:2104.02130, 2021.
- [4] J. Cuntz. Simple algebras generated by isometries. Communications in mathematical physics, 57:173–185, 1977.
- [5] Kenneth R. Davidson. Free semigroup algebras, a survey. In Systems, approximation, singular integral operators, and related topics, pages 209–240. 2001.
- [6] Kenneth R. Davidson, David W. Kribs, and Miron E. Shpigel. Isometric dilations of non-commuting finite rank n-tuples. Canadian Journal of Mathematics, 53:506–545, 2001.
- [7] Kenneth R. Davidson and David R. Pitts. Invariant subspaces and hyper-reflexivity for free semigroup algebras. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, 78:401–430, 1999.
- [8] K.R. Davidson, E. Katsoulis, and D.R. Pitts. The structure of free semigroup algebras. J. Reine Angew. Math., 533:99–126, 2001.
- [9] K.R. Davidson and E.G. Katsoulis. Dilation theory, commutant lifting and semicrossed products. Doc. Math., 16:781–868, 2011.
- [10] K.R. Davidson, J. Li, and D.R. Pitts. Absolutely continuous representations and a Kaplansky density theorem for free semigroup algebras. J. Funct. Anal., 224:160–191, 2005.
- [11] K. Hoffman. Banach spaces of analytic functions. Courier Corporation, 2007.
- [12] M.T. Jury and R.T.W. Martin. Non-commutative Clark measures for the Free and Abelian Toeplitz algebras. J. Math. Anal. Appl., 456:1062–1100, 2017.
- [13] M.T. Jury and R.T.W. Martin. Column-extreme multipliers of the Free Hardy space. J. Lond. Math. Soc., In press, 2019.
- [14] M.T. Jury and R.T.W. Martin. Lebesgue decomposition of non-commutative measures. Int. Math. Res. Not., In press, 2020.
- [15] M.T. Jury and R.T.W. Martin. Fatou’s theorem for non-commutative measures. arXiv:1907.09590, 2021.
- [16] M.T. Jury, R.T.W. Martin, and E. Shamovich. Blaschke–singular–outer factorization of free non-commutative functions. Advances in Mathematics, 384:article 107720, 2021.
- [17] Matthew Kennedy. Wandering vectors and the reflexivity of free semigroup algebras. Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik (Crelle’s Journal), 2011:47–53, 2011.
- [18] Matthew Kennedy. The structure of an isometric tuple. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, 106:1157–1177, 2013.
- [19] V. Paulsen. Completely Bounded Maps and Operator Algebras. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 2002.
- [20] G.K. Pedersen. Analysis now. Springer, 2012.
- [21] G. Popescu. Isometric dilations for infinite sequences of noncommuting operators. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 316:523–536, 1989.
- [22] G. Popescu. Non-commutative disc algebras and their representations. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 124:2137–2148, 1996.
- [23] G. Popescu. Free holomorphic functions on the unit ball of . J. Funct. Anal., 241:268–333, 2006.
- [24] Gelu Popescu. Entropy and multivariable interpolation. American Mathematical Soc., 2006.
- [25] F. Riesz and M. Riesz. Über die randwerte einer analytischen funktion. Quatrièime Congris des Math. Scand. Stockholm, pages 27–44, 1916.
- [26] Guy Salomon, Orr Shalit, and Eli Shamovich. Algebras of bounded noncommutative analytic functions on subvarieties of the noncommutative unit ball. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 370:8639–8690, 2018.
- [27] G. Wittsock. Ein operatorwertiger Hahn–Banach Satz. J. Funct. Anal., 40:127–150, 1981.
Michael T. Jury, Department of Mathematics, University of Florida
E-mail address: [email protected]
Robert T. W. Martin, Department of Mathematics, University of Manitoba
E-mail address: [email protected]
Edward J. Timko, Department of Mathematics, Georgia Institute of Technology
E-mail address: [email protected]