This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

A New Polar Ring Galaxy Discovered in the COSMOS Field

Minoru Nishimura The Open University of Japan
2-11 Wakaba, Mihama-ku
Chiba, Chiba, Japan
Kazuya Matsubayashi Institute of Astronomy, The University of Tokyo
2-21-1 Osawa
Mitaka, Tokyo, Japan
Takashi Murayama Astronomical Institute, Graduate School of Science, Tohoku University
Aramaki, Aoba
Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
Yoshiaki Taniguchi The Open University of Japan
2-11 Wakaba, Mihama-ku
Chiba, Chiba, Japan
Abstract

In order to understand the formation and evolution of galaxies fully, it is important to study their three-dimensional gravitational potential for a large sample of galaxies. Since polar-ring galaxies (PRGs) provide useful laboratories for this investigation, we have started our detailed study of a sample of known PRGs by using the data set obtained by the Hyper Suprime-Cam Subaru Strategic Program (HSC-SSP). During the course of this study, we have discovered a new PRG, identified as SDSS J095351.58+012036.1. Its photometric redshift is estimated as z0.2z\sim 0.2. The polar ring structure in this PRG appears to be almost perpendicular to the disk of its host galaxy without any disturbed features. Therefore, this PRG will provide us with useful information on the formation of such an undisturbed polar structure. We discuss its photometric properties in detail.

Galaxy colors(586) — Galaxy photometry(611) — Galaxy structure(622)

1 Introduction

Polar ring galaxies (PRGs) are galaxies with a polar structure (either a ring or a disk of gas, dust, and stars) rotating in a plane almost perpendicular to the major axis of its host galaxy. The archetypical PRG is NGC 2685 (or Arp 336). Sandage (1961) gives the following note on this galaxy; “There are two axes of symmetry for the projected image; most galaxies have only one.” Its host galaxy is an S0 galaxy, with the polar structure rotating through the minor axis of the host galaxy (Schechter & Gunn, 1978). From a theoretical point of view, it is considered that the stable maintenance of the polar structure is due to the precessional motion of the polar structure (Steiman-Cameron & Durisen, 1982).

So far, more than 400 candidates of PRGs have been discovered to date (e.g., Whitmore et al. (1990), Moiseev et al. (2011)). However, among them, only dozens have been confirmed as real PRGs by spectroscopic observations (e.g., Egorov & Moiseev (2019)).

Since most galaxies reside in large-scale structures, interactions or mergers among galaxies are not rare events for them. In order to understand the dynamical and morphological evolution of galaxies, it is important to study how such interactions or mergers affect the evolution of galaxies by using large unbiased samples of PRGs. Indeed, observational properties of PRGs allow us to investigate a wide range of issues related to their galaxy formation and evolution: e.g., the baryonic matter accretion (e.g., Egorov & Moiseev (2019); Smirnov & Reshetnikov (2020)), the rate of galaxy interactions or mergers (e.g., Reshetnikov et al. (2011); Reshetnikov (2019)), and the 3D distribution of mass in the dark halo (e.g., Khoperskov et al. (2014); Zasov et al. (2017)). In typical PRGs, their host galaxies are mostly early-type galaxies (E/S0), while their polar structures are generally young, blue, and gas rich (Reshetnikov & Mosenkov, 2019). In addition, the observed polar structures show a wide variety in their morphology; e.g., a narrow ring or a wide annulus (Whitmore (1991)), a spindle-, a Saturn-, or a worm-like structure (Faundez-Abans & de Oliveira-Abans, 1998) , inner polar structure (Moiseev, 2012).

As for the formation of PRGs, the following three mechanisms have been theoretically proposed; galaxy mergers (e.g., Bekki (1997, 1998); Bournaud & Combes (2003)), accretion of matter from an approaching galaxy (e.g., Reshetnikov & Sotnikova (1997); Bournaud & Combes (2003)), and cold accretion from filaments in intergalactic space (e.g., Macciò et al. (2006); Brook et al. (2008); Snaith et al. (2012)). However, it is still uncertain which mechanism is important for the formation of PRGs.

In order to improve the understanding of the formation and evolution of PRGs, we have started our systematic search for PRG candidates using the data set obtained by the Hyper Suprime-Cam Subaru Strategic Program (HSC-SSP; Aihara et al. (2018)). During the course of this search, we have discovered a new PRG candidate SDSS J095351.58+012036.1 (hereafter J0953) . This galaxy is located at the edge of the Cosmic Evolution Survey (COSMOS; Scoville et al. (2007)) field. This survey covers a 2 square degree field. It is designed to probe the galaxy formation and evolution as functions of both cosmic time (redshift) and the local galaxy environment. It is noted that only one PRG candidate has been found in the COSMOS Field; SPRC 093 (Moiseev et al., 2011).

In this paper, we discuss the observational properties of our new PRG candidate J0953. Throughout this paper, we use the following cosmological parameters; H0H_{0} = 70 km s-1 Mpc-1, Ωm\Omega_{\rm m} = 0.3, and ΩΛ\Omega_{\Lambda} = 0.7. All magnitudes given in this paper are in the AB magnitude system.

2 SDSS J095351.58+012036.1

The new PRG candidate in our study, J0953, is found at the eastern edge of the COSMOS field in Wide-layer images from the second Public Data Release (PDR2; Aihara et al. (2019)) of HSC-SSP. The HSC-SSP survey consists of the following three layers: Wide, Deep, and UltraDeep. The Wide layer covers about 300 deg2 in all the five broad-band filters (grizygrizy) to the nominal survey exposure (10 min in grgr and 20 min in izyizy).

The HSC-SSP PDR2 data have already been processed with the data reduction pipeline hscPipe version 6 (Bosch et al. (2018), Aihara et al. (2019)), including the following procedures; the point spread function (PSF) modeling, object detection, and photometry.

In figure 1 (a), we show the gg-, rr-, and ii-band composite image of J0953 taken by hscMap tool111hscMap: \langlehttps://hsc-release.mtk.nao.ac.jp/hscMap-pdr2/app/\rangle (Koike (2019)) with SDSS TRUE COLOR mixer. Apparently, a polar structure or ring can be seen in an NE-SW direction almost perpendicular to the disk of the host galaxy.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: The grigri composite image of J0953 taken from the hscMap (Dataset: PDR2 WIDE, Mixer: SDSS TRUE COLOR). North is up and east is left. The white bar displayed in panel (b) corresponds to the angular size of 5 arcsec, or \approx 24 kpc at zz = 0.2 (see text). The solid and dashed lines in panel (b) show the half-light radii of the host galaxy and polar structure, respectively.

J0953 is identified as a galaxy by the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS; York et al. (2000)); SDSS J095351.58+012036.1. Its photometric properties are reported as follows; u=21.49±0.25u^{\prime}=21.49\pm 0.25 mag, g=19.73±0.03g^{\prime}=19.73\pm 0.03 mag, r=18.83±0.02r^{\prime}=18.83\pm 0.02 mag, i=18.34±0.025i^{\prime}=18.34\pm 0.025 mag, and z=18.02±0.05z^{\prime}=18.02\pm 0.05 mag. These data give a photometric redshift of 0.146±0.0360.146\pm 0.036 (Beck et al., 2016). Note that there is no spectroscopic observation of J0953 and thus no spectroscopic redshift is available.

In table 1 we present the photometric properties of J0953 taken from the HSC-SSP database by CAS search tool222CAS search: \langlehttps://hsc-release.mtk.nao.ac.jp/datasearch/\rangle. It is noted that the magnitudes given in this table are slightly brighter than the SDSS magnitudes given above. We consider that this slight difference is probably due to the deeper imaging of the HSC-SSP Wide layer. Using these photometric data, the HSC-SSP group estimates photometric redshifts of J0953 using the two codes. One is the DEmP code (Hsieh & Yee (2014)), and the other is the MIZUKI code (Tanaka (2015)). These two codes give z=0.19z=0.19 (DEmP) and z=0.20z=0.20 (MIZUKI), respectively. Since these are consistent within their errors, we adopt the photometric redshift of J0953, z=0.20z=0.20 in this paper. This gives the luminosity distance of J0953, 980 Mpc.

Table 1: Properties of J0953 from the HSC-SSP Database
Property Name Data
RA (J2000.0) 09h53m51s.59
Dec (J2000.0) +01D20’36”.3
gg 19.4319.43
rr 18.5818.58
ii 18.1218.12
zz 17.7517.75
yy 17.6517.65
Photometric redshift (MIZUKI) 0.200.06+0.090.20^{+0.09}_{-0.06}
Photometric redshift (DEmP) 0.190.05+0.050.19^{+0.05}_{-0.05}
Stellar mass (MIZUKI) 3.852.06+3.10×10103.85^{+3.10}_{-2.06}\times 10^{10} MM_{\odot}
Star formation rate (MIZUKI) 2.662.32+7.772.66^{+7.77}_{-2.32} MM_{\odot} y-1
Interstellar absorption: AVA_{V} (MIZUKI) 0.650.33+0.220.65^{+0.22}_{-0.33}

Note. — We note that the photometric errors in all the five bands are less than 0.01 mag.

We note that there are neither companion galaxies nor satellite galaxies around J0953. In figure 1, however, there appear two faint objects about 5.7 arcsec in both east and west of J0953. Based on their photometric properties, they are background galaxies with photometric redshifts of z1.3z\sim 1.3, respectively.

3 Results and Discussion

We discuss the possibility that J0953 is the PRG. To do so, we need to examine whether at least one of the two components that appear to be vertically intersecting the host galaxy or polar structure is the disk or the ring.

First, PSFs of the g,r,i,z,g,r,i,z, and yy bands of J0953 are obtained by using the PSF picker333PSF picker: \langlehttps://hsc-release.mtk.nao.ac.jp/psf/pdr2/\rangle. Next, the FWHM values of these PSFs are obtained by using the IRAF444IRAF is distributed by the National Optical Astronomy Observatories, which are operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under cooperative agreement with the National Science Foundation. task IMEXAMINE.

The PSF of each band in arcsec is as follows; 0.75 (gg), 0.85 (rr), 0.63 (ii), 0.78 (zz), and 0.64 (yy).

Since the PSF size is the largest in the rr band, the other band images are convolved with Gaussian kernels to fit to the rr-band one by using the IRAF task GAUSS. In the subsequent analyses, we use these smoothed images.

In order to investigate structural properties of both the polar ring and its host galaxy, we have made the gg-, rr-, ii-combined image of J0953 to improve the signal-to-noise ratio. Then, we have carried out the two-component fitting for both the polar ring and the host galaxy, each of which has a Sérsic component. In this analysis, we use the GaLight package555GaLight is a Python-based open-source package for 2D model fitting of galaxy images in cooperation with lenstronomy (Birrer & Amara (2018); Birrer et al. (2021).) (version 0.1.6: Ding et al. (2020); Ding et al. (2021)).

The fitting results are summarized in table 2. The obtained ellipses with the half-light radius are shown in figure 1 (b).

The Sérsic index for the host galaxy is 2.94, suggesting that the host galaxy has an elliptical galaxy-like structure rather than an exponential disk. However, Vika et al. (2015) reports that the average of the Sérsic index for the Sab-Sb galaxies is 2.9. Therefore, it is also possible that the host galaxy is a disk galaxy.

On the other hand, the polar structure has the flatter light profile than the exponential disk; its Sérsic index is 0.47, being much less than 1. This small Sérsic index is consistent with that the polar component has a ring-like structure. Further imaging observation with a higher spatial resolution is necessary to confirm if the polar structure is a ring or not.

Table 2: Structural parameters aaThe structural parameters were estimated on the combined image of the gg, rr, and ii images by GaLight.
Parameter Name Host galaxy Polar structure
effective radius [\arcsec] 0.890.89 2.120.01+0.012.12^{+0.01}_{-0.01}
Sérsic index 2.940.02+0.022.94^{+0.02}_{-0.02} 0.470.47
position angle [°\arcdeg] 102.20.5+0.5102.2^{+0.5}_{-0.5} 31.40.1+0.131.4^{+0.1}_{-0.1}
axis ratiobbThe axis ratio is the semi-minor to semi-major axis ratio. 0.710.71 0.280.28

Note. — No error means that the error is less than 0.01 in each case.

Next, with the structure parameters fixed as those in table 2, we have performed model decomposition by using GaLight in each of the gg, rr, ii, zz, and yy images of J0953 to measure apparent magnitudes of each component. Table 3 lists the apparent magnitudes and the absolute magnitudes of the host galaxy and the polar structure.

Table 3: Estimated magnitudes.
gg rr ii zz yy
mHGm_{\rm HG} 20.0720.07 19.1419.14 18.6718.67 18.2918.29 18.1718.17
mPRm_{\rm PR} 21.0221.02 20.4120.41 20.0020.00 20.0120.01 19.7619.76
MHGM_{\rm HG} 20.30-20.30 20.92-20.92 21.34-21.34 21.73-21.73 21.82-21.82
MPRM_{\rm PR} 19.09-19.09 19.52-19.52 19.85-19.85 19.88-19.88 20.22-20.22

Note. — Note that mm and MM are the apparent and absolute magnitudes, respectively. HG and PR are the host galaxy and the polar structure, respectively. We note that the photometric errors in all the five bands are less than 0.01 mag. The absolute magnitudes are corrected for the Galactic extinction using the values listed in the HSC-SSP PDR2 data, which are estimated from the dust maps given in Schlegel et al. (1998) ; see also Aihara et al. (2019). The kk-correction is applied for all the absolute magnitudes (Chilingarian et al. (2010)).

The spectral energy distribution (SED) of the galaxy is a composite of the spectral emissions from all the stars contained therein. Therefore, we can estimate the stellar mass of both the host galaxy and the polar structure.

Here, we use the absolute magnitudes in ii-band and the color gig-i following the method outlined by Taylor et al. (2011), and obtain the stellar mass of the host galaxy and the polar structure are 26.18×109M26.18\times 10^{9}M_{\odot} and 4.23×109M4.23\times 10^{9}M_{\odot}, respectively.

The characteristic absolute magnitude MM_{*} corresponding to the characteristic luminosity LL_{*} of the galaxies are suggested from Blanton et al. (2001) as follows; u=18.34±0.08u^{\prime}=-18.34\pm 0.08 mag, g=20.04±0.04g^{\prime}=-20.04\pm 0.04 mag, r=20.83±0.03r^{\prime}=-20.83\pm 0.03 mag, i=21.26±0.04i^{\prime}=-21.26\pm 0.04 mag, and z=21.55±0.04z^{\prime}=-21.55\pm 0.04 mag; see table 1 of Blanton et al. (2001) for details on the sample galaxies.

Using the color conversion formulae from the SDSS system to the HSC system from Komiyama et al. (2018), these MM_{*} are converted to g=20.12g=-20.12 mag and i=21.31i=-21.31 mag. The gg- and ii- band absolute magnitudes of the J0953 host galaxy are -20.30 mag and -21.34 mag, respectively. Therefore, the host galaxy of J0953 is possibly brighter and heavier than the galaxies of the characteristic luminosity LL_{*} corresponding to the characteristic absolute magnitude MM_{*}.

Figure 2 is the color-color diagrams to estimate one of the information, and the colors of the host galaxy and the polar structure of this galaxy at z0.20z\sim 0.20 are plotted.

Refer to caption
Figure 2: The rir-i vs, grg-r diagram. The filled circles show the colors for 5 morphology types (E, S0, Sab, Sbc, and Scd) of galaxies in Fukugita et al. (1995). The solid line shows the best linear fit to the colors of 5 morphology types. The open circles of HG and PR show the colors of the host galaxy and the polar structure of J0953. The star mark with HSC shows the colors taken from table 1 of J0953. All of the above colors are at z0.2z\sim 0.2 and corrected for the Galactic extinction.

Figure 2 is the color-color (rir-i vs. grg-r) diagram of the host galaxy and the polar structure compared with that of each Hubble type of typical galaxies at z0.2z\sim 0.2 (Fukugita et al. (1995)). The colors of the host galaxy suggest a Sab-Sb galaxy while host galaxies of typical PRGs are mostly early-type galaxies (E/S0) (Reshetnikov & Mosenkov (2019)). The polar structure is similar in colors to Scd galaxies. This is consistent with that the polar structure is blue and probably younger than the host galaxy. In order to confirm if this galaxy is truly a PRG, it is necessary to make spectroscopic observations, to investigate the kinematical properties of both the host galaxy and the polar structure.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank an anonymous referee for his/her useful comments. The HSC collaboration includes the astronomical communities of Japan and Taiwan, and Princeton University. The HSC instrumentation and software were developed by the National Astronomical Observatory of Japan (NAOJ), the Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe (Kavli IPMU), the University of Tokyo, the High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), the Academia Sinica Institute for Astronomy and Astrophysics in Taiwan (ASIAA), and Princeton University. Funding was contributed by the FIRST program from Japanese Cabinet Office, the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS), Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST), the Toray Science Foundation, NAOJ, Kavli IPMU, KEK, ASIAA, and Princeton University. This paper makes use of software developed for the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope. We thank the LSST Project for making their code available as free software at \langlehttp://dm.lsst.org\rangle. The Pan-STARRS1 Surveys (PS1) have been made possible through contributions of the Institute for Astronomy, the University of Hawaii, the Pan-STARRS Project Office, the Max-Planck Society and its participating institutes, the Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, Heidelberg and the Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, Garching, The Johns Hopkins University, Durham University, the University of Edinburgh, Queen’s University Belfast, the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, the Las Cumbres Observatory Global Telescope Network Incorporated, the National Central University of Taiwan, the Space Telescope Science Institute, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration under Grant No. NNX08AR22G issued through the Planetary Science Division of the NASA Science Mission Directorate, the National Science Foundation under Grant No. AST-1238877, the University of Maryland, and Eotvos Lorand University (ELTE) and the Los Alamos National Laboratory. This paper is based on data collected at the Subaru Telescope and retrieved from the HSC data archive system, which is operated by Subaru Telescope and Astronomy Data Center (ADC) at NAOJ. Data analysis was in part carried out on the Multi-wavelength Data Analysis System operated by ADC.

References

  • Aihara et al. (2018) Aihara, H., Arimoto, N., Armstrong, R., et al. 2018, PASJ, 70, S4
  • Aihara et al. (2019) Aihara, H., AlSayyad, Y., Ando, M., et al. 2019, PASJ, 71, 114
  • Beck et al. (2016) Beck, R., Dobos, L., Budavári, T., Szalay, A. S., & Csabai, I. 2016, MNRAS, 460, 1371
  • Bekki (1997) Bekki, K. 1997, ApJ, 490, L37
  • Bekki (1998) —. 1998, AJ, 499, 635
  • Birrer & Amara (2018) Birrer, S., & Amara, A. 2018, PDU, 22, 189
  • Birrer et al. (2021) Birrer, S., Shajib, A., Gilman, D., et al. 2021, JOSS, 6, 3283
  • Blanton et al. (2001) Blanton, M. R., Dalcanton, J., Eisenstein, D., et al. 2001, AJ, 121, 2358
  • Bosch et al. (2018) Bosch, J., Armstrong, R., Bickerton, S., et al. 2018, PASJ, 70, S5
  • Bournaud & Combes (2003) Bournaud, F., & Combes, F. 2003, A&A, 401, 817
  • Brook et al. (2008) Brook, C. B., Governato, F., Quinn, T., et al. 2008, ApJ, 689, 678
  • Chilingarian et al. (2010) Chilingarian, I. V., Melchior, A.-L., & Zolotukhin, I. Y. 2010, MNRAS, 405, 1409
  • Ding et al. (2021) Ding, X., Birrer, S., Treu, T., & Silverman, J. D. 2021, arXiv, 211108721D
  • Ding et al. (2020) Ding, X., Silverman, J., Treu, T., et al. 2020, ApJ, 888, 37
  • Egorov & Moiseev (2019) Egorov, O. V., & Moiseev, A. V. 2019, MNRAS, 486, 4186
  • Faundez-Abans & de Oliveira-Abans (1998) Faundez-Abans, M., & de Oliveira-Abans, M. 1998, A&AS, 129, 357
  • Fukugita et al. (1995) Fukugita, M., Shimasaku, K., & Ichikawa, T. 1995, PASP, 107, 945
  • Hsieh & Yee (2014) Hsieh, B. C., & Yee, H. K. C. 2014, ApJ, 792, 102
  • Khoperskov et al. (2014) Khoperskov, S. A., Moiseev, A. V., Khoperskov, A. V., & Saburova, A. S. 2014, MNRAS, 441, 2650
  • Koike (2019) Koike, M. 2019, AstHe, 112, 113
  • Komiyama et al. (2018) Komiyama, Y., Chiba, M., Tanaka, M., et al. 2018, ApJ, 853, 29
  • Macciò et al. (2006) Macciò, A. V., Moore, B., & Stadel, J. 2006, ApJ, 636, L25
  • Moiseev (2012) Moiseev, A. V. 2012, AstBu, 67, 147
  • Moiseev et al. (2011) Moiseev, A. V., Smirnova, K. I., Smirnova, A. A., & Reshetnikov, V. P. 2011, MNRAS, 418, 244
  • Reshetnikov & Sotnikova (1997) Reshetnikov, V., & Sotnikova, N. 1997, A&A, 325, 933
  • Reshetnikov (2019) Reshetnikov, V. P. 2019, Ap, 62, 1
  • Reshetnikov et al. (2011) Reshetnikov, V. P., Faúndez-Abans, M., & de Oliveira-Abans, M. 2011, AstL, 37, 171
  • Reshetnikov & Mosenkov (2019) Reshetnikov, V. P., & Mosenkov, A. V. 2019, MNRAS, 483, 1470
  • Sandage (1961) Sandage, A. 1961, The Hubble Atlas of Galaxies
  • Schechter & Gunn (1978) Schechter, P. L., & Gunn, J. E. 1978, AJ, 83, 1360
  • Schlegel et al. (1998) Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., & Davis, M. 1998, ApJ, 500, 525
  • Scoville et al. (2007) Scoville, N., Aussel, H., Brusa, M., et al. 2007, ApJS, 172, 1
  • Smirnov & Reshetnikov (2020) Smirnov, D. V., & Reshetnikov, V. P. 2020, AstL
  • Snaith et al. (2012) Snaith, O. N., Gibson, B. K., Brook, C. B., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 425, 1967
  • Steiman-Cameron & Durisen (1982) Steiman-Cameron, T. Y., & Durisen, R. H. 1982, ApJ, 263, L51
  • Tanaka (2015) Tanaka, M. 2015, ApJ, 801, 20
  • Taylor et al. (2011) Taylor, E. N., Hopkins, A. M., Baldry, I. K., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 418, 1587
  • Vika et al. (2015) Vika, M., Vulcani, B., Bamford, S. P., Häußler, B., & Rojas, A. L. 2015, A&A, 577, A97
  • Whitmore (1991) Whitmore, B. C. 1991, in S. Casertano, P.D. Sackett & F.H. Briggs eds., Warped Disks and Inclined rings around galaxies, Cambridge University Press, 60
  • Whitmore et al. (1990) Whitmore, B. C., Lucas, R. A., McElroy, D. B., et al. 1990, AJ, 100, 1489
  • York et al. (2000) York, D. G., Adelman, J., Anderson, Jr., J. E., et al. 2000, AJ, 120, 1579
  • Zasov et al. (2017) Zasov, A. V., Saburova, A. S., Khoperskov, A. V., & Khoperskov, S. A. 2017, PhyU, 60, 3