A Bott periodicity theorem for -spaces and the coarse Novikov conjecture at infinity111Supported in part by NSFC (No. 11831006, 12171156).
Abstract
We formulate and prove a Bott periodicity theorem for an -space (). For a proper metric space with bounded geometry, we introduce a version of -homology at infinity, denoted by , and the Roe algebra at infinity, denoted by . Then the coarse assembly map descends to a map from to , called the coarse assembly map at infinity. We show that to prove the coarse Novikov conjecture, it suffices to prove the coarse assembly map at infinity is an injection. As a result, we show that the coarse Novikov conjecture holds for any metric space with bounded geometry which admits a fibred coarse embedding into an -space. These include all box spaces of a residually finite hyperbolic group and a large class of warped cones of a compact space with an action by a hyperbolic group.
1 Introduction
The Novikov conjecture claims that the higher signatures of closed oriented smooth manifolds are invariant under orientation preserving homotopy equivalences. It is implied by the injectivity of the Baum-Connes assembly map [2]. The coarse Novikov conjecture, as a geometric analogue of the Novikov conjecture, is the injectivity part of the coarse Baum–Connes conjecture [12, 18]. It offers a technique to determine when an elliptic operators higher index on a noncompact complete Riemannian manifold is nonzero. A detailed survey on the coarse Novikov conjecture can be found in [31].
In [4], X. Chen, Q. Wang and G. Yu generalized Gromov’s notion of coarse embedding into Hilbert space and introduced the notion of fibred coarse embedding (see Definition 2.4) and showed that if a discrete metric space with bounded geometry admits a fibred coarse embedding into Hilbert space, then the maximal coarse Baum–Connes conjecture holds for . Later in [8], M. Finn-Sell showed that the coarse Novikov conjecture also holds for in such a case.
Our main theorem in this paper states as follows:
Theorem 1.1.
[Theorem 2.5] Let be a metric space with bounded geometry. If admits a fibred coarse embedding into an -space for some , then the coarse Novikov conjecture holds for , i.e. the coarse assembly map
is injective.
Warped cones over actions of hyperbolic groups and box spaces of residually finite hyperbolic groups are typical examples to which our main result appies. A sequence of nested normal subgroups of a residually finite group is said to be a filtration if the sequence has trivial intersection. The box space of associated to a filtration , denoted by , is the coarse disjoint union , where each quotient is equipped with the word length metric. Warped cones are metric spaces introduced by J. Roe [20] from discrete group actions on compact metric spaces. Typically, let be a finite generated group, a compact Riemannian manifold. The warped cone for , denoted by , is constructed from the action on by diffeomorphisms. It is a metric space whose underlying topological space is the open cone on , but whose coarse geometry produces large groups of translations. The second section will have a comprehensive introduction for warped cones.
In [22], D. Sawicki and J. Wu found a relationship between fibred coarse embeddability of warped cones and existence of proper affine isometric actions of discrete groups on Banach spaces. They proved that if is free and admits a linearization by unitary operators in a Hilbert space and admits a proper affine isometric action on (i.e., is a-T-menable), then admits a fibred coarse embedding into Hilbert space. The result still holds if we replace the Hilbert space with an -space. The same question is also considered by Q. Wang and Z. Wang in [24]. They provided a different proof for the case of spaces and replace the condition is free by that is required to contain a dense and free orbit of in their paper.
As corollaries, we have the following results:
Corollary 1.2.
Let be a finite generated discrete group and let be a compact manifold. Assume that the action of on is linearisable in an -space and is free (or contains a dense free orbit). If admits a proper affine isometric action on an -space, then the coarse Novikov conjecture holds for the warped cone .
Corollary 1.3.
Let be a finitely generated residually finite hyperbolic group, and the corresponding profinite completion. Then the coarse Novikov conjecture hold for and any box apace .
We now give a short explaination about serveral key ingredients in our proof. We briefly recall the proof of the maximal coarse Baum-Connes conjecture for a metric space which admits a fibred coarse embedding into a Hilbert space in [4]. The authors firstly reduced the issue to proving the maximal coarse Baum-Connes conjecture at infinity for the coarse disjoint unions of finite metric spaces. By using a geometric Dirac-dual-Dirac argument, they further reduced the problem to a twisted version of coarse Baum-Connes conjecture at infinity by using a -algebra constructed in [11]. Then the theorem follows by using a cutting and pasting argument of G. Yu introduced in the Section 6 of [29]. We try to follow the outline of their proof, however there are servarl problems.
For the first step, we need to use a Mayer-Vietoris argument and Five Lemma to reduce the problem to ’infinity’. First of all, a coarse Mayer-Vietoris argument in [13] enables us to just take into consideration of the coarse Baum-Connes conjecture for coarse disjoint unions of finite subsets. For the case when where each is finite, one can use the following diagram, see [4]:
The vertical sequence on the right side is exact only when we take the maximal norm and the top horizantal map is an isomorphism. Then it suffices to prove the assembly map at infinity is an isomorphism.
However, when we consider the coarse Novikov conjecture for certain spaces, the coarse Mayer-Vietories argument above does not work anymore as the Five Lemma fails if we only have the injectivity part of the assembly map . The argument holds only for a coarse disjoint union of a sequence of finite metric spaces . One can still reduce the coarse Novikov conjecture for to ’infinity’ by using the following diagram, see [25, 26].
Notice that is injective only when is a coarse disjoint union of finite spaces, see [16]. By using a diagram chasing argument, to prove is injective, it suffices to prove is injective.
For the general case (especially the case when can not be seen as a coarse disjoint union of finite metric spaces), in order to make the whole progress work well, we introduce a notion of -homology at infinity for a locally compact Hausdorff space and a notion of Roe algebra at infinity for a proper metric space in Section 4 and construct the following diagram:
A metric space with bounded geometry is said to admit an infinite coarse component if there exists such that the Rips complex has an unbounded component. It is an opposite statement to the coarse disjoint union (see Proposition 5.5). We prove that is an injection if admits an infinite coarse component. Thus we can still reduce the Novikov conjecture for to proving is injective in this case. Moreover, we show in Section 5 that our construction coincides with the construction in [4] for the coarse disjoint union case. This means that we can always reduce the coarse Novikov conjecture to ’infinity’ by using our construction (see Theorem 5.7).
For the second step, we need to construct a twisted version of the coarse Baum-Connes conjecture by using an algebra associated with for . As is of property (H) introduced by G. Kasparov and G. Yu in [14], we wanted to use the -algebra introduced in [14, 5] to solve this problem. For any , we shall need a -isomorphism associated to an affine isometry on to translate the support of . However, is built by using a dense subspace of which may not be invarinat under . To solve this problem, we construct a new algebra for an -space in Section 3. Our construction is inspired from the paper of S. Gong, J. Wu and G. Yu [10] for the case when . We construct a Bott homomorphism associated with a base point by using the -Hölder extension of the Mazur map introduced by E. Odell and T. Schlumprecht in [15] and extended by Q. Cheng in [6]. We show that the Bott homomorphism induces an isomorphism on -theory which does not depend on the choice of the base point, i.e., is an isomorphism for any (see Theorem 3.15).
Actually, it has been pointed out in G. Kasparov and G. Yu’s paper [14] that the Bott periodicity theorem holds for -spaces. Indeed, the Mazur map can be extended to a homeomorphism between and and the Bott periodicity for has been proved in [11]. However, the constructions in [11] and [14] also rely on a dense subspace of which is sightly different from ours.
This paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we briefly recall the Roe algebra and Yu’s localization algebra, and states the coarse Novikov conjecture. After that we go over the concept of warped metric and warped cones introduced by John Roe [20]. In Section 3, we introduce an algebra associated with and calculate its -theory. It will play an important role in the following proof. In Section 4, we introduce -homology at infinity, Roe algebra at infinity and the coarse Novikov conjecture at infinity for a proper metric space. In Section 5. we compare the case of coarse disjoint union and the case of spaces which admit an infinite coarse component, and reduce both cases to the coarse Novikov conjecture at infinity. In Section 6, we define twisted algebras at infinity and compute their -theories by using a cutting and pasting technique introduced by G. Yu in [29]. In Section 7, we define the Bott map and complete the proof.
2 The coarse Novikov conjecture
First of all, let us recall the definition of the Roe algebra and the coarse Baum-Connes assembly map for a proper metric space (cf. [2, 18, 19]) in this section.
Assume that is a proper metric space. For , a -net of is a discrete subset of such that there exists such that for all distinct and . Moreover, is said to have bounded geometry if contains a net with bounded geometry for some , i.e., for any there exists such that any ball of radius in contains at most elements.
We denote to be the -algebra of all continuous functions on which vanish at infinity. A separable infinite-dimensional Hilbert space is said to be an -module if is equipped with a non-degenerate -representation . Moreover, is said to be ample if no non-zero element of acts as a compact operator.
Definition 2.1 ([18]).
Let be an ample -module and .
-
(1)
is said to be locally compact if and are compact operators for any ;
-
(2)
The support of , denoted by , is defined to be the set of all points such that for all with and , we have that ;
-
(3)
The propagation of is defined to be
Moreover, is said to have finite propagation if .
-
(4)
The algebraic Roe algebra of , denote by (or simply ), is defined to be the -algebra of all finite propagation locally compact operators on .
-
(5)
The Roe algebra of , denoted by (or simply ), is the norm closure of in .
Note that does not depend on the choice of -module up to a non-canonical -isomorphism [13]. Hence, it is convenient to discuss the following specific -module. Let be a countable dense subset of and be a fixed infinite dimensional Hilbert space. We denote to be the set of all compact operators on . We define to be an ample -module equipped with the pointwise multiplication representation of on . It is easy to check that is ample.
Definition 2.2.
Define to be the set of all bounded functions satisfying the following conditions:
-
(1)
for any bounded subset , the set
-
(2)
there exists such that
for all ;
-
(3)
there exists such that whenever for .
Notice that can be viewed as a dense -subalgebra of in , where the algebraic operation of is given by viewing as -by- matrix. In this sequel, we will use to replace to define the Roe algebra of .
We next recall the assembly map for the Roe algebras. Let be a proper metric space. Recall that the -homology groups are generated by certain cycles modulo certain equivalence relations
-
(1)
a cycle for is a pair , where is an -module and is a bounded linear operator acting on such that and are locally compact, and is compact for all ;
-
(2)
a cycle for is a pair , where is an -module and is a self-adjoint operator acting on such that is locally compact, and is compact for all .
Let represent a cycle in . For any , one can always take a locally finite, uniformly bounded open cover of such that the diameter of each is no more than . Let be a continuous partition of unity subordinate to the open cover . Define
where the sum converges in the strong operator topology. It is not hard to see that and are equivalent via , where . Note that both and have finite propagation, so is a multiplier of and is invertible modulo . Hence gives rise to an element, denoted by in , where
is the boundary map of -theory, and is the multiplier algebra of . We define the index of to be . Similarly, we can define the index map from to .
Now we are ready to introduce the coarse Baum–Connes assembly map for a metric space with bounded geometry.
Definition 2.3.
Let be a discrete metric space with bounded geometry. For each , the Rips complex of at scale , denoted by , consists as a set of all formal sums
such that each is in , such that , and such that the support of defined by has diameter at most .
We will next discuss the semi-simplicial metric of the Rips complex of . One can find more details of Rips complex in the section 7.2 of [27]. We shall first define the spherical metric on . On each path connected component of , the spherical metric is the maximal metric whose restriction to each simplex is the metric obtained by identifying the simplex with via the map
where endowed with the standard Riemannian metric on the unit -sphere.
For any , a semi-simplicial path between and is a finite sequence of points
where and are in for each . The length of is defined to be
We define the semi-spherical metric on by
One can check that identifies isometrically with . Moreover, it has been proved in [27, Proposition 7.2.11] that the canonical inclusion is a coarse equivalence for each .
If , then is included in as a subcomplex via a simplicial map. Passing to inductive limit, we obtain the assembly map
The coarse Novikov conjecture.
If is a discrete metric space with bounded geometry, then the coarse assembly map
is injective.
To state our main theorem, we will also need some preparations of coarse geometry and group actions. Recall that a metric space is said to admits a coarse embedding into a Hilbert space if there exists a map and two non-decreasing unbounded functions such that
The concept of fibred coarse embedding is introduced by X. Chen, Q. Wang and G. Yu in [4] as a generalization of coarse embedding. In this paper, we will only focus on the case when a space admits a fibred coarse embedding into a real -space as following:
Definition 2.4 ([4]).
Let and let denote the real Banach space . A metric space is said to admit a fibred coarse embedding into if there exists
-
•
a field of Banach space over such that each is isometric to ;
-
•
a section , i.e. for each ;
-
•
two non-decreasing functions and from to with
such that, for any , there exists a bounded subset for which there exists a trivialization
for each , that is, a map from to the constant field such that restrict to the fibre is an affine-isometry , satisfying the following conditions:
-
(1)
for any ,
-
(2)
for any with , there exists an affine-isometry such that for all .∎
Notice that for and , if there exists two trivilizations and for and , respectively. Without loss of generality, we may assume that
For the notational convenience, we denote and for all and , respectively.
In the rest of this paper, we will prove the following theorem:
Theorem 2.5.
Let be a discrete metric space with bounded geometry. If admits a fibred coarse embedding into an space, then the coarse Novikov conjecture holds for .
2.1 Warped Cones and proper affine isometric group actions
In this subsection, we shall recall some basic notions of warped cones and proper affine group actions (cf. [20, 21]). These are prominent examples of spaces which admit a fibred coarse embedding into an -space.
Let be a compact metric space. The open cone of , denoted by , is the set with the metric defined by
Let be a proper metric space, a finite generated countable group acting by homeomorphisms on and a finite generating set. The warped metric on is defined to be the greatest metric satisfying that
for any and . The warped metric on always exists and the coarse structure induced by the warped metric does not depend on the choice of generating set for (see [20, Proposition 1.7]). For any , let denote the word length of relative to the generating set . Let , the warped distance between from to is [20]
Definition 2.6 ([21]).
Let be a compact metric space and let be a finitely generated group acting on by homeomorphisms. The warped cone of , denoted by , is the open cone with the warped metric, where the warping group action is defined by .
Definition 2.7 (P. C. Baayen and J. De. Groot [1]).
A group action is said to admit a linearization in Banach space if and there exists an isometric representation of on and admits a bi-Lipschtz equivariant embedding into
One is referred to the section 3.1 in [22] for more informations about linearization.
For a residually finite group, it is well-known that the coarse geometric properties of the box sapces are closely related to the analytic properties of . A summary of the relationship can be found in [3, 7]. Actually, similar results also appear in the relationship between the coarse geometric properties and the dynamical and analytic properties of :
Theorem 2.8.
Let be a finte gnerated group and a compact metric apace. Assume that there is a free group action .
-
(1)
The warped cone has property A if and only if the action is amenable.
-
(2)
Assume moreover the action admit a linearization in the real Banach space for some . If admits a proper affine isometric action on , then admits fibred coarse embedding into .
The first term of the theorem above is proved by combining [20, Theorem 3.4] and [22, Theorem 4.2]. The second term is proved in [22, Theorem 3.2] for the case of . Actually their prove also holds for any . One can also find another proof in [24, Theorem 3.2] for the case of .
In the last of this section, we introduce a typical example constructed by profinite completion:
Examples 2.9.
Let be a residually finite group and a decreasing sequence of finite index normal subgroups with . We denote the quotient group by . The identity map of induces an group homomorphism for each . Then we have the following sequence:
We denote the inverse limit of this sequence and call it the profinite completion of with respect to . It is well-known that is a compact metrizable group containing as a dense subgroup and acts freely on by left multiplication and admit a linearization in for any ([22, Lemma 3.19]).
If admits a proper affine isometric action on for some , then the warped cone admits a fibred coarse embedding into .
Combining with Theorem 2.5, we have the following corollaries:
Corollary 2.10.
Let be a countable discrete group, be a compact metric space with a free -action. If this action admits a linearization in the and admits a proper affine isometric action on for some , then the coarse Novikov conjecture holds for .
G. Yu proved hyperbolic groups always admits a proper affine isometric action on for a sufficiently large in [30, Theorem 1.1]. In particular, we have the following:
Corollary 2.11.
Let be a finitely generated residually finite hyperbolic group, and the corresponding profinite completion. Then the coarse Novikov conjecture holds for .
3 A Bott periodicity theorem for spaces
In this section, we will introduce a -algebra associated to a given real Banach space and calculate its -theory.
In [14], G. Kasparov and G. Yu introduced a -algebra for Banach space with Property (H). They pointed out that its -theory can be calculated if the base space is an -space. We provide a detailed proof in this section. We would like to mention that our construction is slightly different from theirs. The -algebra in [14] is generated by some certain functions on a dense subspace of . To build the twisted algebras in Section 6, for any affine isometry in Definition 2.4, we shall need a -isomorphism associated to the affine isometry to translate the support of a function in . However, the affine isometries in Definition 2.4 may not preserve the dense subspace in [14]. Our construction will circumvent this problem.
3.1 A Clifford algebras for a Hilbert space
In this subsection, we will recall the definition of Clifford algebras for Hilbert spaces.
Let be an infinite dimensional separable real Hilbert space. For each , denote
where means the algebraic tensor product over and . Then is equipped with a natural structure of complex vector space. We define the complex inner product on by the formula:
and denote the completion of under the inner product about. We denote simply by .
Denote the closed subspace of which is spanned by
Define the -th complex exterior power of to be the quotient Hilbert space
where the equivalence class in is always denoted by . Let be an orthonormal basis of . Then the set gives an orthonormal basis of . Define the antisymmetric Fock space:
For any , we define the creation operator by
It is not hard to check that the adjoint operator defined by
We define a self-adjoint operator
for each , then we have that
The complex Cliiford algebra to be subalgebra of generated by .
If is a linear subspace of , then is clearly a subspace of . Thus can be naturally viewed as a subalgebra of .
Proposition 3.1.
Let be an increasing sequence of finite-dimensional Hilbert space such that is dense in . Then
Proof.
For each , we can view as a subalgebra of . It suffices to prove
which follows directly from the fact that and . ∎
Remark 3.2.
Actually, there is another way to construct the Clifford algebra for . Let be tha complex algebraic tensor algebra of . Let be the ideal of which is generated by . Denote the quotient algebra . As a linear space, is also a dense subspace of the Hilbert space . Denote by the completion of under the inner product induced by . Then has a canonical faithful representation by the left multiplication on . Then the Clifford algebra
where the norm is given by the canonical representation on .
3.2 A -algebra associated with a real space
Fix and denote to be the real Banach space. Specially, we denote the real Hilbert space. We define the sign function by the formula
Denote by the closed unit sphere of . Recall the Mazur map , defined by
is a uniform homeomorphism, i.e., the -oscillation of and tend to as tends to , where the -oscillation of is defined to be
We consider the -Hölder extension of the Mazur map , which is a map defined by
Actually, we have the following uniform homeomorphism extension theorem due to E. Odell and T. Schlumprecht [15, Proposition 2.9] and Q. Cheng [6, Theorem 2.4]:
Proposition 3.3 ([15, 6]).
For any , the extended Mazur map restricted on the ball is a uniform homeomorphism, i.e.,
As a corollary, forms a homeomorphism between and . When , the extended Mazur map is the identity map on .
Denote by . Let be the algebra of all continuous functions from to . We view as a subalgebra of in the following paper.
Definition 3.4.
Define to be the subalgebra of consisting of all bounded functions such that
for all .
Definition 3.5.
For any , we define the Clifford operator by
for any and .
We denote (or , respectively) the subset of of all even (or odd, respectively) functions. For any Hilbert space , we next define the functional calculus of : for any and , we define and for , we define the functional calculus by
where is an element of .
Lemma 3.6.
For any and , the Bott map is defined by functional calculus such that
for each and . Then gives a graded homomorphism from to .
Proof.
Combining the definition of the functional calculus and the fact that is continuous, it is obvious that is continuous. ∎
Definition 3.7.
The algebra is the -subalgebra generated by
Let be a subspace of , the algebra is defined to be the -subalgebra of generated by
Lemma 3.8.
Fix .
-
(1)
For any , there exists such that
whenever satisfies .
-
(2)
As a corollary, let be a sequence which converges to . Then
for each .
Proof.
Let and be the even part and odd part of . There exists such that for all .
Case 1. For the even part, by definition, for each , we have that
If satisfies that both and are greater than , then
Notice that . If one of or is less than , without loss of generality, assume that . Then . Notice that
and
Set satisfying that for all with . As is uniform continuous in , then there exists such that for all with . Set . If , then both and are in and we have that
Case 2. For the odd part, assume that there exists such that . Such elements are dense in . Then, by definition,
Similarly, if both and are greater than , then
If one of or is less than , with a similar argument as above, we can find a such that . For the second term, we have that
By Proposition 3.3, there exists associated with such that if , then . Set , we conclude that if , then
for all .
Set , then
This completes the proof. ∎
Corollary 3.9.
Let be an increasing sequence of finite dimensional linear subspaces of with dense in . Then
-
(1)
and ;
-
(2)
.
Proof.
The first term and the first equality in (2) are immediate from the definition. The second equality in (2) comes from Lemma 3.8. ∎
3.3 The -theory of
In this subsection, we shall calculate the -theory of . We will show that the Bott map is an isomorphism for any . One can find a proof in [10, Remark 7.7] for the case when . We remark that the Bott periodicity theorem holds for any Banach space which is spherical equivalent to by using a similar argument.
Let . We denote and to be the finite dimensional subspaces of and , respectively. It is clear that and . Denote equipped with the grading according to even and odd functions.
Define to be the subalgebra of consisting of all bounded function such that
Since the Mazur map restricts to a uniform homeomorphism , for any , we can still define the Clifford operator on by
where is the extended Mazur map of and , . The Bott map is defined to be
Definition 3.10.
Define to be the subalgebra of generated by
Similarly, one can also define the Clifford operator on and by taking . To clearfy the notation, we write the Bott map for associated to by .
Lemma 3.11.
is a --algebra.
Proof.
Let be the -subalgebra of generated by
Then is a subalgebra of the center . It is clear that for any and . For any different points with , we have that
Choose a suitable such that , i.e.,
By Stone-Weierstrass theorem, we conclude that .
For any , let be an even function such that for all , thus for any . This means that is dense in . Then is a --algebra. ∎
In [14], G. Kasparov and G. Yu introduced a -algebra associated with . We briefly recall the definition here. Denote equipped with the grading induced from . Denote to be the graded tensor product.
Theorem 3.12.
With notations as above, is isomorphic to for any .
Proof.
By definition, . Define
is induced with the grading of , the scalar part and the vector part. We define a homomorphism by the following formula:
where and are respectively the even and odd parts of and is a unit vector of . It is not hard to see that is an isomorphism preserving the grading.
As a corollary, we have the identification:
where we view as a subalgebra of . Notice that is a subalgebra of , the center of , which makes a --algebra.
Notice that is a subalgebra of . Indeed,
It suffices to prove is dense in . As both algebras are --algebras, it suffices to prove the fiber of at is the same as for any . The fiber of at is given by
where
which is actually same as . We then finish the proof that . ∎
Corollary 3.13.
The Bott map induces an isomorphism on -theory:
for any .
Proof.
For any , we take for each . Then is a continuous path connecting and . By Lemma 3.8, we have that forms a homotopy between and . Thus it suffices to prove the theorem for .
For any , we denote . Then one can easily see that , where means that is equipped with the norm
for any . Denote by and the direct sum projection, i.e., for any we have that and . The following fact which will be very useful in the next lemma can be checked with a easy calculation:
Fact. For any , we have that
i.e., .
For any , we define the restriction homomorphism by
for all . To see is well-defined, one can check that
for any and .
Lemma 3.14.
The restriction homomorphism is an isomorphism.
Proof.
For each , we define
to be the inclusion which is identity on and maps to , i.e., is the one-dimensional subspace of spanned by and the inclusion is an isometry. This map clearly induces an inclusion of Clifford algebras .
Define
by the following formula:
where . It is clear that is a -homomorphism.
Let , consider the Clifford operator on , i.e., for each . Then for any , we have
(1) |
As , then for any . Thus . Combining the equation (1), we have that the Clifford operator of . Write . Then for any , we have that
(2) |
This shows that maps to and is actually equal to . This also shows that is the inverse of . ∎
Theorem 3.15.
For any , the Bott homomorphism
induces an isomorphism on -theory, i.e.,
is an isomorphism.
Proof.
Similarly, it suffices to prove the theorem for some fixed .
Viewing as a subspace of , one can similarly define a map
By compute on the generators, it is not hard to check that we have the following commuting diagram
where is defined as in [11]. Combining the results we prove before, we have that
As the -functor commutes with the direct limits (see [27]), the theorem holds directly from Theorem 3.12. ∎
4 -homology at infinity and Roe algebra at infinity
In this section, we will introduce -homology at infinity and Roe algebra at infinity for a proper metric space.
The approach to -homology via localization algebras is first introduced by G. Yu in [28]. In this paper, we will also need to work with a version of localization algebras introduced by R. Willett and G. Yu in [27]. For the convenience of the readers, we shall briefly recall its definition and its functoriality. Let be a proper metric space.
Definition 4.1 ([27]).
Let be an -module, where is the one point compactification. Define to be the collection of all bounded functions from to such that:
-
(1)
for any compact subset of , there exists such that for all , the operators and are compact and the functions
are uniformly continuous when restricted to ;
-
(2)
for any open neighbourhood of diagonal in , there exists such that for all
Define , or simply , to be the -algebra completion of for the norm
Theorem 4.2.
The -homology group is isomorphic to the -theory group , i.e.,
and does not depend on the choice of ample modules up to the canonical equivalence.
Let be a geometric module. Let be the collection of all such that for any compact subset there exists such that for all ,
It is not difficult to see that is a -ideal in . Let be the closure of inside , let
be the corresponding quotient -algebra. Using an Eilenberg swindle, we have the following result as in [27, Lemma 6.4.11]
Lemma 4.3.
The quotient map induces an isomorphism on -theory.
To see the functoriality, we still need some preparations:
Definition 4.4.
Let be a closed subspace of , and let be an -module. Define to be the subset of consisting of such that for any open subset of that contains , there exists such that for all
Define , or simply , to be the closure of inside .
Similarly, we shall define and
It is easy to show that the quotient map induces an isomorphism on the -theory level. The following lemma has been proved in [27, Lemma 6.3.6].
Lemma 4.5.
The inclusion homomorphism from to induces an isomorphism from to , i.e.,
∎
Let be a close subset and , then we have the short sequence of topological spaces
where is the inclusion and is the collapse map which is the identity on and sends to the point at infinity in .
Proposition 4.6.
With the notation above, there is a natural sic-term exact sequence
induced by the short exact sequence of -algebra
where and are the covering isometries for and , respectively.
Proof.
Let be a bounded metric function on . Let be a countable dense subset of whose intersection with , is also dense in , respectively for each . Let be a separable, infinite-dimensional Hilbert space, and define ample , and -module respectively by
Define to be the canonical inclusion. Let be an unitary operator and define
Define and . It is easy to see and are the covering isometries for and , respectively.
Notice that is a two-side ideal of and is actually the inclusion. Thus it suffices to prove
Let be an increasing sequence of compact subsets of whose union is all of . Let be a continuous map from to the set of all bounded Borel functions on defined by
if , where is the characteristic function of . Provisionally define maps
and
where can be view as a operator on by viewing as a subspace of for each . It is easy to see and satisfy the conditions in Definition 4.1.
First, we show that and are well-defined -homomorphisms. Let . For any compact subset , we have that . Take , there exists such that
for all . Then for all , which means that . Therefore, is a well-defined map -homomorphism.
Similarly, one can show is also well-defined. Indeed, let . For any , denote . Then is a compact subset of . By definition, there exists such that for all . Thus, for all , we have that
i.e., . By [27, Lemma 6.1.2], the multiplier of defined by is central. Thus is a well-defined -homomorphism.
At last, we show that induces a mutually inverse of . Computing, for
here we view as an operator on for each . Notice that for any compact subset ,
As and , there exists and a compact subset such that and for all . Thus for all , i.e., .
On the other hand, for ,
here we view as an operator on for each . For any , let be a compact subset of . Then by a similar argument above
for sufficiently large , this completes the proof. ∎
Let be a unbounded proper metric space. Fix a based point , and let . Denoted by . Thus we have the following commuting diagram by [27, Proposition B.2.3]:
where is induced by the natural inclusion and is induced by the collapse to map .
If , we denote and the inclusion map. Let be the collapse map that is identity on and sends to the point at infinity in . Then we have the following commuting diagram
(3) |
Taking the direct limit as tends to infinity, we get a commutative diagram
Definition 4.7.
The -homology at infinity of , denote by , is defined to be the group .
For any locally compact, secondly countable, Hausdorff space , we can define a unbounded proper metric on . We can still define the -homology at infinity for according to this metric. By the definition, we can see that does not depend on the choice of the metric. Moreover, if is compact, then is zero group. Recall the definition of the representable -homology:
Definition 4.8 ([27]).
Let be an module. Define to be the collection of all elements of such that there exists a compact subset of and such that
for all . Define to be the completion of for the norm
The representable -homology of , denoted by , is defined to be the -theory group
Remark 4.9.
It is obvious that is a closed ideal of . Notice that is actually the representable -homology [27, Proposition 9.4.7]. Thus the diagram can be rewrite as following:
Let be an ample -module, and be as above. Define to be the quotient algebra .
Proposition 4.10.
The -homology at infinity is isomorphic to the -theory group of , i.e.,
Proof.
Let be a countable dense subset of whose intersection with , is also dense in , respectively for each . Let be a separable, infinite-dimensional Hilbert space, and define ample , and -module respectively by
For each , assume that , define and to be the canonical inclusion. Let and be unitaries and define
and
Define , , and . Then we have the following commuting diagram:
Taking the direct limit as tends to infinity, by [27, Proposition 9.4.7], we have that
We denote the map
For any , there exists a compact subset and such that for all . Set such that , then . Thus for all . Then descends to a map on the quotient:
Thus we have the following commuting diagram
Thus is an isomorphism by Five Lemma, as desire. ∎
For technical convenience, we will consider the following version of localization algebra and representable localization algebra (c.f. [28, 29]). Let be an infinite dimensional Hilbert space, and be a countable dense subset and be as in Definition 2.2.
Definition 4.11 ([28]).
The algebraic localization algebra, denoted by , is the -algebra of all uniformly bounded and uniformly continuous functions
such that the family satisfy the conditions in Definition 2.2 with uniform constants and there exists a bounded function with such that
for all and .
Define to be the completion of with respect to the norm
Theorem 4.12 ([28, 17]).
Suppose that is a proper metric space with bounded geometry, then there exists a local index map which is an isomorphism.
Consequently, if is a discrete metric space with bounded geometry, we have the following commuting diagram:
where the evaluation homomorphism is defined by for all . Then, to proof the coarse Novikov conjecture for , it suffices to prove the evaluation homomorphism
is an injection.
Definition 4.13.
The representable localization algebra of , denoted by , is the closure of the collection of all elements of such that there exists a compact subset of such that
for all . It is not hard to see that is a two-sided closed ideal of .
The proof of the following lemma is similar with [27, Proposition 9.4.2, Proposition 6.6.2] and [28, Theorem 3.2].
Lemma 4.14.
Let be a proper metric space. Then we have
As a consequence, the -homoloogy at infinity is isomorphic to .
Next, we will introduce the Roe algebra at infinity for a proper metric space . Fix , let and . Let be a countable subset of .
Definition 4.15.
The algebraic Roe algebra at infinity, denoted by , is the set of all equivalence classes , where and the equivalence relation on is defined by if and only if
The algebraic operation of is given by the usual matrix operations of . Define the Roe algebra at infinity to be the completion of with respect to the norm
One can see that the Roe algebra at infinity is also invariant up to coarse equivalence, so is isomorphic to for each . If is bounded, then .
Definition 4.16.
The localization algebra at infinity of , denoted by , is defined to be the -algebra of all bounded and unformly norm-continuous functions
such that is of the form with where the family satisfies the conditions in Definition 2.2 with uniform constants and there exists a bounded function with such that
for all and .
Define to be the completion of with respect to the norm
There exists a canonical quoitent map defined by where for each . One can also see that for any as is uniformly supported in some compact subset of . Then we have a homomorphism
which induces a homomorphism on -theory
Theorem 4.17.
Suppose is a discrete metric space with bounded geometry. Then
is an isomorphism for each .
Proof.
By using an Eilenberg swindle argument as [28, Theorem 3.4], one can show that both groups above are invariant under strongly Lipschitz homotopies and both groups admits a Mayer-Vietories sequence. Then it is suffices to prove the theorem for the case when is -dimensional, which obviously holds as both groups are trivial. ∎
5 Reduction to the coarse Novikov conjecture at infinity
In this section, we discuss the strategy to prove the main theorem. As general metric spaces (such as warped cones) are always not of the form of coarse disjoint unions of a sequence of bounded subsets, we can not use the techniques in [4] directly. We will show that there exists an assmbly map at infinity from the -homology group at infinity to the -theory group of the Roe algebra at infinity, and the coarse Novikov conjecture can always be reduced to verifying the assembly map at infinity to be injective whether the space is of the form of coarse disjoint union or not.
5.1 The case of coarse disjoint unions
In this section, we assume that is a coarse disjoint union of a sequence of uniformly bounded geometry, finite metric spaces such that as . Actually, this situation has been discussed in Section 4 of [4].
Lemma 5.1.
Let be a coarse disjoint union of a sequence of uniformly bounded geometry, finite metric spaces such that as . Then for sufficiently large , we have that
Proof.
For any , there exists large enough such that for . Let , then we have that . Then the maps and induced by the inclusions induce isomorphisms
and
The inclusion is an injection, i.e., is an injection. Thus, we have the short exact sequence
This means that
which completes the proof. ∎
For each . let be a countable dense subset, and let for any , . We assume that , if . In this case, the Roe algebra at infinity can be also described as follow:
Definition 5.2 ([4]).
For each , define to be the set of all equivalence classes of sequences described as follows:
-
(1)
is a family of uniformly bounded functions, where is a function from to for all ;
-
(2)
for any bounded subset , we have that
-
(3)
there exists such that
for all , ;
-
(4)
there exists such that whenever for , . The least such is called the propagation of the sequence .
The equivalence relation on these sequences is defined by
if and only if
By viewing as matrices, the product structure for is defined as the usual matrix operations. Define to be the completion of with respect to the norm
where each operator is viewed as an element of the Roe algebra .
The following notion of localization algebra has its origin in [28], we shall recall its relation with -homology at infinity.
Definition 5.3.
Let be the set of all bounded, uniformly norm-continuous functions
such that is of the form and satisfies that there exists a bounded function with such that whenever and ;
The localization algebra at infinity is defined to be the norm completion of , where is endowed with the norm
One can see that the coincides with and coincides with .
For each , there is a -homomorphism
defined by for , with
where and is large enough such that
for all . Then extends to a -homomorphism , see [4, Theorem 4.5].
For any , there exists large enough such that for . Let . As , we have that
By the definition of the assembly maps, we have the following commutative diagram
where is induced by the evaluation map
By [16, Remark 2.12], one has that is an injection.
Passing to inductive limit as , the top horizontal arrow is an isomorphism for the following reason. An element in the sum, as a finite sequence, is supported on summands below some fixed and, as , will eventually be absorbed into the first term on a single simplex. Thus, to prove is injective, it suffices to prove is injective by diagram chasing.
5.2 The case of spaces which admit an infinite coarse component
The next notion is introduced by M. Finn-Sell in [8].
Definition 5.4 ([8]).
A bounded geometry proper metric space is said to have an infinite coarse component if there exists such that has an unbounded connected component. Otherwise, we say only has finite coarse components.
Lemma 5.5.
A bounded geometry proper metric space has only finite coarse components if and only if it is a coarse disjoint union of a sequence of finite metric spaces.
Proof.
Let be a coarse disjoint union of the sequence of finite metric spaces . For each , there exists such that for all . Let and we have that . Thus has only finite coarse components.
On the other hand, let be a metric space which has only finite coarse components. Fix , denote the connected component of which contains . Then let
Then we have that . As has bounded geometry and finite coarse components, is a finite metric space for each . Assume that () and any two points , . As , we have that
which means that as . Thus is the coarse disjoint union of the sequence . ∎
Lemma 5.6.
Let be a bounded geometry metirc space which admits an infinite coarse component. Then
-
(1)
the -theory map induced by the canonical inclusion is the zero map, where is the algebra of all compact operators on the geometric module ;
-
(2)
the map induced by the canonical inclusion is also the zero map.
Proof.
As has an infinite coarse component and bounded geometry property, then there exists and for which there is a unbounded component contianing . Thus there exists a sequence such that and for all . Let for all . As is proper metric space, for any compact subset , there exists such that . We can identify by , where is the Roe algebra of .
To prove Property (1), we will only need to show that is the zero map for all , where is induced by the canonical inclusion . By the definition of , we have that is coarse equivalent to . Thus, can be seen the composition . Notice that , then the following diagram commutes
Then is the zero map. The canonical inclusion induces an isomorphism . Thus we have that
Therefore, is the zero map.
We will next prove Property (2). Notice that . Then it suffices to show
is the zero map for all , where the map is induced by the canonical inclusion for each and . Notice that we have the following commutative diagram
for all , , where the arrows are all given by the inclusions. Thus we have that
Now it suffices to show that, for each , is the zero map for sufficiently large .
For given , let be a real number such that and for all . For each , the inclusion can be seen as the composition
Notice that is homotopy equivalent to and . Thus we have the following commuting diagram
This shows that is the zero map for each . Taking the direct limit as tends to infinity, this completes the proof. ∎
Let be a function such that there exists a compact subset such that for all . Consider the evaluation map defined by . Notice that the restriction of to is a -homomorphism .
Define by and the evaluation map at infinity
Then for each , we have the following commuting diagram:
and the commuting diagram of -theory:
Notice that the bottom sequences of both diagrams are not exact at and , respectively. To prove is an injection, it suffices to prove is an injection by diagram chasing and Lemma 5.6.
We summarize this section by the following theorem:
Theorem 5.7.
To prove the coarse Novikov conjecture for , it suffices to prove the coarse Novikov conjecture at infinity for , i.e., the -theoretic homomorphism induced by the evaluation map at infinity
is injective.
6 Twisted algebras at infinity and their -theories
In the rest of this paper, we shall prove the evaluation map at infinity
is an injection, where is a bounded geometry metric space which admits a fibred coarse embedding into . The strategy of the proof is to build the following commuting diagram for each :
(4) |
where and are twisted localization algebra and twisted Roe algebra, respectively. We will show that the evaluation homomorphism between the twisted algebras induces an isomorphism on -theory and is an injection. By a diagram chasing argument, we can see that is injective.
In this section, we will focus on proving in (4) induces an isomorphism on -theory. We first introduce the twisted algebras at infinity, which are constructed by using the fact that admits a fibred coarse embedding into . The basic ideal of this section comes from [29, 4, 5].
6.1 The twisted algebras at infinity
Let be a discrete metric space with bounded geometry which admits a fibred coarse embedding into .
Definition 6.1.
Let be an affine isometry. We define a homomorphism
by
for any generator where and .
For each , the Rips complex endowed with the semi-spherical metric admits a fibred coarse embedding into as is coarse equivalent to . We give some explainations as follow. As is countable, we write , For each , we define
Then it is obvious that is contained in the union of the simplices that contain as a vertex and forms a disjoint Borel cover of by definition. For any , there exists a unique such that . Define the Borel map
It is easy to check is a coarse equivalence for each . Thus let and for each . We define for any with . One can check that the field of , sections and trivializations defined above satisfy the conditions in Definition 2.4.
Take a countable dense subset consisting of all rational points in , i.e. the point with all coefficients taking rational value. Fix , denote to be the bounded subset of for each and and . By the definition of fibred coarse embedding, there exists a sequence of non-negative real number such that
-
(1)
there exists a trivialization for as in Definition 2.4 for each and ;
-
(2)
is non-decreasing and unbounded, i.e. and .
Now, we are ready to define the twisted algebras.
Definition 6.2.
For each , define to be the set of all equivalence classes of , where is a bounded function satisfying the following conditions
-
(1)
for any bounded subset , we have that
-
(2)
there exists such that
for all ;
-
(3)
there exists such that whenever for , we denote the propagation of the representative element ;
-
(4)
there exists such that for all , we have that
where, is the trivialization for and is the section as in Definition 2.4.
The equivalence relationship is defined by if and only if
The product structure for is defined as follow. For any , we define
to be the function such that there exists a sufficiently large depending only on the and such that for all with where is as in Definition 6.1 and otherwise. The product of and is defined to be .
The -structure for is defined by the formula
where
for all with large enough and otherwise.
Remark 6.3.
We will give some explanations to the product structure and -structure for here. For any , there exists such that for all . Then there exists such that for all . Thus is well-defined for all . Combining with the condition (2) of Definition 2.4, we can check that defined above satisfies the condition (4) of Definition 6.2. Moreover, one can also check that the -structure is also well-defined in a similar way.
Let be the -algebraic direct sum, i.e. the algebra of all bounded sequences with for each . Let
be the set of all bounded functions with finite supports. For notational convenince, we write the element of by . Consider to be the subset of with all elements with compact support satisfying that
-
(1)
and for each and ;
-
(2)
if for all .
Then is a pre-Hilbert module over :
where for any . Define the Hilbert module to be the completion of .
By Definition 6.2, for given , one can verify that the representation element is a bounded module homomorphism which has an adjoint module homomorphism for large enough and the adjoint is compatible with the -structure of , which gives a -norm. We shall check some details in the following remark.
Remark 6.4.
Assume that has propagation and the representation element for all with satisfies that . The reason acts as a bounded module homomorphism is similar to the proof of [27, Proposition 12.2.4]. We will only show how the -structure of fits with the inner product.
For given , there exists such that whenever for . By the definition, we can comupute that
Similarly, we can also comupute that
Combining the -structure of and the fact that whenever such that there exists a trivialization on and as in Definition 2.4, we have that
Thus we have show that the representation is compatible with the the -structure. With a similar argument, we can check that the representation is also compatible under the multiplication.
Definition 6.5.
The twisted Roe algebra at infinity is defined to be the operator norm closure of with respect to the norm
where and are viewed as bounded operators on .
Definition 6.6.
Let be the set of all bounded, uniformly norm-continuous functions
such that can be viewed as an equivalent class of , where is a function from for each and satisfies the following conditions
-
(1)
there exists a bounded function with such that whenever ;
-
(2)
there exists such that
for all and , where for some and is the trivialization.
We remark that if there exists such that for all .
Definition 6.7.
The twisted localization algebra at infinity is defined to be the norm completion of with respect to the norm
The evaluation homomorphism at infinity
is defined by . which induces a homomorphism on -theory:
6.2 The twisted coarse Baum-Connes conjecture at infinity
In this subsection, we will prove the following theorem
Theorem 6.8.
The -theoretic evaluation homomorphism at infinity
is an isomorphism.
The strategy is similar to the proof in [4, 29] by using cutting and pasting techniques. To begin with, we will first introduce the ideals of the twisted algebras at infinity associated with open subsets of .
Definition 6.9.
A collection of open subsets of is said to be coherent if there exists such that for all but finite , we have that
(5) |
for all with .
Examples 6.10.
Fix . We define
for all . Then the collection
is certainly a coherent system of open subsets.
For any two coherent collections and of open subsets of , we say if for all . Denote and . It is easy to check both and are coherent.
Definition 6.11.
Let be a coherent family of open subsets of . We define
to be the -subalgebra of generated by the equivalence class of such that
for all with and , where is defined such that belongs to the Borel set as before.
Define
to be the -subalgebra of consisting of all functions
Define and to be the norm closures of and , respectively.
It is easy to check that is a well-defined two-side ideal of for each coherent family of open set . The equation (5) in Definition 6.9 guarantees that the algebraic structure can be induced from .
Lemma 6.12.
Let and be coherent families of open subsets of . Then we have
-
(1)
;
-
(2)
;
-
(3)
;
-
(4)
;
Proof.
The proof is similar to the proof of [29, Lemma 6.3]. We will only prove part (1) and the rest can be proved in a similar way. It suffices to show that for any , there exists and such that and
With no loss of generality, for each , we assume there exist bounded subsets and such that
for all . By using a partition of unity similar as [29, Lemma 6.3], there exists and such that
for all . Define
Then we have
We complete the proof. ∎
Proposition 6.13.
Let be a subset of and be a coherent collection of open subsets of such that
-
(1)
each splits as a disjoint union of open subsets;
-
(2)
there exists for each such that
-
(3)
for any with , we have that
Then the -theortic homomorphism
induced by the evaluation-at-zero map is an isomorphism.
Such a coherent collection in Proposition 6.13 is also called -separated. We still need some preparations before we prove it. For each , define to be a bounded subset of . Then the collection forms a sequence of bounded subspaces of . Assume that satisfies
-
(1)
for all ;
-
(2)
is uniformly bounded, i.e. there exists such that for all .
For example, we can take for each or for some given and all . For the notational convenience, we denote when . Specially, .
We denote to be the subalgebra of with all functions whose supports are in . With the notation above, we introduce the following algebra:
Definition 6.14.
Define to be the subalgebra of
(6) |
generated by all equivalence class of tuples described as follows:
-
(1)
is a bounded function from to for all such that
-
(2)
for any bounded subset , we have
-
(3)
there exists such that
for all and ;
-
(4)
there exists such that whenever for all , the least such is called the propagation of the representative element , denoted by ;
-
(5)
there exists such that for all and , then
for all .
The algebraic structure of is defined by viewing as the subalgebra of the -algebra in equation (6) and is defined to be the norm closure of with the induced norm.
Definition 6.15.
Define to be the -algebra of all bounded, uniformly norm-continuous functions
such that satisfies the conditions in Definition 6.6 with uniform constants.
Define to be the completion of with respect to the norm
Let be the evaluation map
defined by .
Proposition 6.16.
Suppose that is a coherent collection of open subsets of which is -separated for some . We denote to be the family of subsets of . Then we have
-
(1)
;
-
(2)
.
Proof.
Take an arbitary element
By definition, we have that
where . Since the coherent open susbet is -separate. Then we have a direct sum decomposition
where
is the restriction of on for all and . By property (4) in Definition 6.2, there exists such that
Conbining with the fact that
we have that for all with . It follows that there exists such that for all .
We define
for all but finite and otherwise. Notice that has finite propagation and is -separated, then is well defined for all with large enough. Then we have that defines an element in .
Now, notice that the tuples forms an element of . Then the correspondence extends to a -isomorphism by the fact that the norms in these two -algebras agrees. One can see the proof of [23, Lemma 3.9] for essentially the same arguments which can be used to show the norms in these two algebras agree. ∎
Now let us recall the notion of strong Lipschitz homotopy introduced by G. Yu in [28, 29]. Let and be be two families of uniformly bounded closed subspaces of satisfying the condition in Definition 6.14. A map
is said to be Lipschitz if
-
(1)
for all ;
-
(2)
there exists a constant such that
for all and .
Definition 6.17 ([28]).
Let and be two Lipschitz maps from to . A continuous homotopy between and is said to be strongly Lipschitz if
-
(1)
for all , and , where is a constant (called the Lipschitz constant of );
-
(2)
is equi-continuous in , i.e., for any , there exists such that for all if ;
-
(3)
for all .
We say is strongly Lipschitz homotopy equivalent to if there exists Lipschitz maps
and
such that and are strongly Lipschitz homotopy equivalent to the identity maps, respectively.
The proof of the following result is similar to [29, Lemma 6.4], one can check it with a Eilenberg swindle argument as in [29].
Lemma 6.18 ([29]).
Let be the -subalgebra of consisting of those functions such that . We have the following results:
-
(1)
If is strongly Lipschitz homotopy equivalent to , then
-
(2)
If , then
As a corollary, the evaluation map induces an isomorphism on the level of -theory, i.e.
is an isomorphism.∎
Proof of Proposition 6.13.
Finally, we are able to prove Theorem 6.8.
Proof of Theorem 6.8.
For any , we define by
for any . Then it is easy to check that is a coherent collection of open subsets.
For any , by the definition of the twisted algebras, we have that
Notice that the limits of with limits order and are actually the same. Consequently, it suffices to prove that the -theortic homomorphism
induced by the evaluation-at-zero map is an isomorphism for each .
For any given , as has bounded geometry, there exists such that
satisfying that for any and , we have
We shall define
for all and . Then is a coherent collection which satisfies the condition in Proposition 6.13. Thus we have that
for all . Then it follows from a Mayer-Vietories argument by using Lemma 6.12 to complete the proof. ∎
7 The geometric Bott map and proof of the main theorem
In this section, we shall define the Bott map from the -theory group of the Roe algebra to -theory group of the twisted Roe algebra and its localization algebraic version . The construction relies heavily on the Bott periodicity theorem we introduced in Section 5.
For each and , denote to be the function
For any , we define the Bott map to be
where is the trivilazition on defined as in Definition 2.4, and is the Bott map defined as in Section 5.
Definition 7.1.
For each and , define a map
for each , by the formula
where
Definition 7.2.
For each and , define a map
for each , by the formula
for each .
Lemma 7.3.
For each , the maps and extend respectively to asymptotic morphisms
Proof.
We will only prove it for and the case for follows similarly.
First of all, we claim that
for any . By definition, we can calculate that the -th entry of the above matrix coefficients of and are
and
respectively. By using [9, Lemma 3.4], it suffices to prove for any and , there exists such that
for all . To simplify the notation, we denote and . Write the propagation of . Assmue that and is large enough such that , where is the base point we choose. Combining Definition 6.1, we have that
Notice that , where is the controlled function defined as in Definition 2.4. By using the fact and Lemma 3.8, we complete the proof of the claim.
The rest part of the proof is similar with [29, Lemma 7.6]. One can similarly prove that
for all and . Hence extends to an well-defined asymptotic morphism from to . Since is nuclear, we complete the proof. ∎
Note that the asymptotic morphisms
induce homomorphisms on -theory
Theorem 7.4.
For any , the Bott map
is an isomorphism.
Proof.
The -theory of the localization algebra is invariant under the strong Lipschtiz homotopy equivalence (see [28, 29]). By a Mayer-Vietoris sequence argument and induction on the dimension of the skeletons [13, 28], the general case can be reduced to the zero-dimensional case, i.e., if is the -skeleton of , then
is an isomorphism.
Notice that
Moreover, one can see that and and the Bott map coincides with when restricts on to . Then the theorem follows from Theorem 3.15 directly. ∎
Then we can finally prove the main result:
References
- [1] P. C. Baayen and J. de Groot. Linearization of locally compact transformation groups in Hilbert space. Math. Systems Theory, 2:363–379, 1968.
- [2] P. Baum, A. Connes, and N. Higson. Classifying space for proper -actions and -theory of group -algebras. Contemp. Math., 167(167):241–291, 1994.
- [3] X. Chen, Q. Wang, and X. Wang. Characterization of the Haagerup property by fibred coarse embedding into Hilbert space. Bull. Lond. Math. Soc., 45(5):1091–1099, 2013.
- [4] X. Chen, Q. Wang, and G. Yu. The maximal coarse Baum-Connes conjecture for spaces which admit a fibred coarse embedding into Hilbert space. Adv. Math., 249:88–130, 2013.
- [5] X. Chen, Q. Wang, and G. Yu. The coarse Novikov conjecture and Banach spaces with Property (H). J. Funct. Anal., 268(9):2754–2786, 2015.
- [6] Q. Cheng. Sphere equivalence, property H, and Banach expanders. Studia Math., 233(1):67–83, 2016.
- [7] J. Deng, L. Guo, Q. Wang, and Y. Zhang. Coarse embeddings at infinity and generalized expanders at infinity. arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2206.11151, June 2022.
- [8] M. Finn-Sell. Fibred coarse embeddings, a-T-menability and the coarse analogue of the Novikov conjecture. J. Funct. Anal., 267(10):3758–3782, 2014.
- [9] G. Gong, Q. Wang, and G. Yu. Geometrization of the strong Novikov conjecture for residually finite groups. J. Reine Angew. Math., 621:159–189, 2008.
- [10] S. Gong, J. Wu, and G. Yu. The Novikov conjecture, the group of volume preserving diffeomorphisms and Hilbert-Hadamard spaces. Geom. Funct. Anal., 31(2):206–267, 2021.
- [11] N. Higson, G. Kasparov, and J. Trout. A Bott periodicity theorem for infinite-dimensional Euclidean space. Adv. Math., 135(1):1–40, 1998.
- [12] N. Higson and J. Roe. On the coarse Baum-Connes conjecture. In Novikov conjectures, index theorems and rigidity, Vol. 2 (Oberwolfach, 1993), volume 227 of London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser., pages 227–254. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1995.
- [13] N. Higson, J. Roe, and G. Yu. A coarse Mayer-Vietoris principle. Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc., 114(1):85–97, 1993.
- [14] G. Kasparov and G. Yu. The Novikov conjecture and geometry of Banach spaces. Geom. Topol., 16(3):1859–1880, 2012.
- [15] E. Odell and T. Schlumprecht. The distortion problem. Acta Math., 173(2):259–281, 1994.
- [16] H. Oyono-Oyono and G. Yu. -theory for the maximal Roe algebra of certain expanders. J. Funct. Anal., 257(10):3239–3292, 2009.
- [17] Y. Qiao and J. Roe. On the localization algebra of Guoliang Yu. Forum Math., 22(4):657–665, 2010.
- [18] J. Roe. Coarse cohomology and index theory on complete Riemannian manifolds. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc., 104(497):1–90, 1993.
- [19] J. Roe. Index theory, coarse geometry, and topology of manifolds. Regional conference series in mathematics 90. American Mathematical Society, 1996.
- [20] J. Roe. Warped cones and property A. Geom. Topol., 9:163–178, 2005.
- [21] D. Sawicki. Warped cones over profinite completions. J. Topol. Anal., 10(3):563–584, 2018.
- [22] D. Sawicki and J. Wu. Straightening warped cones. J. Topol. Anal., 13(4):933–957, 2021.
- [23] J. Špakula and R. Willett. Maximal and reduced Roe algebras of coarsely embeddable spaces. J. Reine Angew. Math., 678:35–68, 2013.
- [24] Q. Wang and Z. Wang. Warped cones and proper affine isometric actions of discrete groups on Banach spaces. arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1705.08090, 2017.
- [25] R. Willett and G. Yu. Higher index theory for certain expanders and Gromov monster groups, I. Adv. Math., 229(3):1380–1416, 2012.
- [26] R. Willett and G. Yu. Higher index theory for certain expanders and Gromov monster groups, II. Adv. Math., 229(3):1762–1803, 2012.
- [27] R. Willett and G. Yu. Higher index theory. Cambridge University Press, 2020.
- [28] G. Yu. Localization algebras and the coarse Baum-Connes conjecture. -Theory, 11(4):307–318, 1997.
- [29] G. Yu. The coarse Baum-Connes conjecture for spaces which admit a uniform embedding into Hilbert space. Invent. Math., 139(1):201–240, 2000.
- [30] G. Yu. Hyperbolic groups admit proper affine isometric actions on -spaces. Geom. Funct. Anal., 15(5):1144–1151, 2005.
- [31] G. Yu. Higher index theory of elliptic operators and geometry of groups. In International Congress of Mathematicians. Vol. II, pages 1623–1639. Eur. Math. Soc., Zürich, 2006.
-
Liang Guo
Research Center for Operator Algebras, School of Mathematical Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai, 200241, P. R. China. E-mail: [email protected] -
Zheng Luo
Research Center for Operator Algebras, School of Mathematical Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai, 200241, P. R. China. E-mail: E-mail: [email protected] -
Qin Wang
Research Center for Operator Algebras, and Shanghai Key Laboratory of Pure Mathematics and Mathematical Practice, School of Mathematical Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai, 200241, P. R. China. E-mail: [email protected] -
Yazhou Zhang
Research Center for Operator Algebras, School of Mathematical Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai, 200241, P. R. China. E-mail: [email protected]