This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

11institutetext: Utah State University. Logan UT 84322, USA,

(2,3)-Cordial Oriented Hypercubes

Jonathan M. Mousley
Department of Mathematics and Statistics

LeRoy B. Beasley
Department of Mathematics and Statistics

Manuel A. Santana
Department of Mathematics and Statistics

David E. Brown
Department of Mathematics and Statistics
[email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]
Abstract

In this article we investigate the existence of (2,3)(2,3)-cordial labelings of oriented hypercubes. In this investigation, we determine that there exists a (2,3)(2,3)-cordial oriented hypercube for any dimension divisible by 33. Next, we provide examples of (2,3)(2,3)-cordial oriented hypercubes of dimension not divisible by 33 and state a conjecture on existence for dimension 3k+13k+1. We close by presenting the only 3D oriented hypercubes up to isomorphism that are not (2,3)(2,3)-cordial.

1 Introduction.

Let G=(V,E)G=(V,E) be an undirected graph with vertex set VV and edge set EE, a convention we will use throughout this paper. A (0,1)(0,1)-labeling of the vertex set is a mapping f:V{0,1}f:V\to\{0,1\} and is said to be friendly if approximately one half of the vertices are labeled 0 and the others labeled 1. An induced labeling of the edge set is a mapping g:E{0,1}g:E\to\{0,1\} where for an edge uv,g(uv)=g^(f(u),f(v))uv,g(uv)=\hat{g}(f(u),f(v)) for some g^:{0,1}×{0,1}{0,1}\hat{g}:\{0,1\}\times\{0,1\}\to\{0,1\} and is said to be cordial if ff is friendly and about one half the edges of GG are labeled 0. A graph, GG, is called cordial if there exists a cordial induced labeling of the edge set of GG [4].

In this article we investigate a labeling of directed graphs that is not simply a cordial labeling of the underlying undirected graph. The labeling scheme we investigate here was introduced by L.B. Beasley in [2]. Let D=(V,A)D=(V,A) be a directed graph with vertex set VV and arc set AA with a friendly vertex set mapping ff. Let g:A{1,0,1}g:A\to\{-1,0,1\} be the induced labeling of the arcs of DD such that for any arc initiating at uu and terminating at vv, uv\overrightarrow{uv}, g(uv)=f(v)f(u)g(\overrightarrow{uv})=f(v)-f(u). DD is said to be (2,3)(2,3)-cordial if there exists a friendly vertex set mapping ff such that gg labels approximately one third of arcs 0, approximately one third of arcs 11, and approximately one third of arcs 1-1. Applications of balanced graph labelings can be found in the introduction of [5].

In [3], (2,3)(2,3)-cordial labelings are investigated on oriented trees, oriented paths, orientations of the Petersen graph, and complete graphs. In this article we consider (2,3)(2,3)-cordial labelings on oriented hypercubes. We confirm the existence of (2,3)(2,3)-cordial oriented hypercubes for every dimension 3k3k for kk\in\mathbb{N}. Additionally, we provide examples of (2,3)(2,3)-cordial oriented hypercubes for dimensions 44 and 77 and conjecture that there exists a (2,3)(2,3)-oriented hypercube of dimension 3k+13k+1 for every kk\in\mathbb{N}. We close by presenting the only 3D oriented hypercubes up to isomorphism that are not (2,3)(2,3)-cordial, that is we present the only two 3D oriented hypercube up to isomorphism that do not admit a (2,3)(2,3)-cordial labeling.

2 Preliminaries.

Definition 2.1.

Let ZZ be a finite set and f:Z{0,1}f:Z\to\{0,1\} be a mapping. The mapping ff is a called a (0,1)(0,1)-labeling of the set ZZ. If 1|f1(0)||f1(1)|1-1\leq|f^{-1}(0)|-|f^{-1}(1)|\leq 1, that is, the number of elements of ZZ labeled 0 and the number of elements of ZZ labeled 1 are about equal, then we say that the labeling ff is friendly.

Let G=(V,E)G=(V,E) be an undirected graph with vertex set VV and edge set EE. Let f:V{0,1}f:V\to\{0,1\} be a labeling of VV. An induced labeling of the edge set is a mapping g:E{0,1}g:E\to\{0,1\} where for an edge uv,g(uv)=g^(f(u),f(v))uv,g(uv)=\hat{g}(f(u),f(v)) for some g^:{0,1}×{0,1}{0,1}\hat{g}:\{0,1\}\times\{0,1\}\to\{0,1\} and is said to be cordial if ff and gg are both friendly labelings. A graph GG is cordial if there exists a cordial induced labeling of the edge set of GG. In this article, as in [2], we define a cordial labeling of directed graphs that is not simply a cordial labeling of the underlying undirected graph.

Definition 2.2.

Let D=(V,A)D=(V,A) be a directed graph with vertex set VV and arc set AA. Let f:V{0,1}f:V\to\{0,1\} be a friendly vertex labeling and let gg be the induced labeling of the arc set, g:A{0,1,1}g:A\to\{0,1,-1\} where for an arc uv,g(uv)=f(v)f(u)\overrightarrow{uv},g(\overrightarrow{uv})=f(v)-f(u). The labelings ff and gg are (2,3)(2,3)-cordial if ff is friendly and about one third the arcs of DD are labeled 1, one third are labeled -1 and one third labeled 0, that is, for any i,j{0,1,1},i,j\in\{0,1,-1\}, 1|g1(i)||g1(j)|1-1\leq|g^{-1}(i)|-|g^{-1}(j)|\leq 1. A digraph, DD, is called (2,3)(2,3)-cordial if there exists (2,3)(2,3)-cordial labelings ff of the vertex set and gg of the arc set of DD. An undirected graph GG is said to be (2,3)(2,3)-orientable if there is an orientation of the edges of GG which is a (2,3)(2,3)-cordial digraph.

See [3] for an equivalent definition of (2,3)(2,3)-cordiality and (2,3)(2,3)-orientability beginning from the view of quasi-groups and quasi-group cordiality introduced in [7].

Definition 2.3.

Let 𝒟n\mathcal{D}_{n} be the set of all digraphs on nn vertices. We will define 𝒯n\mathcal{T}_{n} as the subset of 𝒟n\mathcal{D}_{n} that consists of all digon-free digraphs, where a digon is a 22 cycle on a digraph.

Definition 2.4.

Let D=(V,A)D=(V,A) be a digraph with vertex labeling f:V{0,1}f:V\to\{0,1\} and with induced arc labeling g:A{0,1,1}g:A\to\{0,1,-1\}. Define Λf,g:𝒟n3\Lambda_{f,g}:\mathcal{D}_{n}\to\mathbb{N}^{3} by Λf,g(D)=(α,β,γ)\Lambda_{f,g}(D)=(\alpha,\beta,\gamma) where α=|g1(1)|,β=|g1(1)|,\alpha=|g^{-1}(1)|,\beta=|g^{-1}(-1)|, and γ=|g1(0)|\gamma=|g^{-1}(0)|.

Let D𝒯nD\in\mathcal{T}_{n} and let DRD^{R} be the digraph such that every arc of DD is reversed, so that uv\overrightarrow{uv} is an arc in DRD^{R} if and only if vu\overrightarrow{vu} is an arc in DD. Let ff be a (0,1)(0,1)-labeling of the vertices of DD and let g(uv)=f(v)f(u)g(\overrightarrow{uv})=f(v)-f(u) so that gg is a (1,1,0)(1,-1,0)-labeling of the arcs of DD. Let f¯\overline{f} be the complementary (0,1)(0,1)-labeling of the vertices of DD, so that f¯(v)=0\overline{f}(v)=0 if and only if f(v)=1f(v)=1. Let g¯\overline{g} be the corresponding induced arc labeling of DD, g¯(uv)=f¯(v)f¯(u)\overline{g}(\overrightarrow{uv})=\overline{f}(v)-\overline{f}(u).

Lemma 2.5.

Let D𝒯nD\in\mathcal{T}_{n} with vertex labeling ff and induced arc labeling gg. Let Λf,g(D)=(α,β,γ)\Lambda_{f,g}(D)=(\alpha,\beta,\gamma). Then

  1. 1.

    Λf,g(DR)=(β,α,γ)\Lambda_{f,g}(D^{R})=(\beta,\alpha,\gamma).

  2. 2.

    Λf¯,g¯(D)=(β,α,γ)\Lambda_{\overline{f},\overline{g}}(D)=(\beta,\alpha,\gamma), and

  3. 3.

    Λf¯,g¯(DR)=Λf,g(D).\Lambda_{\overline{f},\overline{g}}(D^{R})=\Lambda_{f,g}(D).

Proof 2.6.

If an arc is labeled 1, -1, 0 respectively then reversing the labeling of the incident vertices gives a labeling of -1, 1, 0 respectively, If an arc uv\overrightarrow{uv} is labeled 1, -1, 0 respectively, then vu\overrightarrow{vu} would be labeled -1, 1, 0 respectively.

Example 2.7.

Now, consider a graph, Xn in 𝒢n\mathcal{G}_{n} consisting of three parallel edges and n-6 isolated vertices. Is Xn (2,3)(2,3)-orientable? If n=6n=6, the answer is no, since any friendly labeling of the six vertices would have either no arcs labeled 0 or two arcs labeled 0. In either case, the orientation would never be (2,3)(2,3)-cordial. That is X6 is not (2,3)(2,3)-orientable, however with additional vertices like X7 the graph is (2,3)(2,3)-orientable.

Thus, for our investigation here, we will use the convention that a graph, GG, is (2,3)(2,3)-orientable/(2,3)(2,3)-cordial if and only if the subgraph of GG induced by its non-isolated vertices, G^\hat{G}, is (2,3)(2,3)-orientable/(2,3)(2,3)-cordial.

3 Existence.

We begin with examples of (2,3)-cordial oriented hypercubes for dimensions less than and equal to 33.

Example 3.1 (Dimension 11).

Given in Figure 1(a) is a 11-dimensional oriented hypercube C1C_{1} that is (2,3)-cordial as by the friendly vertex labeling ff shown, Λf,g(C1)=(1,0,0)\Lambda_{f,g}(C_{1})=(1,0,0).

Example 3.2 (Dimension 22).

Given in Figure 1(b) is a 22-dimensional oriented hypercube C2C_{2} that is (2,3)-cordial as by the friendly vertex labeling ff shown, Λf,g(C2)=(1,1,2)\Lambda_{f,g}(C_{2})=(1,1,2).

0111
(a) k=1k=1
110001-1011
(b) k=2k=2
Figure 1: (2,3)(2,3)-cordial kk-dimensional oriented hypercubes
Example 3.3 (Dimension 33).

Given in Figure 2 is a 33-dimensional oriented hypercube C3C_{3} that is (2,3)-cordial as by the friendly vertex labeling ff shown, Λf,g(C3)=(4,4,4)\Lambda_{f,g}(C_{3})=(4,4,4).

𝟏\bf 100111100𝟏\bf 11-11-111111-1111-1110000
Figure 2: (2,3)(2,3)-cordial 3D oriented hypercube

In Examples 3.1, 3.2, and 3.3, we see for dimension less than or equal to 3, there exist (2,3)(2,3)-cordial oriented hypercubes. The question of existence remains unanswered for dimension greater than 33. In the following theorem, this question is answered for the case in which dimension is a multiple of 33.

Theorem 3.4.

Let nn be a multiple of 33, then there exists an nn-dimensional oriented hypercube CnC_{n} that is (2,3)-cordial.

Proof 3.5.

We proceed by induction on the dimension nn in multiples of 33. Example 3.3 serves as a base case for n=3n=3. Suppose the claim is true for some kk that is a multiple of 33. Then there exists some oriented hypercube Qk=(Vk,Ak)Q_{k}=(V_{k},A_{k}) of dimension kk that is (2,3)(2,3)-cordial. That is, there exists a friendly labeling f:Vk{0,1}f\colon V_{k}\to\{0,1\} such that

Λf,g=(13|Ak|,13|Ak|,13|Ak|)\Lambda_{f,g}=\left(\frac{1}{3}|A_{k}|,\frac{1}{3}|A_{k}|,\frac{1}{3}|A_{k}|\right)

where gg is defined as in Definition 2.2. We aim to construct an oriented hypercube Qk+3=(Vk+3,Ak+3)Q_{k+3}=(V_{k+3},A_{k+3}) of dimension k+3k+3 that is (2,3)(2,3)-cordial. We begin by constructing an oriented hypercube Qk+1=(Vk+1,Ak+1)Q_{k+1}=(V_{k+1},A_{k+1}) of dimension k+1k+1. Let LkL_{k} denote the digraph QkQ_{k} with vertex labeling ff and induced arc labeling gg applied and Lk¯\overline{L_{k}} denote the digraph QkQ_{k} with vertex labeling f¯\overline{f} and induced arc labeling g¯\overline{g}. Now, let us draw arcs from LkL_{k} to Lk¯\overline{L_{k}} according to the trivial digraph isomorphism. That is, define an arc initiating at vertex xx in LkL_{k} to vertex yy in Lk¯\overline{L_{k}} if and only if x=yx=y. We then label each of these arcs as f¯(x)f(x).\overline{f}(x)-f(x). The result is a labeled digraph, call it Lk+1L_{k+1}. By construction, the underlying digraph of Lk+1L_{k+1} is an oriented hypercube of dimension k+1k+1, call it Qk+1Q_{k+1}. Define fk+1f_{k+1} and gk+1g_{k+1} to be vertex and arc labelings of Qk+1Q_{k+1} respectively such that Qk+1Q_{k+1} with labelings fk+1f_{k+1} and gk+1g_{k+1} applied is the labeled oriented hypercube Lk+1L_{k+1}. As fk+1f_{k+1} applies friendly labelings ff and f¯\overline{f} to complementary subgraphs of Qk+1Q_{k+1}, fk+1f_{k+1} is a friendly labeling. Further, gk+1g_{k+1} applies gg and g¯\overline{g} to complementary subgraphs of Qk+1Q_{k+1} and labels each arc xx\overrightarrow{xx} from LkL_{k} to Lk¯\overline{L_{k}}, f¯(x)f(x)\overline{f}(x)-f(x). Then, as ff and f¯\overline{f} are friendly,

Λfk+1,gk+1=(23|Ak|+2k1,23|Ak|+2k1,23|Ak|).\Lambda_{f_{k+1},g_{k+1}}=\left(\frac{2}{3}|A_{k}|+2^{k-1},\frac{2}{3}|A_{k}|+2^{k-1},\frac{2}{3}|A_{k}|\right).

Now, we repeat our procedure, constructing an oriented hypercube Qk+2=(Vk+2,Ak+2)Q_{k+2}=(V_{k+2},A_{k+2}) of dimension k+2k+2. We draw arcs from Lk+1L_{k+1} and Lk+1¯\overline{L_{k+1}}. Just as in the previous case, we define an arc from a vertex xx in Lk+1L_{k+1} to vertex yy in Lk+1¯\overline{L_{k+1}} if and only if x=yx=y, and we label this arc fk+1¯(x)fk+1(x)\overline{f_{k+1}}(x)-f_{k+1}(x). The result, as in the previous step, is a labeled digraph, call it Lk+2L_{k+2}. The underlying digraph of Lk+2L_{k+2} is again an oriented hypercube, now of dimension k+2k+2, call it Qk+2Q_{k+2}. As before, define fk+2f_{k+2} and gk+2g_{k+2} to be vertex and arc labelings of Qk+2Q_{k+2} respectively such that when applied to Qk+2Q_{k+2} yield the labeled oriented hypercube Lk+2L_{k+2}. As before, fk+2f_{k+2} applies friendly labelings fk+1f_{k+1} and fk+1¯\overline{f_{k+1}} to complementary subgraphs, thus fk+2f_{k+2} is friendly. Also, gk+2g_{k+2} applies gk+1g_{k+1} and gk+1¯\overline{g_{k+1}} to complementary subgraphs of Qk+2Q_{k+2} and labels each arc xx\overrightarrow{xx} from Lk+1L_{k+1} to Lk+1¯\overline{L_{k+1}}, fk+1¯(x)fk+1(x)\overline{f_{k+1}}(x)-f_{k+1}(x) and f¯\bar{f}. As fk+1f_{k+1} and fk+1¯\overline{f_{k+1}} are friendly,

Λfk+2,gk+2((43|Ak|+2k)+2k,(43|Ak|+2k)+2k,43|Ak|).\Lambda_{f_{k+2},g_{k+2}}\left(\left(\frac{4}{3}|A_{k}|+2^{k}\right)+2^{k},\left(\frac{4}{3}|A_{k}|+2^{k}\right)+2^{k},\frac{4}{3}|A_{k}|\right).

In our final step, we construct an oriented hypercube Qk+3=(Vk+3,Ak+3)Q_{k+3}=(V_{k+3},A_{k+3}) of dimension k+3k+3 by drawing edges between two identically labeled cubes Lk+2L_{k+2}. We draw an arc from vertex xx in the first Lk+2L_{k+2} to vertex yy in the second Lk+2L_{k+2} if and only if x=yx=y and we label this arc fk+2(x)fk+2(x)=0f_{k+2}(x)-f_{k+2}(x)=0. The result is a labeled digraph, call it Lk+3L_{k+3}. The underlying digraph of Lk+3L_{k+3} is an oriented hypercube of dimension k+3k+3, call it Qk+3Q_{k+3}. Finally, we define fk+3f_{k+3} and gk+3g_{k+3} to be vertex and arc labelings of Qk+3Q_{k+3} respectively such that when applied to Qk+3Q_{k+3} yield the labeled oriented hypercube Lk+3L_{k+3}. Then fk+3f_{k+3} simply labels each complementary subgraph Qk+2Q_{k+2} according to fk+2f_{k+2} and gk+3g_{k+3} labels each complementary subgraph Qk+2Q_{k+2} according to gk+2g_{k+2} and the newly drawn 2k+22^{k+2} edges are labeled 0. Let ω=43|Ak|+2k+1\omega=\frac{4}{3}|A_{k}|+2^{k+1}. Then

Λfk+3,gk+3(Qk+3)=(2ω,2ω,83|Ak|+2k+2).\Lambda_{f_{k+3},g_{k+3}}(Q_{k+3})=\left(2\omega,2\omega,\frac{8}{3}|A_{k}|+2^{k+2}\right).

Simplifying, we have

Λfk+3,gk+3(Qk+3)=(13(k+3)2k+2,13(k+3)2k+2,13(k+3)2k+2).\Lambda_{f_{k+3},g_{k+3}}(Q_{k+3})=\left(\frac{1}{3}(k+3)2^{k+2},\frac{1}{3}(k+3)2^{k+2},\frac{1}{3}(k+3)2^{k+2}\right).

As fk+3f_{k+3} is constructed to be a friendly labeling, the above implies Qk+3Q_{k+3} is (2,3)(2,3)-cordial.

3.1 A Conjecture on Existence for Dimension 3k+13k+1.

We have now answered the question of existence of (2,3)(2,3)-cordial oriented hypercubes for dimension less than and equal to 33 and all dimensions which are a multiple of 33. In this section, we now consider the existence of (2,3)(2,3)-cordial oriented hypercubes with dimension 3k+13k+1 for kk\in\mathbb{N}.

Example 3.6 (Tesseract, Dimension 44).

Given in Figures 3(a) and 3(b) are two 3D oriented hypercubes, AA and BB, that are (2,3)(2,3)-cordial as demonstrated by the friendly vertex labelings and induced arc labelings shown.

𝟎\bf 01101111011𝟎\bf 0111-1001-10110111-1111-1
(a) Cube AA
11𝟎\bf 01111011𝟎\bf 001-100111111001-1111-11-1
(b) Cube BB
Figure 3: (2,3)(2,3)-cordial 3D oriented hypercubes, AA and BB

In Figure 4, edges are drawn between the vertices of the oriented cube BB (outer) of Figure 3(b) and the vertices of oriented cube AA (inner) of Figure 3(a). By the induced arc labeling scheme gg, 22 of these 88 edges (red) receive an induced label of 0 regardless of their orientation, and the remaining 66 edges (dashed) can be oriented such that 33 receive label 11 and 33 receive label 1-1, yielding a 4D oriented hypercube. As the outer and inner cubes of Figure 4 have (2,3)(2,3)-cordial labelings applied, this is to say the dashed arcs in Figure 4 can be oriented such that the result is a (2,3)(2,3)-cordial 4D oriented hypercube.

𝟎\bf 01101111011𝟎\bf 011𝟎\bf 01111011𝟎\bf 00
Figure 4: 4D (2,3)(2,3)-Cordial Oriented Hypercube constructed from cubes AA and BB
Definition 3.7.

Let D1D_{1} and D2D_{2} be directed graphs with same sized vertex sets and friendly vertex labelings f1f_{1} and f2f_{2} respectively. Let β:V(D1)V(D2)\beta\colon V(D_{1})\to V(D_{2}) be a bijection on the vertex sets of D1D_{1} and D2D_{2} respectively. Then, let h:V(D1){0,1}h\colon V(D_{1})\to\{0,1\} such that h(v1)=|f1(v)f2(β(v))|h(v_{1})=|f_{1}(v)-f_{2}(\beta(v))| for all vV(D1)v\in V(D_{1}). Then define Φβ(D1,D2)=|h1(0)|\Phi_{\beta}(D_{1},D_{2})=|h^{-1}(0)|. In contexts where the bijection β\beta is clear, we write Φ(D1,D2)\Phi(D_{1},D_{2}).

Remark 3.8.

In the context of the previous definition, given arcs are drawn between vertices of digraphs D1D_{1} and D2D_{2} according to the bijection β\beta, Φ(D1,D2)\Phi(D_{1},D_{2}) is simply the count of arcs shared by D1D_{1} and D2D_{2} that receive induced label 0 by gg. In the following example, we work within such a context, and therefore, interpret Φ(D1,D2)\Phi(D_{1},D_{2}) this way.

Example 3.9 (Dimension 77).

We have introduced 33 3D oriented hypercubes in Figures 2, 3(a), and 3(b) each with a (2,3)(2,3)-cordial labeling. Let us denote the labeled oriented cube in Figure 2 as CC. For this example, we adopt the convention that AA, BB, and CC refer to labeled digraphs rather than the underlying unlabeled digraphs. We seek to construct a (2,3)(2,3)-cordial 7D oriented hypercube from these three cubes, AA, BB, and CC. As given in Figure 4, cubes AA and BB can be combined to form a 4D oriented cube such that only 22 of the arcs they share receive label 0. That is by the bijection between V(A)V(A) and V(B)V(B) defined by the edges drawn in Figure 4, Φ(A,B)=2\Phi(A,B)=2. In Figure 5, we construct 22 individual 4D oriented cubes, 11 from cubes AA and CC, and 11 from cubes BB and CC. As in Figure 4, arcs drawn between distinct cubes define bijections between distinct vertex sets. With respect to these bijections, in Figure 5, we see Φ(A,C)=Φ(B,C)=4\Phi(A,C)=\Phi(B,C)=4.

𝟎\bf 01101111011𝟎\bf 01100𝟏\bf 1𝟏\bf 10011
(a) AA (inner) and CC (outer)
𝟏\bf 100111100𝟏\bf 111𝟎\bf 01111011𝟎\bf 00
(b) B (outer) and C (inner)
Figure 5: 4D oriented cubes constructed from cubes A,B,CA,B,C

Now, for D{A,B,C}D\in\{A,B,C\}, given ff is the friendly vertex labeling of DD and gg is the induced arc labeling of DD, define D¯\overline{D} to be the underlying digraph DD labeled instead by f¯\overline{f} and g¯\overline{g}. Recall, such a labeling is (2,3)(2,3)-cordial by Lemma 1. Then, for all D1,D2{A,B,C}D_{1},D_{2}\in\{A,B,C\}, Φ(D1¯,D2¯)=Φ(D1,D2)\Phi(\overline{D_{1}},\overline{D_{2}})=\Phi(D_{1},D_{2}) and Φ(D1¯,D2)=Φ(D1,D2¯)=8Φ(D1,D2)\Phi(\overline{D_{1}},D_{2})=\Phi(D_{1},\overline{D_{2}})=8-\Phi(D_{1},D_{2}). Then, for all D1D2D_{1}\neq D_{2}, taking Φ(D1,D2¯)\Phi(D_{1},\overline{D_{2}}) to be with respect to the appropriate bijection between V(D1)V(D_{1}) and V(D2)V(D_{2}) defined in either Figure 4, 5(a), or 5(b), we have Φ(A¯,B)=6\Phi(\overline{A},B)=6 and Φ(B¯,C)=Φ(A¯,C)=4\Phi(\overline{B},C)=\Phi(\overline{A},C)=4. Lastly, note we can construct a 4D oriented hypercube between 22 identical cubes DD by drawing arcs between like vertices. According to such a bijection, Φ(D,D)=8\Phi(D,D)=8. Now, define γ={A¯,A,B¯,B,C¯,C}\gamma=\{\overline{A},A,\overline{B},B,\overline{C},C\}. Then for all Q1,Q2γQ_{1},Q_{2}\in\gamma, Φ(Q1,Q2)\Phi(Q_{1},Q_{2}) with reference to the appropriate aforementioned bijections between V(Q1)V(Q_{1}) and V(Q2)V(Q_{2}) are given below in Table 1. As Φ\Phi is commutative by definition, the lower diagonal of Table 1 is left empty.

Φ\Phi A¯\overline{A} AA B¯\overline{B} BB C¯\overline{C} CC
A¯\overline{A} 8 0 2 6 4 4
AA 8 6 2 4 4
B¯\overline{B} 8 0 4 4
BB 8 4 4
C¯\overline{C} 8 0
CC 8
Table 1: Φ(Q1,Q2)\Phi(Q_{1},Q_{2}) for all Q1,Q2γQ_{1},Q_{2}\in\gamma

Now, we construct a (2,3)(2,3)-cordial 7D oriented hypercube by drawing edges between cubes in the set γ\gamma according to the previously defined vertex set bijections. Given in Figure 6 are 22 6D6D oriented hypercubes constructed from cubes in γ\gamma where for all Q1,Q2γQ_{1},Q_{2}\in\gamma, an edge between cube Q1Q_{1} and Q2Q_{2} signifies 88 edges between cubes Q1Q_{1} and Q2Q_{2} drawn according to the appropriate bijection between V(Q1)V(Q_{1}) and V(Q2)V(Q_{2}). Note, in Figure 6, an edge between Q1Q_{1} and Q2Q_{2} is labeled Φ(Q1,Q2)\Phi(Q_{1},Q_{2}). Observe for each cube in Figure 6, the edge label sum is equal to 3232. By Remark 3.8, this is to say a total of 3232 edges shared by distinct cubes in γ\gamma receive induced label 0 by gg regardless of orientation. As each 6D cube in Figure 6 has a total of 128=9612\cdot 8=96 edges drawn between cubes in γ\gamma, and 32=96/332=96/3, the remaining edges not labeled 0 in each 6D cube can be oriented such that half are labeled 11 and half are labeled 1-1 making each 6D cube (2,3)(2,3)-cordial. Now, in Figure 7 a 7D cube is constructed from these (2,3)(2,3)-cordial 6D oriented cubes. In Figure 7 as in Figure 6, an edge between cube Q1Q_{1} and Q2Q_{2} signifies 88 edges between cubes Q1Q_{1} and Q2Q_{2} drawn according to the appropriate bijection between V(Q1)V(Q_{1}) and V(Q2)V(Q_{2}), and each edge between Q1Q_{1} and Q2Q_{2} is labeled Φ(Q1,Q2)\Phi(Q_{1},Q_{2}).

A¯\overline{A}C¯\overline{C}AAA¯\overline{A}CCCCA¯\overline{A}C¯\overline{C}4400448804444440044
(a)
B¯\overline{B}A¯\overline{A}BBC¯\overline{C}BBA¯\overline{A}B¯\overline{B}CC2244044664444008800
(b)
Figure 6: (2,3)(2,3)-cordial 6D oriented hypercubes

In Figure 7, the edge label sum is 2222. Similar to before, by Remark 3.8, this is to say a total of 2222 of the 6464 edges drawn between vertices of the inner 6D cube and the outer 6D cube receive label 0. The remaining 4242 edges can be oriented such that 2121 receive a label of 11 and 2121 receive a label of 1-1 by gg. Because each 6D cube is (2,3)(2,3)-cordial, such a choice yields a (2,3)(2,3)-cordial 7D oriented hypercube.

B¯\overline{B}A¯\overline{A}BBC¯\overline{C}BBA¯\overline{A}B¯\overline{B}CCA¯\overline{A}C¯\overline{C}AAA¯\overline{A}CCCCA¯\overline{A}C¯\overline{C}2222224444444488
Figure 7: 7D (2,3)(2,3)-cordial oriented hypercube constructed from γ\gamma cubes

In the previous two examples we have confirmed there exist (2,3)(2,3)-cordial oriented hypercubes of dimension 3k+13k+1 for k=1,2k=1,2. We now state the following conjecture.

Conjecture 3.10.

Let nn be a multiple of 33, then there exists an (n+1)(n+1)-dimensional oriented hypercube Cn+1C_{n+1} that is (2,3)-cordial.

4 Non-(2,3)(2,3)-Cordial Oriented Cubes.

In the previous section, we demonstrated the existence of (2,3)(2,3)-cordial oriented hypercubes of varying dimension including dimension 33. Now, we demonstrate the existence of oriented cubes that are not (2,3)(2,3)-cordial, that is, we demonstrate there exist oriented cubes that do not admit (2,3)(2,3)-cordial labelings.

s1s_{1}b3b_{3}s3s_{3}v1v_{1}b1b_{1}v2v_{2}s2s_{2}b2b_{2}
Figure 8: Oriented cube VV, 33 vertices of out-degree 33 (labeled bib_{i}), and 22 vertices of in-degree 33 (labeled viv_{i})
Theorem 4.1.

The oriented cube VV in Figure 8 is not (2,3)(2,3)-cordial.

Proof 4.2.

There are (84)\binom{8}{4} possible friendly vertex labelings for the oriented cube VV. By a brute force algorithm, it can be shown that none of these vertex labelings induces a (2,3)(2,3)-cordial labeling.

Corollary 4.3.

The oriented cube VRV^{R} for VV in Figure 8 is not (2,3)(2,3)-cordial.

Proof 4.4.

By Lemma 2.5.1, Λf,g(V)=Λf,g(VR)\Lambda_{f,g}(V)=\Lambda_{f,g}(V^{R}) for any vertex-arc labeling f,gf,g. Thus, given VV does not admit a (2,3)(2,3)-cordial labeling by Theorem 4.1, neither does VRV^{R}. Equivalently, VRV^{R} is not (2,3)(2,3)-cordial.

Theorem 4.5.

The cubes VV and VRV^{R} are the only oriented cubes up to isomorphism that are not (2,3)(2,3)-cordial.

Proof 4.6.

This can be shown by a simple brute force algorithm.

References

  • [1] L. B. Beasley, M. A. Santana, J. M. Mousley and D.E. Brown, Cordiality of Digraphs, Journal of Algebra Combinatorics Discrete Structures and Applications 10 (2023), 1-13.
  • [2] L. B. Beasley, Cordial Digraphs, Journal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing 117 (2022), 1-23.
  • [3] L.B. Beasley, M. A. Santana, J. M. Mousley and D. E. Brown, (2,3)-Cordial Trees and Paths. In Press.
  • [4] I. Cahit, Cordial graphs: A weaker version of graceful and harmonious graphs, Ars Combinatoria 23 (1987) 201-208.
  • [5] Sinah Deepa, Kuar Jaspreet, Full friendly index set -I, Discrete Applied Mathematics 161 (2013) 1262-1274.
  • [6] M. Hovey, A-cordial graphs, Discrete Math 93 (1991) 183-194.
  • [7] O. Penchenik, J. Wise, Generalized Graph Cordiality, Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory 32 (2012) 557-567.