This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

12th Workshop on the CKM Unitarity Triangle
Santiago de Compostela, 18-22 September 2023
Measurement of the CP violating phase ϕs\phi_{s} and ϕssqq¯\phi_{s}^{sq\bar{q}} at LHCb

Melissa Maria Cruz Torres on behalf of the LHCb collaboration
email: [email protected]
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Honduras, Honduras
Abstract

Precise measurements of the Bs0B¯s0B_{s}^{0}-\overline{B}_{s}^{0} mixing parameters provide a powerful test of the Standard Model, offering potential hints to new physics. The LHCb collaboration has performed updated measurements of the CPCP-violating phases ϕscc¯s\phi_{s}^{c\bar{c}s} and ϕsss¯s\phi_{s}^{s\bar{s}s}, which supersede previous results. Also, an alternative approach to determine ΔΓs\Delta\Gamma_{s} is presented, bringing a new tool that may help to resolve the tension observed between measurements made in Bs0J/ψϕB_{s}^{0}\to J/\psi\phi by LHC experiments.

1 Introduction

One of the key goals of the LHCb experiment is the measurement of the CPCP-violating phase, ϕs\phi_{s}, that originates from the interference of the mixing and direct decay of BsB_{s} mesons to CPCP eigenstates. Within the Standard Model ϕs\phi_{s} is predicted to be equal to 2βs-2\beta_{s}, where βsarg[(VtsVtb)/(VcsVcb)]\beta_{s}\equiv arg[-(V_{ts}V_{tb}^{*})/(V_{cs}V_{cb}^{*})], ignoring subleading penguin contributions, and where VijV_{ij} represents the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa matrix elements [1]. In this sense, precise measurements of this phase enhance the potentiality to probe physics beyond the Standard Model [2]

2 Measurement of ϕs\phi_{s} in Bs0J/ψK+KB_{s}^{0}\to J/\psi K^{+}K^{-} decays

The study of the time-dependent CPCP asymmetry in decays modes with transitions of the form bcc¯sb\to c\bar{c}s has been performed by several experiments. It provides insights into understanding the CPCP violation phenomena. The world average value of the CPCP-violating phase, ϕscc¯s\phi_{s}^{c\bar{c}s}, is found to be 0.049±0.019-0.049\pm 0.019 rad [3], which is dominated by the LHCb results in the decay channel Bs0J/ψh+hB_{s}^{0}\to J/\psi h^{+}h^{-} (h=Kh=K or π\pi[4]. An update of the phase, ϕscc¯s\phi_{s}^{c\bar{c}s}, as well of the physics parameters |λ||\lambda|, ΔΓs\Delta\Gamma_{s}, ΔΓsΓd\Delta\Gamma_{s}-\Gamma_{d} and the Bs0B_{s}^{0} mass difference Δms\Delta m_{s}, have been performed using the golden channel Bs0J/ψK+KB_{s}^{0}\to J/\psi K^{+}K^{-} in the vicinity of ϕ(1020)\phi(1020), which is reported in this talk. These results supersede the previous ones. The dataset used includes the full data sample from 2015 to 2018, collected by the LHCb detector corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 6 fb-1 at s\sqrt{s} = 13 TeV.

The analysis strategy consists in performing a flavour-tagger time-dependent angular analysis, where four polarization states are identified, namely A0,A||,AA_{0},A_{||},A_{\perp} for the P-wave and AsA_{s} for the S-wave, regarding to the polarization states of the K+KK^{+}K^{-} system. Candidates with K+KK^{+}K^{-} invariant masses in the range [900,1050] MeV/c2c^{2} from Bs0J/ψ(μ+μ)K+KB_{s}^{0}\to J/\psi(\to\mu^{+}\mu^{-})K^{+}K^{-} decays are selected following the strategy described in reference [4]. Experimental improvements benefit the updated measurements, as to be the flavour-tagging algorithms, the Bs0B_{s}^{0} decay-time resolution model as well as in the determination of the particle identification. A gradient-boosted decision tree (BDT) classifier is trained separately for each year from 2016 to 2018, improving the signal to background ratio by a factor of 50. The Cross-feed contamination due to pion and proton misidentification is handled by appropiate particle identification requirements and mass constraints.

The data sample is divided into 48 independent sub samples, corresponding to six bins in the ϕ(1020)\phi(1020) region, two trigger configurations and four year of data taking. By performing a maximum likelihood fit, a total yield of about 349 000 signal decays are extracted. The fit to the invariant mass is shown in Fig. 1.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: Invariant mass distribution of Bs0J/ψK+KB_{s}^{0}\to J/\psi K^{+}K^{-} for the full data sample. The projection of the maximum likelihood fit is overlaid [6].

To determine the phase ϕs\phi_{s} in Bs0J/ψK+KB_{s}^{0}\to J/\psi K^{+}K^{-}, a weighted simultaneous fit to the distributions of decay time and decay angles (cosθK\theta_{K}, cosθμ\theta_{\mu}, ϕh\phi_{h}) in the helicity basis is performed in the 48 sub samples. Along with the determination of ϕs\phi_{s}, the physics parameters and the polarization amplitudes Ak=|Ak|eiδkA_{k}=|A_{k}|e^{-i\delta_{k}} are also determined. The sub-index, kk, in the latter, stands for polarization states of the K+KK^{+}K^{-} system. The probability density function for the signal takes into consideration the decay-time and angular efficiencies, decay-time resolution and flavour tagging. The results from the fit are shown in Table 1 [6]. The background subtracted data distribution with fit projections overlaid can be seen in Fig 2.

Table 1: Physics parameters results. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second systematic [6]
Parameter Result
ϕs\phi_{s} [rad] -0.039  ±\pm0.022   ±\pm0.006
|λ||\lambda| +1.001  ±\pm0.011   ±\pm0.005
ΓsΓd\Gamma_{s}-\Gamma_{d} [ps-1]    -0.0056  0.0015+0.0013{}^{\>+0.0013}_{\>-0.0015}±\pm0.0014
ΔΓs\Delta\Gamma_{s} [ps-1] +   0.0845±\pm0.0044 ±\pm0.0024
Δms\Delta m_{s} [ps-1]     17.743 ±\pm0.033   ±\pm0.009
|A|2|A_{\perp}|^{2} +   0.2463±\pm0.0023  ±\pm0.0024
|A0|2|A_{0}|^{2} +   0.5179±\pm0.0017±\pm0.0032
δδ0\delta_{\perp}-\delta_{0} [rad] +2.903+0.074+0.075{}^{\>+0.075}_{\>-0.074}     ±\pm0.048
δ||δ0\delta_{||}-\delta_{0} [rad] + 3.146  ±\pm0.061  ±\pm0.052
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 2: Background-substracted data distribution with fit projections for decay-time and decay-angles [6].

The results are in good agreement with LHCb Run 1 [5] and 2015+2016 [4] measurements. The obtained values for ϕs\phi_{s}, ΔΓs\Delta\Gamma_{s} and ΓsΓd\Gamma_{s}-\Gamma_{d} represent the most precise measurements to date and are in good agreement with SM expectations. No evidence for CPCP violation in found. Results also show no evidence for polarization dependence of ϕs\phi_{s}. Combination of all LHCb ϕs\phi_{s} measurements of Bs0B_{s}^{0} decays via bcc¯sb\to c\bar{c}s is shown in Figure 3. The combined value is ϕs=0.031±0.018\phi_{s}=-0.031\pm 0.018 rad.

Refer to caption
Figure 3: ϕs\phi_{s} combination for all LHCb results [4].

3 CPCP violation measurements in the penguin-mediated decay Bs0ϕϕB_{s}^{0}\to\phi\phi

BB mesons decays with Flavour-Changing Neutral Current (FCNC) transitions provides a very sensitive ground to search for new physics. One of the benchmark channels to study at LHCb, in FCNC decays, is the penguin-dominated process Bs0ϕϕB_{s}^{0}\to\phi\phi where ϕK+K\phi\to K^{+}K^{-} as loop contributions could reveal new sources of CPCP violation. A time-dependent angular analysis, using the full Run 2 dataset, is performed on this channels to determine the CPCP-violating parameters ϕsss¯s\phi_{s}^{s\bar{s}s} and |λ||\lambda|. Any deviation of their expected values, 0 or 1 respectively, could be an indication of new physics entering in the penguin decay or the Bs0B_{s}^{0} mixing. The analysis is performed using the full Run 2 data sample.

The Bs0ϕϕB_{s}^{0}\to\phi\phi candidates are selected in the [5150,5600] MeV/c2c^{2} mass range, yielding about 16,000 of signal events. The three polarization states Bs0B_{s}^{0} are considered, namely A0,A||A_{0},A_{||} and AA_{\perp} and both, polarization-dependent and polarization-independent, scenarios are evaluated. The parameters ϕs,i\phi_{s,i} and |λi||\lambda_{i}| are defined by the equation

qpA¯iAi=ηi|λi|eiϕs,i,\frac{q}{p}\cdot\frac{\overline{A}_{i}}{A_{i}}=\eta_{i}|\lambda_{i}|e^{-i\phi_{s,i}}, (3.1)

where ηi\eta_{i} is the CPCP eigenvalue of the polarization state ii, qq and pp are complex numbers relating the Bs0B_{s}^{0} mass eigenstates to the flavour eigenstates. The differential decay rate is written as

d4Γ(t,Ω)dtdΩk=16hk(t)fs(Ω),\frac{d^{4}\Gamma(t,\vec{\Omega})}{dtd\vec{\Omega}}\varpropto\sum_{k=1}^{6}h_{k}(t)f_{s}(\vec{\Omega}), (3.2)

where tt is the decay time and Ω=(θ1,θ2,χ\vec{\Omega}=(\theta_{1},\theta_{2},\chi) refer to the helicity angles of the K+K^{+} mesons in the ϕ\phi rest frame. χ\chi is the angle between the ϕKK\phi\to KK decay planes. The angular function fk(Ω)f_{k}(\vec{\Omega}) and the time-dependent function hk(t)h_{k}(t) are defined as given in references [7] and [8], respectively. After applying a maximum-likelihood fit to the distribution of tt, Ω\vec{\Omega} and the initial Bs0B_{s}^{0} state, the polarization-independent measurements of the CPCP-violation parameters are reported to be ϕsss¯s=0.074±0.069\phi_{s}^{s\bar{s}s}=-0.074\pm 0.069 rad and |λ|=1.009±0.030|\lambda|=1.009\pm 0.030 in combination with Run 1 results [4]. This is the most precise measurement of CPCP violation in Bs0ϕϕB_{s}^{0}\to\phi\phi decays to date [9] as can be seen in Fig 4. The results solely due the Run 2 data are reported to be ϕsss¯s=0.042±0.075±0.009\phi_{s}^{s\bar{s}s}=-0.042\pm 0.075\pm 0.009 rad and |λ|=1.004±0.030±0.009|\lambda|=1.004\pm 0.030\pm 0.009, where the first uncertainty is statistical and the second systematic [9]. The total measurable observables can be seen in Table 2. For the polarization-dependent scenario, no dependence of the CPCP-violation parameters in the polarization states is found.

Refer to caption
Figure 4: Comparison of ϕsss¯s\phi_{s}^{s\bar{s}s} measurements by LHCb experiment. Results presented in this work are the denoted as Run 1 + Run 2, 9 fb-1 and Run 2, 6 fb-1 [9]. The blue vertical line represent the SM prediction.
Table 2: Measured observables in the polarization-independent fit for the full Run 2 dataset [9].
Parameter Result
ϕsss¯s\phi_{s}^{s\overline{s}s} [  rad ] 0.042±0.075±0.009-0.042\pm 0.075\pm 0.009
|λ||\lambda|    1.004±0.030±0.009\;\;\;1.004\pm 0.030\pm 0.009
|A0|2\left|A_{0}\right|^{2}    0.384±0.007±0.003\;\;\;0.384\pm 0.007\pm 0.003
|A|2\left|A_{\perp}\right|^{2}    0.310±0.006±0.003\;\;\;0.310\pm 0.006\pm 0.003
δδ0\delta_{\parallel}-\delta_{0}  [  rad ]    2.463±0.029±0.009\;\;\;2.463\pm 0.029\pm 0.009
δδ0\delta_{\perp}-\delta_{0}  [  rad ]    2.769±0.105±0.011\;\;\;2.769\pm 0.105\pm 0.011

4 A measurement of ΔΓs\Delta\Gamma_{s} from Bs0J/ψηB_{s}^{0}\to J/\psi\eta^{{}^{\prime}} and Bs0J/ψπ+πB_{s}^{0}\to J/\psi\pi^{+}\pi^{-} decays

As explained before, the measurement of the Bs0B¯s0B_{s}^{0}-\overline{B}_{s}^{0} mixing parameters offer a powerful test of the Standard Model. Particularly, ΔΓs\Delta\Gamma_{s} have been determined experimentally using the golden channel Bs0J/ψϕB_{s}^{0}\to J/\psi\phi by ATLAS [10], CMS [11] and LHCb [6] experiments. The results are precise but in tension with each other. In this analysis, an alternative approach to determine ΔΓs\Delta\Gamma_{s} that follows closely the formalism proposed in [12], is presented.

Given that CPCP-odd modes measure the heavy mass eigenstate lifetime (τH=1/ΓH\tau_{H}=1/\Gamma_{H}) and CPCP-even modes measure the light mass eigenstate lifetime (τL=1/ΓL\tau_{L}=1/\Gamma_{L}), ΔΓs\Delta\Gamma_{s} can be determined from the decay-width difference between a CPCP-odd and a CPCP-even Bs0B_{s}^{0} state. In this study it is used the CPCP-even decay Bs0J/ψηB_{s}^{0}\to J/\psi\eta^{{}^{\prime}} and the CPCP-odd decay Bs0J/ψπ+πB_{s}^{0}\to J/\psi\pi^{+}\pi^{-}, where J/ψμ+μJ/\psi\to\mu^{+}\mu^{-} and ηρ0γ\eta^{{}^{\prime}}\to\rho^{0}\gamma.

If CPCP violation is considered negligible the time dependent rate can be expressed as

Γ(Bs0(t)f)eΓst[cosh(ΔΓst2)+ηCPsinh(ΔΓst2)],\Gamma(B_{s}^{0}(t)\to f)\varpropto e^{-\Gamma_{s}t}[\rm{cosh}(\frac{\Delta\Gamma_{s}t}{2})+\eta_{CP}\rm{sinh}(\frac{\Delta\Gamma_{s}t}{2})], (4.1)

where ηCP\eta_{CP} is 11 or 1-1 for CPCP-odd or CPCP-even states, respectively. By integrating Eq. 4.1 over a time range [t1,t2][t_{1},t_{2}], and performing their ratio, it is obtained the following equation

Ri=NLNH[eΓst(1+y)]t1t2[eΓst(1y)]t1t2(1y)(1+y),R_{i}=\frac{N_{L}}{N_{H}}\varpropto\frac{[e^{-\Gamma_{s}t(1+y)}]_{t_{1}}^{t_{2}}}{[e^{-\Gamma_{s}t(1-y)}]_{t_{1}}^{t_{2}}}\cdot\frac{(1-y)}{(1+y)}, (4.2)

the parameter yy is defined to be ΔΓs/2Γs\Delta\Gamma_{s}/2\Gamma_{s} and experimental corrections are taken into account into; RiR_{i} is corrected by the relative efficiency in each decay time bin as Ri=AiNLRAWNHRAWR_{i}=A_{i}\frac{N_{L}^{RAW}}{N_{H}^{RAW}}. A total of 8 time bins are chosen, whose ranges are determined using simulation samples. Similar yields are expected in each bin and it follows the purpose of optimizing the sensitivity of ΔΓs\Delta\Gamma_{s}. Finally, ΔΓs\Delta\Gamma_{s} is determined from χ2\chi^{2} minimization of the expression above (Eq.4.2), where ΔΓs\Delta\Gamma_{s} and a normalization factor are free parameters.

The results are presented in Table 3. The weighted average is reported to be ΔΓs=0.087±0.012±0.0009\Delta\Gamma_{s}=0.087\pm 0.012\pm 0.0009 ps-1, where the first uncertainty is statistical and the second systematic [13]. The study was performed using the full data sample of proton-proton collisions collected by the LHCb between 2011 and 2018 corresponding to a integrated luminosity of 9 fb-1 in the center-of-mass energy s\sqrt{s} = 7, 8 and 13 TeV. The comparison of the results by years of datasets are shown in Fig. 5.

Refer to caption
Figure 5: Measurements of ΔΓs\Delta\Gamma_{s} for the sets of data taking and the weighted average. The orange band represents 1σ1\sigma error [13]

.

In summary, the value obtained for ΔΓs\Delta\Gamma_{s} is in agreement with the HFLAV average value, ΔΓs=0.074±0.006\Delta\Gamma_{s}=0.074\pm 0.006 ps-1 [14], obtained from time-dependent angular analyses of Bs0J/ψϕB_{s}^{0}\to J/\psi\phi, where the initial flavour of the state is tagged. The value reported also agrees with the HFLAV average, ΔΓs=0.083±0.005\Delta\Gamma_{s}=0.083\pm 0.005 ps-1 [14], that includes constraints from other untagged effective lifetime measurements. ΔΓs\Delta\Gamma_{s} is measured for the first time using using the decay mode BS0J/ψηB_{S}^{0}\to J/\psi\eta^{{}^{\prime}} .

Table 3: ΔΓs\Delta\Gamma_{s} results and χ2\chi^{2} probability for the four datasets [13].
Dataset ΔΓs\Delta\Gamma_{s} [ ps1\text{\,ps}^{-1}] P(χ2\chi^{2})
2011&\&12 0.039 ±\pm 0.026 0.83
2015&\&16 0.081 ±\pm 0.022 0.77
2017 0.117 ±\pm 0.024 0.57
2018 0.102 ±\pm 0.021 0.78

References